Skip to main content

Table 4 Assessment of risk of bias in RCT (from BLISS population)

From: Baby-led weaning: what a systematic review of the literature adds on

Study (outcomes) Randomization Allocation concealment Blinding of participants Blinding of personnel Blinding of assessors Follow-up Selective reporting Other
Fangupo et al. 2016 (risk of choking) [27] Low risk High risk High risk Low risk High risk High risk (loss 12% and 15.5% at 6 and 11 months; ITT not performed) Low risk Sample size not defined for primary outcome. Outcomes self-reported
Taylor et al. 2017 (BMI, eating behavior, energy intake) [32] Low risk High risk High risk Low risk High risk High risk (loss 14% and 21.5% at 12 and 24 months; ITT not performed) Low risk (but only few secondary outcomes reported from the original protocol) Self-reporting of secondary outcomes