Skip to main content

Table 4 Correlation of video features, GQS and mMDISCERN scores

From: The reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of breath holding spell

 

Number of per daily views

Number of likes

Number of comments

Duration Time

mDISCERN score

GQS score

Subscriber numbers

Number of per daily views

 Pearson Correlation

1

0.298a

0.855b

0.414b

0.035

-0.030

0.612b

 Sig. (2 tailed)

 

0.26

 < 0.001

0.002

0.799

0.828

 < 0.001

 N

56

56

56

56

56

56

56

Number of likes

 Pearson Correlation

0.298a

1

0.230

0.460b

-0.053

-0.047

0.679b

 Sig. (2 tailed)

0.26

 

0.089

 < 0.001

0.696

0.728

 < 0.001

 N

56

56

56

56

56

56

56

Number of comments

 Pearson Correlation

0.855b

0.230

1

0.477b

-0.001

-0.039

0.523b

 Sig. (2 tailed)

 < 0.001

0.089

 

 < 0.001

0.995

0.773

 < 0.001

 N

56

56

56

56

56

56

56

Duration Time

 Pearson Correlation

0.414b

0.460b

0.477b

1

0.184

0.144

0.384b

 Sig. (2 tailed)

0.002

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 

0.174

0.290

0.003

 N

56

56

56

56

56

56

56

mDISCERN score

 Pearson Correlation

0.035

-0.053

-0.001

0.184

1

0.928b

-0.084

 Sig. (2 tailed)

0.799

0.696

0.995

0.174

 

 < 0.001

0.540

 N

56

56

56

56

56

56

56

GQS score

 Pearson Correlation

-0.030

-0.047

-0.039

0.144

0.965b

1

0.049

 Sig. (2 tailed)

0.828

0.728

0.773

0.290

 < 0.001

 

0.724

 N

56

56

56

56

56

56

56

Subscriber numbers

 Pearson Correlation

0.612b

0.679b

0.523b

0.384b

0.056

0.049

1

 Sig. (2 tailed)

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

0.003

0.682

0.724

 

 N

56

56

56

56

56

56

56

  1. aCorrelation is significant < 0.05 level
  2. bcorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
  3. cSpearman correlation was used for evaluating