From: The future outlook on allergen immunotherapy in children: 2018 and beyond
Major gaps in the evidence of AIT for allergic rhinitis | |
---|---|
❖ Lack of agreement on clinically relevant outcomes of effectiveness and clinically meaningful effect size of AIT (active vs placebo) | |
❖ Lack of evidence of clinical effectiveness for some products | |
❖ Lack of standardized AIT preparations for “orphan allergens” | |
❖ Lack of evidence for effectiveness of mixtures of homologous allergens | |
❖ Evidence for long-term clinical effectiveness after discontinuation treatment | |
❖ Standardization of grading of adverse effects of AIT | |
❖ Approaches to minimize adverse effects | |
❖ Good evidence base for contraindicating AIT | |
❖ Approaches to improve adherence to AIT | |
❖ Role of adjunctive treatment(s) (e.g. omalizumab) | |
❖ Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility studies | |
❖ Good understanding of mechanisms of action | |
❖ Identification of biomarkers of response, to predict and quantify the effectiveness of AIT | |
❖ Identification of the most suitable candidates | |
❖ “Precision medicine” algorithms |