Open Access

Association between obesity and high blood pressure among Lithuanian adolescents: a cross-sectional study

  • Virginija Dulskiene1Email author,
  • Renata Kuciene1,
  • Jurate Medzioniene1 and
  • Rimantas Benetis1
Italian Journal of Pediatrics201440:102

DOI: 10.1186/s13052-014-0102-6

Received: 4 September 2014

Accepted: 4 December 2014

Published: 10 December 2014

Abstract

Background

Most epidemiological studies have shown that the prevalence of high blood pressure (BP) has significantly increased among children and adolescents in various countries of the world.

The aim of this study was to examine the associations between overweight, obesity, abdominal obesity and prehypertension and hypertension among Lithuanian adolescents aged 12–15 years.

Methods

The subjects with increased BP (≥90th percentile) were screened on two separate occasions. Data on the body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and BP were analysed in 7,457 adolescents aged 12–15 years. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations were estimated using multivariate logistic regression models.

Results

After two screenings, the study participants were categorised as prehypertensive (12.8%), hypertensive (22.2%), and normotensive (65%). The overall prevalence of overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity (if WC was in the ≥75th percentile) were 12.1%, 2.4%, and 9%, respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, significant associations were found between overweight and obesity and high BP, namely, prehypertension (overweight: aOR = 2.62; 95% CI 2.13–3.23; obesity: aOR = 4.81; 95% CI 3.08–7.52) and hypertension (overweight: aOR = 3.56; 95% CI 3.02–4.19; obesity: aOR = 6.64; 95% CI 4.65–9.49). Prehypertension was found to be significantly associated with WC in the 75th– < 90th percentiles (aOR = 3.16; 95% CI 2.43–4.10) and WC in the ≥90th percentile (aOR = 4.08; 95% CI 2.35–7.10). For hypertension, significant associations were detected with WC in the 75th– < 90th percentiles (aOR = 3.92; 95% CI 3.18–4.82) and WC in the ≥90th percentile (aOR = 7.41; 95% CI 4.97–11.05).

Conclusions

Overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity were associated with prehypertension and hypertension.

Keywords

Blood pressure Prehypertension Hypertension Overweight Obesity Abdominal obesity Adolescents

Background

Overweight and obesity are serious and growing global public health problems among children and adolescents [1]. Childhood and adolescent obesity is associated with many cardiovascular risk factors: high blood pressure (BP), dyslipidaemia, abnormalities in endothelial function, and hyperinsulinaemia [2]. Abdominal obesity is also related to cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors [3]. Twenty-five longitudinal studies included in the systematic review have reported that overweight and obese youth (children and adolescents) were at an increased risk of becoming overweight or obese in adulthood [4]. It has been shown that childhood overweight and obesity are related to adverse levels of cardiovascular disease risk factors in adulthood [5]. Childhood BP is a significant predictor of adult BP [6]. It is well known that high BP in adulthood increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (such as ischemic heart disease, stroke, or hypertensive heart disease) and is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide [7]. It is therefore essential to begin to identify the risk factors associated with the development of cardiovascular diseases and other chronic non-communicable diseases, and then make every effort to prevent and control these factors in childhood and adolescence.

Epidemiological studies have reported that the prevalence of high BP has significantly increased among children and adolescents over the recent years [8]-[12]. Studies have shown that obesity was significantly associated with hypertension [9],[13]-[15] or high BP (≥90th percentile) [16],[17] among children and adolescents. Several studies that examined the relationships between overweight, obesity, and prehypertension [9],[12],[14] have yielded different findings. There has yet been little scientific evidence supporting the associations between abdominal obesity and prehypertension and hypertension in children and adolescents.

In Lithuania, the prevalence of hypertension in the adult population remains high and increases with age [18]. According to the data of the Health Statistics of Lithuania, cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of death, and their prevalence is among the highest in Europe [19]. Moreover, statistical data show that the prevalence of chronic diseases and various health disorders among children and adolescents has been increasing during the last years [19]. A study conducted in Lithuania has indicated a significant prevalence of elevated BP in children aged 3–7 years (21.4%) [20]. Although the relationships between overweight and increased BP have been established among preschoolers [20], the associations between overweight and obesity with prehypertension and hypertension have not yet been studied in adolescents aged 12–15 years. No epidemiological study in Lithuania has investigated the associations of abdominal obesity as measured by waist circumference (WC) with prehypertension and hypertension among adolescents.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the associations of overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity with prehypertension and hypertension among adolescents living in Lithuania.

Materials and methods

Study population

This cross-sectional study included 12- to 15-year-old adolescents who at the time of the examination (from November 2010 to April 2012) attended gymnasiums or secondary schools in Kaunas city and Kaunas district – the second largest city and district by population size in Lithuania. All the invited schools (n = 81) accepted the invitation to participate in the research project. The schoolchildren who had endocrine diseases, diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases, cardiovascular diseases, or congenital heart defects were excluded from the data analysis. Data on clinically verified health disorders were collected from the subjects’ medical records (Form No. 027-1/a). All medical data were reviewed, and both BP and anthropometric measurements were taken at the participants’ schools by the same team of trained study personnel (physicians and research assistants).

Of 7,638 subjects who participated and were examined in the study, 152 were excluded due to the presence of any of the above-mentioned diseases. Thus, a total of 7,486 participants (3,510 boys and 3,976 girls) met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 29 participants were excluded from the statistical analysis due to missing data on weight, height, or WC.

A written informed consent was obtained from each participant’s parent or guardian. The study was approved by Kaunas Regional Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research at the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (protocol No. BE-2-69).

Blood pressure measurements

Blood pressure was measured in the morning hours (8:30 am to 11:30 am) by the physician who was not wearing a white coat. The subjects were advised to avoid tea, coffee, energy drinks, and physical exercises in the morning of the examination day until the measurements were taken. Before the BP measurement, the participants were asked to sit still for ten minutes. BP was measured three times with a 5-minute rest interval between the measurements, with the participant being in a sitting position; BP was measured using an automatic BP monitor (OMRON M6; OMRON HEALTHCARE CO., LTD, Kyoto, Japan) with the appropriate cuff size (17–22 cm; 22–32 cm; 32–42 cm). The average of three BP measurements was calculated. All subjects with increased BP (BP was in the ≥90th percentile; n = 2,597) during the first screening underwent a second evaluation of BP measurements within a period of 2–3 weeks. If BP was ≥90th percentile during both visits, the final BP status was based on the highest average BP values observed during the first or the second screenings.

Classifications and definitions of BP levels were defined according to “The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents” (National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBPEP) Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents) [21] published in 2004. According to BP charts for age, sex, and height, normal BP was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90th percentile; prehypertension was defined as average SBP or DBP levels between the ≥90th percentile and the <95th percentile; and hypertension was defined as average SBP or DBP readings ≥95th percentile.

Anthropometric measurements

Height and weight of the participants (wearing only light clothing and barefooted) were measured using a portable stadiometer and a balance beam scale (SECA measuring equipment). Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm and weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Waist circumference (WC) was measured with a flexible measuring tape (SECA) at a level midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest. WC was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm.

According to the age and sex specific cut-off points of BMI proposed by the International Obesity Task Force [22], the participants were grouped into three categories of BMI: normal-weight, overweight, and obese. The participants were divided into three categories on the basis of their WC: <75th percentile (normal waist value), 75th– < 90th percentile (moderate), and ≥90th percentile (high), using the cut-off values of WC percentiles as defined in the criteria of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) [23]. Abdominal obesity among adolescents was defined at moderate and high WC percentile categories (in the 75th– < 90th percentile and ≥90th percentile).

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (n) and percentages (%), and were compared using the chi-square (χ 2) test. Tests for trend were analysed with the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. The normality of the distribution of continuous variables was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Means and standard deviations (SD) were presented for normally distributed continuous variables, and medians and interquartile ranges (25th–75th percentiles) - for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Comparisons between groups were performed by applying the t-test and ANOVA (parametric tests for normally distributed continuous variables), the Mann–Whitney test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test (non-parametric tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted separately for boys and girls, and for both sexes combined to evaluate the associations between the analysed risk factors such as BMI categories (overweight and obesity), moderate and high WC percentile categories (WC in the 75th– < 90th percentile and WC in the ≥90th percentile) and prehypertension/hypertension. Crude odds ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. In multivariate analyses conducted for boys and girls separately, ORs were adjusted for age. In the multivariate analysis for both sexes combined, ORs were adjusted for age and sex.

Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package SPSS version 20 for Windows. P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The final study sample consisted of 7,457 subjects (of whom 46.9% (n = 3,494) were boys, and 53.1% (n = 3,963) were girls) aged from 12 to 15 years. The median values of demographic (age), anthropometric (weight, height, BMI, and WC), and BP (SBP and DBP) data for the whole sample and for each sex separately are presented in Table 1. Boys were significantly heavier and taller, and had a higher median BMI and WC. They had a significantly higher median SBP and a significantly lower median DBP, compared to girls. The median age was similar for boys and girls.
Table 1

Demographic, anthropometric, and BP characteristics of the study participants by sex

Variables

Total

Boys

Girls

p*

(n = 7,457)

(n = 3,494)

(n = 3,963)

Age (years)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

0.924

Weight (kg)

52.0 (45.0–60.0)

54.4 (45.0–64.0)

51.0 (45.0–58.0)

<0.001

Height (cm)

164.5 (158.0–171.0)

167.0 (158.0–175.0)

163.0 (158.0–168.0)

<0.001

BMI (kg/m2)

19.1 (17.4–21.2)

19.2 (17.5–21.3)

19.0 (17.3–21.1)

<0.001

WC (cm)

66.0 (62.0–71.0)

68.0 (64.0–73.0)

64.0 (60.5–68.0)

<0.001

SBP (mmHg)

115.3 (108.3–126.7)

117.7 (110.7–133.3)

114.0 (107.3–120.7)

<0.001

DBP (mmHg)

65.0 (60.3–70.3)

64.3 (59.7–70.0)

65.3 (60.7–70.7)

<0.001

BP – blood pressure, BMI – body mass index, WC – waist circumference, SBP – systolic blood pressure, DBP – diastolic blood pressure.

Values are presented as median (25th–75th percentiles).

*Boys versus girls.

Table 2 presents the basic characteristics of the participants according to BP level. Overall, the prevalence rates of prehypertension and hypertension were 12.8% (15.0% for boys and 10.8% for girls) and 22.2% (29.1% for boys and 16.1% for girls), respectively. Girls were more often normotensive than boys (73.1% and 55.9%, respectively). Older participants (aged 14–15 years) were significantly more likely to have prehypertension and hypertension than younger participants (aged 12–13 years) did (43.4% versus 27.3%). The overall prevalence of overweight and obesity was 12.1% (14.3% for boys and 10.2% for girls) and 2.4% (2.7% for boys and 2.2% for girls), respectively. The prevalence of WC in the 75th– < 90th percentile and WC ≥90th percentile was, respectively, 7.1% and 1.9% of the entire group of the study participants. Overall, 7.3% of the participants were overweight/obese as well as abdominally obese. Among 670 subjects with abdominal obesity (WC ≥75th percentile), there were 19.0%, 57.1% and 23.9% participants who were normal-weight, overweight, and obese, respectively. Prehypertensive and hypertensive participants had significantly higher median values for weight, height, BMI, WC, SBP, and mean value for DBP, compared to normotensive participants. The median weight was higher among hypertensive adolescents than among prehypertensive participants, but no significant difference between these groups was found (Table 2).
Table 2

Characteristics of the study participants according to BP level

Variables

Normotensive

Prehypertensive

Hypertensive

p

(n = 4,847)

(n = 955)

(n = 1,655)

n

%

n

%

n

%

 

Sex:

       

 Boys

1,952

55.9

524

15.0

1,018

29.1

<0.001* ^

 Girls

2,895

73.1

431

10.8

637

16.1

 

Age (years):

       

 12–13

2,823

72.7

322

8.3

737

19.0

<0.001* ^

 14–15

2,024

56.6

633

17.7

918

25.7

 

BMI categories:

       

 Normal weight

4,409

69.2

759

11.9

1,204

18.9

<0.001* ^

 Overweight

384

42.4

159

17.6

362

40.0

 

 Obesity

54

30.0

37

20.6

89

49.4

 

WC percentile categories:

       

 <75th

4,601

67.8

831

12.2

1,355

20.0

<0.001* ^

 75th– < 90th

205

38.5

102

19.2

225

42.3

 

 ≥90th

41

29.7

22

15.9

75

54.4

 

Age (years)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

14 (13.0–15.0)a

14.0 (13.0–15.0)a,b

<0.001#

Weight (kg)

50.0 (42.0–56.0)

58.0 (52.0–66.0)a

59.0 (52.0–68.0)a

<0.001#

Height (cm)

162.0 (156.0–168.0)

170.0 (164.0–176.0)a

168.0 (161.5–175)a,b

<0.001#

BMI (kg/m2)

18.5 (16.9–20.2)

20.1 (18.4–22.1)a

20.7 (18.9–22.9)a,b

<0.001#

WC (cm)

64.0 (61.0–69.0)

68.0 (64.0–73.0)a

70.0 (65.0–75.0)a,b

<0.001#

SBP (mmHg)

111.0 (105.3–115.0)

124.3 (122.0–127.3)a

138.0 (132.7–144.3)a,b

<0.001#

DBP (mmHg)

63.1 ± 6.4

67.1 ± 6.9a

71.7 ± 8.1a,b

<0.001#

BP – blood pressure, BMI – body mass index, WC – waist circumference, SBP – systolic blood pressure, DBP – diastolic blood pressure, SD – standard deviation.

Values are presented as mean ± SD or median (25th–75th percentiles).

aSignificantly different (p < 0.05) from normotensive participants.

bSignificantly different (p < 0.05) from prehypertensive participants.

*Significant difference using chi-square (χ 2) test.

^Significant difference using Cochran-Armitage trend test.

#Significant difference between three groups.

The median values of BP and anthropometric variables (including weight, BMI, and WC) increased with increasing BMI (Table 3) and WC (Table 4).
Table 3

Characteristics of the study participants according to BMI categories

 

Normal weight

Overweight

Obesity

p*

Boys

(n = 2,901)

(n = 499)

(n = 94)

 

Age (years)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)a

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

<0.001

Weight (kg)

52.0 (43.8–60.0)

68.0 (60.0–75.0)a

83.5 (72.5–90.4)a, b

<0.001

Height (cm)

167.0 (158.0–175.0)

168.0 (160.0–176.0)a

167.8 (160.0–175.0)

0.037

BMI (kg/m2)

18.61 ± 2.00

23.90 ± 1.57a

29.60 ± 2.91a,b

<0.001

WC (cm)

67.0 (63.0–71.0)

77.0 (72.0–82.0)a

89.0 (82.0–96.0)a, b

<0.001

SBP (mmHg)

116.3 (109.3–130.7)

128.7 (116.0–139.3)a

131.2 (118.6–140.8)a

<0.001

DBP (mmHg)

64.0 (59.3–69.3)

66.0 (61.3–71.7)a

69.0 (63.3–75.0)a, b

<0.001

Girls

(n = 3,471)

(n = 406)

(n = 86)

 

Age (years)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

0.06

Weight (kg)

50.0 (44.0–55.0)

66.0 (60.0–70.0)a

80.0 (75.8–89.0)a, b

<0.001

Height (cm)

163.0 (158.0–168.0)

164.0 (159.0–169.0)

163.0 (160.0–168.0)

0.284

BMI (kg/m2)

18.6 (17.0–20.1)

24.4 (23.5–25.5)a

29.8 (28.6–32.2)a, b

<0.001

WC (cm)

63.0 (60.0–67.0)

74.0 (70.0–79.0)a

87.0 (81.0–90.0)a, b

<0.001

SBP (mmHg)

113.0 (106.7–119.0)

119.0 (112.3–130.1)a

125.5 (117.0–135.0)a, b

<0.001

DBP (mmHg)

65.0 (60.3–70.3)

67.8 (63.0–73.7)a

70.0 (64.6–75.5)a, b

<0.001

All participants

(n = 6,372)

(n = 905)

(n = 180)

 

Age (years)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)a

13.0 (12.0–14.0)a

<0.001

Weight (kg)

50.0 (44.0–57.0)

67.0 (60.0–73.0)a

82.0 (74.0–89.0)a, b

<0.001

Height (cm)

164.0 (158.0–171.0)

165.0 (159.0–172.0)a

165.0 (160.0–172.0)

<0.001

BMI (kg/m2)

18.6 (17.1–20.1)

24.1 (23.0–25.3)a

29.3 (28.1–31.6)a, b

<0.001

WC (cm)

65.0 (61.0–69.0)

76.0 (71.0–80.0)a

87.0 (81.3–93.8)a, b

<0.001

SBP (mmHg)

114.7 (107.7–124.0)

123.7 (114.7–135.3)a

128.5 (117.8–138.6)a, b

<0.001

DBP (mmHg)

64.7 (60.0–70.0)

67.0 (62.3–72.5)a

69.7 (64.0–75.3)a, b

<0.001

BMI – body mass index, SD – standard deviation, WC – waist circumference, SBP – systolic blood pressure, DBP – diastolic blood pressure.

Values are presented as mean ± SD or median (25th–75th percentiles).

aSignificantly different (p < 0.05) from normal weight participants.

bSignificantly different (p < 0.05) from overweight participants.

*Differences between three groups.

Table 4

Characteristics of the study participants according to WC categories

 

Normal WC

Moderate abdominal obesity

High abdominal obesity

p*

Boys

(n = 3,100)

(n = 318)

(n = 76)

 

Age (years)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)a

13.0 (12.0–14.0)a

<0.001

Weight (kg)

53.0 (44.3–60.5)

68.8 (61.0–78.0)a

80.0 (70.3–91.8)a, b

<0.001

Height (cm)

166.0 (157.0–175.0)

170.0 (161.0–177.0)a

171.0 (163.0–178.8)a

<0.001

BMI (kg/m2)

18.8 (17.3–20.5)

23.7 (22.2–25.8)a

27.9 (25.3–30.5)a, b

<0.001

WC (cm)

67.0 (63.0–71.0)

81.0 (78.5–84.1)a

94.0 (90.0–97.8)a, b

<0.001

SBP (mmHg)

116.7 (109.7–131.0)

130.3 (117.0–139.8)a

133.0 (123.7–140.6)a

<0.001

DBP (mmHg)

64.0 (59.3–69.3)

66.8 (62.3–72.7)a

70.8 (64.8–75.5)a, b

<0.001

Girls

(n = 3,687)

(n = 214)

(n = 62)

 

Age (years)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)a

12.5 (12.0–13.0)a, b

<0.001

Weight (kg)

50.0 (44.0–56.0)

67.0 (59.8–75.0)a

77.3 (69.8–87.3)a, b

<0.001

Height (cm)

163.0 (158.0–168.0)

165.5 (160.0–170.0)a

163.0 (158.9–168.0)b

<0.001

BMI (kg/m2)

18.8 (17.2–20.5)

24.5 (22.7–26.5)a

29.1 (26.7–32.4)a, b

<0.001

WC (cm)

63.5 (60.0–67.0)

80.0 (77.0–83.0)a

88.3 (86.8–93.0)a, b

<0.001

SBP (mmHg)

113.3 (107.0–119.7)

119.5 (113.9–129.7)a

122.2 (116.7–136.8)a, b

<0.001

DBP (mmHg)

65.3 (60.3–70.7)

68.8 (64.0–74.0)a

70.0 (63.9–75.6)a

<0.001

All participants

(n = 6,787)

(n = 532)

(n = 138)

 

Age (years)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)

13.0 (12.0–14.0)a

13.0 (12.0–14.0)a, b

<0.001

Weight (kg)

51.0 (44.0–58.0)

68.0 (60.0–76.0)a

78.0 (70.0–88.3)a, b

<0.001

Height (cm)

164.0 (158.0–171.0)

168.0 (160.3–174.0)a

166.5 (160.0–173.3)a

<0.001

BMI (kg/m2)

18.8 (17.2–20.6)

24.1 (22.3–26.0)a

28.2 (25.7–31.5)a, b

<0.001

WC (cm)

65.0 (61.0–69.0)

81.0 (78.0–84.0)a

91.0 (87.0–97.0)a, b

<0.001

SBP (mmHg)

114.7 (108.0–125.0)

126.0 (115.7–136.3)a

131.0 (118.0–139.3)a, b

<0.001

DBP (mmHg)

64.7 (60.0–70.0)

68.0 (63.0–73.3)a

70.3 (64.3–75.4)a, b

<0.001

WC – waist circumference, SD – standard deviation, BMI – body mass index, SBP – systolic blood pressure, DBP – diastolic blood pressure.

Values are presented as median (25th–75th percentiles).

aSignificantly different (p < 0.05) from participants with WC in the <75th percentile.

bSignificantly different (p < 0.05) from participants with WC in the 75th– < 90th percentile.

*Differences between three groups.

Univariate analysis revealed that overweight and obesity were significantly associated with prehypertension and hypertension for both sexes separately and for the combined group consisting of both boys and girls (Table 5), compared to normal-weight participants. WC in the 75th– < 90th percentile was significantly associated with prehypertension and hypertension for boys and girls separately, and for both sexes combined, compared to participants with WC <75th percentile. WC ≥90th percentile was significantly associated with both types of elevated BP for the group of boys and for the combined group of both sexes. P values were below 0.001 for all the above-mentioned associations. However, WC ≥90th percentile was not significantly associated with prehypertension among girls (p = 0.149).
Table 5

Associations between categories of BMI, WC and prehypertension and hypertension (univariate and multivariate analyses)

Variables

Prehypertension

Hypertension

OR(95% CI)

aOR1(95% CI)

OR(95% CI)

aOR1(95% CI)

Boys

    

BMI categories:

    

Normal weight

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Overweight

2.27 (1.72–2.99)

2.85(2.12–3.84)

3.29(2.65–4.08)

3.83(3.06–4.79)

Obesity

3.32(1.78–6.21)

4.46(2.27–8.75)

5.55(3.37–9.12)

6.52(3.91–10.88)

WC percentile categories:

    

<75th

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

75th– < 90th

2.76(1.98–3.85)

3.80(2.64–5.46)

3.73(2.86–4.87)

4.67(3.53–6.16)

≥90th

4.44(2.13–9.26)

6.10(2.76–13.45)

7.61(4.16–13.89)

9.95(5.37–18.42)

Girls

    

BMI categories:

    

Normal weight

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Overweight

2.43(1.81–3.27)

2.52(1.87–3.40)

3.35(2.64–4.26)

3.40(2.67–4.33)

Obesity

4.71(2.63–8.43)

5.17(2.86–9.32)

6.50(3.98–10.61)

6.67(4.08–10.91)

WC percentile categories:

    

<75th

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

75th– < 90th

2.49(1.70–3.66)

2.70(1.83–3.99)

3.13(2.28–4.30)

3.23(2.35–4.45)

≥90th

1.85NS(0.80–4.28)

2.41(1.03–5.61)

5.28(3.09–9.03)

5.56(3.24–9.53)

 

OR(95% CI)

aOR 2 (95% CI)

OR(95% CI)

aOR 2 (95% CI)

All participants

    

BMI categories:

    

Normal weight

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Overweight

2.41(1.97–2.94)

2.62(2.13–3.23)

3.45(2.95–4.04)

3.56(3.02–4.19)

Obesity

3.98(2.60–6.09)

4.81(3.08–7.52)

6.04(4.28–8.51)

6.64(4.65–9.49)

WC percentile categories:

    

<75th

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

75th– < 90th

2.76(2.15–3.53)

3.16(2.43–4.10)

3.73(3.06–4.55)

3.92(3.18–4.82)

≥90th

2.97(1.76–5.01)

4.08(2.35–7.10)

6.21(4.23–9.13)

7.41(4.97–11.05)

BMI – body mass index, WC – waist circumference.

OR – odds ratio; aOR1 – adjusted odds ratio for age; aOR2 – adjusted odds ratio for age and sex; CI – confidence interval.

All results were significant at p < 0.001, except when noted (NS – not significant).

The overall significance levels of the multiple logistic regression models were p < 0.001.

The associations identified by univariate analysis were examined further by multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 5). For prehypertension and hypertension, the age-adjusted ORs among obese adolescents were higher (among boys: aOR = 4.46 and aOR = 6.52, respectively, and among girls: aOR = 5.17 and aOR = 6.67, respectively) than among overweight participants (among boys: aOR = 2.85 and aOR = 3.83, respectively, and among girls: aOR = 2.52 and aOR = 3.40, respectively). After adjustment for age, statistically significant elevated aORs were observed for associations between WC in the 75th– < 90th percentile and prehypertension and hypertension in both sexes (among boys: aOR = 3.80 and aOR = 4.67, respectively, and among girls: aOR = 2.70 and aOR = 3.23, respectively). WC ≥90th percentile was also significantly associated with higher odds of both types of elevated BP for both sexes separately: among boys, the age-adjusted ORs ranged from 6.10 (for prehypertension) to 9.95 (for hypertension), while among girls – from 2.41 (for prehypertension) to 5.56 (for hypertension).

Significant interactions were found between sex and age, sex and BMI, and sex and WC separately for both prehypertension and hypertension (all p < 0.001). Being a boy (vs. a girl) and overweight/obese (vs. normal weighted) at the same time would further increase the individual’s odds of being prehypertensive (OR = 3.11; p < 0.001) and hypertensive (OR = 5.03; p < 0.001). The odds of being prehypertensive (OR = 3.88; p < 0.001) and hypertensive (OR = 6.09; p < 0.001) would also be further increased by a combination of male sex (vs. female) and abdominal obesity (vs. normal WC value) (data not shown).

Table 5 presents the results of multivariate analysis for the combined group of both sexes. The associations also remained significant after adjustments for age and sex in the final multivariate models. Overweight was associated with prehypertension (aOR = 2.62) and hypertension (aOR = 3.56). Significant associations with obesity were observed for prehypertension (aOR = 4.81) and hypertension (aOR = 6.64). In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age and sex, the participants with WC in the 75th– < 90th and >90th percentiles were significantly more likely to have prehypertension or hypertension (all p values were <0.001) than participants with WC <75th percentile did. According to the final multivariate models, the participants with WC in the 75th– < 90th percentile had higher odds of prehypertension and hypertension (aOR = 3.16 and aOR = 3.92, respectively). WC ≥90th percentile was associated with 4.08-fold higher odds of prehypertension, and by 7.41-fold higher odds of hypertension (both p < 0.001).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first report in Lithuania investigating the associations between the selected anthropometric measures of overweight, obesity (based on BMI), abdominal obesity (based on WC), and high BP among schoolchildren aged 12–15 years. The multivariate logistic regression analysis (for both sexes combined) of our data showed significant associations between overweight, obesity, abdominal obesity and prehypertension and hypertension among adolescents.

According to our data, the prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension in adolescents was 12.8% and 22.2%, respectively. Studies on prehypertension and hypertension [8],[9],[11],[12],[14],[24]-[27] among children and adolescents of various age groups and different sample sizes showed that the prevalence rates vary widely. A study conducted in China reported that the prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension was, accordingly, 15% and 20.2% among children and adolescents aged 5–18 years [12], which is partially similar to the estimated prevalence in the current study. Several studies also indicated a high prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension in Portuguese adolescents (13.3% and 22%, respectively [25] and 12% and 34%, respectively [26]) and in Iranian adolescent girls (13.9% and 19.4%, respectively [27]). Besides, our results that were obtained in the sample of schoolchildren could be partly explained by a high prevalence of hypertension in Lithuanian adult population [18].

The prevalence of overweight and obesity was higher in the current sample (12.1% and 2.4%, respectively), compared to the data from a cross-sectional survey of youth (10–16 years) from 34 participating countries (the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Study) conducted in 2001–2002 [28]. Researchers indicated that the prevalence of overweight and obesity among the studied youth in Lithuania were 5.1% and 0.4% [28]. However, the prevalence of overweight and obesity in our study sample was lower than that in most other studies [8],[9],[11],[12],[16], but was higher than in several others [14],[29] that investigated risk factors associated with high BP among children and adolescents.

The findings of the current study indicating that overweight and obesity among adolescents were significantly associated with prehypertension are consistent with the results of other previously published studies [8],[14]. However, some studies presented different results. One study in China found overweight and obesity to be significantly associated with prehypertension in boys, but not in girls [12]. Another study in Canada reported no significant associations between overweight and prehypertension among girls and across both sexes combined, except among boys; however, obesity was associated with prehypertension across all sex groups [9], the latter result being similar to ours. The findings of the present study were also consistent with the findings of the previous studies that established significant associations for hypertension with overweight [13]-[15],[30] and with obesity [9],[13]-[15], although there are some differences among studies in the criteria for defining overweight and obesity, the subjects’ age, and the number of BP measurements. However, one study did not find any significant association between overweight and hypertension among girls in the population of children in rural Canada [9].

Regarding abdominal obesity, the findings of the present study are not easily comparable with other previous studies because there are differences in sample size, the age of the investigated children and adolescents, the methodology, the cut-off criteria for defining abdominal obesity, and potential confounders (e.g., age and sex). There is a problem concerning the definition of abdominal obesity among children and adolescents in research studies of this field.

The prevalence of abdominal obesity (combined 75th– < 90th and ≥90th WC percentiles) in our study (9%) was almost similar to that reported by Souza et al. (WC >75th percentile: 9.3%) [31], and was lower than that reported in other studies – 22.8% of participants with WC ≥75th percentile [16], and 51.7% of participants with WC >75th percentile [32].

The associations between abdominal obesity and high BP among children or adolescents were established by several researchers [12],[16],[29],[33]; however, these studies yielded inconsistent findings. For example, significant associations between WC ≥90th percentile (defining participants with WC <90th percentile as the reference group) and elevated BP were found in the studies in such countries as Egypt [29], China [33], and the United States [34]. In contrast, Guo et al. [12] found no significant association between WC ≥90th percentile and prehypertension in boys and girls separately, when compared to WC <90th percentile. The data of our study and another published study [16] indicated that the subjects with WC in the 75th– < 90th and ≥90th percentiles may have an increased aOR of high BP, compared to those with WC <75th percentile. In the univariate and multivariate analyses of data from our study for both sexes combined, moderate and high WC percentile categories were associated with elevated BP, except for WC ≥90th percentile with prehypertension, at significantly higher ORs than overweight and obesity measured by BMI. These results are partially consistent with the results of univariate analysis in the study by Flores-Huerta et al. [16]. The results of the multivariate analysis in the above-mentioned study [16] indicated that WC ≥90th percentile – but not in the 75th– < 90th percentile – was significantly associated with an elevated BP. However, in the current study, the associations were established separately for prehypertension and hypertension. Our study revealed that in our study sample, WC in the 75th– < 90th and ≥90th percentiles was significantly associated with prehypertension and hypertension for both sexes combined. WC measurement (which has not yet been performed in Lithuania) could be used in clinical practice to identify adolescents who have an increased risk for the development of cardiovascular diseases.

Indeed, high BP can be caused by various risk factors: environmental factors, genetic factors, and interactions between genetic and environmental factors [35]. BP, plasma glucose, and lipids can exert a dose-dependent effect on cardiovascular risk [36]. Scientific studies have also examined the associations of genetic polymorphisms with an increased risk of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases [37]-[40]. Results from a recent study [37] have shown that calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase IV (CaMKIV) plays an essential role in BP regulation through the control of the activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Another study has reported that the angiotensinogen AGT 235 T allele constitutes an independent risk factor for resistant hypertension [40]. Additional genetic and epidemiological investigations regarding the risk of cardiovascular diseases could provide more scientific evidence, which is needed for the development of diagnostic, treatment, and prevention strategies.

Our study has a few limitations. The data analysis of the subjects with increased BP (≥90th percentile) was limited to two separate occasions, after which the participants were classified as prehypertensive or hypertensive, relying on BP measurements. Further screening of BP measurements and detailed clinical examinations are needed for the verification of the diagnosis of prehypertension or hypertension. Moreover, according to the Fourth Report, an elevated BP reading obtained with an oscillometric device should be repeated by using auscultation [21]; however, in the present study, BP readings were obtained by an automatic oscillometric monitor, which has been clinically validated [41]. Other limitations of the current study are that pubertal status, biochemical parameters, and socioeconomic factors were not assessed either. This study investigated the population sample of 12–15 year-old adolescents. Further studies are also needed to examine samples of younger children and older adolescents in our country. It is essential to carry out further research in Lithuania because it could reflect the children’s and adolescents’ real state of health, and would also identify other risk factors for elevated BP. Additionally, future research is required to evaluate the importance of genetic polymorphisms in the increased risk of hypertension among Lithuanian children and adolescents.

Despite the above-mentioned limitations, the results of our study emphasized a high prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension among Lithuanian adolescents, and confirmed that overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity are associated with high BP. Therefore, public health strategies should focus on the prevention of these risk factors of cardiovascular diseases among schoolchildren. The majority of previous studies have suggested that adequate consumption of dairy products [42], fish, fruit and vegetables, a restricted intake of salt (sodium chloride) [43], and reduced consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages [44] can reduce the risk of hypertension and other cardiometabolic disorders. Recent analysis has also shown that higher levels of physical activity decrease the risk of cardiovascular diseases [45]. The promotion of long-lasting behavioural changes related to healthy nutrition, sufficient physical activities, and other healthy lifestyle factors for preventing and controlling overweight, obesity, abdominal obesity, and elevated BP is highly important.

Conclusions

According to our data, a high prevalence of high BP was observed among 12–15 year-old adolescents living in Lithuania. Overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity were significantly associated with prehypertension and hypertension among Lithuanian schoolchildren. These findings would be useful in the development of public health programs for reducing risk factors of cardiovascular diseases, and would also be important for the prevention, management, and treatment of high BP among adolescents.

Abbreviations

aOR: 

Adjusted odds ratio

BMI: 

Body mass index

BP: 

Blood pressure

CI: 

Confidence interval

DBP: 

Diastolic blood pressure

OR: 

Odds ratio

SBP: 

Systolic blood pressure

SD: 

Standard deviation

WC: 

Waist circumference

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a grant (No. LIG-02/2011) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

References

  1. Wang Y, Lobstein T: Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2006, 1: 11-25. 10.1080/17477160600586747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Reilly JJ, Methven E, McDowell ZC, Hacking B, Alexander D, Stewart L, Kelnar CJ: Health consequences of obesity. Arch Dis Child. 2003, 88: 748-752. 10.1136/adc.88.9.748.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Goran MI, Gower BA: Relation between visceral fat and disease risk in children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999, 70: 149S-156S.Google Scholar
  4. Singh AS, Mulder C, Twisk JW, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ: Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2008, 9: 474-488. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00475.x. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00475View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS: Relationship of childhood obesity to coronary heart disease risk factors in adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 2001, 108: 712-718. 10.1542/peds.108.3.712.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen X, Wang Y: Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Circulation. 2008, 117: 3171-3180. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.730366.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ: Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002, 360: 1347-1360. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11403-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McNiece KL, Poffenbarger TS, Turner JL, Franco KD, Sorof JM, Portman RJ: Prevalence of hypertension and pre-hypertension among adolescents. J Pediatr. 2007, 150: 640-644. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.01.052. e1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Salvadori M, Sontrop JM, Garg AX, Truong J, Suri RS, Mahmud FH, Macnab JJ, Clark WF: Elevated blood pressure in relation to overweight and obesity among children in a rural Canadian community. Pediatrics. 2008, 122: e821-e827. 10.1542/peds.2008-0951. doi:10.1542/peds. 2008-0951View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kovacs VA, Gabor A, Fajcsak Z, Martos E: Role of waist circumference in predicting the risk of high blood pressure in children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010, 5: 143-150. 10.3109/17477160903111771. doi:10.3109/17477160903111771View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mehdad S, Hamrani A, El Kari K, El Hamdouchi A, El Mzibri M, Barakat A, Aguenaou H, Mokhtar N: Prevalence of elevated blood pressure and its relationship with fat mass, body mass index and waist circumference among a group of Moroccan overweight adolescents. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2012, 2012: 2012-doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2012.02.006Google Scholar
  12. Guo X, Zheng L, Li Y, Yu S, Zhou X, Wang R, Zhang X, Sun Z, Sun Y: Gender-specific prevalence and associated risk factors of prehypertension among rural children and adolescents in Northeast China: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Pediatr. 2013, 172: 223-230. 10.1007/s00431-012-1873-7. doi:10.1007/s00431-012-1873-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rebelo D, Teixeira J, Marques-Vidal P, Oliveira JM: Obesity markers and blood pressure in a sample of Portuguese children and adolescents. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008, 15: 73-77. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f0e344. doi:10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f0e344View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang CX, Shi JD, Huang HY, Feng LM, Ma J: Nutritional status and its relationship with blood pressure among children and adolescents in South China. Eur J Pediatr. 2012, 171: 1073-1079. 10.1007/s00431-012-1684-x. doi:10.1007/s00431-012-1684-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu X, Shi P, Luo CY, Zhou YF, Yu HT, Guo CY, Wu F: Prevalence of hypertension in overweight and obese children from a large school-based population in Shanghai, China. BMC Public Health. 2013, 11: 13-24. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-24Google Scholar
  16. Flores-Huerta S, Klünder-Klünder M, Reyes de la Cruz L, Santos JI: Increase in body mass index and waist circumference is associated with high blood pressure in children and adolescents in Mexico city. Arch Med Res. 2009, 40: 208-215. 10.1016/j.arcmed.2009.02.009. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2009.02.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Marrodán Serrano MD, Cabañas Armesilla MD, Carmenate Moreno MM, González-Montero de Espinosa M, López-Ejeda N, JR MÁ, Prado Martínez C, Romero-Collazos JF: Association between adiposity and blood pressure levels between the ages of 6 and 16 years: analysis in a student population from Madrid, Spain. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2013, 66: 110-115. 10.1016/j.recesp.2012.08.007. doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2012.08.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Reklaitiene R, Tamosiunas A, Virviciute D, Baceviciene M, Luksiene D: Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, and the risk of mortality among middle-aged Lithuanian urban population in 1983–2009. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012, 12: 68-10.1186/1471-2261-12-68. doi:10.1186/1471-2261-12-68PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lithuanian Ministry of Health Information Centre of Institute of Hygiene: Health Statistics of Lithuania, 2011. In 2012 [], [http://sic.hi.lt/data/la2011.pdf]
  20. Zaborskis A, Petrauskiene A, Gradeckiene S, Vaitkaitiene E, Bartasiute V: Overweight and increased blood pressure in preschool-aged children. Medicina. 2003, 39: 1200-1207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004, 114 (Suppl 2): 555-576. 10.1542/peds.114.2.S2.555.Google Scholar
  22. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000, 320: 1240-1243. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fernández JR, Redden DT, Pietrobelli A, Allison DB: Waist circumference percentiles in nationally representative samples of African-American, European-American, and Mexican-American children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2004, 145: 439-444. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.06.044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ejike CE, Ugwu CE, Ezeanyika LU: Variations in the prevalence of point (pre)hypertension in a Nigerian school-going adolescent population living in a semi-urban and an urban area. BMC Pediatr. 2010, 10: 13-10.1186/1471-2431-10-13. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-10-13PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramos E, Barros H: Prevalence of hypertension in 13-year-old adolescents in Porto, Portugal. Rev Port Cardiol. 2005, 24: 1075-1087.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Silva D, Matos A, Magalhães T, Martins V, Ricardo L, Almeida H: Prevalence of hypertension in Portuguese adolescents in Lisbon, Portugal. Rev Port Cardiol. 2012, 31: 789-794. doi:10.1016/j.repc.2012.02.022PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rafraf M, Gargari BP, Safaiyan A: Prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension among adolescent high school girls in Tabriz, Iran. Food Nutr Bull. 2010, 31: 461-465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, Vereecken C, Mulvihill C, Roberts C, Currie C, Pickett W: Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obes Rev. 2005, 6: 123-132. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00176.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Abolfotouh MA, Sallam SA, Mohammed MS, Loutfy AA, Hasab AA: Prevalence of elevated blood pressure and association with obesity in Egyptian school adolescents. Int J Hypertens. 2011, 2011: 952537-doi:10.4061/2011/952537PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sorof JM, Lai D, Turner J, Poffenbarger T, Portman RJ: Overweight, ethnicity, and the prevalence of hypertension in school-aged children. Pediatrics. 2004, 113: 475-482. 10.1542/peds.113.3.475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Souza MG, Rivera IR, Silva MA, Carvalho AC: Relationship of obesity with high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010, 94: 714-719. 10.1590/S0066-782X2010005000039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Guimarães IC, de Almeida AM, Santos AS, Barbosa DB, Guimarães AC: Blood pressure: effect of body mass index and of waist circumference on adolescents. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008, 90: 393-399. 10.1590/S0066-782X2008000600007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hu YH, Reilly KH, Liang YJ, Xi B, Liu JT, Xu DJ, Yan YK, Xie B, Li XY: Increase in body mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio is associated with high blood pressure in children and adolescents in China. J Int Med Res. 2011, 39: 23-32. 10.1177/147323001103900103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Meininger JC, Brosnan CA, Eissa MA, Nguyen TQ, Reyes LR, Upchurch SL, Phillips M, Sterchy S: Overweight and central adiposity in school-age children and links with hypertension. J Pediatr Nurs. 2010, 25: 119-125. 10.1016/j.pedn.2008.09.003. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2008.09.003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Appel LJ, Brands MW, Daniels SR, Karanja N, Elmer PJ, Sacks FM: Dietary approaches to prevent and treat hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2006, 47: 296-308. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000202568.01167.B6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Santulli G: Coronary heart disease risk factors and mortality. JAMA. 2012, 307: 1137-10.1001/jama.2012.323. Author reply 1138. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.323View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Santulli G, Cipolletta E, Sorriento D, Del Giudice C, Anastasio A, Monaco S, Maione AS, Condorelli G, Puca A, Trimarco B, Illario M, Iaccarino G: CaMK4 gene deletion induces hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012, 1: e001081-10.1161/JAHA.112.001081. doi:10.1161/JAHA.112.001081PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lanni F, Santulli G, Izzo R, Rubattu S, Zanda B, Volpe M, Iaccarino G, Trimarco B: The Pl(A1/A2) polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa and cerebrovascular events in hypertension: increased risk of ischemic stroke in high-risk patients. J Hypertens. 2007, 25: 551-556. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328013cd67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Galasso G, Santulli G, Piscione F, De Rosa R, Trimarco V, Piccolo R, Cassese S, Iaccarino G, Trimarco B, Chiariello M: The GPIIIA PlA2 polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010, 10: 41-10.1186/1471-2261-10-41. doi:10.1186/1471-2261-10-41PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yugar-Toledo JC, Martin JF, Krieger JE, Pereira AC, Demacq C, Coelho OR, Pimenta E, Calhoun DA, Júnior HM: Gene variation in resistant hypertension: multilocus analysis of the angiotensin 1-converting enzyme, angiotensinogen, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase genes. DNA Cell Biol. 2011, 30: 555-564. 10.1089/dna.2010.1156. doi:10.1089/dna.2010.1156View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Topouchian J, Agnoletti D, Blacher J, Youssef A, Ibanez I, Khabouth J, Khawaja S, Beaino L, Asmar R: Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011, 7: 709-717. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S27193PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kris-Etherton PM, Grieger JA, Hilpert KF, West SG: Milk products, dietary patterns and blood pressure management. J Am Coll Nutr. 2009, 28 (Suppl 1): 103S-119S. 10.1080/07315724.2009.10719804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Srinath Reddy K, Katan MB: Diet, nutrition and the prevention of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7: 167-186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Hu FB: Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010, 121: 1356-1364. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Archer E, Blair SN: Physical activity and the prevention of cardiovascular disease: from evolution to epidemiology. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011, 53: 387-396. 10.1016/j.pcad.2011.02.006. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2011.02.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Dulskiene et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement