Skip to main content

Formula feeding for late-preterm infants

Preterm birth interrupts physiological foetal development, leading to various degrees of immaturity according to the gestational age at which the infant is born [1].

Since 2005, the imprecise definition of “near-term” infants has been replaced with “late-preterm”, which includes infants born between 340/7 and 366/7 weeks of gestation [2]. Late-preterm infants are at higher risk than term infants of developing medical complications that result in higher rates of mortality and morbidity [3], including thermal instability, respiratory problems, hypoglycaemia, jaundice, and feeding problems.

Breastfeeding is the first nutritional choice for all infants, especially for those born preterm. The establishment of successful breastfeeding in late-preterm infants is usually problematic, as late-preterm infants can be sleepier, have less muscular strength and more difficulty with latch, suck and swallow than term infants [4]. For this reason, health-care providers should implement specific strategies aimed at anticipate, identify promptly, and manage breastfeeding problems that the late-preterm infant and mother can experience.

However, when exclusive breastfeeding does not guarantee adequate nutrition, supplements might be advisable. Nutritional requirements of late-preterm infants are currently derived from speculations on foetal growth and requirements of preterm and term infants, while specific data on nutritional needs of this population are scarce. There is currently no consensus on whether late-preterm infants would benefit most of a high-protein diet, such as that proposed for “micropreterm” infants [5], or of a low-protein diet, such as that recommended for full-term infants. Some studies suggest that the provision of extra protein and energy could reduce weight loss and increase growth velocity [6], thus decreasing the risk for dehydration and hospital readmission. However, it is important to note that growth rate during late gestation decreases dramatically, and it is likely that protein and energy requirements for infants born during this period wouldn’t be as high as those of very preterm infants [7].

Current guidelines recommend the supplementation with essential nutrients also for late-preterm infants. Actually, it has been shown that supplementation with LC-PUFAs improves visual acuity and cognitive development in infants 30-37 weeks gestation [8].

The best nutritional approach to late-preterm infants still needs to be determined. Human milk’s benefits are undoubted; however, caregivers have to adequately support the establishment of successful breastfeeding and also identify those cases where some supplementation is needed. Further studies will have to clarify whether all late-preterm infants, or only a subgroup such as small-for-gestational-age infants, could benefit from formulas with high energy and protein content.

References

  1. 1.

    Raju TNK: Developmental physiology of late and moderate prematurity. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012, 17: 126-31. 10.1016/j.siny.2012.01.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Raju TNK, Higgins RD, Stark AR, Leveno KJ: Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Pediatrics. 2006, 118: 1207-14. 10.1542/peds.2006-0018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Engle Wa, Tomashek KM, Wallman C: “Late-preterm” infants: a population at risk. Pediatrics. 2007, 120: 1390-401. 10.1542/peds.2007-2952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine: ABM clinical protocol #10: breastfeeding the late preterm infant (34(0/7) to 36(6/7) weeks gestation) (first revision June 2011). Breastfeed Med. 2011, 6: 151-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tudehope D, Fewtrell M, Kashyap S, Udaeta E: Nutritional needs of the micropreterm infant. J Pediatr. 2013, 162 (3 Suppl): S72-80.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Blackwell MT, Eichenwald EC, McAlmon K, Petit K, Linton PT, McCormick MC, Richardson DK: Interneonatal intensive care unit variation in growth rates and feeding practices in healthy moderately premature infants. J Perinatol. 2005, 25: 478-85. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lapillonne A, O’Connor DL, Wang D, Rigo J: Nutritional recommendations for the late-preterm infant and the preterm infant after hospital discharge. J Pediatr. 2013, 162 (3 Suppl): S90-100.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fang P, Kuo H, Huang C, Ko T, Chen C, Chung M: The effect of supplementation of docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid on visual acuity and neurodevelopment in larger preterm infants. Chang Gung Med J. 2005, 28: 708-715.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Corvaglia.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corvaglia, L., Aceti, A. Formula feeding for late-preterm infants. Ital J Pediatr 40, A37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-40-S2-A37

Download citation

Keywords

  • Preterm Birth
  • Human Milk
  • Foetal Growth
  • Exclusive Breastfeed
  • Muscular Strength