Skip to main content

Table 6 Observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) which included pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD)

From: Consensus Conference on Clinical Management of pediatric Atopic Dermatitis

Study

Study design

Patients n (age, yrs)

Allergen

Route

Duration (months)

Outcome

Adverse reactions % AIT compared to control group

Efficacy

Kaufman et al. 1974 [271]

qRCT DBPC

52 (2–47)

Danders

SCIT

24

Success of the treatment (Physician)

Systemic: NA

Positive in 81 % of treatment group vs. 40 % of controls

HDM

Moulds

Locals: 50 vs 40

Pollens

Warner et al. 1978 [272]

RCT DBPC

20 (5–14)

HDM

SCIT

12

Success of the treatment (Patient)

Systemic: NA

Positive

Locals: NA

De Prisco de Fuenmayor et al. 1979 [273]

Obs.

15 (6–14)

Airborne allergens

SCIT

-

Clinical assessment

Occasional exacerbation of AD

Positive in 60 % of patients

Ring 1982 [274]

PC

2 twins (10)

Pollens (grasses)

SCIT

24

Clinical assessment sIgE (grasses) Total IgE

Occasional exacerbations of eczema in SCIT patients

Positive

Seidenari et al. 1986 [275]

Open

63 (4–45)

 

SCIT

6–24

Clinical assessment

Occasional mild exacerbation

Positive in 65 % of patients

Glover et al. 1992 [276]

RCT DBPC

24 (5–16)

HDM

SCIT

8 (phase I)

Success of the treatment

Systemic: 0 vs 8

Uncertain with a possible positive effect of prolonged treatment (phase II)

6 (phase II)

(Patient)

Locals: NA

Heijer et al. 1993 [277]

Obs.

93 (6–66)

Airborne allergens

SCIT

39

Clinical assessment

Asthma, RC, fever, fatigue, itching, dizziness

Positive

Total IgE

Galli et al. 1994 [278]

RCT PC

34 (0.5–12)

HDM

SLIT

36

Success of the treatment (Physician)

Systemic:0

Negative

Locals: 6.3 vs 5.6

Trofimowicz et al. 1995 [279]

Obs.

22

HDM

SCIT

36

Clinical assessment

-

Positive in 75 % of patients treated with AIT for HDM and up to 80 % of patients treated with AIT for pollens

Pollens

Zwacka et al. 1996 [280]

Controlled

212 (6–15)

Airborne allergens

SCIT vs SLIT

24

Clinical assessment

-

Positive (both SLIT and SCIT)

Total IgE

Czarnecka-Operacz et al. 2006 [281]

RCT DBPC

66 (5–44)

HDM

SCIT

48

Success of the treatment (Physician)

-

Positive

- 37 AIT

Pollens

-29 Controls

Pajno et al. 2007 [282]

RCT DBPC

56 (5–16)

HDM

SLIT

18

SCORAD (Physician)

- Local reactions in 7 SLIT patients

Positive only in patients with mild to moderate AD, not in those with severe

- Itching and erythema in 2 SLIT patients

-28 AIT

Pharmacotherapy

-28 Controls

Cadario et al. 2007 [283]

Obs.

86 (3–60)

HDM

SLIT

12 (at least)

SCORAD

No severe reactions

Positive

Total IgE and sIgE

Bussmann et al. 2007 [284]

Obs.

25 (5–65)

HDM (allergoid)

SCIT

7

SCORAD

-

Positive

sIgE; sIgG4

IL/mediators

Nahm et al. 2008 [285]

Obs.

20 (7–58)

HDM

SCIT

12

Clinical assessment

None relevant

Positive

SCORAD

Kwon et al. 2010 [286]

Obs.

20 (6–33)

HDM

SCIT

12–60

Clinical assessment

No exacerbations

Positive

sIgE (DP)

Total IgE

Chemokines

  1. qRCT quasi-randomized controlled trial, DBPC double blind placebo controlled, HDM house dust mite, Obs. observational, PC placebo controlled, SCIT subcutaneous immunotherapy, SLIT sublingual immunotherapy, DP Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus