Table 3 Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression output showing that factors associated with dietary diversityamong school adolescent girls, Gondar City Administration, northwest Ethiopia, 2017
Variables | Dietary diversity | Crude Odds Ratio with 95% C) | Adjusted Odds Ratio with 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Adequate | Not adequate | |||
Age of adolescent | ||||
Early | 90 (69.2%) | 40 (30.8%) | 1 | 1 |
Middle | 216 (53.7%) | 186 (46.3%) | 0.52 (0.34,0.79) | 1.25 (0.71,2.20) |
Late | 93 (39.4%) | 143 (60.6%) | 0.29 (0.18,0.46) | 1.01 (0.51,2.01) |
School type | ||||
Government | 280 (45.8%) | 332 (54.2%) | 1 | 1 |
Private | 119 (76.3%) | 37 (23.7%) | 3.81 (2.55,5.70) | 3.17 (1.90,5.28)a |
Educational status of father | ||||
Informal education | 173 (46.8%) | 197 (53.2%) | 1 | 1 |
Primary | 44 (49.9%) | 52 (46.1%) | 0.96 (0.61,1.51) | 0.81 (0.50,1.31) |
Secondary | 77 (61.6%) | 48 (38.4%) | 1.83 (1.20,2.76) | 1.27 (0.77,2.09) |
College and above | 105 (59.3%) | 72 (40.7%) | 1.66 (1.12,2.39) | 0.98 (0.60,1.64) |
Educational status of mothers | ||||
Informal education | 193 (45.2%) | 234 (54.8%) | 1 | 1 |
Primary | 69 (59%) | 48 (41%) | 1.74 (1.15,2.64) | 1.24 (0.78,1.96) |
Secondary | 72 (58.5%) | 51 (41.5%) | 1.71 (1.14,2.57) | 1.05 (0.62,1.79) |
College and above | 65 (64.4%) | 36 (35.6%) | 2.19 (1.40,3.43) | 1.38 (0.69,2.76) |
Occupation of the mothers | ||||
Government employee | 69 (55.6%) | 55 (44.4%) | 1.39 (0.68,2.83) | 1.61 (0.74,3.53) |
Housewife | 241 (50%) | 241 (50%) | 1.10 (0.58,2.11) | 1.65 (0.81,3.33) |
Daily laborer | 17 (43.6%) | 22 (56.4%) | 0.85 (0.35,2.07) | 1.26 (0.49,3.29) |
Merchant | 53 (63.9%) | 30 (36.1%) | 1.95 (0.91,4.20) | 2.42 (1.06,5.53) |
Others | 19 (47.5%) | 21 (52.5%) | 1 | 1 |
Wealth status | ||||
1st quintile | 75 (45.5%) | 90 (54.5%) | 0.52(0.34,0.79) | 0.78 (0.47,1.29) |
2nd quintile | 100 (47.2%) | 112 (52.8%) | 0.55 (0.37,0.82) | 0.80 (0.51,1.25) |
3rd quintile | 106 (53%) | 94 (47%) | 0.70 (0.47,1.04) | 0.85 (0.54, 1.31) |
4th quintile | 118 (61.8%) | 73 (38.2%) | 1 | 1 |
Availability of latrine | ||||
Yes | 324 (53.4%) | 283 (46.6%) | 1.31 (0.93,1.86) | 0.88 (0.60,1.32) |
No | 75 (46.6%) | 86 (53.4%) | 1 | 1 |
Stunting | ||||
Stunted | 115 (44.4%) | 144 (55.6%) | 1 | 1 |
Normal | 284 (55.8%) | 225 (44.2%) | 1.58 (1.17, 2.14) | 1.00 (0.70, 1.42 |
Residence | ||||
Urban | 380 (53%) | 337 (47%) | 1.90 (1.06, 3.41) | 2.00 (0.84, 3.01)a |
Rural | 19 (37.3%) | 32 (62.7%) | 1 | 1 |
Respondents educational status | ||||
5–8 | 184 (64.1%) | 103 (35.9%) | 1 | 1 |
9–10 | 197 (47.2%) | 220 (52.8%) | 0.50 (0.37, 0.68) | 0.69 (0.46, 1.03) |
11–12 | 18 (28.5%) | 46 (71.9%) | 0.22 (0.12, 0.40) | 0.23 (0.11, 0.50) |