Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance of digital rectal examination, fecal calprotectin and abdominal ultrasound for detecting colorectal polyps

From: Faecal calprotectin and ultrasonography as non-invasive screening tools for detecting colorectal polyps in children with sporadic rectal bleeding: a prospective study

Technique

SE, % (95% CI)

SP, % (95% CI)

PPV, % (95% CI)

NPV, % (95% CI)

ACC, %

Digital rectal examination (DRE)

Overall

26.9% (9–44)

100%

100%

63.5% (59–67)

67.8%

Rectum

77.8% (51–100)

100%

100%

94.2% (86–100)

95.2%

Fecal calprotectin (FC)

100%

93.9% (72–100)

92.8% (84–100)

100%

96.6%

Abdominal ultrasound (AUS)

50% (31–69)

100%

100%

71.7% (59–84)

77.9%

Combination of FC and AUS

86.6% (75–98)

100%

100%

67.4% (54–80)

74.6%

Combination of FC and DRE

33% (16–50)

100%

100%

59.6% (46–73)

64.4%

Combination of AUS and DRE

53.8% (27–81)

100%

100%

88.4% (71–100)

89.8%

  1. Abbreviations: SE Sensitivity, SP Specificity, PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value, ACC Accuracy, CI Confidence interval