Celiac disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus

  • Maria Erminia Camarca1,

    Affiliated with

    • Enza Mozzillo1, 2,

      Affiliated with

      • Rosa Nugnes1, 3,

        Affiliated with

        • Eugenio Zito1,

          Affiliated with

          • Mariateresa Falco1,

            Affiliated with

            • Valentina Fattorusso1,

              Affiliated with

              • Sara Mobilia1,

                Affiliated with

                • Pietro Buono1,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Giuliana Valerio2,

                    Affiliated with

                    • Riccardo Troncone1 and

                      Affiliated with

                      • Adriana Franzese1Email author

                        Affiliated with

                        Italian Journal of Pediatrics201238:10

                        DOI: 10.1186/1824-7288-38-10

                        Received: 14 February 2012

                        Accepted: 26 March 2012

                        Published: 26 March 2012

                        Abstract

                        Celiac Disease (CD) occurs in patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) ranging the prevalence of 4.4-11.1% versus 0.5% of the general population. The mechanism of association of these two diseases involves a shared genetic background: HLA genotype DR3-DQ2 and DR4-DQ8 are strongly associated with T1D, DR3-DQ2 with CD. The classical severe presentation of CD rarely occurs in T1D patients, but more often patients have few/mild symptoms of CD or are completely asymptomatic (silent CD). In fact diagnosis of CD is regularly performed by means of the screening in T1D patients. The effects of gluten-free diet (GFD) on the growth and T1D metabolic control in CD/T1D patient are controversial. Regarding of the GFD composition, there is a debate on the higher glycaemic index of gluten-free foods respect to gluten-containing foods; furthermore GFD could be poorer of fibers and richer of fat. The adherence to GFD by children with CD-T1D has been reported generally below 50%, lower respect to the 73% of CD patients, a lower compliance being more frequent among asymptomatic patients. The more severe problems of GFD adherence usually occur during adolescence when in GFD non compliant subjects the lowest quality of life is reported. A psychological and educational support should be provided for these patients.

                        Keywords

                        Diabetes Celiac disease Genetic background HLA Dietetic compliance Glycaemic index Gluten free diet Quality of life

                        Introduction

                        Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1D) is frequently associated to other autoimmune conditions. These conditions can severely affect clinical management of the disease, especially in paediatric age.

                        The most frequent are autoimmune thyroid disease (AIT), celiac disease (CD), Addison's disease (AD) and vitiligo. These diseases are associated with organ-specific autoantibodies: AIT with thyroid peroxidase (TPO) and thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TG), CD with endomysial (EMA) and transglutaminase (TTG) autoantibodies, and AD with adrenal autoantibodies. Using these autoantibodies, organ-specific autoimmunity may be often detected before the development of clinical disease, in order to prevent significant morbidity related to unrecognized disease [1]. These diseases are very often clustered in the same individual and a shared genetic background probably explains this association [2].

                        Genetics

                        The majority of autoimmune endocrine diseases, including T1D, are inherited as complex genetic traits. Multiple genetic and environmental factors interact with each other to confer susceptibility to these disorders. Genetic risk factors associated with T1D, ATD, CD and AD include HLA genes and non-HLA genes.

                        HLA DR4 and DR3 are strongly associated with T1D and approximately 30-50% of patients are DR3/DR4 heterozygotes. The DR3/DR4 genotype confers the highest diabetes risk with a synergic mode of action, followed by DR4 and DR3 homozygosity, respectively. The HLA-DQ (particularly DQ 2 and DQ8) locus has been found to be the most important determinant of diabetes susceptibility. Approximately 90% of individuals with T1D have either DQ2 or DQ8, compared to 40% of the general population [3]. So, the highest-risk human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype for T1D is DR3-DQ2, DR4-DQ8.

                        DR3-DQ2 shows a strong association with CD; homozygosity for DR3-DQ2 in a population with T1D carries a 33% risk for the presence of TTG autoantibodies [4].

                        Non-HLA genes are also involved in the predisposition to T1D and other autoimmune diseases, such as MIC-A, PTPN22, CTLA-4 [1].

                        Epidemiology

                        Traditional studies, both in children and adults, have shown that CD occurs in patients with T1D with a prevalence that varies from 4.4 to 11.1% compared with 0.5% of the general population (Table 1 for references from) [514]. The mean age at diagnosis of classical CD is commonly around 2-3 years, while the mean age at diagnosis of T1D is 7-8 years. The age at onset of T1D is younger in patients with the double disease than in those with only T1D [15]. The risk of CD is negatively and independently associated with age at onset of diabetes, with an higher risk being seen in children age < 4 years than in those age > 9 years [16]. In patients with T1D, diabetes is usually diagnosed first, CD precedes diabetes onset only in 10-25% [16, 17], while generally CD diagnosis in T1D patients occurs, trough the screening performed at diabetes onset, in 70-80% of patients with a median age > 8 years. Some authors hypothized that in genetically susceptible patients one disease could predispose to another. Particularly, it has been suggested that untreated (latent or silent) CD could be an immunological trigger and induce diabetes and/or thyroid disorders due to gluten as a driving antigen [18]. In accordance with this, the prevalence of autoimmune disorders in CD is closely related to age at diagnosis or, in other words, to the duration of exposure to gluten [19] and thyroid-related antibodies tend to disappear during twelve months of gluten-free diet, like CD-related antibodies [20]. However, at present, it is unknown whether treatment of CD reduces the likelihood of developing autoimmune disorders, or changes their natural history and actually others found no correlation between duration of gluten exposure in adult CD and risk of autoimmune disorders [21].
                        Table 1

                        Prevalence of CD in patients with T1D in recent literature (2004-2011)

                        Reference

                        Country

                        N.

                        Age (yr)

                        Screening

                        Prevalence (%)

                        Cerutti et al. 2004

                        Italy

                        4322

                        11.8 ± 4.2

                        AGA + EMA

                        6.8

                        Contreas et al. 2004

                        North Italy

                        357

                        Children

                        EMA

                        7

                        Sanchez et al. 2005

                        Germany

                        281

                        Children

                        AGA + EMA

                        6.4

                        Araujo et al. 2006

                        Brasil

                        354

                        Children

                        TG

                        10.5

                        Goh et al. 2007

                        UK

                        113

                        Children

                        EMA + TG + AGA

                        4.4

                        Larsson et al. 2008

                        Sweden

                        300

                        < 20

                        EMA

                        10

                        Karavanaki et al. 2009

                        Greece

                        144

                        12.3 ± 4.6

                        TG

                        4.8

                        Djuric et al. 2010

                        Serbia

                        121

                        Mean 10.8

                        TG

                        5.79

                        Bhadada et al. 2011

                        India

                        189

                        10.81 ± 7.3

                        TG

                        11.1

                        Gabriel S et al. 2011

                        Romania

                        119

                        11 ± 4

                        TG

                        9.2

                        CD clinical symptoms

                        The most severe CD-related symptoms are generally related to gastrointestinal malabsorption and include malnutrition, failure to thrive, diarrhea, anorexia, constipation, vomiting, abdominal distension, and pain. These features are more common in children younger than three years of age. Non-gastrointestinal symptoms of CD include short stature, pubertal delay, fatigue, vitamin deficiencies, and iron deficiency anemia and are more commonly observed in older children. The gastrointestinal presentation of CD rarely occurs in T1D patients (< 10%), but many patients with CD and T1D are either asymptomatic (silent CD) or present only mild symptoms [17, 20, 22]. Furthermore, the wide spectrum of CD include also subjects with positive celiac-related antibodies without diagnostic small-bowel mucosal villous atrophy. This condition is defined as potential celiac disease (pot-CD) [2325]. Data from the majority of childhood diabetes care centers in Italy showed that prevalence of pot-CD patients in this population (higher in females than males) is 12.2%, while the prevalence of pot-CD in the CD control population is 8.4% and only few of them present CD-related symptoms [26].

                        CD-screening

                        Diagnosis of CD is regularly due to screening protocols which are widely recommended and performed. Actually diagnosis is commonly performed by means of TTG IgA (confirmed by EMA) or TTG-IgG if IgA-deficiency is present. Screening has to performed at followed times: 1) at the time of diabetes onset, 2) yearly in the first 4 years of follow up, 3) each 2 years in the successive 6 years of follow up [27, 28]. In the presence of CD-related antibodies positivity it is mandatory to perform bowel biopsy to confirm diagnosis of CD, even if in very recent guide-lines of ESPGHAN Society [29] it is proposed that in evident CD-cases it is possible to avoid biopsy (4 main criteria).

                        CD-treatment

                        GFD should be proposed actually only in patients with mucosal atrophy.

                        In patients with overt CD, identifying and treating CD with gluten free diet (GFD) surely confer benefit in reducing/resolving malabsorption, infertility, osteoporosis, poor nutrition, impaired growth and long-term malignancy risks and mortality rates [3032]. Similarly, children with T1D and symptomatic CD benefit from GFD [33] and also metabolic control of diabetes could be ameliorated [34].

                        On the contrary, in symptom-free patients weight gain and bone mineral density (BMD) changes have been non-univocally described as benefit [3537]. The different viewpoints highlight the need of a prolonged follow up in patients affected by T1D and asymptomatic CD to clarify the role of GFD. Some authors argument that GFD in asymptomatic CD-T1D patients should be opportunely proposed but not excessively stressed [38, 39].

                        Finally, no definite consensus exists among experts about to treat by GFD pot-CD patients, in whom recently it has been suggested that GFD could be a benefit [40]. Concerning to the natural history of patients whit pot-CD, a recent study shows that 30% of these patients develops overt CD in a three years follow-up and underlines the necessity of re-testing [41]. However no data are available about the follow-up of patients with T1D and pot-CD.

                        Surprisingly, intestinal inflammation has been described also in T1D patients without CD-related antibodies and structurally normal intestinal mucosa [42]. According to this, our group has observed a gluten-related inflammation either in rectal either in small bowel mucosa of children with T1D [43, 44]. It can be speculated that gluten could be an optimal candidate to stimulate an abnormal innate immune reaction in intestinal mucosa due to its pro-inflammatory characteristics. It remains a crucial issue to establish if the extended intestinal inflammation in T1D is gluten-dependent and whether it precedes the occurrence of the disease.

                        Bone impairment: a hidden threat

                        In patients with only T1D it is possible to demonstrate impairment of bone metabolism and structure, specially in relationship with duration and/or poor control of diabetes [45]. Furthermore CD also have been underlined as cause of bone impairment. Clinical observation indicates that clustering of three autoimmune diseases (T1D, CD and generally thyroiditis) significantly increases the occurrence of osteopenia (37.5%). It is possible that bone impairment might be considered not only a complication due to endocrine or nutritional mechanisms, but also a consequence of an immunoregulatory imbalance [46]. In fact osteoclasts are now considered as the innate immune cells in the bone, since they are able to produce and respond to cytokines and chemokines. Bone remodelling involves complex interactions between osteoclasts and other cells in bone microenvironment (marrow stromal cells, osteoblasts, macrophages, T-lymphocytes and marrow cells) [47]. Several cytokines, like the cytokine receptor activator of NFkB ligand (RANKL) and the macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), can promote osteoclast formation and activity. Also osteoprotegerin (OPG), a circulating secretory glycoprotein, could have a role in bone remodelling in children with T1D because it could promote differentiation, fusion, survival, activation and apoptosis of the osteoblasts. Alterations or abnormalities of the RANKL/OPG system have been implicated in different metabolic bone diseases characterized by increased osteoclast differentiation and activation, and by enhanced bone resorption [48].

                        In patients affected by both T1D and CD, the risk of developing osteopenia is also influenced by the compliance to GFD. In fact, osteopenia occurs more frequently in patients with diabetes and CD with poor compliance to GFD [49]. Recent observations indeed indicated an imbalance of cytokines relevant to bone metabolism in untreated celiac patients' sera and the direct effect of these sera on in vitro bone cell activity. In particular the RANKL/osteoprotegerin (OPG) ratio was increased in patients not on gluten-free diet [46].

                        In conclusion osteopenia seems to be a new occult problem in CD patients, in T1D patients and in patients with two or three immunological diseases, depending also on GFD.

                        GFD composition

                        Diet is a fundamental part of the treatment in both T1D and CD. However GFD composition could present some problems for diabetic people (Table 2).
                        Table 2

                        Variations of HbA1c, BMI gain and height velocity after GFD in children with T1D-CD

                        Reference

                        HbA1c

                        BMI gain

                        Heigh velocity

                        Westman et al.

                        unchanged

                        Unchanged

                        unchanged

                        Saukkonen et al.

                        unchanged

                        Increased

                        unchanged

                        Amin et al.

                        reduced

                        Increased

                        unchanged

                        Saadah et al.

                        unchanged

                        Increased

                        unchanged

                        Valletta et al.

                        unchanged

                        Unchanged

                        unchanged

                        The glycemic index (GI) provides an indirect measure of the ability of a food to raise blood glucose.GI is retained a direct index of absorption of carbohydrates, being: "the area under curve of blood glucose after eating a food containing a determined quantity of carbohydrate". White bread (GI = 100) is usually compared as reference value. In normal subjects ingestion of foods with high GI leads to a rapid blood glucose increase causing a marked insulin response. In diabetes, diet containing food with high GI is considered inopportune because in condition of insulin deficiency (T1D) or insulin inefficacy (type 2 diabetes) the normal insulin response is not obtainable; traditionally the common diet of the diabetes people consists principally in foods with low GI. In 2002 American Society for Clinical Nutrition published an international table, revised by an older published of the sixties, which shows the GI of most common foods, evaluated in comparison to glucose and to white bread [50], (Table 3) where gluten-free products have higher GI-foods than similar products gluten containing. In Paker's study [51] six types of gluten-free foods are compared with white bread containing gluten. These foods were eaten from 11 adult patients with type 2 diabetes and blood glucose was measured after eating. Results showed no difference about GI among gluten-free foods and those containing gluten. On the contrary, Berti et al. show a higher blood glucose curve for gluten-free foods, although with similar insulin curves and with contradictory results between in vivo and in vitro analysis. (Table 4), [52]). Specific studies both in healthy patients and in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients should be necessary, particularly in pediatric age.
                        Table 3

                        GI of some gluten-free foods, compared to glucose and white bread

                         

                        GI glucose = 100

                        GI bread = 100

                        Gluten-free multigrain bread

                        79 ± 13

                        113

                        Gluten-free white bread

                        76 ± 5

                        108 ± 7

                        Gluten-free fiber enriched bread

                        73 ± 4

                        104 ± 5

                        Table 4

                        GI of gluten-free foods evaluated in vivo, compared to white bread (= 100)

                        Food

                        GI

                        Gluten-free bread

                        230

                        Gluten-free pasta

                        255

                        Quinoa

                        186

                        In addition, gluten-free foods are prepared using corn flour, rice and wheat, where the percentage of fiber, carbohydrate, fats and micronutrients isn't completely known. Scarce contrasting data generally describe in gluten free foods composition few proteins, more fat and few fibers than gluten containing foods. (from SCHAR website and Ministry of Agriculture website, Tables 5 and 6). In addition in the review of Kupper [53] GFD seems to can be the cause of a multiple nutrients deficiency, especially of vitamin B, vitamin D, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, but sources of his information are not well documented. Finally Berti et al. [52] reported higher amount of fats in gluten-free bread then those with gluten, but the same amount of fibers (Table 7).
                        Table 5

                        Nutritional composition of gluten free and containing gluten foods

                        Products

                        PROT (g)

                        CHO (g)

                        SUGARS (g)

                        FATS (g)

                        FIBER (g)

                        KCALS

                        Flour 00

                        11

                        77.3

                        1.7

                        0.7

                        2.2

                        340

                        Gluten-free flour

                        1.2

                        86.3

                        1.5

                        0.8

                        4.5

                        357

                        Crackers containing gluten

                        9.4

                        80.1

                        2.5

                        10

                        2.8

                        428

                        Gluten-free crackers

                        5.2

                        74.7

                        5.2

                        12.7

                        2.9

                        434

                        Cereal flakes containing gluten

                        6.6

                        87.4

                        10.4

                        0.8

                        3.8

                        361

                        Gluten-free cereal flakes

                        8

                        80

                        5.3

                        16

                        5

                        361

                        Rusks containing gluten

                        11.3

                        82.3

                        2.2

                        8.2

                        3.5

                        408

                        Gluten-free rusks

                        4.8

                        82.9

                        5.4

                        1.4

                        3.6

                        425

                        Pasta containing gluten

                        10.9

                        79.1

                        4.2

                        2.5

                        2.7

                        353

                        Gluten-free pasta

                        9

                        73.7

                        0.4

                        7.9

                        2.2

                        353

                        Biscuits

                        6.6

                        84.8

                        18.5

                        14.3

                        2.6

                        416

                        Gluten-free biscuits

                        2.7

                        79.9

                        16.1

                         

                        0.8

                        459

                        Table 6

                        Portion size, macronutrient and micronutrient composition of test meal.

                         

                        White

                        bread

                        GF biscuits

                        GF white Unsliced bread

                        GF fibre Sliced bread

                        GF white Sliced bread

                        GF fibre Unsliced bread

                        GF

                        pasta

                        Serving (g)

                        107

                        73

                        101

                        119

                        101

                        119

                        64

                        Energy (kcals)

                        232

                        335

                        221

                        225

                        221

                        236

                        230

                        Protein (g)

                        8.1

                        2.55

                        3.03

                        3.57

                        3.03

                        3.57

                        5.05

                        Carbohydrate (g)

                        50

                        50

                        50

                        50

                        50

                        50

                        50

                        (g sugars)

                        3.21

                        17.5

                        4.54

                        5.36

                        4.50

                        5.35

                        0.61

                        Fat (g)

                        1.39

                        13.87

                        1.01

                        1.19

                        1.01

                        2.38

                        1.02

                        (g satured)

                        0.32

                        4.38

                        0.50

                        0.60

                        0.50

                        1.19

                        0.32

                        Fibre (g)

                        1.61

                        2.92

                        1.01

                        5.95

                        1.01

                        7.7

                        0.96

                        Sodium (g)

                        0.56

                        0.37

                        0.51

                        0.47

                        0.51

                        0.35

                        0.05

                        GF = gluten-free

                        Table 7

                        Weight of meal and nutrient composition of 50 g available carbohydrate portions of the foods studied as served.

                        Tests foods

                        Weight of meal (g)

                        Protein (g)

                        Water (g)

                        Carbohydrate (g)

                        Fat (g)

                        Total dietary fibers (g)

                        Bread

                        100

                        9.4

                        31.4

                        50

                        3.6

                        2.8

                        GF Bread

                        125

                        5.7

                        38.5

                        50

                        9.7

                        3.9

                        Gf Pasta

                        156

                        3.2

                        61.2

                        50

                        0.6

                        2.1

                        Quinoa

                        320

                        3.4

                        75.9

                        50

                        2.0

                        2.8

                        GF = gluten-free

                        Compliance/adherence to GFD and quality of life (QOL)

                        Adherence to GFD among T1D-CD patients, in our experience, is generally good in patients who experienced clear clinical symptoms of CD, but is scarce among patients with few symptoms or asymptomatic. In Table 8 a summary of the data of literature is presented, but authors did not specify whether patients had experienced symptoms; data of our group are also presented [36]. In contrast with T1D population, dietary compliance in CD patients (without T1D), seems to be higher: approximately 73% of patients followed the diet strictly [54]. Probably for a patient with T1D, already engaged in coping day by day a complex chronic disease, the addition of a second "limiting" condition, is a remarkable discomfort [55]. Consequently, in the case of double diagnosis (T1D + CD), it is very difficult to manage patients who did not experienced CD symptoms.
                        Table 8

                        Adherence to the GFD in children with T1D-CD

                        Reference

                        Country

                        Prevalence (%)

                        Acerini et al.

                        United Kingdom

                        Partial

                        Westman et al.

                        Australia

                        30

                        Valerio et al.

                        Italy

                        59

                        Saadah et al.

                        Australia

                        25

                        Studies on the compliance/adherence to GFD in non diabetic people showed that, in relation to the social life, children usually have a better compliance to GFD than adults [56]. In a follow-up of 10 years in the Netherlands conducted on children from 2 to 4 years who received CD diagnosis by screening, authors described a general improvement of health without deterioration in QOL [57]. In concordance Kolsteren showed that the QOL of celiac children is quite similar to that of other children [58]. Usually the difficulty with the diet occurs when the patient became adolescent, because she/he needs to feel equal to peers, especially when she/he decides to go out to eat and more acutely she/he feels limits imposed by GFD. According to Wagner et al. [59] celiac adolescents non compliant with GFD reported a lower general QOL, more physical problems, a higher burden of illness, more family troubles, and more problems in leisure time than adolescents who are compliant with GFD. No differences between compliant patients with CD and adolescents without any chronic condition were found in all QOL aspects.

                        It is also important remark that the balance between GFD adherence and daily life is difficult to achieve for the child/adolescent who is also affected by an other chronic disease such as T1D. The need to coordinate insulin therapy with proper nutrition and a healthy lifestyle, in order to maintain adequate metabolic control, is already a considerable effort for the young T1D-patient and families [60]. Rebellions are frequent especially in adolescents, who are already feeling diabetes as very "invasive" for all the aspects of daily life and who receive a further "restriction" constituted by the GFD. Consequently there it could be the risk, especially if this proposal is not properly, to elicit a response of complete rebellion which will endanger not only the adherence to the GFD [36, 54, 55], but also the entire management of T1D, causing a sharp deterioration of general compliance and increasing the risk of severe acute complications (recurrent ketoacidosis, unawareness hypoglycemia). In addition it is possible to think that this further limit could be a trigger also of eating disorders in adolescent patients, being eating disorders not rare and previously reported in diabetes. Regarding QOL, Sud et al. [61] in children with T1D-CD showed that the double diagnosis appears to have a minimal impact on QOL, even if patients' parents reported a very important difficulty on management. It is interesting that not significant differences in QOL were observed with regard to age at CD diagnosis and duration, or on the basis of adherence with a GFD. Furthermore parents of T1D-CD children did express greater concern about their child's social functioning.

                        Conclusions

                        Prevalence of CD among children with T1D is significantly higher than in non diabetic children. In a large proportion CD is asymptomatic or characterized by modest/atypical symptoms. Periodic screening of CD auto-antibodies is mandatory. CD diagnosis requires the biopsy confirmation and it is necessary to prescribe GFD in the presence of mucosa impairment. Concerning the clinical benefits of GFD in T1D-CD patients, data are contrasting, except in severely symptomatic patients.

                        Osteopenia seems to be a new occult problem in CD patients, in T1D patients and in patients with two or three immunological diseases, depending also on GFD.

                        It is unclear whether GFD composition could present any disadvantages regarding of glycemic index, fibers, percentage of fat and micro-nutrients. Data are not univocal on this point.

                        Communication of the need of GFD in patients with T1D-CD is particularly delicate, especially in adolescents where it is possible to trigger rebellion behaviors. The coexistence of these two diseases in the same patient requires care by clinicians and probably a specific psychological approach.

                        Abbreviations

                        AIT: 

                        Autoimmune thyroid disease

                        AD: 

                        Addison's disease

                        BMD: 

                        Bone mineral density

                        CD: 

                        Celiac disease

                        EMA: 

                        Endomysial autoantibodies

                        GFD: 

                        Gluten-free diet

                        HbA1c: 

                        Glycated hemoglobin

                        HLA: 

                        Human leukocyte antigen

                        pot-CD: 

                        Potential celiac disease

                        QOL: 

                        Quality of life

                        T1D: 

                        Type 1 diabetes

                        TG: 

                        Thyroglobulin autoantibodies

                        TPO: 

                        Peroxidase autoantibodies

                        TTG: 

                        Transglutaminase autoantibodies

                        Declarations

                        Authors’ Affiliations

                        (1)
                        Department of Paediatrics, “Federico II” University
                        (2)
                        School of Movement Sciences (DiSIST), Parthenope University
                        (3)
                        Department of Cellular and Molecular Pathology “L. Califano”, “Federico II” University

                        References

                        1. Barker JM, et al.: Clinical review: type 1 diabetes-associated autoimmunity: natural history, genetic associations and screening. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006,91(0021–972X):1210–1217.PubMedView Article
                        2. Smyth DJ, Plagnol V, Walker NM, Cooper JD, Downes K, Yang JH, Howson JM, Stevens H, McManus R, Wijmenga C, Heap GA, Dubois PC, Clayton DG, Hunt KA, Heel Van, Todd JA: Shared and distinct genetic variant in Type 1 diabetes and celiac disease. N Eng J Med 2008,359(0028–4793):2837–2838.
                        3. Ide A, Eisenbarth GS: Genetic susceptibility in type 1 diabetes and its associated autoimmune disorders. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2003,4(3):243–253. 1389–9155PubMedView Article
                        4. Bao F, Yu L, Babu S, Wang T, Hoffenberg EJ, Rewers M, Eisenbarth GS: One third of HLA DQ2 homozygous patients with type 1 diabetes express celiac disease associated transglutaminase autoantibodies. J Autoimmun 1999, 13:143–148. 0896–8411PubMedView Article
                        5. Cerruti F, Bruno G, Chiarelli F, Lorini R, Meschi F, Sacchetti C: Diabetes Study Group of the Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology. Younger age at onset and sex predict celiac disease in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: an Italian multicenter study. Diabetes Care 2004, 27:1294–1298.View Article
                        6. Contreas G, Valletta E, Ulmi D, Cantoni S, Pinelli L: Screening of celiac disease in north Italian children with type 1 diabetes: limited usefulness of HLA-DQ typing. Acta Paediatr 2004, 93:628–632.PubMedView Article
                        7. Sanchez-Albisua I, Wolf J, Neu A, Geiger H, Wascher I, Stern M: Coeliac disease in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: the effect of the gluten free diet. Diabet Med 2005, 22:1079–1082.PubMedView Article
                        8. Araujo J, da Silva GA, de Melo FM: Serum prevalence of celiac disease in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2006, 82:210–214.
                        9. Goh C, Banerjee K: Prevalence of celiac disease in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus in a clinic based population. Postgrad Med J 2007, 83:132–136.PubMedView Article
                        10. Larsson K, Carlsson A, Cederwall E, Jonsson B, Neiderud J, Jonsson B, Lernmark A, Ivarsson SA, Skane Study Group: Annual screening detects celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2008, 9:354–354.PubMedView Article
                        11. Karavanaki K, Kakleas K, Paschali E, Kefalas N, Konstantopoulos I, Petrou V, Kanariou M, Karayanni C: Screening for associated autoimmunity in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Horm Res 2009, 71:201–206.PubMedView Article
                        12. Djuric Z, Stamenkovic H, Stankovic T, Milecevic R, Brankovic L, Ciric V, Katic V: Celiac disease prevalence in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from Serbia. Pediatr Int 2010, 52:579–583.PubMedView Article
                        13. Bhadada SK, Kochlar R, Bhansali A, Dutta U, Kumar PR, Poornachandra KS, Vaiphei K, Nain CK, Singh K: Prevalence and clinical profile of celiac disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus in north India. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 2:378–381.View Article
                        14. Gabriel S, Mihaela I, Angela B, Mariana A, Doru D: Prevalence of IgA antitissue transglutaminase antibodies in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Lab Anal 2011,25(3):156–161.PubMedView Article
                        15. Kaspers S, Kordonouri O, Schober E, Grabert M, Hauffa BP, Holl RW, German Working Group for Pediatric Diabetology: Anthropometry, metabolic control, and thyroid autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes with celiac disease: A multicenter survey. J Pediatr 2004,145(6):790–795. 0022–3476PubMedView Article
                        16. Cerutti F, Bruno G, Chiarelli F, Lorini R, Meschi F, Sacchetti C: Diabetes study group of the Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology. Younger age at onset and sex predict celiac disease in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: an Italian multicenter study. Diabetes Care 2004,27(6):1294–1298. 0149–5992PubMedView Article
                        17. Valerio G, Maiuri L, Troncone R, Buono P, Lombardi F, Palmieri R, Franzese A: Severe clinical onset of diabetes and increased prevalence of other autoimmune diseases in children with coeliac disease diagnosed before diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2002,45(12):1719–1722. 0012–186XPubMedView Article
                        18. Pocecco M, Ventura A: Coeliac disease and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a causal association? Acta Paediatr 1995,84(12):1432–1433. 0803–5253PubMedView Article
                        19. Ventura A, Magazzù G, Greco L: Duration of exposure to gluten and risk for autoimmune disorders in patients with celiac disease. SIGEP Study Group for Autoimmune Disorders in Celiac Disease. Gastroenterology 1999,117(2):297–303. 0016–5085PubMedView Article
                        20. Ventura A, Neri E, Ughi C, Leopaldi A, Citta A, Not T: Gluten-dependent diabetes-related and thyroid-related autoantibodies in patients with celiac disease. J Pediatr 2000,137(2):263–265. 0022–3476PubMedView Article
                        21. Viljamaa M, Kaukinen K, Huhtala H, Kyronpalo S, Rasmussen M, Collin P: Coeliac disease, autoimmune diseases and gluten exposure. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005,40(4):437–443. 0036–5521PubMedView Article
                        22. Holmes GK: Coeliac disease and Type 1 diabetes mellitus - the case for screening. Diabet Med 2001,18(3):169–177. 0742–3071PubMedView Article
                        23. Holmes GK: Potential and latent coeliac disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001,13(9):1057–1060. 0954–691XPubMedView Article
                        24. Paparo F, Petrone E, Tosco A, Maglio M, Borrelli M, Salvati VM, Miele E, Greco L, Auricchio S, Troncone R: Clinical, HLA, and small bowel immunohistochemical features of children with positive serum antiendomysium antibodies and architecturally normal small intestinal mucosa. Am J Gastroenterol 2005,100(10):2294–2298. 0002-9270PubMedView Article
                        25. Troncone R, Greco L, Mayer M, Paparo F, Caputo N, Micillo M, Mugione P, Auricchio S: Latent and potential celiac disease. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1996, 412:10–14. 0803–5253PubMedView Article
                        26. Franzese A, Iafusco D, Spadaro R, Cavaliere O, Prisco F, Auricchio R, Troncone R, Valerio G, The Study-Group on Diabetes of Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology: Potential celiac disease in type 1 diabetes: A multicenter study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011,92(1):53–56. 0168–8227PubMedView Article
                        27. Peretti N, Bienvenu F, Bouvet C, Fabien N, Tixier F, Thivolet C, Levy E, Chatelain PG, Lachaux A, Nicolino M: The temporal relationship between the onset of type 1 diabetes and celiac disease: a study based on immunoglobulin A antitransglutaminase screening. Pediatrics 2004, 113:e418-e422.PubMedView Article
                        28. Karavanaki K, Kakleas K, Paschali E, Kefelas N, Konstantopoulos I, Petrou V, Kanariou M, Karayianni C: Screening for associated autoimmunity in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Horm Res 2009, 71:201–206.PubMedView Article
                        29. Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó IR, et al.: The ESPGHAN Working Group on Coeliac Disease Diagnosis. ESPGHAN Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease in Children and Adolescents. An Evidence-based Approach JPGN 2012,54(1):136–160.
                        30. Collin P, Kaukinen K, Valimaki M, Salmi J: Endocrinological disorders and celiac disease. Endocr Rev 2002,23(4):464–483. 0163–769XPubMedView Article
                        31. Freemark M, Levitsky LL: Screening for celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes: two views of the controversy. Diabetes Care 2003,26(6):1932–1939. 0149–5992PubMedView Article
                        32. Rubio-Tapia A, Kyle RA, Kaplan EL, Johnson DR, Page W, Erdtmann F, Brantner TL, Kim WR, Phelps TK, Lahr BD, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ, Murray JA: Increased prevalence and mortality in undiagnosed celiac disease. Gastroenterology 2009,137(1):88–93. 0036–5521PubMedView Article
                        33. Hansen D, Brock-Jacobsen B, Lund E, Bjorn C, Hansen LP, Nielsen C, Fenger C, Lillevang ST, Husby S: Clinical benefit of a gluten-free diet in type 1 diabetic children with screening-detected celiac disease: a population-based screening study with 2 years' follow-up. Diabetes Care 2006,29(11):2452–2456. 0149–5992PubMedView Article
                        34. Sanchez-Albisua I, Wolf J, Neu A, Geiger H, Wascher I, Stern M: Coeliac disease in children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: the effect of the gluten-free diet. Diabet Med 2005,22(8):1079–1082. 0742–3071PubMedView Article
                        35. Artz E, Warren-Ulanch J, Becker D, Greenspan S, Freemark M: Seropositivity to celiac antigens in asymptomatic children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: association with weight, height, and bone mineralization. Pediatr Diabetes 2008,9(4):277–284. 1399–543XPubMedView Article
                        36. Rami B, Sumnik Z, Schober E, Waldhor T, Battelino T, Bratanic N, Kurti K, Lebl J, Limbert C, Madacsy L, Odink RJ, Paskova M, Soltesz G: Screening detected celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: effect on the clinical course (a case control study). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2005,41(3):317–321. 0277–2116PubMedView Article
                        37. Simmons JH, Klingensmith GJ, McFann K, Rewers M, Ide LM, Taki I, Liu E, Hoffenberg EJ: Celiac Autoimmunity in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: A Two-Year Follow-up. J Pediatr 2011,158(2):276–281. 0022–3476PubMedView Article
                        38. Franzese A, Lombardi F, Valerio G, Spagnuolo MI: Update on Coeliac Disease and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Childhood. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2007,20(12):1257–1264. 0334–018XPubMedView Article
                        39. Van Koppen EJ, Schweizer JJ, Csizmadia CG, Krom Y, Hylkema HB, Van Geel AM, Koopman HM, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Mearin ML: Long-term health and quality-of-life consequences of mass screening for childhood celiac disease: a 10-year follow-up study. Pediatrics 2009,123(4):582–588. 0031–4005View Article
                        40. Kurppa K, Ashorn M, Iltanen S, Koskinen LL, Saavalainen P, Koskinen O, Mäki M, Kaukinen K: Celiac disease without villous atrophy in children: a prospective study. J Pediatr 2010,157(3):373–380. 0022–3476PubMedView Article
                        41. Tosco A, Salvati VM, Auricchio R, Maglio M, Borrelli M, Coruzzo A, Paparo F, Boffardi M, Esposito A, D'Adamo G, Malamisura B, Greco L, Troncone R: Natural history of potential celiac disease in children. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011,9(4):320–325.PubMedView Article
                        42. Westerholm-Ormio M, Vaarala O, Pihkala P, Ilonen J, Savilahti E: Immunologic Activity in the Small Intestinal Mucosa of Pediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes 2003,52(9):2287–2295. 0012–1797PubMedView Article
                        43. Maglio M, Florian F, Vecchiet M, Auricchio R, Paparo F, Spadaro R, Zanzi D, Rapacciuolo L, Franzese A, Sblattero D, Marzari R, Troncone R: Majority of children with type 1 diabetes produce and deposit anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in the small intestine. Diabetes 2009,58(7):1578–1584. 0012–1797PubMedView Article
                        44. Troncone R, Franzese A, Mazzarella G, Paparo F, Auricchio R, Coto I, Mayer M, Greco L: Gluten sensitivity in a subset of children with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Gastroenterol 2003,98(3):590–595. 0002–9270PubMedView Article
                        45. Valerio G, Del Puente A, Buono P, Esposito A, Zanatta M, Mozzillo E, Moretto E, Mastidoro L, Franzese A: Quantitative ultrasound of proximal phalanxes in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004,64(3):161–166.PubMedView Article
                        46. Lombardi F, Franzese A, Iafusco D, Del Puente A, Esposito A, Prisco F, Troncone R, Valerio G: Bone involvement in clusters of autoimmune diseases: Just a complication? Bone 2010, 46:551–555.PubMedView Article
                        47. Kollet O, Dar A, Lapidot T: The multiple roles of osteoclast in host defence: one remodeling and hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Annu Rev Immunol 2007, 25:51–69.PubMedView Article
                        48. Galluzzi F, Stagi S, Salti R, Toni S, Piscitelli E, Simonini G, Falcini F, Chiarelli F: Osteoprotegerin serum levels in children with type 1 diabetes: a potential modulating role in bone status. Eur J Endocrinol 2005, 153:879–885.PubMedView Article
                        49. Valerio G, Spadaro R, Iafusco D, Lombardi F, Del Puente A, Esposito A, et al.: The influence of gluten free diet on quantitative ultrasound of proximal phalanxes in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes mellitus and celiac disease. Bone 2008, 43:322–326.PubMedView Article
                        50. Foster-Powell Kaye, Susanna HoltHA, Brand-Miller C: International table of glycaemic index and glycaemic load values. Am J Clin Nutr 2002,76(1):5–56.PubMed
                        51. Parker SC, Dornhost A, Frost GS: The glycaemic index of a range of gluten free foods. Diabetics Medicine 2000, 17:657–660.View Article
                        52. Berti C, Riso P, Monti L, Porrini M: In vitro starch digestibility and in vivo glucose response of gluten free foods and their gluten counterparts. Eur J Nutr 2004, 43:198–204.PubMedView Article
                        53. Kupper C: Dietary guidelines and implementation for celiac disease. Gastroenterology 2005, 128:S121-S127.PubMedView Article
                        54. Errichiello S, Esposito O, Di Mase R, Camarca ME, Natale C, Limongelli MG, Marano C, Coruzzo A, Lombardo M, Strisciuglio P, Greco L: Celiac disease: predictors of compliance with a gluten-free diet in adolescents and young adults. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010,50(1):54–60.PubMedView Article
                        55. Franzese A, Valerio G, Spagnuolo MI: Management of diabetes in childhood: are children small adults? Clin Nutr 2004,23(3):293–305.PubMedView Article
                        56. Rashid M, Cranney A, Zarkadas M, Graham ID, Switzer C, Case S, Molloy M, Warren RE, Burrows V, Butzner JD: Celiac disease: evaluation of the diagnosis and dietary compliance in Canadian children. Pediatrics 2005,116(6):e754-e759.PubMedView Article
                        57. Van Koppen EJ, Schweizer JJ, Csizmadia CG, Krom Y, Hylkema HB, van Geel AM, Koopman HM, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Mearin ML: Long-term health and quality-of-life consequences of mass screening for childhood celiac disease: a 10-year follow-up study. Pediatrics 2009,123(4):e582-e588.PubMedView Article
                        58. Kolsteren MM, Koopman HM, Schalekamp G, Mearin ML: Health-related quality of life in children with celiac disease. J Pediatr 2001,138(4):593–595.PubMedView Article
                        59. Wagner G, Berger G, Sinnreich U, Grylli V, Schober E, Huber WD, Karwautz A: Quality of life in adolescents with treated coeliac disease: influence of compliance and age at diagnosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008,47(5):555–561.PubMedView Article
                        60. Rubin RR, Peyrot M: Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 1999, 15:205–218.PubMedView Article
                        61. Sud S, Marcon M, Assor E, Daneman D, Mahmud FH: Quality of life in children with diabetes and celiac disease: minimal impact of the 'double diagnosis'. Pediatric Diabetes 2011.

                        Copyright

                        © Camarca et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012