- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
- Published:
Response to commentary ‘long COVID-19/post-COVID condition in children: do we all speak the same language?
Italian Journal of Pediatrics volume 48, Article number: 200 (2022)
Abstract
Here we present the Authors’ answer to the Letter written by Dr. Garazzino and Colleagues with reference to our article “Long COVID-19 in children: an Italian cohort study”.
Main text
Dear Editor,
we read with interest the letter by Dr. Garazzino and colleagues. They present a large hospital series with a cumulative incidence of post-COVID condition (PCC) of 8.4% (35/417), in contrast with the incidence recorded in our cohort of outpatients visited in primary care, which was of 24.3% (153/629) [1].
Of course, it is useful to try to analyze the possible reasons that could explain these differences.
The first point to consider is the difference existing between the two studies regarding design and follow-up. The Turin study has a prospective design, whereas our study is cross-sectional. Moreover, the first refers to a monocentric, hospital-based series, whereas the second is a multicentric study which considers mainly primary care patients. Multicentricity could be surely an added risk of inhomogeneity in evaluation of PCC symptoms, especially when self-reported and regarding qualitative and subjective conditions like fatigue or psychological disorders. We tried to contain this risk by directly making the Primary Care Pediatrician detect symptoms during the interview with the parents or during the clinical visit.
A very important role is played by the differences in the PCC definition itself.
Dr. Garazzino and colleagues deemed that only symptoms occurring or persisting within 12 weeks from SARS-CoV-2 infection were consistent with sequelae of COVID-19. In our study instead, long COVID-19 syndrome was diagnosed when at least one of the symptoms increased in frequency during the 8–36 weeks after recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection, with respect to the previous year.
Another reason could be that the two study cohorts have been recruited in two different time periods. The series from Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital was collected in March 2020 – January 2022, while our survey was performed on patients who acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection in October 2020 – June 2021. Hence, most children in our series had COVID-19 before the vaccination era, while severity of COVID-19 greatly decreased after the start of vaccination and the surge of omicron variant in the second semester of 2021.
In addiction with the primary care series, we also presented data of a small hospital series regarding 60 children admitted at the Vittore Buzzi Children’s Hospital in Milan, Italy. PCC cumulative incidence in this cohort is higher: the previously mentioned reasons could have a role in the explication of the difference.
In our opinion, research in the hospital setting and in primary care are both essential, even if they yield different results as in the present situation. Hospital series are better characterized through medical specialist visits, lab exams, imaging.
Anyway, we completely agree with the conclusions, reported by Dr. Garazzino and coll.: “PCC in the pediatric population is still an ill-defined entity that urgently needs agreed and standardized definitions, as well as outcome measures. Only when these items are conclusively established, the real prevalence of the disease will be clarified”.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- SARS-CoV-2:
-
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2
- COVID-19:
-
CoronaVirus Disease 2019
Reference
Trapani G, Verlato G, Bertino E, et al. Long COVID-19 in children: an italian cohort study. Ital J Pediatr. 2022;48(1):1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-022-01282-x.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The study has been pursued with no sources of funding to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GT, EB, GM, RV, and AS wrote the first version of the letter. GV, AD, and VF revised critically the manuscript. All authors have given the final approval of the version to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Liguria Region on 13/12/2021 with the register number 419/2021. All methods were performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained for every participant from a parent.
Consent for publication
Informed consent was obtained from all patients’ parents.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Trapani, G., Verlato, G., Bertino, E. et al. Response to commentary ‘long COVID-19/post-COVID condition in children: do we all speak the same language?. Ital J Pediatr 48, 200 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-022-01394-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-022-01394-4
Keywords
- Long COVID-19
- post-COVID condition
- Pediatric age