Table 1 Modified DISCERN reliability and GQS quality tool

1. Are the aims clear and achieved?

1. Poor quality, poor flow, most information missing, not helpful for patients

2. Are the sources of information reliable?

2. Generally poor, some information given but of limited use to patients

3. Is the information balanced and unbiased?

3. Moderate quality, some important information is adequately discussed

4. Are additional resources to information provided?

4. Good quality good flow, most relevant information is covered, useful for patients

5. Does the video address areas of controvesy/uncertainty?

5. Excellent quality and excellent flow, very useful for patients