Volume 40 Supplement 1

70th Congress of the Italian Society of Pediatrics

Open Access

Essential of audiology: screening and post-screening

  • Francesco Martines1Email author,
  • Pietro Salvago1,
  • Salvatore Cocuzza2,
  • Eleonora La Mattina3,
  • Martinelli Stefano4,
  • Marianna Mucia3 and
  • Enrico Martines3
Italian Journal of Pediatrics201440(Suppl 1):A55

DOI: 10.1186/1824-7288-40-S1-A55

Published: 11 August 2014

Newborn hearing screening is a type of screening test for the early detection of hearing loss. It can recognize with good accuracy newborns affected by hearing impairment allowing an early diagnosis and intervention and avoiding cognitive and linguistic deficits [16].

The incidence of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in Sicily is 2.35 cases per 1000 newborns; this value increases to 2.95 if we consider also unilateral SNHL [2, 3] and to 10 cases per 1000 births among infants at risk [79].

A correct newborn hearing screening programme is based on different protocols depending on the presence/absence of audiologic risk factors:

  • Newborns without risk factors: [13]

Initial Hearing Screening (Step I): The initial screening should be performed using Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAEs) in the birth centers as close to discharge as possible, preferably 12 hours or more after birth. It is recommended that an infant be referred for a re-screening (step 2) if s/he does not pass the initial screening or results cannot be obtained in one or both ears.

Re-screening (Step II): The re-screening should be performed in a second level center using TEOAEs and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR). If an infant does not pass the re-screening or if results cannot be obtained in one or both ears, s/he shall be referred to the regional third level center for diagnostic audiological evaluation.

  • Newborns with risk factors (JCIH 2007) [710]

Initial Hearing Screening (Step I): The Initial Hearing Screening should be performed in a second level center using TEOAEs and AABR. If an infant does not pass the initial screening or if results cannot be obtained in one or both ears, s/he shall be referred to the regional third level center for diagnostic audiological evaluation.

Screening variables

Actually TEOAEs have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of about 70-95%. A higher TEOAEs specificity value depends on [1, 2, 11]:

  • Timing of TEOAEs recording

  • Trained and qualified personnel

  • PASS/REFER criteria

Limitations of screening

Audiologic screening does not identify:

  • Post-natal SNHL (prelingual or perilingual) , mainly related to genetic causes [12, 13]

  • ANSD (Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder): the main risk factors associated to ANSD are severe jaundice, prematurity, respiratory distress, ototoxic drugs (used to treat neonatal infections), genetic mutations (e.g. OTOF gene). The diagnosis of ANSD is usually based on the combination of absent or abnormal ABR with normal TEOAESs and/or cochlear microphonics (CM) [14].

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Biomedicina Sperimentale e Neuroscienze Cliniche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, (BioNeC), Sezione di Otorinolaringoiatria
(2)
Dipartimento di Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Clinica Otorinolaringoiatrica, Università degli Studi di Catania
(3)
Dipartimento di Biopatologia e Biotecnologie Mediche e Forensi (Di.Bi.Me.F.), Sezione di Audiologia, Università degli Studi di Palermo
(4)
Azienda Ospedaliera ‘Ospedale Niguarda Cà Granda’ – U.O.C. Neonatologia e Terapia Intensiva Neonatale

References

  1. Ballacchino A, Mucia M, Cocuzza S, Ferrara S, Martines E, Salvago P, Sireci F, Martines F: Newborn hearing screening in Sicily: Lesson learned. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2013, 29: 731-734.Google Scholar
  2. Martines F, Porrello M, Ferrara M, Martines M, Martines E: Newborn hearing screening project using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: Western Sicily experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007, 71: 107-112. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Martines F, Bentivegna D, Ciprì S, Costantino C, Marchese D, Martines E: On the threshold of effective well infant nursery hearing screening in Western Sicily. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012, 76: 423-427. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.12.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Maggio M, Maggio O, Mucia M, Martines F, Carmuco A, Noto G, Puccio R: The scholastic integration process of the impaired child in the province of Palermo: a cognitive survey. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2006, 22: 159-162.Google Scholar
  5. Maggio M, Martines F, Mucia M, Maggio O: A multifactorial pattern for the understanding of the psychological development of the child with impaired hearing and its clinical-therapeutic implications. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2006, 22: 41-44.Google Scholar
  6. Martines F, Martines E, Ballacchino A, Salvago P: Speech perception outcomes after cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf infants: The Western Sicily experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013, 77: 707-713. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.01.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Martines F, Salvago P, Bentivegna D, Bartolone A, Dispenza F, Martines E: Audiologic profile of infants at risk: Experience of a Western Sicily tertiary care centre. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012, 76: 1285-1291. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.05.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Salvago P, Martines E, Martines F: Prevalence and risk factors for sensorineural hearing loss: Western Sicily overview. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013, 270: 3049-56. 10.1007/s00405-013-2379-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Martines F, Martines E, Mucia M, Sciacca V, Salvago P: Prelingual sensorineural hearing loss and infants at risk: Western Sicily report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013, 77: 513-518. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.12.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing: Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007, 120: 898-921.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bentivegna D, Salvago P, Agrifoglio M, Ballacchino A, Ferrara S, Mucia M, Sireci F, Martines F: The linkage between upper respiratory tract infections and otitis media: evidence of the ‘united airways concept. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2012, 28: 287-290.Google Scholar
  12. Bartolotta C, Salvago P, Cocuzza S, Fabiano C, Sammarco P, Martines F: Identification of D179H, a novel missense GJB2 mutation in a Western Sicily family. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, 271: 1457-67. 10.1007/s00405-013-2613-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Martines F, Salvago P, Bartolotta C, Cocuzza S, Fabiano C, Ferrara S, La Mattina E, Mucia M, Sammarco P, Sireci F, Martines E: A genotype–phenotype correlation in Sicilian patients with GJB2 biallelic mutations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, DOI 10.1007/s00405-014-2970-1Google Scholar
  14. Martines F, Salvago P: Hyperbilirubinemia, Auditory Neuropathy and Prelingually Deafness: Evidence Linking. Neonatal Care: New Research. Edited by: Novinka; Fabian Koubek & Junica Linser. 2013, 79-97.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Martines et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement