Skip to main content

Advertisement

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

Meeting abstract | Open | Published:

Follow-up of late preterm infants: why, what and who?

Late preterm infants (LPI) represent a growing population with own peculiar vulnerabilities; only recently attention has been focused on the impact of late preterm birth on child health, in order to define short and long-term outcomes [1, 2].

LPI are physiologically and metabolically immature; they are at higher risk than term infants of developing medical complications, resulting in greater rate of mortality and morbidity not only in the neonatal period, but also during infancy, childhood, adolescence, and through adulthood [2, 3].

Increasing evidence shows the association between late-preterm birth and various long-term medical and behavioral morbidities, including cerebral palsy, attention problems and antisocial behavior, as well as lower IQ, impaired cognitive and academic performance at school age. Fetal brain undergoes a dramatic growth and maturation during last four weeks of gestation, and this is probably the most important reason of LPI worse neurodevelopmental outcomes compared to full-term infants [35].

Physical development is an other important outcome for LPI; in addition to intrauterine growth restriction, LPI may be susceptible to feeding difficulty resulting in poor weight gain and underweight. Since failure to thrive in early infancy may be also associated with adverse cognitive and developmental outcomes, close monitoring of LPI growth pattern is needed [6].

Moreover, late-preterm birth has a negative effect also on maturation of the lungs, interrupting evolution from alveolar saccules to mature alveoli. LPI have been shown to develop early respiratory morbidities more frequently than infants born at term. However, the risk for long-term respiratory problems, such as asthma, has not yet been established in this group of patients [3, 7].

Therefore LPI need a multidisciplinary, personalized and effective follow–up care that begins at birth and continues, with varying degrees of surveillance and reflecting individual needs, throughout the lifespan. Pediatricians must play a crucial role by ensuring that appropriate screening and assessments are completed, referrals are made and continuity of care is coordinated. They have to be aware of the major problems that LPI may encounter, providing anticipatory guidance when needed. Pediatricians together with parents, child development specialists, and education professionals need to know the possible school underachievement and behavioral problems so that prompt referrals to early intervention services are made [8, 9].

Up to now, standardized short and long term follow-up schedule for LPI has not been developed yet; therefore, further research should focus on systematic evaluation of outcomes of LPI, in order to optimize follow-up monitoring of this population of children.

References

  1. 1.

    Egle WA, Tomashek KM, Wallman C: ''Late-Preterm'' Infants: A Population at Risk. Pediatrics. 2007, 120: 1390-1401. 10.1542/peds.2007-2952.

  2. 2.

    Kugelman A, Colin AA: Late Preterm Infants: Near Term But Still in a Critical Developmental Period. Pediatrics. 2013, 132: 741-751. 10.1542/peds.2013-1131.

  3. 3.

    McGowan JE, Alderdice FA, Holmes VA, Johnston L: Early Childhood Development of Late-Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2011, 127: 1111-1122. 10.1542/peds.2010-2257.

  4. 4.

    Petrini JR, Dias T, McCormick MC: Increased Risk of Adverse Neurological Development for Late Preterm Infants. J Pediatr. 2009, 154: 169-76. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.08.020.

  5. 5.

    Talge NM, Holzman C, Wang J: Late-Preterm Birth and Its Association With Cognitive and Socioemotional Outcomes at 6 Years of Age. Pediatrics. 2010, 126: 1124-1131. 10.1542/peds.2010-1536.

  6. 6.

    Goyal NK, Fiks AG, Lorch SA: Persistence of Underweight Status Among Late Preterm Infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012, 166: 424-430. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1496.

  7. 7.

    Abe K, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Hall LR: Late Preterm Birth and Risk of Developing Asthma,. J Pediatr. 2010, 157: 74-78. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.01.008.

  8. 8.

    Phillips RM, Goldstein M, Hougland K: Multidisciplinary guidelines for the care of e preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology. 2013, 33: S5-S22.

  9. 9.

    Morse SB, Zheng H, Tang Y, Roth J: Early School-Age Outcomes of Late Preterm Infants. Pediatrics. 2009, 123: e622-e629. 10.1542/peds.2008-1405.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to F Gallini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Preterm Birth
  • Antisocial Behavior
  • Intrauterine Growth Restriction
  • Neurodevelopmental Outcome