Open Access

Neonatal blood stream infections in tertiary referral hospitals in Kurdistan, Iran

  • Bahram Nikkhoo1,
  • Fariba Lahurpur2,
  • Ali Delpisheh3,
  • Mohammad Aziz Rasouli4 and
  • Abdorrahim Afkhamzadeh5Email author
Italian Journal of Pediatrics201541:43

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-015-0136-4

Received: 26 September 2014

Accepted: 28 March 2015

Published: 9 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is one of the most common causes of nosocomial infection in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). The aim of the present study was to determine bacterial agents and their susceptibility patterns to antibiotics and to investigate the risk factors associated with BSI.

Methods

This was a nested case–control study carried out from September 2009 to June 2010 in the NICU wards in Sanandaj hospitals western Iran. Cases were patients with BSI and controls were other patients who had negative blood culture. Bacteriologic diagnosis and antibiotic susceptibility pattern was performed based on the Edward & Ewings and the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory (NCCL) Standards.

Results

Of 472 patients who hospitalized in NICU, 6.4% had BSI (n = 30) including 17girls (56.7%) and 13 boys (43.3%). Enterobacter SPP was the predominant isolated bacteria from blood culture (36.7%). The maximum antibiotic resistance and sensitivity were observed by Tetracycline and Ciprofloxacin respectively. Risk factors associated with BSI were age ≤ 7 days (p = 0.001), previous antibiotic consumption (p = 0.013), and low birth weight (LBW), (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Gram negative bacteria and Entrobacter in particular are the most common pathogens. Improving prenatal health care, standards of infection control and choosing accurate antibiotics are recommended to avoid BSI in neonatal intensive care units.

Keywords

Bloodstream Infections (BSI)Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)Sanandaj

Introduction

The World Health Organization has estimated that 130 million neonates are born each year and more than 10 millions die during the first five days after birth. Bloodstream infection is one of the major causes of mortality in developing countries and in some communities almost half of patients in intensive care units acquire infection [1,2]. Hospital infections especially in the neonatal wards are the major cause of mortality in children [3,4].

Neonatal infection can be acquired vertically from birth canal bacteria or environmentally due to lack health facilities. Neonatal septicemia is a clinical syndrome bacteremia with symptoms and clinical signs in the first months of life and delay in its diagnosis and treatment causes mortality [5]. Signs and symptoms of neonatal infection are often nonspecific, and the rates of hospital septicemia operating with both prematurity and low birth weight are increasing [6-8].

Overall, 16.5% of all births in the world are growth restricted annually [9]. It is estimated that one in five neonates in developing countries is suffering from septicemia and blood infection [10]. The organism spectrum of neonatal septicemia can change over time and is different from region to region. Septicemia with gram-negative microorganisms is expanding especially in Asia, but it is still the main cause of septicemia in developing countries [11,12].

Newborns are devoiced of efficient structural barriers, of a protective endogenous microbial flora and of a mature immune system. Premature and growth restricted neonates in particular who admitted to NICUs are under a profound physiologic instability and are frequently exposed to therapeutic interventions associated with infectious complications such as invasive procedures and broad-spectrum antibiotics [13].

The organisms responsible for neonatal sepsis vary across geographical boundaries and in time of onset. One organism alone or a group of organisms may replace over time as the leading cause of neonatal sepsis in a particular region. It is crucial to monitor the local epidemiology of neonatal BSI continuously to detect any changes in patterns of infection and susceptibility to various antibiotics.

The present study was designed and implemented to determine the etiology of BSI and to examine antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the isolated organisms as well as risk factors for septicemia.

Methods

The nested case–control study was conducted in the NICU of general teaching hospitals and tertiary care referral centers in Sanandaj city, Kurdistan province, western Iran. All neonates admitted to the NICU from September 2009 to June 2010 were recruited. Cases were patients with blood stream infection (BSI) and controls were patients with negative blood cultures. Bloodstream infections were confirmed when at least a positive peripheral-blood culture was present.

The antibiotic susceptibility for isolated pathogens was determined and met all the recommendations of the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards breakpoint values [14]. Bacteriologic diagnosis and antibiotic susceptibility pattern was performed based on Edward & Ewings [15].

Clinical signs of sepsis were the following: temperature >38°C or <36°C, heart rate >20/min or inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Low birth weight was defined as weight of ≤ 2000 grams.

Factors associated with blood infections, including demographic characteristics such as age, sex, occupation and education of parents and other factors such as hospitalization period, previous antibiotic consumption, low birth weight and the using ventilator were investigated.

Chi-square test was performed to assess potential risk factors and neonatal bloodstream. The level of statistical significance adopted was p < 0.05. SPSS version17 was used for all statistical analysis.

Results

Of 472 patients recruited 30 BSI cases were diagnosed. The total BSI incidence rate was 6.4%. Mean age and standard deviation was 12.13 ± 5.72 in BSI group and 14.57 ± 6.03 in non BSI group (p = 0.03) . In BSI group, 17 (56.7%) were girls and 13 (43.3%) were boys with no significant difference (p > 0.05). The isolated bacteria identified in blood culture of 30 neonates are showen in (Figure 1) including Enterobacter (36.7%), Klebsiella (20.0%), Escherichia coli (10.0%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (26.7%) and others (6.6%) .
Figure 1

Frequency of isolated bacteria in Neonates hospitalized in NICU.

Susceptibility testing results are showen in Table 1. Klebsiella species revealed high susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (98%), cotrimoxazole (60%). Enterobacter isolates were susceptible to cotrimoxazole (90%) and ciprofloxacin (88.9%) and amikacin (71.4, but less so to the cefalotin/ampicillin. E. coli revealed decreased susceptibility to amikacin (100%), cefotaxime/cefalotin (66.7%), cefteriaxone/cefixim/cotrimoxazole/gentamicin (33.3%), tetracycline (0%).
Table 1

Results of susceptibility for isolated bacteria (N = 30)

Bacteria

E.coli

Klebceilla

Entrobacter

Staph Epidermidis

Strep GB

Serratia

Antibiotic

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

Susceptible

Susceptible

Susceptible

Susceptible

Susceptible

Susceptible

Ciprofloxacin

1 (50)

5 (100)

8 (88.9)

4 (80)

*

1 (100)

Cefotaxime

2 (66.7)

0 (0)

6 (66.7)

3 (60)

0 (0)

1 (100)

Cefalotin

2 (66.7)

0 (0)

1 (12.5)

1 (25)

*

1 (100)

Ampicillin

1 (33.3)

0 (0)

1 (11.1)

0 (0)

1 (100)

0 (0)

Amikacin

3 (100)

0 (0)

5 (71.4)

*

*

1 (100)

Cefixim

1 (33.3)

0 (0)

6 (66.7)

2 (40)

0 (0)

1 (100)

Cefteriaxone

1 (33.3)

3 (60)

5 (50)

4 (80)

0 (0)

1 (100)

Cotrimoxazole

1 (33.3)

0 (0)

9 (90)

2 (66.7)

0 (0)

1 (100)

Getamicin

1 (33.3)

0 (0)

4 (57.1)

0 (0)

*

1 (100)

Tetracycline

0 (0)

0 (0)

4 (44.4)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

*Not tested for susceptibility to this antibiotic.

The variables associated with BSI according to the univariate analysis were:

age ≤ 7 days (p = 0.001), previous antibiotic consumption (p = 0.013), and birth weight ≤ 2 kg (LBW), (p = 0.001).

On the other hand, sex, ventilator use, clinical signs and existence of underlying disease were not significantly associated with BSI (Table 2).
Table 2

Demographic and clinical characteristics of neonates

Variable

BSI**

Non-BSI

P Value

Odds Ratio (CI***)

N (%)

N (%)

Birth weight

  

0.001

4.55 (1.95-10.64)

2000 g

21 (4.9)

404 (95.1)

  

<2000 g

9 (19.1)

38 (80.9)

  

Ventilator

  

0.49*

 

NO

8 (7.8)

95 (92.2)

  

YES

22 (6)

347 (94)

  

Previous antibiotic use

  

0.01

2.65 (1.21-5.79)

NO

10 (3.8)

252 (96.2)

  

YES

20 (9.5)

190 (90.5)

  

Clinical Sign of Sepsis

  

0.49*

 

NO

1 (2.6)

38 (97.4)

  

YES

29 (6.7)

404 (93.3)

  

Underlying disease

  

0.7*

 

NO

    

YES

29 (6.6)

409 (93.4)

  
 

1 (2.9)

33 (97.1)

  

Age group

  

0.001

0.22 (0.1-0.5)

7 days

11(17.7)

51 (82.3)

  

>7 days

19 (4.6)

391 (95.4)

  

*Not significance.

**Blood stream infection.

*** Cl, confidence interval.

Discussion

Blood infection is the main cause of neonatal mortality in the neonatal intensive care units [16]. The prevalence rate of blood stream infection in the present study was 6.4%. The majority of pathogens isolated from blood cultures were Gram-negative bacteria (70%) including Enterobacter, Klebsiella and Escherichia coli. Risk factors associated with sepsis were age ≤ 7 days, previous antibiotic consumption, and low birth weight.

Prevalence of neonatal septicemia, its pathogens and risk factors are different across the world. Macharashvili and colleagues has reported a prevalence rate of 63% for septicemia which Gram-negative bacteria was the highest [2]. Similar studies in Iran [3,17] and other countries [18-20] are consistent with the result of our study except that the prevalence of septicemia in the present study was much lower. Because our patients were whom hospitalized in NICU for any reason, but in other studies all of patients had clinical signs for sepsis.

The significant relationship between lengths of hospitalization more than a week and blood infection in the present study, was also consistent with the recent reports [7,8].

In the present study, Klebsiella species revealed high susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (98%). Enterobacter isolates were susceptible to cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. E. coli revealed gighest susceptibility to amikacin and the least to tetracycline (0%).

In a Palestinian study in Gaza, the most sensitive antibiotics were Meropenem and isolates were resistant against other antibiotics including Ciprofloxacin [5]. The pattern of sensitivity to gram-negative bacteria BSI in the present study was also differs from the recent report by Macharashvili for Ciprofloxacin, Carbapnem and Gentamicin [2]. In another study, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli have been reported as the most common cause of blood infection [21].

In this study, age ≤ 7 days (p = 0.001), previous antibiotic consumption (p = 0.013), and low birth weight, (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with BSI. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies [4,8,10].

We had one limitation: Information on gestational age was not available.

Conclusions

Gram negative bacteria and Entrobacter in particular are the most common pathogens. Improving prenatal health care, standards of infection control and choosing accurate antibiotics are recommended to avoid BSI in neonatal intensive care units.

Abbreviation

BSI: 

Bloodstream infection

NICU: 

neonatal intensive care units

Declarations

Acknowledgement

This study was financially and ethically supported by the Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
(2)
Department of Microbiology, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
(3)
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Ilam University of Medical Sciences
(4)
Department of Epidemiology & Statistics, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
(5)
Department of Community Medicine & Kurdistan Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Modi N, Doré CJ, Saraswatula A, Richards M, Bamford KB, Coello R, et al. A case definition for national and international neonatal bloodstream infection surveillance. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(1):F8–F12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Macharashvili N, Kourbatova E, Butsashvili M, Tsertsvadze T, McNutt LA, Leonard MK. Etiology of neonatal blood stream infections in Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13(4):499–505.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Salamati P, Rahbarimanesh AA, Yunesian M, Naseri M. Neonatal nosocomial infections in Bahrami Children Hospital. Indian J Pediatr. 2006;73(3):197–200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lakshmi KS, Jayashree M, Singhi S, Ray P. Study of nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. J Trop Pediatr. 2007;53(2):87–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. El-Jadba AHE, El-Yazji MS. Neonatal Septicemia In Gaza City Hospitals. Pak J Med Sci. 2009;25(2):226–31.Google Scholar
  6. Stocker M, Fontana M, El Helou S, Wegscheider K, Berger TM. Use of procalcitonin-guided decision-making to shorten antibiotic therapy in suspected neonatal early-onset sepsis: prospective randomized intervention trial. Neonatology. 2010;97(2):165–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Xu Y, Zhang LJ, Ge HY, Wang DH. Clinical analysis of nosocomial infection in neonatal intensive care units. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2007;45(6):437–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Holmes A, Doré CJ, Saraswatula A, Bamford KB, Richards MS, Coello R, et al. Risk factors and recommendations for rate stratification for surveillance of neonatal healthcare-associated bloodstream infection. J Hosp Infect. 2008;68(1):66–72. Epub 2007 Oct 17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Delpisheh A, Kelly Y, Rizwan S, Attia E, Drammond S, Brabin BJ. Population attributable risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes related to smoking in adolescents and adults. Public Health. 2007;121(11):861–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Elster T, Beata Czeszyńska M, Sochaczewska D, Konefał H, Baryła-Pankiewicz E. Analysis of risk factors for nosocomial infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin in the years 2005–2008. Ginekol Pol. 2009;80(8):609–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Litzow JM, Gill CJ, Mantaring JB, Fox MP, MacLeod WB, Mendoza M, et al. High frequency of multidrug-resistant gram-negative rods in 2 neonatal intensive care units in the Philippines. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(6):543–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Viswanathan R, Singh AK, Mukherjee S, Mukherjee R, Das P, Basu S. Aetiology and antimicrobial resistance of neonatal sepsis at a tertiary care centre in eastern India: A 3 year study. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78(4):409–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Távora AC, Castro AB, Militão MA, Girão JE, Ribeiro Kde C, Távora LG. Risk Factors for Nosocomial Infection in a Brazilian Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Braz J Infect Dis. 2008;12(1):75–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1999. NCCLS approved standard M100-S9.Google Scholar
  15. Roberts JA. Management of pyelonephritis and upper urinary tract infections. Urol Clin North Am. 1999;26(4):753–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Robinson D, Kumar P, Cadichon S. Neonatal Sepsis in the Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Med. 2008;9(3):160–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sharif M, Hoseinian M, Moosavi SGA, Sharif A. Etiology of bacterial sepsis and bacterial Drug resistance in hospitalized neonates of Shahid Beheshti Hospital of Kashan in 1996 and 1997. Feyz, Kashan Univ Med Sci Health Serv. 2000;12(3):71–7.Google Scholar
  18. Vergnano S, Sharland M, Kazembe P, Mwansambo C, Heath PT. Neonatal sepsis: an international perspective. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(3):F220–4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Gastmeier P, Hentschel J, De VI, Obladen M, Rüden H. Device- associated nosocomial infection surveillance in neonatal intensive care using specified criteria for neonates. J Hosp Infect. 1998;38(1):51–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tseng YC, Chiu YC, Wang JH, Lin HC, Lin HC, Su BH, et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in a neonatal intensive care unit of a medical center: a three-year review. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2002;35(3):168–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Kugler K. Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with blood stream infection; frequencies of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (United States and Canada. 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Nikkhoo et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement