Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the included articles

From: Assessment of the measurement properties of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 by applying the COSMIN methodology

Authors (year)

Population characteristics

Research characteristics of PDMS-2

 

N

Age

Sex (M/F)

Studied population

Country/Region

PDMS-2 language

Measurement properties

Álvarez Gonzalo et al. (2021) [50]

74

0–36 m

NR

Children with neurodevelopmental disorders

Spain

Spanish

Internal consistency,

Inter-rater reliability

Chien & Bond (2009) [52]

419

0–60 m

238/181

Normal children and fine motor delays children

China Taiwan

Chinese

Unidimensional

Connolly et al. (2006) [19]

15

12 m

9/6

Normal children

America

English

Concurrent validity

Connolly et al. (2012) [56]

48

1–26 m

32/16

Developmentally delayed children

America

English

Concurrent validity

Folio & Fewell (2000) [14]

567

0–11 m

284/273

Normal children

America

English

Structure validity,

Test-retest reliability, Inter-rater reliability

Gill et al. (2019) [49]

184

18 m

95/89

Premature children

England

English

Concurrent validity

Holloway et al. (2019) [18]

22

48–71 m

21/1

Children with autism spectrum disorder

America

English

Concurrent validity

Kim et al. (2021) [55]

84

24–71 m

50/34

Typical children and Cerebral Palsy children

Korea

Korean

Test-retest reliability

Lee et al. (2019) [20]

50

42–71 m

25/25

Normal children

Korea

Korean

Inter-rater reliability, Concurrent validity

Lin et al. (2020) [51]

223

13–36 m

157/66

Developmentally delayed children

China Taiwan

Chinese

Concurrent validity

Maring & Elbaum (2007) [17]

30

12–44 m

18/12

Developmentally delayed children

America

English

Concurrent validity

Provost et al. (2004) [57]

110

3–41 m

75/35

Developmentally delayed children

America

English

Concurrent validity

Rebelo et al. (2021) [45]

392

12–48 m

199/193

Normal children

Portugal

Portuguese

Internal consistency, Test-retest reliability, Structure validity

Saraiva et al. (2011) [21]

540

36–71 m

255/285

Normal children

Portugal

Portuguese

Internal consistency, Structure validity

Saraiva et al. (2013) [46]

540

36–71 m

255/285

Normal children

Portugal

Portuguese

Cross-cultural validity

Tavasoli et al. (2014) [22]

88

18 ± 2 m

44/44

58 low and 30 normal weight children

Iran

Iranian

Test-retest reliability, Convergent validity

Valentini & Zanella (2022) [58]

637

0–71 m

312/325

Premature and normal children

Brazil

Portuguese

Unidimensional

van Hartingsveldt et al. (2005) [48]

36

4–5 y

32/4

18 children with and 18 without minor motor development problems

Netherlands

Dutch

Test-retest reliability, Inter-rater reliability, Convergent validity

Waelvelde et al. (2007) [47]

31

4–5 y

27/4

Developmentally delayed children

Belgium

English

Convergent validity

Wang et al. (2006) [53]

32

27–64 m

23/9

Cerebral palsy children

China Taiwan

English

Test-retest reliability, Responsiveness

Wuang et al. (2012) [54]

141

36–72 m

52/89

The children with an adaptive disability

China Taiwan

English

Internal consistency, Test-retest reliability, Concurrent validity, Responsiveness, Measurement error

Zanella et al. (2021) [59]

637

0–71 m

312/325

Premature and normal children

Brazil

Portuguese

Content validity, Structure validity, Test-retest reliability, Inter-rater reliability,

Intra-rater reliability

  1. Note: M/F = male/female, y = years, m = month, NR = Not Report