Skip to content


  • Case report
  • Open Access

Coeliac disease in infants: antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptide come first!

Italian Journal of Pediatrics201743:70

  • Received: 10 April 2017
  • Accepted: 3 August 2017
  • Published:



The onset of coeliac disease (CD) in the first year of life is uncommon and the diagnosis can be challenging due to the suboptimal sensitivity of tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) at this age and the many other possible causes of malabsorption in infants. Antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides (anti-DGPs), especially IgG, may appear earlier than IgA anti-tTG in very young children with CD.

Case presentation

We report here on an 8-month-old child who was evaluated for failure to thrive, constipation and developmental delay. The symptoms started following gluten introduction in the diet. Laboratory tests showed high fecal elastase concentration, normal serum IgA levels with positive IgG and IgA anti-DGPs, whereas anti-tTG were not detected. The duodenal biopsy revealed a complete villous atrophy (Marsh-Oberhuber 3C). The culture of biopsy fragments in the presence of gliadin peptides did not stimulate the production of IgA anti-endomysial antibodies. Genetic testing proved the child was positive for HLA-DQ2 (DQA1*05; DQB1*02) and HLA-DQ8 (DQA1*03, DQB1*0302). Having initiated the gluten-free diet, the symptoms disappeared and the infant experienced rapid catch-up growth with normalization of psychomotor development.


This case report highlights the utility of anti-DGPs for screening infants with suspected CD. The pattern with positivity for IgG and IgA anti-DGPs only is rare in IgA-competent children with biopsy-proven CD. It could be explained in infancy as immaturity of the adaptive immune system.


  • Coeliac disease
  • Anti-deamidated gliadin peptides antibodies


Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder triggered by gluten ingestion in genetically predisposed subjects [1]. While it is know to affect around 1% of Caucasian schoolchildren, the true prevalence is probably underestimated [2, 3]. While coeliac disease can occur at any age following gluten introduction in the diet, the onset of symptoms shortly after weaning is uncommon [46]. The pathogenesis of the disease depends on the presence of gliadin-reactive CD4+ T cells in the lamina propria of the small bowel, which recognize gliadin peptides deamidated by tissue transglutaminase and bound to DQ2+ or DQ8+ antigen-presenting cells [7, 8]. The gliadine-reactive CD4+ T cells enhance an adaptive immune response that leads to intraepithelial and lamina propria infiltration of inflammatory cells, crypt hyperplasia, and villous atrophy [9]. Innate immunity also contributes to mucosal damage [10]. Tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) are directed against the enzyme responsible for the deamidation of gliadin in the lamina propria. These antibodies perform at a lower sensitivity and specificity in children under 18 months of age compared to older subjects, the earliest tTG seropositivity being reported at the age of 12 months [1114]. Tests for antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides (anti-DGPs) have replaced those for anti-gliadin antibodies, as the former show higher specificity [15]. Immunoglobulin G anti-DGPs are more sensitive than IgA in the diagnosis of CD [1619]. The combination of IgA anti-tTG and IgG anti-DGP offers the best accuracy for diagnosis of CD at all ages, as it increases the chances of detecting the disease in subjects with IgA deficiency [17, 2023]. Moreover, the presence of IgG anti-DGPs seems to be the best serologic marker of villous atrophy in the follow up of coeliac patients [2426]. While in older patients IgA anti-tTG levels generally correlate with the severity of the duodenal lesions according to the Marsh–Oberhuber grading system [27, 28], in young children high IgG anti-DGP titres are related to severe intestinal damage [2932].

In this article we present the unusual case of an infant who developed symptoms of CD shortly after weaning. In spite of a complete villous atrophy at biopsy, only serum anti-DGPs were increased, whereas anti-tTG and anti-endomysial antibodies were absent.

Case presentation

An 8-month-old boy was evaluated for failure to thrive and developmental delay. He was born at 38 weeks of gestational age (birth weight 4.090 kg, above the 90th percentile). Familial and antenatal history was unremarkable; in particular there was no history of gestational diabetes nor any significant perinatal event. The patient had been exclusively breastfed for the first 5 months of life, with regular growth and psychomotor development. After weaning, at between 6 and 8 months of age, the child experienced worsening constipation, bulky stools, irritability and anorexia. The onset of symptoms had no association with any specific event. The infant was admitted to the pediatric ward of the University Hospital of Udine, Italy, when he was 8-months old. His weight-for-length was below the 3rd percentile, whereas 2 months before it was at the 25th percentile [33]. Between the 6th and 8th months he also showed developmental regression: his babbling and smiling decreased, he could no longer sit without support and became apathetic and irritable. The head circumference had increased normally since birth at around the 25th percentile. The physical examination revealed severe dystrophy, with a potbelly and wasted limbs. He appeared apathetic with little interest in things and people around him. He also had mild hypotonia, with decreased muscle bulk but preserved deep tendon reflexes. Laboratory tests revealed a normal full blood count. A metabolic panel showed serum albumin (3.6 g/dL;), Vitamin A (207 mcg/L) and total IgG (269 mg/dL) levels at the lower limit of normal. A screening for CD revealed normal IgA levels, absence of tTG antibodies but positive serum anti-DGPs (IgG 183 U/mL; IgA 147 U/mL; normal range < 10 U/ml for both, as suggested by the manufacturer). Tissue-tranglutaminase antibodies and anti-DGPs were assessed by a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (Zenit-RA®, Menarini Diagnostics, Florence, Italy). All other laboratory tests of the metabolic panel were normal (including iron levels, folic acid, vitamin D, B12, and E, thyroid-stimulating hormone, creatinine kinase, venous blood gas, lactate and ammonia levels). Fecal elastase was at a low concentration (<100 mcg/g), while fecal calprotectin concentration (IDK® Calprotectin ELISA, Immundiagnostik, Bensheim, Germany) of 135 mg/kg was in the normal range for the patient’s age [34, 35]. A normal sweat chloride test ruled out cystic fibrosis and a magnetic resonance imaging of the brain excluded structural/anatomic brain abnormalities.

An esophagogastroduodenoscopy with duodenal biopsy showed complete villous atrophy with crypt hypertrophy and more than 60 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 enterocytes in the duodenal mucosal, corresponding to a 3C score of the Modified Marsh (Oberhuber) classification. Antiendomysial IgA antibodies were not detected in the supernatant of duodenal mucosal fragments cultured with gliadin peptides [36]. Genetic analysis revealed the presence of HLA-DQ2 (DQA1*05; DQB1*02) and HLA-DQ8 (DQA1*03; DQB1*0302). Within 4 months of initiating a gluten-free diet, the child caught up with his original weight-for-age z-score, with complete normalization of neurological evaluation and laboratory parameters. Six months after the diagnosis, IgG anti-DGP were still slightly positive (20 UI/ml, normal range < 10 UI/ml), while IgA anti-tTG were absent. After 6 months and for the next 2 years both DGP and tTG antibodies resulted negative.


In this case report, the serological pattern with DGP-positive/tTG-negative antibodies in an infant was predictive of CD with villous atrophy. The finding confirms evidence from literature that anti-DGPs are a sensitive marker of CD in very young children and may be the first CD antibodies to seroconvert [37, 38]. This would be in accordance with the suggested pathogenesis of CD, as the disease process seems to initiate with the T-cell responses to deamidated gliadin peptides in the intestinal mucosa [39]. However, only a minority of children with circulating T cells specific to deamidated gliadin will develop anti-DGPs and celiac disease. Peripheral blood T-cell responses to deamidated gliadin peptides were detectable at 9 months of age in 40% of a cohort including 300 children with HLA-associated genetic risk for CD. However only 3.1% of the cohort’s subjects had developed CD by the age of 4 years, each being seropositive for IgG anti-DGPs and IgA anti-tTG at the time of diagnosis [40].

Lammi et al. showed that in 35 of the 48 children with CD from the Finnish DIPP study [41], serum IgG anti-DGPs preceded tTG positivity and appeared on average 1 year earlier [19]. Our patient, unlike the children with anti-DGPs seropositivity and CD described by Lammi et al. [19], never developed tTG antibodies in spite of severe gluten-sensitive enteropathy.

The positivity of serum anti-DGPs only in very young children has a poor positive predictive value for CD and should be considered with caution: in a retrospective analysis, Parizade found that over 60% of children under 2 years of age with DGP-positive/tTG-negative pattern (HLA alleles not reported) became seronegative within 1 year, without following a gluten-free diet [42]. In that study, 6 out of 12 children with only anti-DGP positivity referred for biopsy, had a diagnosis of CD [42]. In the study by Olen and colleagues, [43] villous atrophy was found only in 8 of 149 children with DGP-positivity and tTG-negativity. These findings would suggest duodenal biopsy may be indicated in infants with sole anti-DGP positivity only if they have signs/symptoms consistent with CD and positivity for HLA DQ2/DQ8, as was the case in our patient [42, 44].

The children reported here was at standard genetic risk of CD, given the presence of the HLA-DQ2 (DQA1*05; DQB1*02) and HLA-DQ8 (DQA1*03, DQB1*0302) [4], while in a case-control study by Megiorni et al. [45], the HLA haplotype with copresence of DQ2 and DQ8 resulted at the top of the genetic risk gradient for CD (risk 1:7).

The infant’s fecal elastase was low, with chronic malabsorption. In subjects with villous atrophy, the mucosal damage may impair the release of enteric hormones (secretin and cholecystokinin) and cause secondary reduction of exocrine pancreatic secretion, which includes fecal elastase [4650]. However in children with CD, fecal elastase concentration usually normalizes after a few months from the introduction of a gluten free diet [51], as in the case presented here.

The patient described in this paper had neurological symptoms at presentation, such as developmental delay and hypotonia. These symptoms are sometimes reported in children with onset of CD during infancy, possibly due to vitamin and micronutrient deficiency [52]. In our patient, no such nutritional deficit was identified although zinc levels, which are linked to neurocognitive delay in malnourished children, could not be investigated [53].

Timing of gluten introduction in our patient was in accordance with current international recommendations [37] and could not influence the onset of CD. However, recent evidence indicates that neither early (<17 weeks of life) nor delayed gluten introduction (>26 weeks) is a risk factor for future CD [54].


This case report highlights the utility of IgG anti-DGPs for screening infants with suspected coeliac disease. Some of the children who develop CD at this age, might have an immature adaptive immune response with the sole production of anti-DGPs even in the presence of villous atrophy, as was the case in our patient. We suggest that the serologic pattern with DGP-positive/tTG-negative antibodies in an infant with consistent symptoms and HLA DQ2/DQ8 haplotype should prompt a duodenal biopsy to rule out CD. Further studies are needed to provide a more detailed evaluation of this serologic pattern in IgA-competent children with celiac disease.



Coeliac disease


Deamidated gliadin peptides


Human leukocytes antigen


Transglutaminase antibodies



Not applicable.


The authors did not receive funding for this study.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

MA was an attending paediatrician. He conceptualized and drafted the initial manuscript, and subsequently reviewed and revised the manuscript. FRM conducted a literature review for this case report and reviewed and revised the manuscript. MF and ET performed laboratory analyses and reviewed and revised the manuscript. PM was an attending paediatrician. She reviewed and revised the manuscript. PC contributed to conceptualizing the case report and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted, and all agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of the patient’s clinical details was obtained from the parents. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences, Unit of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Udine, Piazzale S. Maria Misericordia 1, 33100 Udine, Italy
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy


  1. Zawahir S, Safta A, Fasano A. Pediatric celiac disease. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21:655–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Garnier-Lengliné H, Cerf-Bensussan N, Ruemmele FM. Celiac disease in children. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015;39:544–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Snyder J, Butzner JD, DeFelice AR, Fasano A, Guandalini S, Liu E, et al. Evidence-Informed Expert Recommendations for the Management of Celiac Disease in Children. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20153147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lionetti E, Castellaneta S, Francavilla R, Pulvirenti A, Tonutti E, Amarri S, et al. Introduction of Gluten, HLA Status, and the Risk of Celiac Disease in Children. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1295–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Saari A, Harju S, Mäkitie O, Saha M-T, Dunkel L, Sankilampi U. Systematic growth monitoring for the early detection of celiac disease in children. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:e1525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Tanpowpong P, Broder-Fingert S, Katz AJ, Camargo CA. Age-Related Patterns in Clinical Presentations and Gluten-Related Issues Among Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2012;3:e9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Green PHR, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1731–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Sabatino A, Corazza GR. Coeliac disease. Lancet Lond Engl. 2009;373:1480–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Guandalini S, Assiri A. Celiac disease: a review. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:272–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gianfrani C, Auricchio S, Troncone R. Adaptive and innate immune responses in celiac disease. Immunol Lett. 2005;99:141–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lagerqvist C, Dahlbom I, Hansson T, Jidell E, Juto P, Olcén P, et al. Antigliadin immunoglobulin A best in finding celiac disease in children younger than 18 months of age. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;47:428–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Leffler DA, Schuppan D. Update on serologic testing in celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2520–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Giersiepen K, Lelgemann M, Stuhldreher N, Ronfani L, Husby S, Koletzko S, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic antibody tests for coeliac disease in children: summary of an evidence report. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54:229–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Simell S, Hoppu S, Hekkala A, Simell T, Ståhlberg M-R, Viander M, et al. Fate of five celiac disease-associated antibodies during normal diet in genetically at-risk children observed from birth in a natural history study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2026–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vermeersch P, Geboes K, Mariën G, Hoffman I, Hiele M, Bossuyt X. Diagnostic performance of IgG anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibody assays is comparable to IgA anti-tTG in celiac disease. Clin Chim Acta Int J Clin Chem. 2010;411:931–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Basso D, Guariso G, Fogar P, Meneghel A, Zambon C-F, Navaglia F, et al. Antibodies against synthetic deamidated gliadin peptides for celiac disease diagnosis and follow-up in children. Clin Chem. 2009;55:150–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Volta U, Granito A, Parisi C, Fabbri A, Fiorini E, Piscaglia M, et al. Deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies as a routine test for celiac disease: a prospective analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:186–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tonutti E, Visentini D, Picierno A, Bizzaro N, Villalta D, Tozzoli R, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of the ELISA test for the detection of deamidated anti-gliadin peptide antibodies in the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease. J Clin Lab Anal. 2009;23:165–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lammi A, Arikoski P, Simell S, Kinnunen T, Simell V, Paavanen-Huhtala S, et al. Antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptide in diagnosis of celiac disease in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60:626–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Villalta D, Tonutti E, Prause C, Koletzko S, Uhlig HH, Vermeersch P, et al. IgG Antibodies against Deamidated Gliadin Peptides for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Patients with IgA Deficiency. Clin Chem. 2010;56:464–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mozo L, Gómez J, Escanlar E, Bousoño C, Gutiérrez C. Diagnostic value of anti-deamidated gliadin peptide IgG antibodies for celiac disease in children and IgA-deficient patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012;55:50–5.Google Scholar
  22. Pallav K, Xu H, Leffler DA, Kabbani T, Kelly CP. Immunoglobulin A deficiency in celiac disease in the United States. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:133–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolf J, Hasenclever D, Petroff D, Richter T, Uhlig HH, Laaβ MW, et al. Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease: A Biopsy-Controlled, International, Multicentre Study of 376 Children with Coeliac Disease and 695 Controls. PLoS One. 2014;9:e97853.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaukinen K, Collin P, Laurila K, Kaartinen T, Partanen J, Mäki M. Resurrection of gliadin antibodies in coeliac disease. Deamidated gliadin peptide antibody test provides additional diagnostic benefit. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:1428–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. de Chaisemartin L, Meatchi T, Malamut G, Fernani-Oukil F, Hosking F, Rault D, et al. Application of Deamidated Gliadin Antibodies in the Follow-Up of Treated Celiac Disease. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136745.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Monzani A, Rapa A, Fonio P, Tognato E, Panigati L, Oderda G. Use of deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies to monitor diet compliance in childhood celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53:55–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marsh MN. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenterology. 1992;102:330–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11:1185–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Agardh D, Lee H-S, Kurppa K, Simell V, Aronsson CA, Jörneus O, et al. Clinical Features of Celiac Disease: A Prospective Birth Cohort. Pediatrics. 2015;135:627–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Donaldson MR, Firth SD, Wimpee H, Leiferman KM, Zone JJ, Horsley W, et al. Correlation of duodenal histology with tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibody levels in pediatric celiac disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2007;5:567–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Alessio MG, Tonutti E, Brusca I, Radice A, Licini L, Sonzogni A, et al. Correlation between IgA tissue transglutaminase antibody ratio and histological finding in celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55:44–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Amarri S, Alvisi P, De Giorgio R, Gelli MC, Cicola R, Tovoli F, et al. Antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides: an accurate predictor of coeliac disease in infancy. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33:1027–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. WHO | Weight-for-length/height tables [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2017 Jun 27]. Available from:
  34. Li F, Ma J, Geng S, Wang J, Liu J, Zhang J, et al. Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations in Healthy Children Aged 1-18 Months. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119574. View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Hestvik E, Tumwine JK, Tylleskar T, Grahnquist L, Ndeezi G, Kaddu-Mulindwa DH, et al. Faecal calprotectin concentrations in apparently healthy children aged 0-12 years in urban Kampala. Uganda: a community-based survey BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Carroccio A, Iacono G, D’Amico D, Cavataio F, Teresi S, Caruso C, et al. Production of anti-endomysial antibodies in cultured duodenal mucosa: usefulness in coeliac disease diagnosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:32–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:656–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu E, Li M, Emery L, Taki I, Barriga K, Tiberti C, et al. Natural history of antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides and transglutaminase in early childhood celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;45:293–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Castillo NE, Theethira TG, Leffler DA. The present and the future in the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterol Rep. 2015;3:3–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Lammi A, Arikoski P, Hakulinen A, Schwab U, Uusitupa M, Heinonen S, et al. Development of gliadin-specific immune responses in children with HLA-associated genetic risk for celiac disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:168–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Haller MJ, Schatz DA. The DIPP project: 20 years of discovery in type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2016;17:5–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Parizade M, Shainberg B. Positive Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibodies and Negative Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies in a Pediatric Population: To Biopsy or Not To Biopsy. Clin Vaccine Immunol CVI. 2010;17:884–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Olen O, Gudjónsdóttir AH, Browaldh L, Hessami M, Elvin K, Liedberg A-S, et al. Antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides and tissue transglutaminase for diagnosis of pediatric celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55:695–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Barbato M, Maiella G, Di Camillo C, Guida S, Valitutti F, Lastrucci G, et al. The anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies unmask celiac disease in small children with chronic diarrhoea. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver. 2011;43:465–9.Google Scholar
  45. Megiorni F, Mora B, Bonamico M, Barbato M, Nenna R, Maiella G, et al. HLA-DQ and risk gradient for celiac disease. Hum Immunol. 2009;70:55–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Carroccio A, Iacono G, Montalto G, Cavataio F, Di Marco C, Balsamo V, et al. Exocrine pancreatic function in children with coeliac disease before and after a gluten free diet. Gut. 1991;32:796–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Nousia-Arvanitakis S, Fotoulaki M, Tendzidou K, Vassilaki C, Agguridaki C, Karamouzis M. Subclinical Exocrine Pancreatic Dysfunction Resulting From Decreased Cholecystokinin Secretion in the Presence of Intestinal Villous Atrophy: J. Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43:307–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Nousia-Arvanitakis S, Karagiozoglou-Lamboudes T, Aggouridaki C, Malaka-Lambrellis E, Galli-Tsinopoulou A, Xefteri M. Influence of Jejunal Morphology Changes on Exocrine Pancreatic Function in Celiac Disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol. 1999;29:81–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Kelly T, Buxbaum J. Gastrointestinal Manifestations of Cystic Fibrosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:1903–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Whitcomb DC, Lowe ME. Human pancreatic digestive enzymes. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:1–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rana SS, Dambalkar A, Chhabra P, Sharma R, Nada R, Sharma V, et al. Is pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in celiac disease related to structural alterations in pancreatic parenchyma? Ann. Gastroenterol Q Publ Hell Soc Gastroenterol. 2016;29:363–6.Google Scholar
  52. Zelnik N. Neurologic Disorders in Patients With Celiac Disease: Are They Mediated by Brain Perfusion Changes?: In Reply. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1734.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Black MM. The evidence linking zinc deficiency with children’s cognitive and motor functioning. J Nutr. 2003;133:1473S–6S.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Aronsson CA, Lee H-S, Liu E, Uusitalo U, Hummel S, Yang J, et al. Age at Gluten Introduction and Risk of Celiac Disease. Pediatrics. 2015;peds:2014–1787.Google Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017