Volume 40 Supplement 1

70th Congress of the Italian Society of Pediatrics

Open Access

Good practices in bilingual children

  • Francesca Cucinotta1,
  • Roberta Maggio1,
  • Matilde Gagliano1,
  • Maria Venuti1 and
  • Antonella Gagliano1Email author
Italian Journal of Pediatrics201440(Suppl 1):A80

DOI: 10.1186/1824-7288-40-S1-A80

Published: 11 August 2014

Bilingualism is the regular use of more than one language in everyday life [1, 2]. In our country, 47.2% of students were born from non-Italian parents [3], and in Europe, bilingualism is even more prevalent: 56% of the population across all European Union countries is reported being functionally bilingual [4]. So it is critical to understand risks and protective factors specific to the development of bilingual children for clinical and educational reasons.

It is true that linguistic tasks are often performed more poorly by bilingual children than monolinguals [5, 6], especially as regards assessment of vocabulary [7, 8], picture-naming tasks [9, 10], comprehending and producing words [11, 12]. It is also common among bilingual children who learn Italian as a second language, to have lower skill levels than those of monolinguals, in relation to reading and writing or understanding of texts [13]; but these results cannot be described as a pathological outcome.

In contrast to this pattern, bilinguals at all ages demonstrate better executive control than monolinguals matched in age and other background factors.

In the last decades, many studies showed that the experience of early exposure to two languages, and the constant practice of selecting the target language avoiding intrusions of the non-target language, can improve skills such as selective attention, inhibition and cognitive control with respect to non-verbal tasks. Other benefits also include the early development of metalinguistic ability and better achievements in working memory tasks.

These effects have been found at all stages across the life span, beginning from infancy and toddlerhood, continuing through young adulthood and up to older age [1417].

Thus, it is a matter of considerable concern with the large and growing dual language population, how to properly recognize normal and abnormal dual language development, and several important implications can be derived from extant developmental and clinical research: a language disorder should be suspected in a dual language child, when the child is reported to be significantly behind in the understanding of both languages, although there has been significant exposure to both languages, and when there are language-based learning problems [18]. While it has been clearly documented that bilingualism does not cause language delay or language disorders [19], the latter are certainly possible in bilingual children. Such possibility should not be easily dismissed and slight delays should not instead be misattributed to the child’s bilingual condition even though a more severe delay must be assessed.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UOC di Neuropsichiatria Infantile, Policlinico Universitario G. Martino

References

  1. Grosjean F: Studying bilinguals. Oxford Linguistics, USA: Oxford University. 2008Google Scholar
  2. Grosjean F: Bilingual: life and reality. Harvard University. 2012Google Scholar
  3. Ministro dell’Istruzione dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR): Gli alunni stranieri nel sistema scolastico Italiano A.S. 2012/2013.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission: Special Eurobarometer 243: Europeans and their languages (Executive Summary). Europa Web Portal. 2006, [http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_243_sum_en.pdf]Google Scholar
  5. Barac R, Balystok E: Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Dev. 2012, 83: 413-422.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Luck G: Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012, 16: 240-250. 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bialystok E, Luck G, Peets KF, Yang S: Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2010, 13: 525-531. 10.1017/S1366728909990423.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Oller DK, Pearson BZ, Cobo-Lewis AB: Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy. Appl Psycholinguist. 2007, 28: 191-230.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Luk G: Lexical access in bilinguals: effects of vocabulary size and executive control. J Neuroling. 2008, 21: 522-538. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.07.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hernandez A, Martinez A, Kohnert K: In search of the language switch: an fMRI study of picture naming in Spanish English bilinguals. Brain Lang. 2000, 73: 421-431. 10.1006/brln.1999.2278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ransdell SE, Fischler I: Memory in a monolingual mode: when are bilinguals at a disadvantage?. J Mem Lang. 1987, 26: 392-405. 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90098-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ivanova P, Costa A: Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production?. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008, 127: 277-288. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bellocchi S, Genesse F: L’apprendimento della lettura in bambini scolarizzati in una seconda lingua: Traiettorie evolutive tipiche e difficoltà. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo. 2012, 16: 481-506.Google Scholar
  14. Kovács ÁM, Mehler J: Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. N Academ of Scien. 2009, 106: 6556-6560. 10.1073/pnas.0811323106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Poulin-Dubois D, Blaye A, Coutya J, Bialystok E: The effects of bilingualism on toddlers' executive functioning. J Exper Child Psychol. 2011, 108: 567-579. 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Costa A, Hernández M, Sebastián-Gallés N: Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition. 2008, 106: 59-86. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Klein R, Viswanathan M: Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon Task. Psych Aging. 2004, 19: 290-303. 10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Toppelberg C, Collins B: Language, culture and adaptation in immigrant children. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2010, 19: 697-717. 10.1016/j.chc.2010.07.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. King K, Fogle L: Raising bilingual children: common parental concerns and current research. Center for Applied Linguistics. 2006, [http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/raising-bilingual-children.html]Google Scholar

Copyright

© Cucinotta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement