From: Update on leukotriene receptor antagonists in preschool children wheezing disorders
 | Author | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | No difference: |
 |  |  | - in length of stay |
 | Amirav[47] |  | - in clinical severity score |
 |  |  | - in cytokine levels in nasal lavage fluid |
 | Bisgaard[48] |  | No differences in percentage symptom-free days |
 |  |  | No differences: |
Bronchiolitis and post bronchiolitis | Proesmans[49] | Â | - of symptoms and disease-free days and nights |
 |  |  | - of n° of exacerbations |
 |  |  | - of n° of unscheduled visits and need of inhaled steroids |
 |  | Higher percentage of symptom-free days and nights |  |
 | Bisgaard[50] | Reduced daytime cough |  |
 |  | Decreased exacerbations versus placebo |  |
 | Kim[51] | Reduced serum eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels compared with initial levels |  |
 | Decreased cumulative recurrent wheezing episodes at 12 months versus placebo |  | |
 | Harmanci[52] | Reduced oral steroids need |  |
Acute asthma | Â | Decreased lung index scores and respiratory rate versus placebo | Hospitalization rates not significantly different |
 | Robertson[33] | Reduced healthcare resource use, symptoms, time-off school/parent work | No effect on hospitalization rate, symptoms duration, β2 or steroids use |
 | Bacharier[40] |  | No difference in symptom free-days, oral steroid, healthcare resource use |