Volume 41 Supplement 2

71st Congress of the Italian Society of Pediatrics

Open Access

Is organic diet really necessary for children?

Italian Journal of Pediatrics201541(Suppl 2):A75

https://doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-41-S2-A75

Published: 30 September 2015

Pesticides are a wide class of phytochemicals commonly used in conventional agriculture. Most of them are characterized by being very toxic to humans and persistent in the environment, and represent long-term dangers as they biomagnify up the food-chain. Humans, and particularly breastfed babies, are at the top of the food-chain since they ingest more food and water per unit body weight than adults, so any exposure is greater in proportion to their size. For such a reason, dietary intake of pesticides represents the major source of exposure for infants and children. Since they are growing so quickly, infants and young children are more susceptible to the effects of pesticide exposure than adults [1]. Their internal organs are still developing and maturing and the enzymatic, metabolic, and immune systems are less efficient than those of an adult. Furthermore, it has been shown that there are “critical periods” in human development when exposure to a toxin can permanently alter the way in which an individual's biological system operates. Children's exposure to pesticides has been linked to a wide range of disease, including asthma, ADHD, autism and cancer [2]. A maximum residue level (MRL) is the highest level of a pesticide residue that is legally tolerated in/on food or feed when pesticides are applied correctly, so that the amounts of residues found in food must be safe for consumers and must be as low as possible. However, the toxicity was set in the adult population, not on children, and it does not take into account the multiresidue in food. Therefore is a priority for children health to reduce exposure to contaminated food, similarly to baby food, where no pesticide residues are admitted according to the European Directive. Interventional studies have shown that an organic diet reduces children's exposure to pesticides, and when kids switched from a conventional to an organic diet, urinary pesticide metabolites dropped to almost undetectable levels [3]. Organic food also contributes to increasing nutritional quality: a recent meta-analysis reported that organic food is richer in vitamins and antioxidants compared to conventional ones [4]. The environmental benefits of organic agriculture to air, soil and water, consist of lowering the total toxic burden to our ecosystems. As demand for organic foods continues to grow, more farmers are likely to view organic methods as a viable and marketable option, helping to stabilize supply and price.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Neuropsychiatry, “La Sapienza” University of Rome
(2)
Department of Anesthesiology, IRCCS Orthopaedic Institute Rizzoli
(3)
University of Chieti-Pescara

References

  1. Holland N, Lizarraga D, Huen K: Recent progress in the genetics and epigenetics of paraoxonase: why it is relevant to children's environmental health. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015, 27 (2): 240-247. 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000192.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kishi R, Kobayashi S, Ikeno T, Araki A, Miyashita C, Itoh S, et al: Ten years of progress in the Hokkaido birth cohort study on environment and children's health: cohort profile--updated 2013. Environ Health Prev Med. 2013, 18 (6): 429-450. 10.1007/s12199-013-0357-3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lu C, Toepel K, Irish R, Fenske RA, Barr DB, Bravo R: Organic Diets Significantly Lower Children's Dietary Exposure to Organophosphorus Pesticides. Environ Health Perspect. 2006, 114 (2): 260-263. 10.1289/ehp.8418.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Barański M, Srednicka-Tober D, Volakakis N, Seal C, Sanderson R, Stewart GB, et al: Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Br J Nutr. 2014, 112 (5): 794-811. 10.1017/S0007114514001366.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Vania et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement