Open Access

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) for the assessment of bone strength in most of bone affecting conditions in developmental age: a review

Contributed equally
Italian Journal of Pediatrics201642:88

DOI: 10.1186/s13052-016-0297-9

Received: 21 June 2016

Accepted: 15 September 2016

Published: 26 September 2016

Abstract

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography provides an automatical scan analysis of trabecular and cortical bone compartments, calculating not only their bone mineral density (BMD), but also bone geometrical parameters, such as marrow and cortical Cross-Sectional Area (CSA), Cortical Thickness (CoTh), both periosteal and endosteal circumference, as well as biomechanical parameters like Cross-Sectional Moment of Inertia (CSMI), a measure of bending, polar moment of inertia, indicating bone strength in torsion, and Strength Strain Index (SSI). Also CSA of muscle and fat can be extracted. Muscles, which are thought to stimulate bones to adapt their geometry and mineral content, are determinant to preserve or increase bone strength; thus, pQCT provides an evaluation of the functional ‘muscle-bone unit’, defined as BMC/muscle CSA ratio. This functional approach to bone densitometry can establish if bone strength is normally adapted to the muscle force, and if muscle force is adequate for body size, providing more detailed insights to targeted strategies for the prevention and treatment of bone fragility. The present paper offers an extensive review of technical features of pQCT and its possible clinical application in the diagnostic of bone status as well as in the monitoring of the skeleton’s health follow-up.

Keywords

Bone mineralization Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) Bone mass Bone mineral density Muscle area Fat area Osteoporosis

Background

Osteoporosis (OP) may be recognized as one of the major public health problems, growing both in paediatrics and adulthood, irrespective of the gender [13]. It is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength because of decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and altered trabecular bone architecture [4]. The Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry scan (DXA) is recommended as the first clinical tool for diagnosing OP [5, 6]. However, due to difficulties in the detection of relatively small changes along longitudinal studies, DXA scans is not useful in monitoring OP treatment or prevention on a routine basis.

Although, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), which has been shown to have the same reproducibility of BMD assessed by DXA at the forearm [7] and a good accuracy [8], appears to be more promising because it allows to determine a direct quantification of bone structure, other than BMD, with resolutions below 100 μm [8]. Changes in trabecular morphology are reported to lead to a disproportionate decrease in bone strength [9], therefore microstructural information should be included in the analysis to accurately predict individual mechanical bone properties [1013]. However, the relative importance of bone density and architecture in the aetiology of bone fractures is still poorly understood.

In contrast, peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) enables bone parameters of the peripheral skeleton (e.g. radius, tibia and femur) to be investigated in details. While providing low radiation doses, pQCT enables calculation of volumetric BMD (vBMD), instead of the projected areal BMD obtained by DXA. Furthermore, using pQCT, trabecular and cortical bone parameters can be analyzed separately, thus allowing the examination of bone distribution, architecture and geometry at fracture-prone sites. The use of pQCT technology in one of our studies [14] provided a more comprehensive assessment of the effects of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) on overall bone size and strength as well as the delineation of trabecular and cortical bone characteristics and their relationship to muscle mass.

In this paper, a review of recent literature describing pQCT technique, and its use for assessing bone strength in different conditions has been reported.

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a three-dimensional non-projection technique to quantify BMD in the spine, proximal femur, forearm, and tibia with a number of advantages to other densitometry techniques: cortical and trabecular bone can be separated, trabecular volumes of interest (VOI) are largely independent of spine degenerative changes, and 3D geometric parameters can be determined. PQCT is also increasingly used to study the interaction between muscle and bone systems [15, 16], being able to benefit from high-quality, accurate imaging and morphological assessment which allow an accurate diagnosis and treatment of a musculoskeletal diseases spectrum [17] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Typical tibia (a) and radius (b) pQCT, with scan location indicated as percent of the length of the respective bones. c Scan section for tibia and radius obtained by pQCT in a normal-weight girl. The image allows identifying some of the main parameters obtained, such as the fat cross-sectional area (CSA) (fatCSA) and the muscle CSA (muscleCSA). d Example of a forearm pQCT scan.in an osteoporotic 14-year-old patient

PQCT at the forearm was introduced shortly after computed tomography (CT) for medical imaging and several years before the development of spinal QCT, as a volumetric extension to Cameron’s projection technique for bone mineral measurements [18]. For a long period the technical implementations of QCT by using clinical CT scanners, and of pQCT with smaller dedicated forearm scanners, remained virtually unchanged. A number of single-slices, e.g. one slice for each lumbar vertebra L1-L4, are scanned; then, for each acquired slice, a CT image is reconstructed in which dedicated regions of interest (ROI) for trabecular and cortical compartments are analyzed. BMD values are then derived, either from a calibration procedure using an in-scan calibration phantom measured below the patient, or from stored calibration values obtained before the patient scan.

Renewed interest in QCT/pQCT has been increased by several reasons: a) the rapid progress in CT technology since the introduction of spiral CT, which enables the acquisition of volumetric scans of skeletal sites other than spine, such as femur; b) the ability to measure cortical and trabecular bone separately, c) to provide information of bone geometry and trabecular structure, and d) to quantify BMD independently from bone size, unlike DXA [19]. In fact, areal density (aBMD or BMDa) as measured by DXA is typically better correlated with body weight and height than BMD as measured by QCT, or a volumetric estimation of bone mineral density (BMAD), obtained by dividing DXA aBMD by the square root of bone area. Finally, it has been reported in several pharmaceutical trials that increases in aBMD, as measured by DXA, do not entirely explain the observed reduction in fracture risk, highlighting some challenges in monitoring treatment with DXA.

Image generation in CT

The image generation in CT is a two-step process [19]. First, a survey radiograph, called a scout scan or topogram, is acquired in order to locate the scan range for the tomographic images. Newer systems equipped with multiple rows of detectors acquiring up to 64 slices simultaneously are designated as multi-slice CT (MSCT). Scan times for MSCT are typically below 10 s for the lumbar spine (LS) or the proximal femur. A further development in MSCT is the use of areal detectors, which acquire even larger volumes in one rotation, so that in many applications a spiral motion of the X-ray tube relative to the body is no longer necessary. This true volumetric data acquisition is used in a new dedicated forearm scanner, but has not yet been introduced in whole body (WB) CT scanners.

After acquisition, the second step of CT image generation is the tomographic reconstruction, which describes the mathematical process of calculating the image from the acquired data. It is important to separate these two steps, as the operator can select a variety of parameters for both that influence image quality.

The forearm pQCT

Standard pQCT scanners work in step and scan mode. Some acquire single-slices, while others operate in multi-slice mode. Measurement locations are defined with respect to the length of the radius, measured from the radio-carpal joint surface to the olecranon. Typically, scan locations with single-slice CT scanners are distal sites (4 % of radius length), containing mainly trabecular bone, and a shaft location (15–65 % of radius length), consisting predominantly of cortical bone.

Multi-slice scanners use a distal site between 4 % and 10 % of the length of the radius and a shaft location. A decrease in slice thickness, e.g., from 2 mm to 1 mm, increases the geometrical resolution. Currently, only few types of pQCT scanners are in use. Most of the literature has been published for the XCT 2000 (Stratec Medizintechnik, Pforzheim, Germany) and its predecessors, the XCT 960 and the isotope based XCT 900. These are scan and step scanners that are predominantly used to determine BMD, bone mineral content (BMC), cortical width and volume, or cross-sectional area of the radius, to derive biomechanical parameters such as stress strain index (SSI) and moment of inertia [19].

Patient positioning

As with any medical imaging device, the proper positioning of the patient is crucial to accuracy and reproducibility. The most common use of HR-pQCT in vivo is to scan the non-dominant radius and tibia. The scanner’s gantry, narrow and shallow, only allows the distal peripheral skeleton to be accommodated, then immobilized in a carbon fibershell. A scout view, essentially a two-dimensional x-ray scan, is obtained so that the operator can identify a precise region for the 3D measurement. The standard measurement protocol utilizes the following settings: an X-ray tube of 60kVp potential, X-ray tube current of 95 mA, matrix size of 1536 × 1536 and slice thickness and in-plane voxel size of 82 μm. While the reconstructed voxel size is 82 μm for the standard-patient HR-pQCT protocol, the actual spatial resolution of the image is approximately 130 μm near the centre of the field of view, and somewhat less off-centre (140–160 μm) [20, 21]. Consequently, structures less than 100 μm are not typically resolved from in vivo images. At each site, 110 computerized tomography slices are obtained and used to reproduce a 9.02 mm (radial or tibial length) three-dimensional image.

Daily and weekly quality control scans must be performed to identify drift, which can occur as a consequence of decreased X-ray emission (decay). The HR-pQCT single-scan effective dose is estimated to be 3 μSv [22]. Since exposure is additive, we recommend no more than three measures at a single site during an appointment, being the recommended radiation dose limit 50 μSv/year (Inter-national Commission on Radiological Protection). Since HR-pQCT uses a polychromatic X-ray source, it is subject to beam hardening, which can significantly impact geometric and density measures [23].

Motion artefacts

As HR-pQCT has a high resolution and scan times are relatively long (3 min), any movement during the scan can result in artefact, compromising the accuracy and reproducibility of the images obtained [24]. Measures of micro-architecture are more sensitive to movement artefact compared with geometric or densitometry measures [2528]. The best solution in case of motion is to re-scan the patient, since correction algorithms cannot be applied to the parameters themselves [24].

Advantages of pQCT

The aBMD is commonly used to predict fractures at clinically important sites [29], influenced by several different skeletal parameters such as periosteal expansion, cortical BMD (BMDcort), cortical thickness (CoTh), trabecular number and trabecular thickness [30], all measures under distinct systems of biological and genetic control. Currently, it is unclear which of these bone parameters better identifies genetically determined phenotypes, or whether aBMD is more related to bone size or growth [31], or genetic features. Devices such as pQCT, which measure cross sections of predominantly cortical or trabecular bone, enable the different constituents of bone mass to be analyzed separately and offer advantages over DXA in terms of possible genotype/bone phenotype correlations. In recent genome-wide association studies, we examined how those genetic polymorphisms found to be associated with aBMD were also related to pQCT parameters, based on analysis of adolescents from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and young adult men from the ‘Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinants’ (GOOD) cohort [32]. In comparison to DXA, QCT or pQCT provide a more refined characterization of bone, including measures of vBMD, bone geometry (dimensions, area, and CoTh), and quantifies the distribution of mineral within cross-section, thus providing a better understanding of skeletal deficits associated with fracture risk.

Few studies of children with a forearm fracture have used QCT. A cross-sectional study of girls found no difference in trabecular or cortical vBMD of the distal radius; however, girls with a fracture had a narrower diameter of the radial metaphysis than girls without a fracture [33]. A longitudinal study of pubertal girls found that those who sustained an upper limb fracture had lower integral vBMD (cortical and trabecular bone), but a greater cross-sectional area of the radial metaphysis compared to controls, and these differences persisted throughout adolescence [34]. Lastly, among males aged 18, those with a previous forearm fracture had lower cortical and trabecular vBMD and lower cortical thickness, but no difference in periosteal circumference compared to non-fractured controls [35]. The discordant findings among studies make it difficult to draw conclusions about the relative importance of bone density and aspects of bone geometry for forearm fracture in children and adolescents [36].

Separate measurement of trabecular and cortical bone compartments provided by volumetric methods allows earlier detection of changes in bone mass in response to disease or therapy [36]. However, both pQCT and HR-pQCT are more sensitive to movement and require the subject to be still for nearly five minutes for optimal scans, which is difficult to obtain in very young children.

While pQCT is limited to assessment of peripheral sites, QCT, HR-QCT and pQCT have limited published pediatric specific reference data [36]. Therefore, it seems reasonable that DXA continues to be used to assess low bone mass in children, especially if adjustment for body size deficits are considered [36].

Changes of bone characteristics during childhood and adolescence

During childhood and adolescence, skeletal development is characterized by increases in BMDtrab and BMDcort and cortical dimensions [37]. In healthy human subjects, bone mineral mass follows a trajectory from birth on to attain a maximal value, the so called peak bone mass (PBM), by the end of the second or the beginning of the third decade, according to both gender and skeletal sites examined [38]. Childhood and adolescence are critical periods for bone mass gain, since about 90 % of PBM is acquired before the age of 18, and a low PBM may increase fractures risk in adulthood [39]. Furthermore, this influence of pubertal timing on peak bone mass is predetermined before the onset of pubertal maturation [40]. Growth in infancy was reported to be associated with BMC in later life [41]. The risk of hip fracture in elderly results as related to early variation in height and weight growth [42, 43]. Glucocorticoid (GC) medications are highly effective and widely prescribed for the treatment of varied inflammatory conditions in children and adults. However, GC therapy in children is associated with multiple adverse side effects, including obesity, impaired linear growth, and increased fracture rates [44, 45]. Studies have consistently shown that GCs result in sustained reductions in bone formation because of decreased osteoblast differentiation and activity and increased osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis [46].

Other than providing vBMD and cortical geometry, highly correlated with fracture load [47, 48], pQCT is able to measure muscle and fat cross-sectional area (CSA) [46].

Soft-tissue measurements

Muscle and fat CSAs were estimated at the 66 % tibial and 25 % femoral pQCT scan sites. Combined muscle and fatCSA can be automatically calculated by subtracting CSAtot from the total image CSA. For the remaining area, the manufacturer’s threshold of 36 mg*cm−3 can be used to separate fatCSA from muscle CSA (muscleCSA or mCSA). Then a combination of filters allows extracting the total fat from the muscle. The bone-to-muscle ratio (BMR) is the ratio of cortical bone CSA (tibia + fibula) to muscleCSA, presented as a percentage. The fat-to-muscle ratio (FMR) is the ratio of total fatCSA to muscleCSA, as a percentage. BMR and FMR are determined at the 66 % scan site in the lower leg and the 25 % scan site in the thigh.

Muscle area

A muscle threshold is used to create a muscle template for soft tissue analysis. Muscle area result to be compromised in many inflammatory conditions affecting childhood.

Children and adolescents with JIA have decreased skeletal size, muscle mass, trabecular bone density and cortical bone geometry and strength [49]. Not surprisingly, these bone abnormalities are more pronounced in children with greater disease severity [49]. Although the muscleCSA in the lower leg was reduced in all JIA subtypes, whole-body lean mass (LBM) was diminished only in patients with systemic JIA as described in one of our previous papers [14] where muscleCSA loss ranged from 0.46 to 0.89 SD (Fig. 2), thus being not as dramatic as reported by Roth et al [50]: they found height-adjusted forearm muscleCSA measured by pQCT to be reduced by >1.25 SD in 57 patients with JIA ages 6 to 23 years, when compared with healthy controls [49]. This difference may reflect variation in joint inflammation sites and number, greater weight-bearing activity in lower versus upper extremities, or differences in our control population [49]. A linear relationship between muscle mass and bone mass is well documented in healthy children and adults [51]. In general, the greater the LBM, the higher load the muscle exerts on the bone.
Fig. 2

Reduction of fat CSA (fatCSA) (a) and increase of muscle CSA (muscleCSA) (b) in a boy with systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis at the diagnosis and during treatment with biological drugs

Fat area

A fat threshold is used to create a fat template within the limb area. In a cohort of pre-pubertal, free-living children, in whom DXA and pQCT measurements were acquired, the total fat mass, adjusted for lean mass, resulted positively associated with bone size, but negatively with volumetric bone density assessed by pQCT at tibia [52].

In a group of paediatric renal transplant recipients undergoing tibia pQCT assessment, muscle and fat area Z-scores were significantly lower compared with reference participants at transplantation time (both p < 0.01), and increased significantly within transplant recipients over the course of 12 months (both p < 0.001) of about 0.56 and 1.29 SD, respectively. Twelve months after transplantation, muscle area Z-scores and cortical BMD did not differ between transplant recipients and reference participants, whereas fat area Z-scores were significantly higher in transplant recipients [53].

The multivariable quasi-least squares (QLS) regression model for changes in muscle area Z-scores showed that greater increases in fat area Z-scores over each interval (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with greater increases in muscle area Z-scores. In the QLS model for changes in fat area Z-scores, greater glucocorticoid exposure was associated with significantly major increases in fat area Z-scores (P < 0.001). The link between fat area and BMD remains unclear.

Recent studies led researcher to hypothesize a strong relationship among leptin, metabolic state, and immunological self-tolerance [54]. Nutritional status, through the secretion of leptin, one of the most abundant adipocyte-derived hormones, can control immune self-tolerance, setting the basis for an exaggerated immune response to altered self or non-self, leading to chronic inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and autoimmunity in subjects with risk factors (i.e. genetic predisposition, environment, sex, infectious agents, etc) [54, 55]. Moreover, chronic systemic inflammation, in Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) patients, has shown to increase lipogenesis in nonadipose tissues and lipolysis in white adipose tissue, resulting in ectopic lipid deposition in nonadipose tissues, like muscle and liver [56] (Fig. 2). The production of proinflammatory cytokines characterizing an autoimmune disorder like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) could be associated with both an increased secretion of leptin and ectopic lipid accumulation in skeletal muscles, and with a higher bone turnover and consequent loss of bone mass.

Changes in section modulus relative to changes in muscle

In order to determine if gains in muscle area after transplantation were associated with the expected gains in section modulus (i.e., the “functional muscle-bone unit”), the 12-month changes in muscle area and section modulus Z-scores were compared in the transplant recipients and a subset of 302 reference participants enrolled in an ancillary longitudinal study, adjusted for baseline muscle area and section modulus Z-scores. The latter increased with increasing muscle area Z-scores in both transplant and reference participants. However, the increase in the section modulus Z-score for a given increase in muscle area Z-score was significantly lower in transplant recipients compared with reference participants (p < 0.001). This impaired response was less pronounced in participants with lower section modulus Z-scores at baseline (p < 0.01) [53].

In recent years, an increase in the use of pQCT for regional soft tissue assessment deriving indices of adiposity and lean soft tissue has been reported. Consequently, establishment of the relationship between pQCT-derived adiposity of the limbs and the recognized standard of total body fat percentage by DXA would make it possible to reduce the need for exposure to both DXA and pQCT in paediatric subjects.

More recent research has focused on relating soft tissue properties to bone parameters [57]. Although pQCT is capable of regional soft tissue analysis, other techniques are usually employed to determine whole body soft tissue composition, frequently DXA, or both DXA and pQCT in the same investigation. The advantage of using pQCT is that fat, muscle and bone tissues proportions are provided for the same appendicular site, while DXA whole body scan gives the respective percentage of the three components in the whole body, leading to possible bias.

The muscle-bone unit

Frost proposed a negative feedback system, i.e. the mechanostat, to explain how mechanics might influence bone mass and geometry, and postulated that structural adaptation is driven by the experienced bone strains [58, 59].

However, the mechanostat theory makes no assumptions about the nature of the mechanical forces causing bone strain. In line with Thompson’s conception that bone mass is influenced by the developing musculature [60], and based on the data obtained by Zanchetta’s group [61], Schiessl et al. [62] suggested that, except for traumata, it must be maximum muscle forces that cause the largest bone strains, primarily due to the poor lever arms against which most muscles work. Consequently, muscle and bone form a functional unit, the so-called muscle-bone unit [63]. Following the previous line of reasoning, a very strong relationship should exist between maximum muscle force and bone mass/geometry, and the former should be a better predictor for bone mass/geometry than any other proxy marker for maximum force (e.g. muscle cross-sectional area, volume, mass, and torque) [64].

Maximum voluntary ground reaction force (Fmvm1LH) assessed by mechanography, a new functional system named Multiple One-Legged Hopping (m1LH) can be measured during the landing phase of m1LH, where plantar flexor muscles are contracting eccentrically. A correlation study was provided between Fmvm1LH and pQCT bone parameters [65],

Metabolism & bone

Interestingly, an inverse association has been found between fat infiltration in skeletal muscle, fasting insulin levels and insulin resistance, and bioactive androgens, independent of total adiposity [66]. The data regarding androgenic hormone effects on fat infiltration in skeletal muscle are very limited. A previous study among 54 healthy young eugonadal white men reported that testosterone administration decreases ectopic skeletal muscle fat infiltration [67], thus raising the possibility that lower androgenic hormone levels may promote increased fat infiltration in skeletal muscle and insulin resistance. However, it is also possible that increased skeletal muscle fat infiltration may have an effect on androgen metabolism and/or androgen production; this hypotheses should be tested in future longitudinal studies [66].

Primary prevention of OP consists of maximizing peak bone mass during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood, and minimizing bone loss later in life, especially after menopause for women [68]. A view on the adaptation of bone mass due to biomechanical forces suggests why amenorrhea and osteoporosis might be related in anorexic women [69]. Muscle strength and gravitation field-related forces provide the biomechanical environment of bone [58]. Muscular inactivity leads to reduced mass of muscle fibres, called muscle atrophy or sarcopenia. Bone adaptation to sarcopenia results in osteopenia, which typically facilitates located osteoporotic bone fractures [70, 71].

Parameters of bone density of the radius of the non-dominant side were measured by pQCT (XCT 900; Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH, Pforzheim, Germany). A single tomographic slice of 2.5 mm thickness was taken at the site of the radius whose distance to the medial border of the distal radial articular cartilage corresponded to 4 % of forearm length. Forearm length was measured using a caliper as the distance between the ulnar styloid processus and the olecranon. Volumetric total BMD (BMDtot), BMC and volumetric trabecular BMD (BMDtrab) were automatically analyzed from the tomographic image using the manufacturer’s software. BMDtrab was defined as the mean mineral density of the 45 % core area of the bone’s cross-section. BMC closely corresponds to the mass of mineral contained in the entire tomographic slice, therefore it is a useful parameter to represent bone mass.

Bone pQCT parameters and physical activity

Physical activity and bone loading stimulates bone remodeling. Increased rates of intra-cortical remodeling increases porosity and decreases the overall density of cortical bone [72], so that newly remodeled bone has a lower cortical volumetric density (BMDcort) than older cortical bone tissue [73].

By using pQCT, a positive association between exercise during growing years and bone apposition and strength was reported [74, 75]. Muscular contractions during weight-bearing activities can site-specifically increase bone mass and strength in pre-pubertal or early pubertal children [76]. Some data in adolescent subjects showed significant correlation coefficients among muscle power, muscleCSA, and bone strength (SSI) [77]. However, a greater difference in geometry of humeral diaphysis, measured with pQCT, has been observed in the playing arm of tennis and squash players when the sportive activity was started at or before the menarche [78].

The influence of factors like gender and ethnic origin on the exercise-bone health correlation is suggested by some data. In fact, additional school-based physical education conducted over seven years was associated with greater tibial structure, strength, and region-specific adaptations in cortical bone mass and density distribution in girls, but not in boys [79]. This data was confirmed by a 4-year cluster randomized controlled trial involving 365 boys and 362 girls aged 8.1 ± 0.3 years, evaluating the effects of a specialist-taught physical education (PE) program on bone strength and body composition [80]. These last group, in comparison to other children receiving PE from general classroom teachers, showed similar gains in total body BMC, FM, and muscleCSA in both sexes, but a greater gain in total body LM, cortical area (CoA) and CoTh at the mid-tibia and mid-radius in girls [80]. In a cross-sectional study involving 724 adolescents using objective measures of physical activity, the highest impact levels of physical activity were positively associated with the periosteal bone mineral accrual at the femoral neck and other hip sites [81]. Interestingly, a study conducted in pubertal subjects disclosed that, in boys, sitting was negatively associated with tibial endosteal and periosteal circumference as well as bone strength mediated by lean mass. In pubertal girls, moderate to vigorous physical activity was positively associated with CoTh and the association was not mediated by lean mass [82].

Finally, examining the effects of weight-bearing physical activity on the content and volumetric properties of bone in a pre- to early pubertal South African black (n = 42) and white (n = 24) population, the data showed that in the low bone loading group, black children had greater femoral neck BMC, greater radius area and a greater tibia total area and strength than white children, suggesting a possible ethnic specific response to mechanical loading [83].

Regarding the importance of weight-bearing activities in conditioning bone strength, some studies did not find significant differences between swimmers and normo-active controls for bone strength indexes, structure or vBMD, suggesting that swimmers present similar bone strength and structure than controls [84].

Radiation exposure

Analogously to DXA, radiation exposure from pQCT is low (0.01 mSv), although slightly higher if compared with DXA (0.004–0.005 mSv). [85]. PQCT radiation emission must be calibrated by the daily scanning of a fantom.

Paediatric pQCT reference values

PQCT utilizes 3-dimensional imaging to evaluate bone geometry and true volumetric density for cortical and trabecular bone separately, making it ideal for evaluation of bone in growing children and adolescents [86].

However, as pQCT is available in a limited number of institutions, which use it mainly for research purposes, some researcher groups created normative values, even if it should be applied only in the centres where the data have been developed [87, 88].

Thus, some problems in the compilation and comparison of the data can occur, as the measuring technique, the equipment, and the analysing software may often differ considerably. Moreover, many studies reported small population sampling, frequently not representative or applicable to all age groups and/or ethnicities, making patently difficult the generalization of the results [87, 88].

A few studies reported pQCT reference data in children and adolescents. Ashby et al [89] studied 499 white children and adolescents aged 6–19 years from United Kingdom using a Stratec XCT 2000. In this study the authors produced reference charts with 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th centiles for males and females by age for BMDtot, BMDtrab, and bone CSA measured at 4 % of radius, and CoTh, cortical mineral content, axial moment of inertia, and bone CSA measured at 50 % of radius.

However, a study from United States [82] using a Stratec XCT 2000, evaluated 231 children, adolescents and young adults aged 5–22 years, mostly Caucasian, at the 20 % tibial site for CoA, cortical density, periosteal circumference, and endosteal circumference. Another study [90] employing a Stratec XCT 2000, and including 416 children aged 5–18 years, measured at the 4 % tibial site for BMDtrab and at the 66 % site for the total, cortical and marrow CSA, cortical BMC, BMD, and CoTh.

In Europe, a Dutch study involving 371 white children aged 6–23 years old, produced reference values for age and for pubertal stage using a Stratec XCT 2000,Total CSA, BMDtot, and BMDtrab were measured at the 4 % radius site, while CoTh, BMC, BMD, CoA, and marrow area were obtained at the 65 % proximal radius [88]. However, another Dutch group [91] published data on 469 children, where reference values at the 65 % radius site included total CSA, cortical CSA, BMDcort, BMC, and muscleCSA.

As regards geographic differences in bone health, for a sample of 665 white and black subjects aged 5–35 years in the United States, the measurements at the 38 % tibial length for BMDcort, periosteal and endosteal circumferences, BMC, and bone area were given as reference curves in relation to age [37]. Ethnic and sex differences were reported in both metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone parameters, which were not accounted for by differences in body size or skeletal maturity [92]. Furthermore, in a study conducted in 471 13-year-old South African children, metaphyseal (4 %) radial BMDtrab was greater in black girls than their white peers, whereas bone strength index was not different. However, diaphyseal (38 %) tibial values, including total area, endosteal diameter, tibial diameter, periosteal circumference and polar strength-strain index were greater in the black than in white children. Cortical density was greater in black than in white boys, and higher in girls than in boys. CoTh was major in the white group. Lower leg muscleCSA was higher in white than in black children, as well as forearm muscleCSA was higher in white than in black boys. No difference in fatCSA area was reported between the ethnic groups [92]. These data have been confirmed also in adults black men in comparison to white and South Asian men independently from body size adjustments [93].

Thus, due to the great variability in site of measurement, age ranges and groups of subjects, most of the data reported in literature cannot be compared or standardized, according to what observed by Zemel et al. [94]

The utility of pQCT in different conditions

The application of pQCT allowed enhancing the comprehension of age-related changes and sex differences in bone microarchitecture [95]. Over the past 10 years, many studies have been published about the use of pQCT in children and adolescent with chronic diseases potentially threatening bone health [96], such as cystic fibrosis [97100], inflammatory bowel disease [101105], juvenile idiopathic arthritis [106109], cancer survivors [110112], juvenile onset lupus erythematosus [109, 113115], hematologic disorders [116119], mellitus diabetes [120123], renal diseases [46, 53, 124131], cerebral palsy [132135], growth hormone deficiency [136, 137], and genetic disorders and syndromes [138149] (Table 1).
Table 1

Literature on clinical pQCT employment for bone status assessment in chronic diseases

Disease

Type of study

Patients

Controls

Results

References

HIV

Cross-sectional study

30 HIV-infected African–American or Hispanic on ART treatment

 

Markedly abnormal trabecular plate and cortical microarchitecture, and decreased whole bone stiffness

Yin MT et al., 2014 [174]

Cushing’s syndrome

 

30 patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome

 

Lower cortical area (CoA), lower cortical thickness (CoTh), lower cortical density and lower total vBMD.

dos Santos CV et al., 2015 [175]

JIA

Longitudinal study

245 patients (172 females, 73 males) with JIA

 

Lower TrabBMD, muscle CSA (muscleCSA), and SSIp. In contrast, JIA showed fatCSA significantly higher than controls. but not with ERA, Longitudinally, we did not find any difference in all JIA patients in comparison with baseline, except for the SSI value that normalized. A significant negative correlation among TrabBMD and systemic and/or intraarticular corticosteroids, and a positive correlation among TNF-α-blocking agents and TrabBMD were observed.

Stagi S et al., 2014 [14]

Cystic Fibrosis (CF)

Cross-sectional study

Thirty young adults with CF

 

↓ bone cross-sectional area and ↓ vBMD. Cortical and trabecular microarchitecture were compromised most notably involving the trabecular bone of the tibia. These differences translated into ↓ estimated bone strength both at the radius and tibia.

Putman MS et al., 2014 [176]

 

Cross-sectional study

Twelve children with CF

Age and sex- matched controls

↓ WBBMC with larger differences at older ages. Periosteal and endosteal circumferences were smaller in CF. Positive relationships of CoA and SSI with age were attenuated with CF.

Bai W et al., 2016 [98]

 

Cross-sectional study

Fifty-three children with CF

 

Pre-pubertal males with CF had greater trabecular vBMD and total vBMD at 4 % tibia, and greater total vBMD at 4 % radius. Pre-pubertal females with CF had greater total vBMD at 66 % tibia and radius, and cortical vBMD at the radius. At puberty, the CF cohort had less BMC at 4 % tibia, and smaller muscleCSA at 66 % tibia. Pubertal CF females had a smaller bone CSA at 4 % tibia, and lower SSI at the tibia and radius sites.

Brookes DS et al., 2015 [99]

Obesity

Cross-sectional study

18 lean and 18 obese children

 

In obese children, radial cortical porosity, cortical pore diameter, tibial trabecular thickness was lower, whereas trabecular number was higher.

Dimitri P et al., 2015 [177]

 

Cross-sectional study

68 subjects with early-onset severe obesity

73 normal-weight controls

In men CoTh in proximal radius together with Tot CSA and SSI in diaphyseal tibia favored the obese over controls, while no difference was observed in other characteristics. In women, most bone characteristics were consistently higher in obese subjects compared with controls.

Viljakainen HT et al., 2015 [178]

Klinefelter syndrome and anorchia

Cross-sectional study

20 young adults (12 KS, 8 anorchia)

 

Reduced tibial CoA and CoTh. Lean mass was positively associated with tibial CoA and radial total, trabecular, and volumetric density.

[Wong SC et al., 2015] [143]

SHOX mutation carriers

Cross-sectional study

22 SHOX mutation carriers

22 controls

Despite a different bone geometry in radius and tibia, subjects with a SHOX mutation presented no differences in BMD or failure load compared to controls, suggesting that mutations in SHOX gene may affect bone microarchitecture albeit not bone strength

Frederiksen AL et al. 2014 [149]

Turner syndrome

Cross-sectional study

22 Turner girls

21 unaffected females

According to pQCT of the radius, total vBMD Z-score and trabecular vBMD Z-score were not significantly different between the TS group and controls. A significant reduction in cortical vBMD and a trend in CoTh at the proximal radius in the TS group suggests that cortical density may be reduced with sparing of trabecular bone, possibily predisposing to fracture

Holroyd CR et al., 2010 [139]

Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE)

 

56 female patients

 

Tb.BMD and SLICC/ACR-DI were independent risk factors for vertebral fracture. JSLE patients present bone microstructure and strength deficits, particularly at the distal radius.

Paupitz JA et al., 2016 [113]

 

Longitudinal study

56 JSLE patients

 

JSLE subjects present a reduced peak bone mass with high risk of osteoporosis in early adulthood. JSLE patients had significantly lower TrabBMD, SSI, but not muscleCSA and CBA values, while CortBMD and fatCSA were significantly increased. At longitudinal evaluation, TrabBMD, fatCSA, but not muscleCSA and CBA, remained lower in patients, but SSI and CortBMD did not differ from controls.

Stagi S et al., 2014 [114, 115]

Hemophilia A and B

Cross-sectional study

18 patients with hemophilia A and hemophilia B ($18 year old)

 

Lower nondominant distal tibia and radius totalBMD, trabecular BMD, and corticalBMD. In addition, PWH had significantly lower Tb.N in the distal tibia, but not radius, and increased Tb.Sp at both tibia and radius. Ct.Th was significantly lower at both sites, but not Ct.Po.

Lee A et al., 2015 [179]

Neurofibromatosis 1

Cross-sectional study

18 children with NF1

 

Trabecular density was more severely compromised than cortical. Peripheral QCT-derived estimates of bone strength and resistance to bending and stress were poorer among children with NF1

[Armstrong L et al., 2013] [145]

Crohn’s disease

Cross-sectional study

65 CD patients

650 reference partecipants

pQCT in CD showed a marked reduction of trabecular vBMD and cortical dimensions at diagnosis; while the trabecular vBMD improved significantly diagnosis and treatment of CD, deficits in cortical dimensions progressed

Tsampalieros A et al., 2014 [101]

 

Cross-sectional study

10 CD patients

 

pQCT and DXA revealed important differences in the associations with auxological and disease-related factors, indicating that the measures of spine BMD may not capture disease and treatment effects on trabecular bone in IBD patients

Werkstetter KJ et al., 2013 [102]

Hypovitaminosis D

Cross-sectional study

333 girls, 230 boys

 

In girls, aBMD and BMC of femoral necks, CoA, CoTh, total vBMD, and trabecular thickness were significantly correlated with 25(OH)VitD levels. In boys, aBMD of bilateral femoral necks, BMC of the dominant femoral neck, CoA, CoTh, total vBMD, trabecular vBMD, BV/TV, and trabecular separation were significantly correlated with 25(OH)Vit-D levels.

Cheung TF et al., 2016 [168]

Nephrotic Syndrome

Cross-sectional study

29 affected children

29 healthy controls

Bone CSA was greater in NS group at both the metaphysis and diaphysis (p = 0.014); greater endosteal and periosteal circumferences (both p < 0.01), resulting in reduced CoTh (p = 0.018), but similar cortical CSA (p = 0.22).

Moon RJ et al., 2014 [131]

 

Cross-sectional study

56 NS children

>650 reference partecipants

GC therapy was associated with increases in CortBMD-Z, potentially related to suppressed bone formation and greater mineralization. Conversely, greater expansion of CortArea-Z was associated with declines in CortBMD-Z in NS.

Tsampalieros A et al., 2013 [128]

CKD

Cross-sectional study

88 CKD cases

>650 controls

LS and WB DXA suggested greater trabecular BMD and lower cortical BMC in CKD, consistent with pQCT results. LS-BMD-Z and TrbBMD-Z were greater in CKD, while WBBMC-Z (p < 0.0001) and CortBMC-Z (p < 0.0001) were lower than controls.

Griffin LM et al., 2012 [127]

Moreover, some longitudinal studies [105, 114, 115, 126, 150] have shown correlations between bone features assessed by pQCT and disease behaviour or treatments; this technique, besides describing structural changes over time, permits a better clinical follow-up. In literature, the only randomized placebo-controlled trial which used pQCT outcomes to evaluate bone health in paediatric chronic diseases regards children with Crohn’s disease [37].

Therefore, while many data have been produced about the impact of growth and body composition deficits on skeletal health and characteristics, a consensus on how to account for these important factors and interpret their effects is not yet available.

Below, a synthesis of retrospective studies conducted in children and adolescents with chronic diseases by using pQCT is reported.

Cystic fibrosis (CF)

With rising life expectancy, CF has been associated with an increased prevalence of low BMD [151, 152]. However, whereas well-recognized in adults, osteopenia and increased fracture rates due to CF are not well-characterized in paediatric age. Subjects with CF show a reduced aBMD, or BMC when adjusted for lean tissue mass (LTM, proxy for muscle) [97, 153]: while prior to puberty, BMC is not compromised for the associated LTM, however, lower BMC for LTM emerged in pubertal females [153]. Besides, we have clear evidence suggesting that bone mineral gain is reduced compared to normal accretion rates during adolescent growth, potentially leading to a suboptimal PBM [153155]. Additionally, CF specific factors cause reduced areal BMD, such as malnutrition and vitamin D deficiency secondary to pancreatic insufficiency, immobility, corticosteroid therapy and chronic inflammation [151, 152, 156].

A study conducted in children with CF showed that they had lower weight-, height-, BMI-, and whole LBM-Z and tibial length; in CF females, after adjustment for BMI-Z-score and muscleCSA, lower total and trabecular vBMD was shown, whereas the males had lower cortical, muscleCSA, and fatCSA, and their trabecular vBMD deficit approached significance. The occurrence of these differences in CF youth highlights the importance of instituting measures to optimize peak bone mass early in the course of CF [157].

In another study, CF patients showed lower whole body BMC (WBBMC) than controls with larger differences at older ages. Periosteal and endosteal circumferences were smaller in CF. Positive relationships of CoA and bone strength with age were attenuated with CF. Children with CF have similar WBBMC relative to lean mass as controls. Cortical bone area and bone strength were less in CF group compared to controls, with greater differences in older children [98].

Finally, another study evaluating pQCT parameters in children and adolescents with CF, showed that pre-pubertal males had greater trabecular vBMD and total vBMD at 4 % tibia, and greater total vBMD at 4 % radius. Pre-pubertal females with CF had greater total vBMD at 66 % tibia and radius, and cortical vBMD at the radius. At puberty, the CF cohort had less BMC at 4 % tibia, and smaller muscleCSA at 66 % tibia. Pubertal CF females had a smaller bone CSA at 4 % tibia, and lower SSI at the tibia and radius sites. Bone strength parameters were not compromised prior to puberty in this CF cohort. At puberty, the bone phenotype changed for this CF cohort, showing several deficits compared to the controls. However, bone strength was adapting to the mechanical demands of the muscle [99].

Inflammatory bowel diseases

In literature we have found only four papers regarding pQCT in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), mainly paediatric populations of Crohn’s disease (CD) [101, 102, 104, 105]. CD and ulcerative colitis patients present multiple risk factors responsible for an impaired bone accrual, such as poor growth, delayed pubertal development, malnutrition, cachexia [158]. Moreover, elevated inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 [159, 160], as well as glucocorticoid therapy impair bone formation, causing reduced BMD [161].

Most of the previous studies of BMD in IBD has been relied using DXA [162165], and children with CD diagnosis should undergo DXA assessment of lumbar spine BMD at diagnosis, and annually thereafter [166].

Studies using pQCT in CD showed a marked reduction of trabecular vBMD and cortical dimensions at diagnosis [105]. Therefore, in these patients, following diagnosis and treatment of pediatric CD, the trabecular vBMD improved significantly, whereas deficits in cortical dimensions progressed [105]. In a recent paper, the comparison of pQCT and DXA revealed important differences in the associations with auxological and disease-related factors, stressing the fact that the measures of spine BMD may not capture disease and treatment effects on trabecular bone in IBD patients [167].

Hypovitaminosis D

Vitamin D (25(OH)D) deficiency and insufficiency are highly prevalent among children and adolescents. 25(OH)D level is significantly correlated with bone density and bone quality key parameters. Further interventional studies are warranted to define the role of vitamin D supplementation for the improvement of bone health among adolescents. Three hundred thirty-three girls and 230 boys (12–16 years old) with normal health were recruited in summer and winter separately from local schools. Serum 25(OH)D level, bone density and quality parameters by DXA and HR-pQCT, dietary calcium intake, and physical activity level were assessed. Sixty-four point seven percent and 11.4 % of subjects resulted insufficient [25(OH)D ≤ 50 nmol/L] and deficient [25(OH)D <25 nmol/L], respectively. The mean level of serum 25(OH)D in summer was significantly higher than that in winter, without obvious gender difference. In girls, aBMD and BMC of bilateral femoral necks, CoA, CoTh, total vBMD, and trabecular thickness were significantly correlated with 25(OH)D levels. In boys, aBMD of bilateral femoral necks, BMC of the dominant femoral neck, CoA, CoTh, total vBMD, trabecular vBMD, BV/TV, and trabecular separation were significantly correlated with 25(OH)D levels [168].

Small-for-gestational-age patients

In a study evaluating with pQCT 46 preterm children (31 appropriate-for-gestational-age, AGA, and 15 small-for-gestational-age, SGA) at mean age 10.1 years and 27 years later, preterm AGA individuals had similar BMC and BMD height-adjusted Z-scores in adulthood compared to controls, whereas preterm SGA individuals had lower distal forearm BMC and BMD height-adjusted Z-scores in adulthood than both controls and preterm AGA individuals. Moreover, preterm SGA individuals had lower gain from childhood to adulthood in distal forearm BMC height-adjusted Z-scores than controls. In tibial CSA Z-score and SSI Z-score, where all measurements were lower than controls. Preterm SGA individuals are at increased risk of reaching low adult bone mass, at least partly due to a deficit in the accrual of bone mineral during growth. In our cohort, we were unable to find a similar risk in preterm AGA individuals [169].

Obesity

In 135 girls and 123 boys some authors have studied whether greater pre-pubertal adiposity (defined as BMI ≥ 85th percentile for age and sex) was associated with subsequent timing of maturation and bone strength during adolescence. BMI was negatively associated with age of maturation. Overweight (OW) versus healthy-weight (HW) girls had significantly greater SSI, while OW versus HW boys had significantly greater bone strength at the tibia and femoral neck, but not radius. Analyses were repeated using biological age, which yielded reduced parameter estimates for girls but similar results for boys. Differences were no longer present following adjustment for lean mass in girls while differences at the tibia were sustained in boys. These findings demonstrate sex- and site-specific differences in the associations between adiposity, maturation and bone strength [170].

Interestingly, childhood overweight appear to be consistently associated with larger long bone cross-sections in both sexes. However, overweight in childhood may also lead to higher trabecular density in women and somewhat lower cortical density in men. Specific mechanisms underlying these associations are not known.

Total cross-sectional (ToA) and CoA at the distal and shaft sites and cortical (shaft CoD) and trabecular (distal TrD) bone density of the nonweight-bearing radius and weight-bearing tibia were evaluated with pQCT. Despite being taller in adolescence, the adult body height of overweight children was similar. In both sexes, childhood overweight was consistently associated with 5-10 % larger ToA at all bone sites measured in adulthood. CoA did not show such a consistent pattern. Women, who were overweight in childhood, had ~5 % denser TrD with no difference in CoD. In contrast, TrD in men who were overweight in childhood was not different, but their CoD was ~1 % lower [171]. In another study involving 302 NW and 143 OW children, at baseline, all bone measures (bone area, total BMD, bone strength index [BSI], SSI, and muscleCSA were significantly greater in OW compared with HW children, with the exception of BMDcort. Over 16 months, total BMD increased more in the OW children, SSI was low when adjusted for body fat in the OW group, suggesting that in OW children bone strength may be not adapt to body fat excess [172].

HIV infection

A study involving 31 perinatally HIV-infected youth aged 3–18 years, used pQCT assessing muscleCSA, total and cortical bone area, cortical BMD and thickness and SSI at the tibial shaft. Thirty and 18 participants returned at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At baseline, height and muscleCSA were reduced in HIV-infected patients. BMC Z-scores adjusted for height and lean mass were lower than controls at all sites except the lumbar spine. Bone area and SSI Z-scores were not different from zero after adjusting for tibial length and muscleCSA. In contrast, cortical BMD Z-scores were greater in HIV-infected youth. Z-scores for all bone outcomes showed positive trends over time in those subjects. Although HIV infection may be associated with bone mass deficits during growth, bone geometry and strength appear adapted to muscle force. Further, deficits in bone mass may dissipate over time in this population [150].

SHOX deficiency

Short-stature homeobox (SHOX) gene haploinsufficiency may cause skeletal dysplasia including Léri–Weill Dyschondrosteosis (LWD), a syndrome presenting the triad of low height, mesomelic disproportion and Madelung’s deformity of the wrist. Bone microarchitecture and estimated strength in adult SHOX mutation carriers have not been examined.

Twenty two SHOX mutation carriers’ bone status weas compared to 22 healthy subjects by DXA and pQCT. Areal BMD and T-scores showed no significant differences between cases and controls. Total radius area was smaller in cases than controls (p < 0.01). Radius cortical bone area (p = 0.01) and thickness (p < 0.01) as well as total density (p < 0.01) were higher in SHOX mutation carriers compared to controls. Radius trabecular bone area were smaller in SHOX mutation carriers. Tibia trabecular thickness was lower in cases (p = 0.01). These results remained significant after adjustment for differences in body height and when restricting analyses to females. There were no differences in BMD, radius and tibia cortical porosity or FEA failure load between groups. A segment of cortical bone defect was identified in the distal radius adjacent to ulna in five unrelated SHOX mutation carriers. Despite a different bone geometry in radius and tibia, subjects with a SHOX mutation presented no differences in BMD or failure load compared to controls, suggesting that mutations in SHOX gene may have an impact on bone microarchitecture albeit not bone strength [149].

Turner syndrome

In 22 girls with Turner syndrome (TS) pQCT of the radius showed that total vBMD Z-score and trabecular vBMD Z-score were not significantly different between the TS group and controls. A significant reduction in cortical vBMD and a trend in CoTh at the proximal radius was noted in the TS group, suggesting that cortical density may be reduced with sparing of trabecular bone, possibly predisposing to fracture [139].

Cushing syndrome

Whether higher production of glucocorticoids (GCs) within the physiological range may affect bone status in healthy children is unknown. Because dietary protein intake affects both bone and GCs, we examined the association of urinary measures of glucocorticoid status and cortical bone in healthy non-obese children, after assessment of protein intake. Subjects studied (n = 175, 87 males, aged 6 to 18 years) had two 24-h urine samples collected. After controlling for several covariates and especially urinary nitrogen (the biomarker of protein intake) cortisol secretion ∑C21 was inversely associated with all analyzed pQCT measures of bone quality. ∑C21 also predicted a higher endosteal and lower periosteal circumference, explaining both a smaller CoA and, together with lower BMD, a lower SSI. Therefore higher GC levels, even within the physiological range, appear to exert negative influences on bone modeling and remodeling during growth. Our physiological data also suggest a relevant role of cortisone as the direct source for intracrine-generated cortisol by bone cell 11beta-HSD1 [173].

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)

Children with rheumatic diseases showed significantly reduced trabecular bone mineral density and total BMD in comparison to controls, whereas cortical BMD did not differ significantly between the groups. BMD did not correlate with duration of disease or steroid medication [109].

Children with JIA have decreased skeletal size, muscle mass, trabecular bone density, cortical bone geometry, and strength. Not surprisingly, these bone abnormalities are more pronounced in children with greater disease severity. In fact, in a study involving 48 children with JIA, a decreased tibia trabecular bone density, cortical bone size and strength, and muscle mass was reported. The tibia diaphysis was narrower with decreased muscle mass, but normal, size-adjusted bone mineral in all subtypes indicated a localized effect of bone JIA. Patients exposed to glucocorticoids and MTX or to glucocorticoids or MTX alone had greatly reduced trabecular density, cortical bone geometry properties, BMC, muscle mass, and bone strength [49].

Another study evaluating tibia pQCT in 101 JIA patients and 830 healthy control subjects, disclosed that muscleCSA and SSI Z-scores were significantly lower in patients with polyarticular JIA and those with SpA. Trabecular vBMD Z-scores were significantly lower in patients with polyarticular JIA, those with systemic JIA, and those with SpA. Significant predictors of musculoskeletal deficits included active arthritis in the previous 6 months (muscleCSA), temporomandibular joint disease (muscleCSA and SSI), functional disability (muscleCSA and vBMD), short stature (vBMD), infliximab exposure (vBMD), and JIA duration (SSI). The SSI was significantly reduced relative to muscleCSA in patients with JIA after adjustment for age and limb length. Marked deficits in vBMD and bone strength occur in JIA in association with severe and longstanding disease. Contrary to the findings of previous studies, bone deficits were greater than expected relative to the muscleCSA, which illustrates the importance of adjusting for age and bone length [108].

Finally, in a study evaluating 245 children, adolescents, and young adults, 166 of whom longitudinally evaluated, showed that, in comparison with controls, JIA patients presented musculoskeletal deficits, with significantly lower levels of trabecular bone mineral density (TrabBMD), muscleCSA, and SSI. In contrast, JIA showed fatCSA significantly higher than controls [14].

Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE)

In 56 female JSLE patients, reduced density and strength parameters and microarchitecture alterations of cortical and trabecular bones were observed. Patients with vertebral fracture (VF) exhibited a significant decrease in trabecular bone parameters solely at the distal radius (Total.BMD; Trabecular.BMD [TrbBMD]; bone volume (BV)/trabecular volume (TV); apparent modulus) and higher scores for disease damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR-DI)). A logistic regression univariate analysis revealed that TrbBMD and SLICC/ACR-DI were independent risk factors for VF, The study demonstrates bone microstructure and strength deficits in JSLE patients, particularly at the distal radius, and the association between VF and trabecular radius alterations [113].

In another study, involving fifty-six patients with JSLE (mean age 18.5 ± 5.7 years), 46 of these longitudinally revaluated and compared with age- and sex- matched healthy controls, disclosed that JSLE patients had significantly lower TrbBMD, SSI, but not muscleCSA and CBA values, while CortBMD and fatCSA were significantly increased. At longitudinal evaluation, TrbBMD, fatCSA, but not muscleCSA and CBA, remained lower in patients, but SSI and CortBMD were not significantly different between patients and controls. JSLE subjects present a reduced peak bone mass with high risk of osteoporosis in early adulthood. To reduce the risk, close monitoring of BMD, better control of disease activity, physical exercise and dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D are advocated to ameliorate the loss of bone mass. In patients with proved osteoporosis, therapeutic approaches including bisphosphonates should be considered [114]. In fact, in a recent study evaluating 43 JSLE patients, 138 JIA patients and 79 controls, JSLE patients had a higher CortBMD than controls and JIA patients. However, JSLE and JIA patients had a significantly reduced TrbBMD compared to controls, with no differences between JSLE and JIA. In addition, JIA patients showed a significantly reduced muscleCSA compared to JSLE and controls. Conversely, fatCSA was significantly increased both in JIA and JSLE patients when compared to controls, with no differences between the JSLE and JIA groups. Analogous results were observed in the polar resistance to stress (SSI). On longitudinal evaluation, contrary to CortBMD, the difference between BMAD SDS, TrbBMD, muscleCSA and fatCSA remains unchanged; in JSLE patients, SSI is stable in comparison to JIA and controls without any difference between the two groups. The evaluation of bone density and structure parameters in JSLE patients highlights significant differences compared with JIA patients and controls. These data might indicate a different pathogenesis of bone damage in the two entities, and suggest a different diagnostic and therapeutic approach to improve the peak bone mass [115].

Hemophilia A and B

Children with haemophilia are at risk of suboptimal bone mass accrual and low BMD. We recently demonstrated that although BMD in Finnish haemophilic children was within the normal range, their whole-body BMD was significantly lower and hypercalciuria more prevalent than in controls. A case-control study aimed to assess bone structure and strength by pQCT at radius in 29 physically active haemophilic children (mean age 12.2 years) and 46 age-matched controls. Children with haemophilia had decreased total BMD Z-score at the distal radius (P ≤ 0.001), but increased cortical bone density at the proximal radius (P ≤ 0.001). Total bone area at the proximal radius was significantly lower in patients (P = 0.002), whereas there were no differences in cortical bone area or in polar SSI, between the patients and controls. Patients with mild to moderate haemophilia and on-demand treatment had inferior bone strength compared to those with moderate to severe haemophilia and prophylaxis. Altered skeletal development in haemophilic patients assessed in the radius, resulted in smaller bone size and higher cortical bone density. Importantly, bone strength at the radius appears equal to healthy children, therefore exercise seems to have a beneficial effect on bone health in these patients [118].

Nephrotic syndrome

Twenty nine children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) compared to 29 age- and sex- matched healthy controls, presented similar height, but a higher weight (p = 0.022) and a greater body fat percentage SDS (p = 0.008). Tibial trabecular and cortical vBMD were similar between the two groups but bone CSA was significantly greater in NS group at both the metaphysis and diaphysis (p = 0.014). Endosteal and periosteal circumferences were greater in children with NS than controls (both p < 0.01), resulting in reduced CoTh (p = 0.018), but similar cortical CSA. There were no associations between cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) exposure, duration of NS or number of relapses and any bone parameter. Tibial bone CSA was increased in children with NS, and this could be interpreted as a compensatory response to increased body weight. Defects in trabecular BMD were not identified in this cohort of children with NS [131].

A recent study aimed to examine changes in vBMD and cortical structure over 1 year in 56 NS children and to identify associations with concurrent GC exposure and growth. Tibia pQCT scans were obtained at enrolment, and at 6 and 12 months. Sex, race, and age-specific Z-scores were generated for trabecular vBMD (TrbBMD-Z), cortical vBMD (CortBMD-Z), and cortical area (CortArea-Z) based on >650 reference participants. CortArea-Z was further adjusted for tibia length-for-age Z-score. Quasi-least squares regression was used to identify determinants of changes in pQCT Z-scores. At enrolment, mean TrbBMD-Z (-0.54 ± 1.32) was significantly lower (p = 0.0001) and CortBMD-Z (0.73 ± 1.16, p < 0.0001) and CortArea-Z (0.27 ± 0.91, p = 0.03) significantly greater in NS versus reference participants. Fortyeight (86 %) participants were treated with GC over the study interval (median dose 0.29 mg/kg/day). On average, TrbBMD-Z and CortBMD-Z did not change significantly; however, CortArea-Z decreased (p = 0.003). Greater GC dose (p < 0.001), lesser increases in tibia length (p < 0.001), and lesser increases in CortArea-Z (p = 0.003) were independently associated with greater increases in CortBMD-Z. Greater increases in tibia length were associated with greater declines in CortArea-Z (p < 0.01), unlike in reference participants (interaction p < 0.02). Thus, GC therapy was associated with increases in CortBMD-Z, potentially related to suppressed bone formation and greater secondary mineralization. Conversely, greater growth and expansion of CortArea-Z (ie, new bone formation) were associated with declines in CortBMD-Z. Greater linear growth was associated with impaired expansion of CoA in NS [128].

In another study regarding stage 4–5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) children, LS and WB DXA and tibia pQCT scans were obtained in 88 cases and >650 healthy controls, aged 5–21 years. Sex- and race-specific Z-scores were generated for BMD and BMC by DXA, relative to age and adjusted for height Z-score (LS-BMD-Z and WBBMC-Z), and compared to pQCT TrbBMD-Z for age and CortBMC-Z for age and tibia length. LS-BMD-Z (p < 0.0001) and TrbBMD-Z (p < 0.0001) were greater in CKD, and WBBMC-Z (p < 0.0001) and CortBMC-Z (p < 0.0001) were lower, compared to controls. Z-scores were correlated at trabecular (LS-BMD-Z and TrbBMD-Z: R = 0.36) and cortical (WBBMC-Z and CortBMC-Z: R = 0.64) sites in CKD, similarly to controls. LS and WB DXA suggested greater trabecular BMD and lower cortical BMC in CKD, consistent with pQCT results; however, correlations were modest. Studies are needed to identify methods that predict fracture in childhood CKD [127].

Conclusions

The employment of pQCT has been shown to allow an accurate assessment and follow-up of bone status in several chronic inflammatory diseases in developmental age (see Table 1) [180]. Due to its negligible radiation exposure and its ability to characterize appendicular bone geometry, compartmental density and strength, and to study fat and muscle composition of limbs, as schematized in Table 2, pQCT, may represent a valid functional approach to monitor the beneficial and harmful effects of drug therapies, diet and exercise, as well as the disease outcome on bone health.
Table 2

Pros and cons of pQCT for bone health evaluation in developmental age [180]

Advantages of pQCT

Disadvantages of pQCT

Measure of bone geometry : marrow and cortical Cross-Sectional Area (CSA), Cortical Thickness (CoTh), periosteal and endosteal circumference.

Evaluation of only appendicular bone with low turnover (radius and tibia).

Distinct obtainment of Trabecular and Cortical BMD values

Low spatial resolution.

Good accurancy and precision.

Exact repositioning of the extremity required in follow-up.

Low radiation dose (≈3 μSv per scan), especially important in children.

Scarce data available about pQCT –based fracture risk.

Functional evaluation of pediatric bone diseases, through muscle and fat measures and biomechanical bone parameters provided.

 

Abbreviations

%BF: 

Percent body fat (%)

aBMD: 

Areal bone mineral density

AD-SoS: 

Amplitude-dependent speed of sound

BMAD: 

Bone mineral apparent density

BMD: 

Bone mineral density

BMI: 

Body mass index

BTT: 

Bone transmission time

CBA: 

Cortical bone area

CortBMD: 

Cortical bone mineral density

DXA: 

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

ERA: 

Enthesitis-related arthritis

fatCSA: 

fat cross-sectional area

JIA: 

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

muscleCSA: 

muscle cross-sectional area

PBM: 

Peak bone mass

pQCT: 

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography

QUS: 

Quantitative ultrasonography

SDS: 

Standard deviation scores

SSI: 

Density-weighted polar section modulus

TotBMD: 

Total bone mineral density

TrbBMD: 

Trabecular bone mineral density

vBMD: 

Volumetric BMD

Declarations

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors’ contributions

SS, LC and TC conceived the manuscript, wrote the draft of the manuscript and critically reviewed it. MdM and MLB wrote parts of the manuscript, provided comments on the manuscript for important intellectual content, critically reviewed it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Health Sciences Department, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children’s University Hospital
(2)
Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Endocrinology Unit, University of Florence
(3)
Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Emergency and Digestive Surgery with Oncological and Functional Address Unit, University of Florence

References

  1. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton 3rd LJ. Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:1001–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Riggs BL, Melton 3rd LJ. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone. 1995;17(5 Suppl):505S–11S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anonymous. Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1993;94:646–50.Google Scholar
  5. Lochmüller EM, Müller R, Kuhn V, Lill CA, Eckstein F. Can novel clinical densitometric techniques replace or improve DXA in predicting bone strength in osteoporosis at the hip and other skeletal sites? J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:906–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckstein F, Wunderer C, Boehm H, Kuhn V, Priemel M, Link TM, Lochmüller EM. Reproducibility and side differences of mechanical tests for determining the structural strength of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:379–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Felsenberg D, Gowin W, Diessel E, Armbrust S, Mews J. Recent developments in DXA. Quality of new DXA/MXA-devices for densitometry and morphometry. Eur J Radiol. 1995;20:179–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. MacNeil JA, Boyd SK. Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. Med Eng Phys. 2007;29:1096–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldstein SA. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J Biomech. 1987;20:1055–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mosekilde L. Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture--assessed by a new method. Bone. 1988;9:247–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Parfitt AM. Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. Am J Med. 1987;82:68–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Müller R, Hannan M, Smith SY, Bauss F. Intermittent ibandronate preserves bone quality and bone strength in the lumbar spine after 16 months of treatment in the ovariectomized cynomolgus monkey. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1787–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Turner CH, Cowin SC, Rho JY, Ashman RB, Rice JC. The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. J Biomech. 1990;23:549–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Stagi S, Cavalli L, Signorini C, Bertini F, Cerinic MM, Brandi ML, Falcini F. Bone mass and quality in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: longitudinal evaluation of bone mass determinants using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, and quantitative ultrasonography. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:R83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Rauch F, Tutlewski B, Fricke O, Rieger-Wettengl G, Schauseil-Zipf U, Herkenrath P, Neu CM, Schoenau E. Analysis of cancellous bone turnover by multiple slice analysis at distal radius: a study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Densitom. 2001;4:257–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Schoenau E, Neu CM, Mokov E, Wassmer G, Manz F. Influence of puberty on muscle area and cortical bone area of the forearm in boys and girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:1095–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Muhit AA, Arora S, Ogawa M, Ding Y, Zbijewski W, Stayman JW, Thawait G, Packard N, Senn R, Yang D, Yorkston J, Bingham III CO, Means K, Carrino JA, Siewerdsen JH. Peripheral Quantitative CT (pQCT) using a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT scanner. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2013;8672:867203.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Prevrhal S, Engelke K, Genant HK. Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography. In: Radiology of Osteoporosis, Grampp S (ed.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003; pp 115–129.Google Scholar
  19. Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, Augat P, Bogado CE, Bouxsein ML, Felsenberg D, Ito M, Prevrhal S, Hans DB, Lewiecki EM. Position statement clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:123–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Burghardt AJ, Pialat JB, Kazakia GJ, Boutroy S, Engelke K, Patsch JM, Valentinitsch A, Liu D, Szabo E, Bogado CE, Zanchetta MB, McKay HA, Shane E, Boyd SK, Bouxsein ML, Chapurlat R, Khosla S, Majumdar S. Multicenter precision of cortical and trabecular bone quality measures assessed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:524–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Tjong W, Kazakia GJ, Burghardt AJ, Majumdar S. The effect of voxel size on high-resolution peripheral computed tomography measurements of trabecular and cortical bone microstructure. Med Phys. 2012;39:1893–903.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. MacNeil JA, Boyd SK. Improved reproducibility of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:792–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sekhon K, Kazakia GJ, Burghardt AJ, Hermannsson B, Majumdar S. Accuracy of volumetric bone mineral density measurement in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2009;45:473–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Cheung AM, Adachi JD, Hanley DA, Kendler DL, Davison KS, Josse R, Brown JP, Ste-Marie LG, Kremer R, Erlandson MC, Dian L, Burghardt AJ, Boyd SK. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for the assessment of bone strength and structure: a review by the Canadian Bone Strength Working Group. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;2:136–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Engelke K, Stampa B, Timm W, Dardzinski B, de Papp AE, Genant HK, Fuerst T. Short-term in vivo precision of BMD and parameters of trabecular architecture at the distal forearm and tibia. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:2151–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pialat JB, Burghardt AJ, Sode M, Link TM, Majumdar S. Visual grading of motion induced image degradation in high resolution peripheral computed tomography: impact of image quality on measures of bone density and micro-architecture. Bone. 2012;50:111–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sode M, Burghardt AJ, Pialat JB, Link TM, Majumdar S. Quantitative characterization of subject motion in HR-pQCT images of the distal radius and tibia. Bone. 2011;48:1291–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Pauchard Y, Liphardt AM, Macdonald HM, Hanley DA, Boyd SK. Quality control for bone quality parameters affected by subject motion in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2012;50:1304–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16 Suppl 2:S3–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bachrach LK. Acquisition of optimal bone mass in childhood and adolescence. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2001;12:22–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Timpson NJ, Sayers A, Davey-Smith G, Tobias JH. How does body fat influence bone mass in childhood? A Mendelian randomization approach. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:522–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Paternoster L, Lorentzon M, Vandenput L, Karlsson MK, Ljunggren O, Kindmark A, Mellstrom D, Kemp JP, Jarett CE, Holly JM, Sayers A, St Pourcain B, Timpson NJ, Deloukas P, Davey Smith G, Ring SM, Evans DM, Tobias JH, Ohlsson C. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of cortical bone mineral density unravels allelic heterogeneity at the RANKL locus and potential pleiotropic effects on bone. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001217.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Skaggs DL, Loro ML, Pitukcheewanont P, Tolo V, Gilsanz V. Increased body weight and decreased radial cross-sectional dimensions in girls with forearm fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:1337–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cheng S, Xu L, Nicholson PH, Tylavsky F, Lyytikäinen A, Wang Q, Suominen H, Kujala UM, Kröger H, Alen M. Low volumetric BMD is linked to upper-limb fracture in pubertal girls and persists into adulthood: a seven-year cohort study. Bone. 2009;45:480–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Darelid A, Ohlsson C, Rudäng R, Kindblom JM, Mellström D, Lorentzon M. Trabecular volumetric bone mineral density is associated with previous fracture during childhood and adolescence in males: the GOOD study. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:537–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalkwarf HJ, Laor T, Bean JA. Fracture risk in children with a forearm injury is associated with volumetric bone density and cortical area (by peripheral QCT) and areal bone density (by DXA). Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:607–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Leonard MB, Elmi A, Mostoufi-Moab S, Shults J, Burnham JM, Thayu M, Kibe L, Wetzsteon RJ, Zemel BS. Effects of sex, race, and puberty on cortical bone and the functional muscle bone unit in children, adolescents, and young adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1681–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Bonjour JP, Theintz G, Law F, Slosman D, Rizzoli R. Peak bone mass. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4 Suppl 1:7–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Soyka LA, Fairfield WP, Klibanski A. Clinical review 117: Hormonal determinants and disorders of peak bone mass in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:3951–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Chevalley T, Bonjour JP, Ferrari S, Rizzoli R. The influence of pubertal timing on bone mass acquisition: a predetermined trajectory detectable five years before menarche. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3424–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Cooper C, Fall C, Egger P, Hobbs R, Eastell R, Barker D. Growth in infancy and bone mass in later life. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:17–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Cooper C, Westlake S, Harvey N, Javaid K, Dennison E, Hanson M. Review: developmental origins of osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:337–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Cooper C, Eriksson JG, Forsén T, Osmond C, Tuomilehto J, Barker DJ. Maternal height, childhood growth and risk of hip fracture in later life: a longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:623–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. van Staa TP, Cooper C, Leufkens HG, Bishop N. Children and the risk of fractures caused by oral corticosteroids. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:913–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Foster BJ, Shults J, Zemel BS, Leonard MB. Interactions between growth and body composition in children treated with high-dose chronic glucocorticoids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:1334–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wetzsteon RJ, Shults J, Zemel BS, Gupta PU, Burnham JM, Herskovitz RM, Howard KM, Leonard MB. Divergent effects of glucocorticoids on cortical and trabecular compartment BMD in childhood nephrotic syndrome. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:503–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Augat P, Reeb H, Claes LE. Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:1356–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu D, Manske SL, Kontulainen SA, Tang C, Guy P, Oxland TR, McKay HA. Tibial geometry is associated with failure load ex vivo: a MRI, pQCT and DXA study. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:991–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Felin EM, Prahalad S, Askew EW, Moyer-Mileur LJ. Musculoskeletal abnormalities of the tibia in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:984–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Roth J, Palm C, Scheunemann I, Ranke MB, Schweizer R, Dannecker GE. Musculoskeletal abnormalities of the forearm in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis relate mainly to bone geometry. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1277–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ferretti JL, Cointry GR, Capozza RF, Frost HM. Bone mass, bone strength, muscle-bone interactions, osteopenias and osteoporoses. Mech Ageing Dev. 2003;124:269–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Cole ZA, Harvey NC, Kim M, Ntani G, Robinson SM, Inskip HM, Godfrey KM, Cooper C, Dennison EM, Southampton Women’s Survey Study Group. Increased fat mass is associated with increased bone size but reduced volumetric density in pre pubertal children. Bone. 2012;50:562–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Terpstra AM, Kalkwarf HJ, Shults J, Zemel BS, Wetzsteon RJ, Foster BJ, Strife CF, Foerster DL, Leonard MB. Bone density and cortical structure after pediatric renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:715–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Matarese G, Procaccini C, De Rosa V. At the crossroad of T cells, adipose tissue, and diabetes. Immunol Rev. 2012;249:116–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Procaccini C, Carbone F, Galgani M, et al. Obesity and susceptibility to autoimmune diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2011;7:287–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Mei M, Zhao L, Li Q, et al. Inflammatory stress exacerbates ectopic lipid deposition in C57BL/6J mice. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:110.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Pollock NK, Laing EM, Hamrick MW, Baile CA, Hall DB, Lewis RD. Bone and fat relationships in postadolescent black females: a pQCT study. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:655–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff’s law: the remodeling problem. Anat Rec. 1990;226:414–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Frost HM. The mechanostat: a proposed pathogenic mechanism of osteoporoses and the bone mass effects of mechanical and nonmechanical agents. Bone Miner. 1987;2:73–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Thompson D. On Growth and Form. abridgedth ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1961 (original edition published in 1917).Google Scholar
  61. Zanchetta JR, Plotkin H, Alvarez Filgueira ML. Bone mass in children: normative values for the 2-20-year-old population. Bone. 1995;16:393S–9S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Schiessl H, Frost HM, Jee WS. Estrogen and bone-muscle strength and mass relationships. Bone. 1998;22:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Schönau E, Werhahn E, Schiedermaier U, Mokow E, Schiessl H, Scheidhauer K, Michalk D. Influence of muscle strength on bone strength during childhood and adolescence. Horm Res. 1996;45 Suppl 1:63–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Anliker E, Toigo M. Functional assessment of the muscle-bone unit in the lower leg. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2012;12:46–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Lang I, Busche P, Rakhimi N, Rawer R, Martin DD. Mechanography in childhood: references for grip force, multiple one-leg hopping force and whole body stiffness. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013;13:227–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Miljkovic I, Cauley JA, Dressen AS, Gordon CL, Goodpaster BH, Kuller LH, Bunker CH, Patrick AL, Wheeler VW, Orwoll ES, Zmuda JM. Bioactive androgens and glucuronidated androgen metabolites are associated with subcutaneous and ectopic skeletal muscle adiposity among older black men. Metabolism. 2011;60:1178–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Woodhouse LJ, Gupta N, Bhasin M, et al. Dose-dependent effects of testosterone on regional adipose tissue distribution in healthy young men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:718–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Moyer-Mileur LJ, Xie B, Ball SD, Pratt T. Bone mass and density response to a 12-month trial of calcium and vitamin D supplement in preadolescent girls. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2003;3:63–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Fricke O, Tutlewski B, Stabrey A, Lehmkuhl G, Schöenau E. A cybernetic approach to osteoporosis in anorexia nervosa. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005;5:155–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Snow-Harter C, Bouxsein M, Lewis B, Charette S, Weinstein P, Marcus R. Muscle strength as a predictor of bone mineral density in young women. J Bone Miner Res. 1990;5:589–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Ruiz JC, Mandel C, Garabedian M. Influence of spontaneous calcium intake and physical exercise on the vertebral and femoral bone mineral density of children and adolescents. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;95:675–9.Google Scholar
  72. Schoenau E, Neu CM, Beck B, Manz F, Rauch F. Bone mineral content per muscle cross-sectional area as an index of the functional muscle-bone unit. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1095–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Weidauer LA, Binkley TL, Berry R, Specker BL. Variation in cortical density within the cortical shell of individuals across a range in densities and ages. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013;13:89–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Duckham RL, Baxter-Jones AD, Johnston JD, Vatanparast H, Cooper D, Kontulainen S. Does physical activity in adolescence have site-specific and sex-specific benefits on young adult bone size, content, and estimated strength? J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:479–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Detter F, Rosengren BE, Dencker M, Lorentzon M, Nilsson JÅ, Karlsson MK. A 6-year exercise program improves skeletal traits without affecting fracture risk: a prospective controlled study in 2621 children. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:1325–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, Hergenroeder AC, Must A, Nixon PA, Pivarnik JM, Rowland T, Trost S, Trudeau F. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005;146:732–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Janz KF, Letuchy EM, Burns TL, Francis SL, Levy SM. Muscle power predicts adolescent bone strength: Iowa bone development study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:2201–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Kontulainen S, Sievänen H, Kannus P, Pasanen M, Vuori I. Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:2281–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Fritz J, Duckham RL, Rantalainen T, Rosengren BE, Karlsson MK, Daly RM. Influence of a school-based physical activity intervention on cortical bone mass distribution: A 7-year intervention study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  80. Daly RM, Ducher G, Hill B, Telford RM, Eser P, Naughton G, Seibel MJ, Telford RD. Effects of a specialist-led, school physical education program on bone mass, structure, and strength in primary school children: a 4-year cluster randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:289–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Deere K, Sayers A, Rittweger J, Tobias JH. Habitual levels of high, but not moderate or low, impact activity are positively related to hip BMD and geometry: results from a population-based study of adolescents. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:1887–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Binkley TL, Specker BL, Wittig TA. Centile curves for bone densitometry measurements in healthy males and females ages 5-22 yr. J Clin Densitom. 2002;5:343–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Meiring RM, Avidon I, Norris SA, McVeigh JA. A two-year history of high bone loading physical activity attenuates ethnic differences in bone strength and geometry in pre-/early pubertal children from a low-middle income country. Bone. 2013;57:522–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Gómez-Bruton A, González-Agüero A, Gómez-Cabello A, Matute-Llorente A, Zemel BS, Moreno LA, Casajús JA, Vicente-Rodríguez G. Bone structure of adolescent swimmers; a peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) study. J Sci Med Sport. 2015:S1440-2440(15)00232-7.Google Scholar
  85. Damilakis J, Adams JE, Guglielmi G, Link TM. Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2707–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Gordon CL, Webber CE, Cottreau M. Radiation dose associated with peripheral quantitated computed tomography scanning in children. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:S302.Google Scholar
  87. Fonseca A, Gordon CL, Barr RD. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to assess bone health in children, adolescents, and young adults: a review of normative data. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013;35:581–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Neu CM, Manz F, Rauch F, Merkel A, Schoenau E. Bone densities and bone size at the distal radius in healthy children and adolescents: a study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2001;28:227–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Ashby RL, Ward KA, Roberts SA, Edwards L, Mughal MZ, Adams JE. A reference database for the Stratec XCT-2000 peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scanner in healthy children and young adults aged 6-19 years. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1337–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Moyer-Mileur LJ, Quick JL, Murray MA. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the tibia: pediatric reference values. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:283–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Rauch F, Schoenau E. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the proximal radius in young subjects--new reference data and interpretation of results. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2008;8:217–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Micklesfield LK, Norris SA, Pettifor JM. Determinants of bone size and strength in 13-year-old South African children: the influence of ethnicity, sex and pubertal maturation. Bone. 2011;48:777–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Zengin A, Pye SR, Cook MJ, Adams JE, Wu FC, O'Neill TW, Ward KA. Ethnic differences in bone geometry between White, Black and South Asian men in the UK. Bone. 2016;91:180–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Zemel B, Bass S, Binkley T, Ducher G, Macdonald H, McKay H, Moyer-Mileur L, Shepherd J, Specker B, Ward K, Hans D. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in children and adolescents: the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:59–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Paccou J, Edwards M, Moss C, Dennison E, Cooper C. High-resolution imaging of bone and joint architecture in rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med Bull. 2014;112:107–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Adams JE, Engelke K, Zemel BS, Ward KA, International Society of Clinical Densitometry. Quantitative computer tomography in children and adolescents: the 2013 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2014;17:258–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Kelly A, Schall JI, Stallings VA, Zemel BS. Deficits in bone mineral content in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis are related to height deficits. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:581–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Bai W, Binkley TL, Wallace JW, Carver Jr TW, Specker BL. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) bone measurements in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:28–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Brookes DS, Briody JN, Munns CF, Davies PS, Hill RJ. Cystic fibrosis-related bone disease in children: Examination of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) data. J Cyst Fibros. 2015;14:668–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. De Schepper J, Roggen I, Van Biervliet S, Robberecht E, Gies I, De Waele K, De Wachter E, Malfroot A, De Baets F, Toye K, Goemaere S, Louis O. Comparative bone status assessment by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral quantitative computed tomography and quantitative ultrasound in adolescents and young adults with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2012;11(2):119–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Tsampalieros A, Berkenstock MK, Zemel BS, Griffin L, Shults J, Burnham JM, Baldassano RN, Leonard MB. Changes in trabecular bone density in incident pediatric Crohn’s disease: a comparison of imaging methods. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:1875–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Werkstetter KJ, Schatz SB, Alberer M, Filipiak-Pittroff B, Koletzko S. Influence of exclusive enteral nutrition therapy on bone density and geometry in newly diagnosed pediatric Crohn’s disease patients. Ann Nutr Metab. 2013;63:10–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Werkstetter KJ, Pozza SB, Filipiak-Pittroff B, Schatz SB, Prell C, Bufler P, Koletzko B, Koletzko S. Long-term development of bone geometry and muscle in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:988–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Bechtold S, Alberer M, Arenz T, Putzker S, Filipiak-Pittroff B, Schwarz HP, Koletzko S. Reduced muscle mass and bone size in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:216–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Dubner SE, Shults J, Baldassano RN, Zemel BS, Thayu M, Burnham JM, Herskovitz RM, Howard KM, Leonard MB. Longitudinal assessment of bone density and structure in an incident cohort of children with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:123–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Bechtold S1, Ripperger P, Dalla Pozza R, Roth J, Häfner R, Michels H, Schwarz HP. Dynamics of body composition and bone in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis treated with Growth Hormon. J Clin Enocrinol Metab. 2010;95(1):178–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Burnham JM, Shults J, Dubner SE, Sembhi H, Zemel BS, Leonard MB. Bone density, structure, and strength in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: importance of disease severity and muscle deficits. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2518–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  108. Bechtold S, Simon D. Growth abnormalities in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(11):1483–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Lettgen B, Neudorf U, Hosse R, Peters S, Reiners C. Bone density in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases. Preliminary results of selective measurement of trabecular and cortical bone using peripheral computerized tomography. Klin Padiatr. 1996;208:114–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Müller HL, Schneider P, Bueb K, Etavard-Gorris N, Gebhardt U, Kolb R, Sörensen N. Volumetric bone mineral density in patients with childhood craniopharyngioma. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2003;111:168–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Kohler JA, Moon RJ, Sands R, Doherty LJ, Taylor PA, Cooper C, Dennison EM, Davies JH. Selective reduction in trabecular volumetric bone mineral density during treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Bone. 2012;51:765–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Mostoufi-Moab S, Brodsky J, Isaacoff EJ, Tsampalieros A, Ginsberg JP, Zemel B, Shults J, Leonard MB. Longitudinal assessment of bone density and structure in childhood survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial radiation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:3584–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  113. Paupitz JA, Lima GL, Alvarenga JC, Oliveira RM, Bonfa E, Pereira RM. Bone impairment assessed by HR-pQCT in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:1839–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Stagi S, Cavalli L, Bertini F, Matucci Cerinic M, Luisa Brandi M, Falcini F. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of bone mass and quality in children and young adults with juvenile onset systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE): role of bone mass determinants analyzed by DXA, PQCT and QUS. Lupus. 2014;23:57–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Stagi S, Cavalli L, Bertini F, Signorini C, Matucci Cerinic M, de Martino M, Brandi ML, Falcini F. Comparison of bone mass and quality determinants in adolescents and young adults with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Lupus. 2014;23:1392–406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Fung EB, Vichinsky EP, Kwiatkowski JL, Huang J, Bachrach LK, Sawyer AJ, Zemel BS. Characterization of low bone mass in young patients with thalassemia by DXA, pQCT and markers of bone turnover. Bone. 2011;48:1305–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Bagni B, Palazzi G, Bagni I, Caporali C, Froehlich W, Casolo A, Caputo C, Rossi S, Garetti E, Pansini F, Corazzari T, De Sanctis V, Massolo F. pQCT (quantitative peripheral tomography) and data evaluation of phosphocalcic metabolism in thalassaemic patients. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 1998;11 Suppl 3:791–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Ranta S, Viljakainen H, Mäkipernaa A, Mäkitie O. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) reveals alterations in the three-dimensional bone structure in children with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2012;18:955–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Soucek O, Komrska V, Hlavka Z, Cinek O, Rocek M, Zemkova D, Lebl J, Sumnik Z. Boys with haemophilia have low trabecular bone mineral density and sarcopenia, but normal bone strength at the radius. Haemophilia. 2012;18:222–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Saha MT, Sievänen H, Salo MK, Tulokas S, Saha HH. Bone mass and structure in adolescents with type 1 diabetes compared to healthy peers. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1401–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Bechtold S, Putzker S, Bonfig W, Fuchs O, Dirlenbach I, Schwarz HP. Bone size normalizes with age in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2046–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Moyer-Mileur LJ, Dixon SB, Quick JL, Askew EW, Murray MA. Bone mineral acquisition in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr. 2004;145:662–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Lettgen B, Hauffa B, Möhlmann C, Jeken C, Reiners C. Bone mineral density in children and adolescents with juvenile diabetes: selective measurement of bone mineral density of trabecular and cortical bone using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Horm Res. 1995;43:173–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Hegarty J, Mughal MZ, Adams J, Webb NJ. Reduced bone mineral density in adults treated with high-dose corticosteroids for childhood nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2005;68:2304–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Rüth EM, Weber LT, Schoenau E, Wunsch R, Seibel MJ, Feneberg R, Mehls O, Tönshoff B. Analysis of the functional muscle-bone unit of the forearm in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1694–706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Bacchetta J, Boutroy S, Vilayphiou N, Ranchin B, Fouque-Aubert A, Basmaison O, Cochat P. Bone assessment in children with chronic kidney disease: data from two new bone imaging techniques in a single-center pilot study. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26:587–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Griffin LM, Kalkwarf HJ, Zemel BS, Shults J, Wetzsteon RJ, Strife CF, Leonard MB. Assessment of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of bone health in pediatric chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27:1139–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  128. Tsampalieros A, Gupta P, Denburg MR, Shults J, Zemel BS, Mostoufi-Moab S, Wetzsteon RJ, Herskovitz RM, Whitehead KM, Leonard MB. Glucocorticoid effects on changes in bone mineral density and cortical structure in childhood nephrotic syndrome. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:480–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  129. Wesseling-Perry K, Bacchetta J. CKD-MBD after kidney transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26:2143–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  130. Wetzsteon RJ, Kalkwarf HJ, Shults J, Zemel BS, Foster BJ, Griffin L, Strife CF, Foerster DL, Jean-Pierre DK, Leonard MB. Volumetric bone mineral density and bone structure in childhood chronic kidney disease. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:2235–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  131. Moon RJ, Gilbert RD, Page A, Murphy L, Taylor P, Cooper C, Dennison EM, Davies JH. Children with nephrotic syndrome have greater bone area but similar volumetric bone mineral density to healthy controls. Bone. 2014;58:108–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Binkley T, Johnson J, Vogel L, Kecskemethy H, Henderson R, Specker B. Bone measurements by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr. 2005;147:791–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Lee DC, Gilsanz V, Wren TA. Limitations of peripheral quantitative computed tomography metaphyseal bone density measurements. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4248–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Ireland A, Rittweger J, Schönau E, Lamberg-Allardt C, Viljakainen H. Time since onset of walking predicts tibial bone strength in early childhood. Bone. 2014;68:76–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Gusso S, Munns CF, Colle P, Derraik JG, Biggs JB, Cutfield WS, Hofman PL. Effects of whole-body vibration training on physical function, bone and muscle mass in adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22518.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  136. Schweizer R, Martin DD, Haase M, Roth J, Trebar B, Binder G, Schwarze CP, Ranke MB. Similar effects of long-term exogenous growth hormone (GH) on bone and muscle parameters: a pQCT study of GH-deficient and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) children. Bone. 2007;41:875–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Bechtold S, Bachmann S, Putzker S, Dalla Pozza R, Schwarz HP. Early changes in body composition after cessation of growth hormone therapy in childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Densitom. 2011;14:471–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. González-Agüero A, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Gómez-Cabello A, Casajús JA. Cortical and trabecular bone at the radius and tibia in male and female adolescents with Down syndrome: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) study. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:1035–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Holroyd CR, Davies JH, Taylor P, Jameson K, Rivett C, Cooper C, Dennison EM. Reduced cortical bone density with normal trabecular bone density in girls with Turner syndrome. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:2093–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Gordon CM, Gordon LB, Snyder BD, Nazarian A, Quinn N, Huh S, Giobbie-Hurder A, Neuberg D, Cleveland R, Kleinman M, Miller DT, Kieran MW. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria is a skeletal dysplasia. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:1670–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Soucek O, Lebl J, Zapletalova J, Novotna D, Plasilova I, Kolouskova S, Zemkova D, Rocek M, Hlavka Z, Hirschfeldova K, Sumnik Z. Bone geometry and volumetric bone density at the radius in patients with isolated SHOX deficiency. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2013;121:109–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Streeten EA, Ramirez S, Eliades M, Jaimungal S, Chandrasekaran S, Kathleen R, Holmes Morton D, Puffenberger EG, Herskovitz R, Leonard MB. Fractures on bisphosphonates in osteoporosis pseudoglioma syndrome (OPPG): pQCT shows poor bone density and structure. Bone. 2015;77:17–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  143. Wong SC, Scott D, Lim A, Tandon S, Ebeling PR, Zacharin M. Mild deficits of cortical bone in young adults with klinefelter syndrome or anorchia treated with testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:3581–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Girschick HJ, Haubitz I, Hiort O, Schneider P. Long-term follow-up of bone mineral density in childhood hypophosphatasia. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:263–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Armstrong L, Jett K, Birch P, Kendler DL, McKay H, Tsang E, Stevenson DA, Hanley DA, Egeli D, Burrows M, Friedman JM. The generalized bone phenotype in children with neurofibromatosis 1: a sibling matched case-control study. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A:1654–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Stevenson DA, Viskochil DH, Carey JC, Slater H, Murray M, Sheng X, D'Astous J, Hanson H, Schorry E, Moyer-Mileur LJ. Tibial geometry in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 without anterolateral bowing of the lower leg using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2009;44:585–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Edouard T, Deal C, Van Vliet G, Gaulin N, Moreau A, Rauch F, Alos N. Muscle-bone characteristics in children with Prader-Willi syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E275–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Cheung M, Roschger P, Klaushofer K, Veilleux LN, Roughley P, Glorieux FH, Rauch F. Cortical and trabecular bone density in X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:E954–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Frederiksen AL, Hansen S, Brixen K, Frost M. Increased cortical area and thickness in the distal radius in subjects with SHOX-gene mutation. Bone. 2014;69:23–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Macdonald HM, Chu J, Nettlefold L, Maan EJ, Forbes JC, Côté H, Alimenti A, CIHR Emerging Team Grant on HIV Therapy and Aging (CARMA). Bone geometry and strength are adapted to muscle force in children and adolescents perinatally infected with HIV. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013;13:53–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Aris RM, Merkel PA, Bachrach LK, Borowitz DS, Boyle MP, Elkin SL, Guise TA, Hardin DS, Haworth CS, Holick MF, Joseph PM, O'Brien K, Tullis E, Watts NB, White TB. Guide to bone health and disease in cystic fibrosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:1888–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Sermet-Gaudelus I, Bianchi ML, Garabédian M, Aris RM, Morton A, Hardin DS, Elkin SL, Compston JE, Conway SP, Castanet M, Wolfe S, Haworth CS. European cystic fibrosis bone mineralisation guidelines. J Cyst Fibros. 2011;10 Suppl 2:S16–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Buntain HM, Schluter PJ, Bell SC, Greer RM, Wong JC, Batch J, Lewindon P, Wainwright CE. Controlled longitudinal study of bone mass accrual in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2006;61:146–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Bhudhikanok GS, Wang MC, Marcus R, Harkins A, Moss RB, Bachrach LK. Bone acquisition and loss in children and adults with cystic fibrosis: a longitudinal study. J Pediatr. 1998;133:18–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Bianchi ML, Romano G, Saraifoger S, Costantini D, Limonta C, Colombo C. BMD and body composition in children and young patients affected by cystic fibrosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:388–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Boyle MP. Update on maintaining bone health in cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2006;12:453–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Kelly A, Schall J, Stallings VA, Zemel BS. Trabecular and cortical bone deficits are present in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Bone. 2016;90:7–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Burnham JM, Shults J, Semeao E, Foster BJ, Zemel BS, Stallings VA, Leonard MB. Body-composition alterations consistent with cachexia in children and young adults with Crohn disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:413–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Gilbert L, He X, Farmer P, Boden S, Kozlowski M, Rubin J, Nanes MS. Inhibition of osteoblast differentiation by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Endocrinology. 2000;141:3956–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Sylvester FA, Wyzga N, Hyams JS, Gronowicz GA. Effect of Crohn’s disease on bone metabolism in vitro: a role for interleukin-6. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:695–702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. von Scheven E, Corbin KJ, Stagi S, Cimaz R. Glucocorticoid-associated osteoporosis in chronic inflammatory diseases: epidemiology, mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2014;12:289–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  162. Burnham JM, Shults J, Petit MA, Semeao E, Beck TJ, Zemel BS, Leonard MB. Alterations in proximal femur geometry in children treated with glucocorticoids for Crohn disease or nephrotic syndrome: impact of the underlying disease. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:551–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Burnham JM, Shults J, Semeao E, Foster B, Zemel BS, Stallings VA, Leonard MB. Whole body BMC in pediatric Crohn disease: independent effects of altered growth, maturation, and body composition. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1961–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Ahmed SF, Horrocks IA, Patterson T, Zaidi S, Ling SC, McGrogan P, Weaver LT. Bone mineral assessment by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in children with inflammatory bowel disease: evaluation by age or bone area. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;38:276–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Hill RJ, Brookes DS, Lewindon PJ, Withers GD, Ee LC, Connor FL, Cleghorn GJ, Davies PS. Bone health in children with inflammatory bowel disease: adjusting for bone age. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48:538–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Bishop N, Braillon P, Burnham J, Cimaz R, Davies J, Fewtrell M, Hogler W, Kennedy K, Mäkitie O, Mughal Z, Shaw N, Vogiatzi M, Ward K, Bianchi ML. Dual-energy X-ray aborptiometry assessment in children and adolescents with diseases that may affect the skeleton: the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:29–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Leonard MB, Shults J, Long J, Baldassano RN, Brown JK, Hommel K, Zemel BS, Mahboubi S, Howard Whitehead K, Herskovitz R, Lee D, Rausch J, Rubin CT. Effect of low-magnitude mechanical stimuli on bone density and structure in pediatric Crohn’s disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:1177–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Cheung TF, Cheuk KY, Yu FW, Hung VW, Ho CS, Zhu TY, Ng BK, Lee KM, Qin L, Ho SS, Wong GW, Cheng JC, Lam TP. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency among adolescents and its correlation with bone parameters using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:2477–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Buttazzoni C, Rosengren B, Tveit M, Landin L, Nilsson JÅ, Karlsson M. Preterm children born small for gestational age are at risk for low adult bone mass. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;98:105–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Glass NA, Torner JC, Letuchy EM, Burns TL, Janz KF, Eichenberger Gilmore JM, Schlechte JA, Levy SM. The relationship between greater prepubertal adiposity, subsequent age of maturation, and bone strength during adolescence. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:1455–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  171. Uusi-Rasi K, Laaksonen M, Mikkilä V, Tolonen S, Raitakari OT, Viikari J, Lehtimäki T, Kähönen M, Sievänen H. Overweight in childhood and bone density and size in adulthood. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:1453–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Wetzsteon RJ, Petit MA, Macdonald HM, Hughes JM, Beck TJ, McKay HA. Bone structure and volumetric BMD in overweight children: a longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1946–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Shi L, Sánchez-Guijo A, Hartmann MF, Schönau E, Esche J, Wudy SA, Remer T. Higher glucocorticoid secretion in the physiological range is associated with lower bone strength at the proximal radius in healthy children: importance of protein intake adjustment. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:240–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Yin MT, Lund E, Shah J, Zhang CA, Foca M, Neu N, Nishiyama KK, Zhou B, Guo XE, Nelson J, Bell DL, Shane E, Arpadi SM. Lower peak bone mass and abnormal trabecular and cortical microarchitecture in young men infected with HIV early in life. AIDS. 2014;28:345–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  175. dos Santos CV, Vieira Neto L, Madeira M, Alves Coelho MC, de Mendonça LM, Paranhos-Neto Fde P, Lima IC, Gadelha MR, Farias ML. Bone density and microarchitecture in endogenous hypercortisolism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;83:468–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  176. Putman MS, Milliren CE, Derrico N, Uluer A, Sicilian L, Lapey A, Sawicki G, Gordon CM, Bouxsein ML, Finkelstein JS. Compromised bone microarchitecture and estimated bone strength in young adults with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:3399–407.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  177. Dimitri P, Jacques RM, Paggiosi M, King D, Walsh J, Taylor ZA, Frangi AF, Bishop N, Eastell R. Leptin may play a role in bone microstructural alterations in obese children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:594–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. Viljakainen HT, Valta H, Lipsanen-Nyman M, Saukkonen T, Kajantie E, Andersson S, Mäkitie O. Bone Characteristics and Their Determinants in Adolescents and Young Adults with Early-Onset Severe Obesity. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;97:364–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Lee A, Boyd SK, Kline G, Poon MC. Premature changes in trabecular and cortical microarchitecture result in decreased bone strength in hemophilia. Blood. 2015;125:2160–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. D’Elia G, Caracchini G, Cavalli L, Innocenti P. Bone fragility and imaging techniques. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2009;6(3):234–46.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement