Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical measures of the whole sample at T0 and T1, and number of children who improved in the different domains

From: Can biological components predict short-term evolution in Autism Spectrum Disorders? A proof-of-concept study

 

M ± SD

 

T0

T1

p

ADOS composite

13.63 ± 3.67

10.85 ± 4.10

<0.0001

A

4.72 ± 1.74

3.39 ± 1.75

<0.001

B

8.91 ± 2.27

7.46 ± 2.79

<0.0001

C

2.86 ± 1.11

2.39 ± 1.28

<0.01

D

3.71 ± 1.56

3.17 ± 1.75

<0.01

CSS

5.34 ± 1.44

4.51 ± 1.46

<0.0001

DQ

0.64 ± 0.14

0.66 ± 0.15

<0.01

 

DQ sub-quotients:

Cognitive abilities

0.72 ± 0.19

0.77 ± 0.21

<0.0001

Expressive language

0.44 ± 0.16

0.47 ± 0.19

<0.05

Receptive language

0.52 ± 0.18

0.57 ± 0.23

<0.01

Fine motor abilities

0.73 ± 0.15

0.73 ± 0.17

=0.915

Gross motor abilities

0.78 ± 0.16

0.78 ± 0.17

=0.799

Visual motor imitation

0.68 ± 0.15

0.68 ± 0.14

=0.964

 

Number (Percent)

Improvement in both ADOS classification and DQ level

14 (15.2 %)

Improvement in ADOS classification

34 (37.0 %)

Improvement in DQ level

31 (33.7)%

Improvement in cognitive abilities

47 (51.1 %)

Improvement in expressive language

40 (43.5 %)

Improvement in receptive language

35 (38.1 %)

Improvement in fine-motor abilities

30 (32.6 %)

Improvement in gross motor abilities

35 (38.1 %)

Improvement in visual-motor imitation

29 (31.5 %)

  1. N = 92; ADOS Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, CSS Calibrate Severity Score, DQ Developmental Quotient, Statistically significant results are in bold