Skip to main content

Human parechovirus meningitis in children: state of the art


Human Parechovirus is a common cause of infection occurring especially during the first years of life. It may present with a broad spectrum of manifestations, ranging from a pauci-symptomatic infection to a sepsis-like or central nervous system disease. Aim of this study is to explore the knowledge on Parechovirus meningitis. According to the purpose of the study, a systematic review of the literature focusing on reports on central nervous system. Parechovirus infection of children was performed following PRISMA criteria. Out of the search, 304 papers were identified and 81 records were included in the revision dealing with epidemiology, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, imaging, therapy and outcome. Parechovirus meningitis incidence may vary all over the world and outbreaks may occur. Fever is the most common symptom, followed by other non-specific signs and symptoms including irritability, poor feeding, skin rash or seizures. Although several reports describe favourable short-term neurodevelopmental outcomes at discharge after Parechovirus central nervous system infection, a specific follow up and the awareness on the risk of sequelae should be underlined in relation to the reported negative outcome. Evidence seems to suggest a correlation between magnetic imaging resonance alteration and a poor outcome.


Human Parechovirus (HPeV) is a common cause of infections occurring especially during the first years of life. It may present with a broad spectrum of manifestations, ranging from a pauci-symptomatic infection to a sepsis-like or central nervous system (CNS) disease, with possible neurological involvement, particularly among the youngest, that may even require intensive care unit assistance. The cytopathic effect, the rapid viral replication in neuronal cells, in combination with the likely lack of maternal protective antibodies and the immaturity of the immune system in toddlers may explain the potential danger related to HPeV infections in the youngest and the risk of sequelae [1].

Aim of the study is to review the current literature on HPeV meningitis in order to highlight the actual knowledge on epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory findings and imaging as well as therapeutic indication and need to follow up.

Materials and methods

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [2]. The literature research was performed through four different electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science, on 13th February 2023. For the aim of the study, the keywords used were “Parechovirus Meningitis”, and filters were added to limit the research to a paediatric population (< 18 years old), to reports written in English, and to limit the time spam to the last 5 years (2018–2023). Each research performed on each database was downloaded and then uploaded to the web tool “Rayyan web application” [3], a website used to analyse and appoint articles, specific for writing reviews.

Eligibility criteria

To be included in the review, reports should satisfy the following inclusion criteria:

th February 2023.

The exclusion criteria are:

− Issues not pertinent to the field of investigation;

− Reports including adults, without age distinction;

− Reports without data.

Selection process

The selection process was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, and it was assisted using the web application “Rayyan” [3].

First, the duplicates, produced by the research on four databases, were identified by the web application, Rayyan. Then, two authors checked the accuracy of the duplicates detected and excluded the unnecessary copies.

To limit errors and bias, two authors independently screened titles and abstracts produced by the research and defined those articles clearly irrelevant to the review. Afterward, full texts were retrieved and assessed for eligibility by the two screening authors. If full text articles couldn’t be found, an attempt of contacting authors was performed, to obtain the full text.

Finally, following PRISMA guidelines, references not included in the original search but relevant to the review were examined. Disagreements regarding inclusion/exclusion were settled through discussion between the researchers and a third author.

Data Collection process and data items

Relevant articles were selected on the web application Rayyan and grouped together based on the different issues they dealt with.

Afterwards, data was compiled in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to evaluate the main topics reported in the last years about HPeV meningitis. The information extracted from the full-text reports included epidemiological, clinical, laboratories, radiological, therapeutic data, and outcome results.

Data synthesis

Using the information gathered from the included studies, an updated review was achieved. The characteristics of the included studies were reported using descriptive statistics. No meta-analysis could be made with statistical work because of the variability of the studies. These results were then elaborated on in the discussion.


The search of the selected electronic databases produced 304 studies. Diagram 1 presents the flow chart of the selection process, adapted from the PRISMA guidelines [4] (Fig. 1).

Out of them, 127 were the duplicates and 4 were not written in English. Then, according to PRISMA guidelines, all abstracts were analysed, and 63 records were discharged because they dealt with different topics, or with other types of HPeV infection, or with an adult population. Also, another duplicate article was found, not previously identified by the Rayyan web application.

Afterwards, 109 records were eligible to be analysed by reading their full-length text; however, 8 articles could not be retrieved. Therefore, 101 full-length reports were assessed for eligibility, and 21 were excluded because they did not display any data (n. 15), or no age subgroups could be found in a study population including adults and children (n. 5). In two cases the study reported had already been described in other articles. Finally, two relevant reports cited in other studies were added to this research.

In conclusion, 81 records were included in the revision.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the selection process

Table 1 below shows the main issues found in this scoping review. Epidemiology was discussed in 39 reports, clinical manifestations in 47 reports, laboratory findings in 36 reports, imaging in 23 reports, therapy in 11 reports and outcome in 24 reports.

Table 2 displays all the reports included and their major findings.

Table 1 Main issues found in this scoping review



Of 81 reports analysed, 39 dealt with the epidemiology of HPeV meningeal infection [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].


The reported percentage of HPeV positivity on Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) in children with meningeal involvement varied in American patients from 0.4 to 8.9%, with epidemic waves being occasionally reported [5,6,7,8,9,10]. HPeV type 3 was the most frequently detected single viral type [9].

As for Europe, many European Countries have been involved in epidemiological studies and highlighted the HPeV meningitis outbreak as well [11, 12]. The reported incidence in European patients varied as well from 0,04 to 10% [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].

Incidence of HPeV meningitis in the Asian continent has been studied mainly in Japan and Korea [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. A multicentre study, conducted in Japan identified 240 infants with HPeV type 3 infection, of which 14.2% diagnosed with acute CNS infection [28]. Among 216 patients aged less than 4 months and hospitalised for fever, 110 were found to have a viral infection on serum or CSF, caused by HPeV in 60 cases [30]. In Korea the reported incidence varied from 8,6 to 37% [31,32,33,34].

As well as for other Continents, in Oceania incidence was varying from 5,4% to 25,8%, depending on the case series and period time considered [38,39,40].

Incidence of HPeV meningitis in the African continent seemed to be low. In Sudan, between December and August 2010 no patient was found positive for HPeV on CSF, out of 503 children aged 0 to 15 years presenting with fever, seizures, and a suspicion of neuroinfection [42]. Nine years later in the Comoros archipelago, HPeV RT-PCR were performed on 122 CSFs, of which 77 were collected from children, and only a 30-days-aged infant presented with a CSF HPeV infection (0,8%) [43]. The Countries involved in the studies are represented on the Map in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Countries involved in the studies are shown in blue on the World map. They were Argentina, Australia, Canada, Comoros, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sudan, Taiwan, Turkey, United Kingdom., USA.


Some reports described the seasonality of the HPeV infection, with most of the cases presenting in the warmer months of the year [8,9,10,11,12, 18, 19, 27, 34, 43]. Whereas other studies didn’t find evidence of seasonality connected to HPeV meningitis [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].

HPeV genotypes

Regarding the molecular epidemiology of HPeV infection, HPeV type 3 was the predominant genotype, as reported by most studies analysed by this review [8, 9, 11, 17, 19, 21, 26, 27, 40]. Chamings A et al. described two cases of HPeV meningitis caused by the recombinant HPeV type 5 [41].

Clinical manifestations

Of 81 reports analysed, 47 dealt with the clinical presentation of HPeV meningeal infection [1, 8,9,10,11,12, 14, 17, 21, 23, 25,26,27,28, 32, 33, 41, 44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73].

Almost all reports showed that the youngest (under 3 months of age and in particular neonates) were the most affected patients. [9,10,11,12, 14, 21, 23, 26,27,28, 32, 33, 59,60,61,62, 64,65,66,67,68, 70]. Of note, an exceptional adolescent onset was reported in an immunosuppressed 17-year-old girl [58].

Most studies reported a higher incidence in males (56.4–91%) than in females [9,10,11, 17, 21, 27, 59, 60, 62, 65, 66]. Only two Korean studies reported a female prevalence (57.1-80%) [32, 33].

Clinical presentation was nonspecific, mainly in neonates, so that the diagnosis may be challenging. At onset, patients appeared with sepsis-like symptoms and poor general conditions. Fever was the most frequent presenting sign [1, 41, 44,45,46,47, 49, 50, 52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. In fact, fever occurrence ranged between 80% and 100% [8, 10,11,12, 14, 17, 21, 23, 25,26,27,28, 32, 33, 60,61,62,63,64, 69, 70]. However, in an American retrospective study, 2% of patients reported hypothermia (TC < 35 °C) instead of hyperthermia [68].

Other frequent symptoms included irritability, from 40 to 100%, poor feeding, from 42 to 81.8%, and tachycardia ranging from 63.6 to 77% [12, 14, 26, 41, 44,45,46, 51,52,53,54, 58, 60, 62,63,64, 67,68,69,70]. In a few cases lethargy was the presenting symptom, with a prevalence between 14% and 51% [1, 12, 14, 26, 60, 69].

Many clinical cases of HPeV CNS infection included a cutaneous sign, as macular or maculo-papular rash, involving mainly truncus and extremities [14, 23, 41, 45, 47, 54,55,56,57,58, 62]. The occurrence of a rash as a presenting sign ranged from 20 to 60% [1, 8, 11, 12, 17, 21, 52, 53, 60, 64, 68, 69].

Moreover, 15 reports evidenced the presence of seizures [1, 10, 11, 21, 26, 28, 45, 50, 58, 62, 65,66,67,68, 70]. Their occurrence may vary from 3.1 to 65.2% [10, 11, 21, 26, 28, 62, 65,66,67,68, 70].

Gastrointestinal symptoms were described as concomitant to meningitis, usually as diarrhoea, with a variable occurrence, ranging from 15 to 30% [12, 23, 52].

Other symptoms involving the respiratory system have been described, including coryza, cough, breathing difficulties, apnea and tachypnea. Their reported occurrence varied from 37.5 to 18.2% [11, 64, 68, 70].

Congenital HPeV Infection

Three cases of congenital/in utero transmission had been described in recent literature, leading to neonatal meningitis at birth, requiring intensive care unit support. The onset presentation symptoms were hypotonia, respiratory distress with desaturation, bradycardia, fever and abnormal movements [71,72,73].

Laboratory findings

Out of the 81 articles included in this review, 36 focused on the laboratory findings [1, 8, 12, 14, 17, 18, 21, 23, 26, 27, 31, 33, 36, 38, 41, 44, 45, 48, 51,52,53, 55,56,57, 61,62,63, 67, 69, 70, 72,73,74,75,76].

Blood analysis

In children with HPeV meningitis, peripheral leukocyte count, haemoglobin and platelets were within normal value range [51, 52]. Leukopenia was found especially in neonates and infants aged < 3 months [1, 55, 63, 67]. Low values of haemoglobin were occasionally described [12, 56].

General chemistry was unremarkable [41], although some authors described an increase of the transaminase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values and hyponatremia [27, 51, 67, 70].

Inflammation markers were generally in the range of normality or mildly elevated [1, 12, 18, 31, 41, 52, 53, 55,56,57, 63, 69, 70]. Of note, compared with Enterovirus (EV) positive infants, infants with HPeV meningitis had lower values of blood white blood cells [27, 33] and infection indices [17].

Blood cultures were reported as negative [1, 41, 48, 62].

CSF analysis

CSF samples of children with HPeV meningitis were clear and pleocytosis characteristically mild or absent [1, 8, 12, 14, 21, 26, 27, 36, 38, 41, 45, 51, 53, 55, 57, 62, 67, 69, 70, 72, 74].

Despite that, some case-reports described pleocytosis in children, predominantly neonates, with HPeV meningitis [44, 48, 57, 61, 73]. Compared with EV meningitis, HPeV meningitis determined a lower rate of CSF pleocytosis [14, 17, 27, 32, 33, 61]. In case of pleocytosis, white cell count was lower in the HPeV meningitis than in the EV group, and other viral meningitis, such as Human Herpes 6 and Herpes Simplex Virus-2 meningitis [23, 32].

As for the remaining CSF biochemistry, in HPeV meningitis proteins were normal or slightly elevated [1, 8, 14, 18, 21, 27, 45, 55, 56, 61, 62, 70, 72]. Moreover, glucose values were generally normal [1, 8, 21, 27, 41, 51, 55, 61, 62, 70, 72]. Of note, low glucose concentration has been described just in few cases, mainly in neonates [57, 63].

CSF cultures were negative [1, 41, 45, 48, 51,52,53, 62].

Cytokine Profile on serum and CSF

Measurement of cytokines levels revealed high levels of interleukins (IL): IL-6, IL-17 and TNF alpha on serum and of IL-2, IL-4, IL-7 and IL-13 in CSF [31, 75].

Compared to EV, a higher serum level of proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine was present in HPeV, likely related to the more severe clinical manifestations in the former [76].


HPeV meningitis was diagnosed by clinical manifestations and laboratory findings. Instrumental diagnostic exams were used as complementary and to investigate HPeV’s clinical complications and outcomes. Twenty-three publications analysed instrumental exams in patients affected by HPeV meningitis [1, 10, 12, 25, 26, 28, 45, 48,49,50, 56,57,58, 62, 65,66,67,68, 71,72,73, 77, 78].

Head ultrasound and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were the most used diagnostic exams; few cases reported head Computerised Tomography (CT) scan finding.

Head ultrasound

Head ultrasound was used in reports as it is a fast, non-invasive and economic diagnostic exam. Nevertheless, it generally resulted in normal finding [1, 12, 25, 45, 48, 50, 56, 62, 77, 78].

Magnetic resonance imaging

When performed in patients with HPeV neuro-infections, MRI resulted in white matter anomalies. Common findings included restricted diffusion in deep white matter and periventricular white matter involving mainly the frontal zones [48,50,65, 6872]. Involvement of parietal and temporal lobes, corpus callosum and thalamus have been described as well [58, 71, 73, 77, 78]. Hyperintensity in the T2/FLAIR was also a possible presentation of HPeV neuro-infection [28]. These findings were typically bilateral, either asymmetrical or symmetrical [50, 58, 65]. Other findings, such as unilateral lesions, low signal intensity on T2 and hyperintensity on T1 or just a leptomeningeal enhancement were also described [28, 50].

Some authors reported that MRI abnormalities were usually detected in a minority of children with HPeV CSF infections [1, 10, 12, 26, 57, 65]. Conversely, other authors demonstrated that the majority of patients in the study populations had positive MRIs findings [28, 66].

There’s evidence that most of the patients with white matter alterations on MRI developed more severe diseases, with seizures or necessity of ventilations and vasoactive infusion [67].

When performed weeks or months after the acute infection, MRI scan might be normal, with no evidence of white matter lesions [49, 58]. Persistence of the lesions had been proved in a minority of patients [28, 65].

White matter MRI anomaly had been also used as a prognostic sign of neurodevelopmental concerns. By the way, some authors found neurodevelopmental impairment at clinical follow-up in children with initial MRI alterations [28, 65, 66].

Bucci S. et al. showed that children with MRI abnormalities in the HPeV acute infection scored lower, but still in the range of normality, on cognitive Bayley III (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition) subscale at Neurodevelopmental assessment at 1 year of age compared with children with normal MRI [25]. Whereas Abe Y. et al. reported that the totality of the patients (6/6) with MRI negative findings had a neurological good prognosis [28].

Other investigations

Electroencephalography (EEG) demonstrated seizure activity or encephalopathy signs [67, 68, 72,73,7868].


Out of the included reports, eleven focused on the therapeutic approach [10, 21, 45, 50, 56, 57, 62, 68, 69, 73, 79]. Authors agree on supportive therapy, including paracetamol and fluids. Antibiotics as well as antivirals were prescribed at onset and then discontinued as soon as the diagnosis of HPeV infection was confirmed [21, 56, 57, 62, 69, 73].

In case of seizures, antiepileptic therapy was considered [10, 45, 68, 73].

In case of critical conditions or unresponsiveness to therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin and/or methylprednisolone have been prescribed [10, 21, 50, 69]. Finally, posaconazole was used against HPeV type 3, acting as an early-stage inhibitor of viral replication: it binds the capsid interfering with virus-cell attachment and entry [79].


We identify 24 publications dealing with clinical outcome of HPeV meningitis, in term of hospital stay and long-term outcome [1, 12, 21, 25, 26, 28, 44, 48, 49, 56, 57, 59, 60, 62, 65, 66, 70, 73, 74, 80,81,82,83,84].

Hospital Stay

Hospitalisation has been analysed in 9 reports [1, 12, 21, 48, 49, 56, 57, 62, 70].

Hospitalisation ranged from 2 days to 5 weeks. The high variability was depending on various factors, including the clinical course and the need of intensive care in case of respiratory distress, apnoea, seizures, and hemodynamic instability [1, 12, 21, 48, 49, 56, 57, 62, 70].

All but one otherwise healthy 11-days old neonate affected by HPeV type 3 meningoencephalitis survived. The neonate’s autopsy showed bilateral multicystic cavitation of the fronto-parietal white matter as well of temporal and occipital asymmetric cavitation [78].

Long-term outcome

The long-term outcome was analysed in 21 reports.

Even if HPeV is one of the main identified etiological agents of viral meningitis in infants, poor attention has been reserved to it from the Scientific Community in the past, mainly due to the high survival range. Examining scientific reports from all over the world are increasing awareness of the risk connected to a severe parechovirus infection. In fact, out of the revised literature, cerebral palsy, vision and neuropsychomotor development impairment were reported in a high percentage of case series [65, 80, 83]. The appropriate duration of post hospitalisation follow-up is still being debated. Evidence supported clinical follow-up until at least the second year of life, with a recommended longer-term follow-up in case of further potential risk factors, such as prematurity, early onset of infection (neonatal period), MRI abnormalities, severe clinical course (seizures, apnoea) with necessity of paediatric Intensive Care Unit [1, 25, 28, 48, 6566]. Evidence suggested an ameliorating of clinical sequelae with a normal development in most cases by the age of three [65]. Anyway, as neurodevelopmental impairment is often difficult to detach at an early stage, prior to school-age, families should be aware of potential neurological, behavioural, and learning impairments in childhood in order to eventually seek assessment.


HPeV infection is very common in paediatric age and may have a severe course mainly among neonates and toddlers less than 3 months of age when it manifests as meningitis. Symptoms may be non-specific, including fever, irritability, poor feeding, skin rash, or seizures. Although several authors described favourable outcome with high probability of survival, reported neurodevelopmental outcomes at discharge suggest a specific follow up and the family awareness on the risk of sequelae.

Evidence supported clinical follow-up until at least the second year of life, with a recommended longer-term follow-up in case of further potential risk factors, such as prematurity, early onset of infection (neonatal period), MRI abnormalities, severe clinical course (seizures, apnoea) with necessity of paediatric Intensive Care Unit. Of note, we emphasise the need for surveillance to define the disease burden, evaluate strategies and interventions to prevent and manage cases, and to respond to the potential first early signals of sequelae developing. Finally, defying and following the global epidemiology of HPeV infection may be useful for considering the opportunity of vaccine development mainly for those with risk factors for a severe course.

Table 2 Reports included and the major finding

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.



Human parechovirus


Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta Analysis


Central Nervous System


Cerebrospinal Fluid


Lactate dehydrogenase






tumour necrosis factor


white blood cell count


white blood cell


alanine aminotransferase


aspartate aminotransferase


red blood cell


C reactive protein


computerised tomography


Magnetic resonance imaging




interquartile range


Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition


gross motor function


  1. Ancora G, Faldella G, Chiereghin A, Marsico C, Nigro CS, Lazzarotto T, Sambri V, Brusa G, Capretti MG. Parechovirus Infection causing sepsis-like Illness in newborns: a NICU approach. New Microbiol. 2020;43(3):144–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, Akl EA, Chang C, McGowan J, Stewart L, Hartling L, Aldcroft A, Wilson MG, Garritty C, Lewin S, Godfrey CM, Macdonald MT, Langlois EV, Soares-Weiser K, Moriarty J, Clifford T, Tunçalp Ö, Straus SE. PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Naccache SN, Lustestica M, Fahit M, Mestas J, Dien Bard J. One year in the life of a Rapid Syndromic Panel for Meningitis/Encephalitis: a Pediatric Tertiary Care Facility’s experience. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(5):e01940–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Abedi GR, Messacar K, Luong W, Nix WA, Rogers S, Queen K, Tong S, Oberste MS, Watt J, Rothrock G, Dominguez S, Gerber SI, Watson JT. Picornavirus etiology of acute Infections among hospitalized infants. J Clin Virol. 2019;116:39–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee BR, Sasidharan A, Harrison CJ, Selvarangan R. Positive impact of routine testing for enterovirus and parechovirus on length of hospitalization and antimicrobial use among inpatients ≤ 6 months of age. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;59(1):e02106–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tomatis Souverbielle C, Wang H, Feister J, Campbell J, Medoro A, Mejias A, Ramilo O, Pietropaolo D, Salamon D, Leber A, Erdem G. Year-Round, routine testing of multiple body site specimens for human parechovirus in Young Febrile infants. J Pediatr. 2021;229:216–222e2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sasidharan A, Banerjee D, Harrison CJ, Selvarangan R. Emergence of Parechovirus A3 as the Leading cause of Central Nervous System Infection, surpassing any single enterovirus type, in children in Kansas City, Missouri, USA, from 2007 to 2016. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(6):e02935–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh SH, Hassouneh L. Parechovirus in infancy: a 5-year experience at a pediatric center. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences; 2023.

  11. Black S, Bradley C, Lai FY, Shenoy S, Bandi S, Allen DJ, Tang JW. Comparing the clinical severity of Disease caused by enteroviruses and human parechoviruses in neonates and infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(2):e36–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferreras Antolín L, Kadambari S, Braccio S, Tang JW, Xerry J, Allen DJ, Ladhani SN. Parechovirus Surveillance Network. Increased detection of human parechovirus Infection in infants in England during 2016: epidemiology and clinical characteristics. Arch Dis Child. 2018;103(11):1061–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cosgun Y, Bayrakdar F, Karademirtok H, Atak T, Korukluoglu G. Role of viral agents in Childhood Central Nervous System Infections. Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases; 2020.

  14. Chakrabarti P, Warren C, Vincent L, Kumar Y. Outcome of routine cerebrospinal fluid screening for enterovirus and human parechovirus Infection among infants with sepsis-like Illness or Meningitis in Cornwall, UK. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(10):1523–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sirin MC, Goktas S. Determination of the prevalence of viral, bacterial and fungal pathogens causing Meningitis by using multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction. Acta Med Mediterranea. 2018;34:127.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bal A, Saz EU, Arslan SY, Atik S, Bayturan S, Yurtseven A, Gazi H, Cicek C, Kurugol Z, Bal ZS. The evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in children: a retrospective Multicenter Study. J Pediatr Infect Dis. 2022.

  17. de Jong EP, van den Beuken MGA, van Elzakker EPM, Wolthers KC, Sprij AJ, Lopriore E, Walther FJ, Brus F. Epidemiology of Sepsis-like Illness in Young infants: major role of Enterovirus and Human Parechovirus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(2):113–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eichinger A, Hagen A, Meyer-Bühn M, Huebner J. Clinical benefits of introducing real-time multiplex PCR for cerebrospinal fluid as routine diagnostic at a tertiary care pediatric center. Infection. 2019;47(1):51–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elling R, Böttcher S, du Bois F, Müller A, Prifert C, Weissbrich B, Hofmann J, Korn K, Eis-Hübinger AM, Hufnagel M, Panning M. Epidemiology of human parechovirus type 3 upsurge in 2 hospitals, Freiburg, Germany, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(7):1384–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Posnakoglou L, Siahanidou T, Syriopoulou V, Michos A. Impact of cerebrospinal fluid syndromic testing in the management of children with suspected central nervous system Infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(12):2379–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Posnakoglou L, Tatsi EB, Siahanidou T, Syriopoulou V, Michos A. Genetic variations in human parechovirus type 3 in infants with central nervous system Infection. Virol Sin. 2021;36(6):1660–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vincent JJ, Zandotti C, Baron S, Kandil C, Levy PY, Drancourt M, Raoult D, Ninove L. Point-of-care multiplexed diagnosis of Meningitis using the FilmArray® ME panel technology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(8):1573–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marchand S, Launay E, Schuffenecker I, Gras-Le Guen C, Imbert-Marcille BM, Coste-Burel M. Severity of parechovirus Infections in infants under 3 months of age and comparison with enterovirus Infections: a French retrospective study. Arch Pediatr. 2021;28(4):291–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schnuriger A, Vimont S, Godmer A, Gozlan J, Gallah S, Macé M, Lalande V, Saloum K, Perrier M, Veziris N, Morand-Joubert L. Differential Performance of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Assay To Detect Bacterial and Viral Pathogens in Both Pediatric and Adult Populations. Microbiology Spectrum. 2022.

  25. Bucci S, Coltella L, Martini L, Santisi A, De Rose DU, Piccioni L, Campi F, Ronchetti MP, Longo D, Lucignani G, Dotta A, Auriti C. Clinical and neurodevelopmental characteristics of Enterovirus and Parechovirus Meningitis in neonates. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:881516.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Stephens C, Reynolds C, Cremin M, Barry R, Morley U, Gibson L, De Gascun CF, Felsenstein S. Parent-administered neurodevelopmental follow up in children after Picornavirus CNS Infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021;40(10):867–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sano K, Hamada H, Hirose S, Sugiura K, Harada S, Koizumi M, Hara M, Nishijima H, Taira M, Ogura A, Ogawa T, Takanashi JI. Prevalence and characteristics of human parechovirus and enterovirus Infection in febrile infants. Pediatr Int. 2018;60(2):142–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abe Y, Ohno T, Matsumoto H, Daimon Y, Kurahashi H, Takayama R, Sakaguchi Y, Tanabe S, Tanaka F, Miyamoto Y, Kawano A, Yamanouchi H. HPeV3-associated acute encephalitis/encephalopathy among Japanese infants. Brain Dev. 2021;43(4):528–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Izumita R, Deuchi K, Aizawa Y, Habuka R, Watanabe K, Otsuka T, Saitoh A. Intrafamilial transmission of Parechovirus A and enteroviruses in neonates and Young infants. J Pediatr Infect Dis Snamfooc. 2019;8(6):501–6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Suzuki Y, Aizawa Y, Izumita R, Habuka R, Watanabe K, Saitoh A. PCR detection rates for serum and cerebrospinal fluid from neonates and young infants infected with human parechovirus 3 and enteroviruses. J Clin Virol. 2021;135:104736.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Park SE, Song D, Shin K, Nam SO, Ko A, Kong J, Kim YM, Yeon GM, Lee YJ. Prospective research of human parechovirus and cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid of young children less than one year with sepsis-like Illness: comparison with enterovirus. J Clin Virol. 2019;119:11–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Park SE, Lim TJ, Nam SO, Chang CL, Byun SY, Ko A, Kong J, Cho JW, Yeon GM, Lee YJ. Clinical utility of the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel in children at a tertiary center in South Korea. Brain Dev. 2021;43(2):234–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rhie S. Clinical differences between enterovirus and human parechovirus in children and infants. Annals of Child Neurology. 2020.

  34. Nam EJ, Ham JY, Song KE, Kim YK, Lee NY. Incidence and distribution of the pathogens causing Central Nervous System Infections at the University Hospital of Korea. Clin Lab. 2021;67(6).

  35. Chang JT, Chen YS, Chen BC, Huang TS, Chang TH. Human parechovirus Infection in children in Taiwan: a Retrospective, single-hospital study. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2018;71(4):291–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nassrallah B, Bamberger E, Cohen S, Srugo I, Golan-Shany O, Shlonsky Y, Mubariki R, Genizi J. The yield of CSF molecular testing in febrile neonates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(7):1553–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mathew S, Al Khatib HA, Al Ansari K, Nader J, Nasrallah GK, Younes NN, Coyle PV, Al Thani AA, Al Maslamani MA, Yassine HM. Epidemiology Profile of viral Meningitis Infections among patients in Qatar (2015–2018). Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:663694.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Brien MP, Francis JR, Marr IM, Baird RW. Impact of Cerebrospinal Fluid Multiplex assay on diagnosis and outcomes of Central Nervous System Infections in children: a before and after Cohort Study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(9):868–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Berkhout A, Cheng DR, McNab S, Lee LY, Daley AJ, Clifford V. Clinical and Health System Impact of Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Routine Testing of CSF in a Pediatric Hospital: an observational study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2023;42(4):281–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chamings A, Druce J, Caly L, Yoga Y, Britton PN, Macartney KK, Alexandersen S. Evolutionary analysis of human parechovirus type 3 and clinical outcomes of Infection during the 2017-18 Australian epidemic. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8906.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Chamings A, Liew KC, Reid E, Athan E, Raditsis A, Vuillermin P, Yoga Y, Caly L, Druce J, Alexandersen S. An Emerging Human Parechovirus Type 5 Causing Sepsis-Like Illness in infants in Australia. Viruses. 2019;11(10):913.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Abdelrahim NA, Mohammed N, Evander M, Ahlm C, Fadl-Elmula IM. Viral Meningitis in Sudanese children: differentiation, etiology and review of literature. Med (Baltim). 2022;101(46):e31588.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fourgeaud J, Mirand A, Demortier J, Kamus L, Collet L, Olivier S, Henquell C, Vauloup-Fellous C. Enterovirus Meningitis in Mayotte French Comoros Island, March-June 2019. J Clin Virol. 2022;150–151:105154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Garrido R, Antunes J, Pedroso H, Fialho M, Cunha M. Parechovirus neonatal sepsis and Meningitis – a (still) poorly recognised agent. J Pediatr Neonatal Individualized Med. 2022.

  45. Fox B, Sabio Paz V, Incardona MA, Elisiri ME, Gonzalez Fraga S, Solana CL, Fernández-Canigia L. Rapid syndromic molecular testing and human parechovirus Infection in children: a report of three cases in Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2022 Jan-Mar;54(1):31–4.

  46. Alhazmi A, Lazrek M, Alidjinou EK, Engelmann I, Schuffenecker I, Dubos F, Hober D. Repeated viral Meningitis in a newborn. J Neurovirol. 2020;26(3):449–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chowdhury SR, Lee D. Atypical acral swelling and viral exanthem with parechovirus Meningitis. J Paediatr Child Health. 2020;56(5):815–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Berk MC, Bruning AHL, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG, Wolthers KC, Pajkrt D. Human parechovirus Meningitis with adverse neurodevelopmental outcome: a Case Report. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(10):e256–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Piralla A, Perniciaro S, Ossola S, Giardina F, De Carli A, Bossi A, Agosti M, Baldanti F. Human parechovirus type 5 neurological Infection in a neonate with a favourable outcome: a case report. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;89:175–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yehia R, Weidow N, Maertens PA, Tengsupakul S. Successful treatment of parechovirus meningoencephalitis and Myocarditis in two neonates. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences; 2023.

  51. Kirkley MJ, Robinson C, Dominguez SR, Messacar K. Neonatal parechovirus Infection mimicking a surgical abdomen. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12(6):e229053.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Kanagaratnam M, Jyothish D. Parechovirus Meningitis in infants-time for routine CSF viral screening? Archives of Disease in Childhood; 2019.

  53. Urooj F, Flinders P, Paul J, Padmakumar B. A case series of human parechovirus associated sepsis and Meningitis in young children. Arch Dis Child. 2019.

  54. Lee D, Loh SW, Tan J, Chong J. Acral-accentuated exanthem in an infant with parechovirus Meningitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35(1):e20–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Masanori T, Endo A, Hisata K, Kudo T, Shimizu T. Parechovirus Infection in an infant with severe abdominal distention. Pediatr Int. 2022;64(1):e15075.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tokmak DN, Yalçınkaya R, Gülenç N, Öz FN, Kaman A, Teke TA, Durmuş SY, Tanır G. Parechovirus Infection mimicking bacterial sepsis in an infant. J Pediatr Inf. 2021;15(1):e45–8.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tokak S, Özdemir M, Gülseren YD, Çaksen H. A case of human parechovirus Infection in an infant with Meningitis. J Pediatr Inf. 2021;15(2):e112–4.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tierradentro-García LO, Zandifar A, Kim JDU, Andronikou S. Neuroimaging findings in Parechovirus Encephalitis: a Case Series of Pediatric patients. Pediatr Neurol. 2022;130:41–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. van Hinsbergh T, Elbers RG, Bouman Z, van Furth M, Obihara C. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of newborns and infants with parechovirus and enterovirus central nervous Infection: a 5-year longitudinal study. Eur J Pediatr. 2022;181(5):2005–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. van Hinsbergh TMT, de Crom SCM, Lindeboom R, van Furth MAM, Obihara CC. Human parechovirus Meningitis and gross-motor neurodevelopment in young children. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178(4):473–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tan JHY, Choong CT, Tee NWS, Chong CY, Thoon KC, Maiwald M, Lee EYX, Tan MSS, Tan NWH. Clinical profile of children with parechovirus Meningitis in Singapore. J Neurovirol. 2022;28(1):46–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Linhares MI, Brett A, Correia L, Pereira H, Correia C, Oleastro M, De Sousa R, Rodrigues F. Parechovirus Genotype 3 outbreak among Young infants in Portugal. Acta Med Port. 2021;34(10):664–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kielar M, Tokarz A, Dumnicka P, Maraj M, Burzyńska B, Stępniewski S. Parechovirus and enterovirus Infections in neonates. Folia Med Cracov. 2019;59(1):37–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Samarasekara H, Janto C, Balgahom R, Polkinghorne A, Branley J. Unexpected detection of human parechovirus in infants with suspected Meningitis using real-time multiplex PCR. Pathology. 2020;52(4):502–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Silcock RA, Doyle R, Clark JE, Kynaston JA, Thomas M, May ML. Parechovirus Infection in infants: evidence-based parental counselling for paediatricians. J Paediatr Child Health. 2022;58(5):856–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Joseph L, May M, Thomas M, Smerdon C, Tozer S, Bialasiewicz S, McKenna R, Sargent P, Kynaston A, Heney C, Clark JE. Human parechovirus 3 in infants: expanding our knowledge of adverse outcomes. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(1):1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. McKenna R, Joseph L, Sargent P, May M, Tozer S, Bialasiewicz S, Heney C, Schlapbach LJ, Clark JE. Paediatric intensive care admissions during the 2015–2016 Queensland human parechovirus outbreak. J Paediatr Child Health. 2019;55(8):968–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Midgley CM, Jackson MA, Selvarangan R, Franklin P, Holzschuh EL, Lloyd J, Scaletta J, Straily A, Tubach S, Willingham A, Nix WA, Oberste MS, Harrison CJ, Hunt C, Turabelidze G, Gerber SI, Watson JT. Severe parechovirus 3 Infections in Young infants-Kansas and Missouri, 2014. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2018;7(2):104–12.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kadambari S, Braccio S, Ribeiro S, Allen DJ, Pebody R, Brown D, Cunney R, Sharland M, Ladhani S. Enterovirus and parechovirus Meningitis in infants younger than 90 days old in the UK and Republic of Ireland: a British Paediatric Surveillance Unit study. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(6):552–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Roh DE, Kwon JE, Kim YH. Human parechovirus: an emerging cause of sepsis-like syndrome in infants aged under 3 months. Pediatr Infect Vaccine. 2020;27(2):102–10.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hilbig A, Liew KC, Foster C, Fuller DG, Chamings A, Alexandersen S. Neonatal parechovirus Infection: possibility of in-utero transmission. J Paediatr Child Health. 2022;58(6):1088–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mei Jy Lim S, Foley DA, Lakshmanan R, Caly L, Gehlot S, Davis J. A case of congenital human parechovirus type 3 Meningoencephalitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2022;41(2):e67–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Salavati S, Salavati M, Coenen MA, Ter Horst HJ, Bos AF. A parechovirus type 3 Infection with a presumed Intrauterine Onset: a poor neurodevelopmental outcome. Neonatology. 2020;117(5):658–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Izumita R, Aizawa Y, Watanabe K, Saitoh A. Persistence of high neutralizing antibody titers after neonatal and early infantile Infection with Parechovirus-A3. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(7):e159–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sugiura K, Ogura A, Takanashi JI, Hamada H. Multiple hypercytokinemia in human parechovirus-3 Infection in infants with pediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Chiba Med J. 2020;96E:73–7.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Habuka R, Aizawa Y, Izumita R, Domon H, Terao Y, Takihara H, Okuda S, Saitoh A. Innate Immune responses in serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid from neonates and infants infected with Parechovirus-A3 or enteroviruses. J Infect Dis. 2020;222(4):681–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Sarma A, Hanzlik E, Krishnasarma R, Pagano L, Pruthi S. Human parechovirus meningoencephalitis: neuroimaging in the era of polymerase chain reaction-based testing. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(8):1418–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Lane LM, McDermott MB, O’Connor P, Cronly S, O’Regan M, De Gascun CF, Morley U, Snow A, Tone S, Heffernan J, Cryan JB. Multicystic Encephalomalacia: the neuropathology of systemic neonatal parechovirus Infection. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2021 Sep-Oct;24(5):460–6.

  79. Rhoden E, Ng TFF, Campagnoli R, Nix WA, Konopka-Anstadt J, Selvarangan R, Briesach L, Oberste MS, Weldon WC. Antifungal triazole posaconazole targets an early stage of the parechovirus A3 life cycle. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(3):e02372–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. de Ceano-Vivas M, García ML, Velázquez A, Del Martín F, Menasalvas A, Cilla A, Epalza C, Romero MP, Cabrerizo M, Calvo C. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants younger than 90 days old following enterovirus and parechovirus Infections of the Central Nervous System. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:719119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. de Crom SC, van Hinsbergh MT, van Beijsterveldt IA, van Furth AM, Rossen JW, Obihara CC. Motor development of children after a human parechovirus or enterovirus Infection: 24 months follow-up. Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2023;75(2):224–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Del Martín F, Menasalvas Ruiz A, Cilla A, González AV, de Ceano Vivas M, Cabrerizo Sanz M, Calvo C. Neurodevelopment medium-term outcome after parechovirus Infection. Early Hum Dev. 2019;132:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Britton PN, Khandaker G, Khatami A, Teutsch S, Francis S, McMullan BJ, Jones CA. High prevalence of developmental concern amongst infants at 12 months following hospitalised parechovirus Infection. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54(3):289–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Britton PN, Walker K, McMullan B, Galea C, Burrell R, Morgan B, Honan I, Teutsch S, Smithers-Sheedy H, Fairbairn N, Mattick R, Hutchinson D, Jones CA. Early life parechovirus Infection neurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 years: a Cohort Study. J Pediatr. 2020;219:111–117e1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported also by the Italian Ministry of Health with “current Research funds”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



EB and AV coordinated the study; SB and CB conceived the study, participated in its design; EB, CP carried out the literature research AM and AV helped to draft the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Bozzola.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

EB is Associate Editor of Italian Journal of Pediatrics-Section Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bozzola, E., Barni, S., Barone, C. et al. Human parechovirus meningitis in children: state of the art. Ital J Pediatr 49, 144 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: