Peculiar type 1 congenital pyloric atresia: a case report
© Zecca et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 11 November 2009
Accepted: 14 January 2010
Published: 14 January 2010
Pyloric atresia (PA) is a very rare condition. Its incidence is approximately 1 in 100,000 newborns and constitutes about 1% of all intestinal atresias. We describe the neonatal course of a peculiar case of type 1 pyloric atresia, in which the pyloric membrane was connected to a second duodenal membrane through a virtual duodenal lumen in a premature newborn. The atypical variant required an unusual side to side gastroduodenostomy. We emphasize the importance of a prompt diagnosis to avoid potentially fatal complications and to warrant a good outcome even in the presence of a strange form of PA in the neonatal period.
Pyloric atresia (PA) is a very rare condition. Its incidence is approximately 1 in 100,000 newborns and constitutes about 1% of all intestinal atresias [1, 2]. Sometimes it occurs with genetic disorders like epidermolysis bullosa and aplasia cutis congenital [3–6] or in association with other atresias of the gastrointestinal tract [7–9]. The presence of associated anomalies is a contributing factor for the reported high mortality . There are 3 recognized anatomic varieties of pyloric atresia: type 1, pyloric membrane (57%); type 2, pyloric canal replaced by solid tissue (34%); type 3, atretic pylorus with a gap between stomach and duodenum (9%) . We describe the neonatal course of a peculiar case of type 1 PA connected to a second duodenal membrane through a virtual lumen in a premature newborn with visualization of polyhydramnios on prenatal ultrasonography. We emphasize the importance of a prompt diagnosis to avoid potentially fatal complications and to warrant a good outcome.
Pyloric atresia is a very rare condition. Its incidence is approximately 1 in 100.000 newborns and constitutes about 1% of all intestinal atresias [1, 2]. Calder reported the first case of PA in 1749 and Touroff performed the first successful operation in 1940 [3, 9]. Since then there have been case reports and studies of small series. The etiology of PA is not known but embryologically it is supposed to depend from a developmental arrest between the 5th and 12th week of intrauterine life [8, 11]. Familial occurrence with a high frequency of consanguinity and an equal sex incidence suggest a genetic predisposition with an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance . PA can occur as an isolated lesion but in 40-50% of the cases it is associated with other anomalies, epidermolysis bullosa being the commonest. [3–6] PA may be also part of hereditary multiple intestinal atresias (HMIAs) involving the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, and rectum. This form has an extremely rare occurrence and a pathogenesis that is still speculative, including the possibility of a combined immunodeficiency syndrome [7–9]. The presence of associated anomalies is a contributing factor for the reported high mortality . Our case can be considered a variant of type 1 because of the presence of a second membrane located in the first tract of duodenum and of a virtual duodenal lumen between the two membranes.
Antenatal diagnosis may be difficult and in our case only suspected by the presence of polyhydramnios, which is associated with PA in more than 50% of cases, with a dilated stomach but in the absence of a double bubble . The clinical features of PA are well documented but the diagnosis may be delayed because the neonates usually are well at the time of first presentation. Typically, they develop nonbilious vomiting and abdominal distension during the first days of life and examination may show gastric peristalsis. A delayed diagnosis may lead to pulmonary aspiration, severe metabolic derangement and gastric perforation, which can be fatal. The instrumental diagnosis of PA is made on plain abdominal x-ray, based on the presence of a single large gastric air bubble with no gas distally. This was confirmed in our patient by a barium meal.
Different operative procedures can be used, depending on the anatomic type. In the literature, the best results from operative treatment of typical type 1 and type 2 PA were obtained by excision of the membrane and pyloroplasty according to Heineke-Mikulicz or Finney [2, 14]. Pyloro-duodenostomy is the treatment of choice in case of type 3 PA. In our patient, the association of a duodenal membrane connected with the pyloric one by a virtual lumen required an unusual side to side gastroduodenostomy. The prognosis of PA is variable. The overall mortality is very high exceeding 50% but it is due to the high incidence of severe and often fatal associated anomalies . Isolated PA and PA associated with other intestinal atresias can be managed successfully. Early diagnosis and surgery, together with current neonatal supportive care, have significantly improved the survival rate in these patients.
Our case demonstrates that a prompt diagnosis is crucial to obtain a good outcome, even in the presence of a strange form of PA in the neonatal period.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal."
- Gester BC, Aberdeen SD: Prepyloric diaphragm, an unusual abnormality. Arch Surg. 1965, 90: 472-475.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muller M, Morger R, Engert J: Pyloric atresia: report of two cases and review of literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 1990, 5: 276-279. 10.1007/BF00169670.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nawaz A, Matta H, Jacobsz A, Al-Salem A: Congenital pyloric atresia and junctional epidermolysis bullosa: a report of two cases. Pediatr Surg Int. 2000, 16: 206-208. 10.1007/s003830050724.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tomà P, Mengozzi E, Dell'Acqua A, Mattioli G, Pieroni G, Fabrizzi G: Pyloric atresia: report of two cases (one associated with epidermolysis bullosa and one associated with multiple intestinal atresias). Pediatr Radiol. 2002, 32: 552-555. 10.1007/s00247-002-0716-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carmi R, Sofer S, Karphus M, Ben-Yakar Y, Mahler D, Zirkin H, Bar-Ziv J: Aplasia cutis congenita in two sibs discordant for pyloric atresia. Am J Med Genet. 1982, 11: 319-328. 10.1002/ajmg.1320110308.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Achiron R, Hamiel-Pinchas O, Engelberg S, Baraki G, Reichman B, Mashiach S: Aplasia cutis congenital associated with epydermolisis bullosa and pyloric atresia: the diagnostic role of prenatal ultrasonography. Prenatal Diagn. 1992, 12: 765-771. 10.1002/pd.1970120909.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Al-Salem AH: Pyloric atresia associated with jejunal and duodenal atresia and duplication. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999, 15: 512-514. 10.1007/s003830050653.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snyder CL, Mancini ML, Kennedy AP, Amoury RA: Multiple gastrointestinal atresias with cystic dilatation of the biliary ducts. Pediatr Surg Int. 2000, 16: 211-213. 10.1007/s003830050726.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sencan A, Mir E, Karace I, Günşar C, Sencan A, Topçu K: Pyloric atresia associated with multiple intestinal atresias and pylorocholedochal fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 2002, 37: 1223-1224. 10.1053/jpsu.2002.34482.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ilce BZ, Erdogan E, Kara C, Celayir S, Sarimurat N, Snyuz OF, Yeker D: Pyloric atresia: 15-year review from a single institution. J Pediatr Surg. 2003, 38: 1581-1584. 10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00565-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bronsther B, Nadeau MR, Abrams MW: Congenital pyloric atresia: a report of three cases and review of literature. Surgery. 1971, 69: 130-136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bar-Maor JA, Nissan S, Nevo S: Pyloric atresia: a hereditary congenital anomaly with autosomal recessive transmission. J Med Genet. 1972, 9: 70-72. 10.1136/jmg.9.1.70.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peled Y, Hod M, Friedman S, Mashiach R, Greenberg N, Ovadia J: Prenatal diagnosis of congenital pyloric atresia. Prenat Diag. 1992, 12: 151-154. 10.1002/pd.1970120212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moore CCM: Congenital gastric outlet obstruction. J Ped Surg. 1989, 24: 1241-1246. 10.1016/S0022-3468(89)80559-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.