Guidelines on pediatric day surgery of the Italian Societies of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) and Pediatric Anesthesiology (SARNePI)
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 7 December 2017
Accepted: 23 February 2018
Published: 12 March 2018
The Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) together with The Italian Society of Pediatric Anesthesia (SARNePI) through a systematic analysis of the scientific literature, followed by a consensus conference held in Perugia on 2015, have produced some evidence based guidelines on the feasibility of day surgery in relation to different pediatric surgical procedures. The main aspects of the pre-operative assessment, appropriacy of operations and discharge are reported.
Pediatric Day Surgery has become increasingly prevalent in western countries during recent years. Pediatric procedures elegible for day surgery have also been more frequently produced mainly because of the improvement in minimally-invasive surgical techniques, the development of new general anesthetic drugs and the wider use of regional anesthesia. Nowdays, 60% to 80% of operations in a modern pediatric hospital are performed on a day surgery basis. The major advantages of this trend consist in the lessening of psychological stress for children and parents and the reduction in hospital costs, frequency of nosocomial infections and length of surgical waiting lists. In order to evaluate the surgical procedures suitable for day surgery with the same level of reliability as applies in the case of in-patient operations, the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) together with the Italian Society of Pediatric Anesthesia and Resuscitation (SARNePI) have produced EBM-guidelines concerning pediatric day surgery.
The literature was examined by means of specific “queries” in the database of NCBI, the National Guidelines Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Library, Medline Complete and Dynamed-Ebsco. The query “ambulatory surgical procedures”[Mesh] and ((“2010/05/01”[PDAT]: “2015/05/31”[PDAT]) and (“infant”[MeSH Terms] or “child”[MeSH Terms] or “adolescent”[MeSH Terms])) provided 391 items, which included 86 clinical trials and 31 reviews.
The CEVeAS Scale of the level of evidence of the proofs and the grades of recommendation
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (LE)
I Evidence obtained from several RCTs and/or reviews of RCT
II Evidence obtained from one RT adequately designed
III Evidence obtained from non randomized cohort studies with case/control or their methanalysis
IV Evidence obtained from case/control retrospective studies or their methanalysis
V Evidence obtained from series of cases without control group
VI Evidences obtained from experts advice, from consensus conferences, etc.
GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION (GR)
A Surgical or diagnostic procedures are strongly recommended because they are sustained by high level scientific evidence, even if not necessarily of type I or II
B It is doubtful that the procedure must be always recommended but it must be carefully considered
C There exists an element of uncertainty both in favor and against the recommendation
D The procedure is not recommended
E The procedure is strongly ill-advised
There are three main stages in day surgery: the pre-operative assessment, the surgical procedure and the discharge.
Children have been considered as ideal for day-case management because they usually have little co-morbidity and on account of the fact that many common pediatric operations are well suited for day surgery.
The pre-operative assessment must concern principally:
Structured questionnaires completed and signed by the parents and by the pediatrician concerned, covering both social and medical history, are obtained during the pre-operative assessment.
ASA I-II children are suitable for outpatient treatments. ASA III patients are generally excluded, but may possibly be included for low grade surgical procedures.
Premature infants must be excluded if they are of less than 60 weeks post-conception age even if the risk of any post-anesthetic apnoea is related to the grade of prematurity.
Family or Social Status excluding Day Surgery
Parents reluctant or unable to take care of the child in the post-operative period at home. Poor domestic hygienic conditions. Lack of a telephone. House more than 1 h travelling distance from an hospital provided with a 24 h emergency facility. Absence of public transport
Full term newborns (Gestional Age Weeks > 38) of less than 1 month are excluded from Day Surgery. Exclusion should be preferably extended to at least 6 months of age. Infants from 2 to 6 months age could be included according to Structure Policy and Surgical Grading.
ASA III Patients
Normally excluded from Day Surgery. May possibly be eventually included in relation to low surgical grading procedures. There needs to be, at any rate, a prolonged observation post-operatively before discharge.
Patient with current Upper Respiratory Infection (URI)
Procedure must be postponed in relation to patients with major respiratory symptoms. If there are mild or moderate symptoms the procedure should be postponed if the child is of less than 1 year of age. In the case of older patients the risk factors should be considered and the appropriacy of the operation assessed in each case.
Infants PCA > 60 weeks. Clinically Stable. Anemia corrected.
Evaluation of Timing
No pre-anesthesia assessment much in advance. An assessment is advisable shortly before the procedure.
Routine Lab Tests in healthy patients older than > 1 yr. have a low predictive value
A parental anamnestic questionnaire is a good tool before any surgical procedure.
The administration of clear fluids up to two hours before induction is advised. This lower the residual gastric volume and raise pH.
Prevention of Nausea and Post-Operatory Vomiting (PONV)
PONV prevention requests a multifactorial approach that includes pre-operative identification of risk factors (family history, age > 3 yrs., Strabismus Repair and ORL surgery). In patients at risk prophylaxis is recommended (i.e.ondansetron 0.05 mg/kg + dexametason 0.015 mg/kg).
A responsible adult, preferably both parents, must be available to transport the child and to provide home assistance in the post-operative period. A telephone must also be available and the home hygiene condition must be satisfactory. Finally a primary care hospital must be accessible within 1 h travelling distance by car from the patient home. All these requirements can be summarized as parental/environmental adequacy.
Over recent years the complexity of surgical procedures has increased, with a wider range of children being suitable for day surgery. This is mainly due to the development of minimal invasive surgery and new anesthetic drugs and techniques, the wider use of regional anesthesia and the improved postoperative pain management. Generally speaking, a surgical day-case procedure should last not more than 120 min, without a high risk of post-operative bleeding or uncontrollable post-operative pain.
Suitable surgical procedures
Inguinal hernia and hydrocele
Inguinal hernia and communicating hydrocele are both caused by a failure of obliteration of the processus vaginalis of the peritoneum. The majority of inguinal hernias in infants and children are indirect hernias with direct and femoral hernias only occasionally observed. All these hernias are appropriate for surgical treatment on a day surgery basis either with a traditional open approach (LE 4; GR A) or with a laparoscopic approach (LE 4; GR B) except for premature infants of less than 60 post- conception weeks of age due to risk of postoperative apnoea (LE 3; GR E) [2–22].
A congenital failure of the testis to reach the base of the scrotum after the third month of life requires surgical treatment, preferably if performed between 6 and 18 months of age. In particular, it is advisable to operate within the first year of life in the case of a higher position of the testicle (intrabdominal or intrainguinal) and within 18 months the case of an in extrainguinal lower position (pre-pubic, external inguinal ring or ectopic) (LE: 3; FR: B). A retractile testis does not need medical or surgical treatment, but require regular follow-up until puberty (LE: 3; GR: A). Orchidopexy can be carried out on a day surgery basis [23–29] either by an open technique (LE: 3; GR: A) or laparoscopically, in the case of an intra-abdominal testis (LE: 3; GR: B).
Varicocele is an abnormal dilation of the testicular veins in the pampiniformis plexus, more often (in 90% of cases) of the left side, caused by venous reflux. Indications for surgical treatment consist in testicular hypotrophy (> 20% of the contralateral size) and/or symptomatic varicocele (pain). All operations for the treatment of varicocele are based on the ligation or occlusion of the internal spermatic veins [30–36]. Inguinal or subinguinal microsurgical ligation, anterograd sclero-embolization and suprainguinal ligation, using open or laparoscopic techniques, are all suitable for day surgery (LE: 5; GR: A/B).
Indeed, it is safe to say that all inguinal procedures are suitable for day surgery. The low level of evidence in the scientific literature in this field is due to the absence of randomized trials. However this is counterbalanced by the higher grade of recommendation deriving from the widespread and consolidated clinical experience throughout the world in the last 30 years, summarized in certain relevant consensus documents, such as those produced by BAPS and AAPHA) [3–6].
SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
INGUINAL HERNIAS: LE: 4; FR: A
HYDROCELE: LE: 4; FR: A
UNDESCENDED TESTIS LE: 3; FR: A
VARICOCELE LE: 3; FR: A
TO BE EVALUATED IF SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA LE: 4; FR: B
LAPAROSCOPY FOR INTRA-ABDOMINAL TESTIS LE: 3; FR: B
LAPAROSCOPIC VARICOCE LE: 3; FR: B
NOT SUITABLE TO DAY SURGERY
INGUINAL HERNIA IN PRETERM INFANTS < 60 PCW: LE: 3; FR: E
Umbilical and alba hernias
Common umbilical hernias after 3 years of life, as well as alba (epigastric) hernias are reported to be well managed as day surgery procedures (LE: 4; GR: A).
SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
UMBILICAL HERNIA (LE: 4; GR: A)
ALBA LINE HERNIA (EPIGASTRIC) (LE: 4; GR: A)
NOT SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
PERMAGNA UMBILICAL HERNIA IN INFANTS (LE: 4; GR: D)
An absence of the retraction of the foreskin after the first year of life is called phimosis. Only scarring phimosis should be considered as true fhimosis (post-traumatic, due to chronic inflammation or to BXO). Partial or total circumcision is the operation of choice, limiting plastic procedures, like Duhamel’s, only to cases of light preputial stenosis occuring in older children during erection. Both surgical procedures (circumcision and preputial plasty) can be performed as day surgery. (LE: 5; GR: A) [4–6, 17, 41, 42].
A buried penis is a normal length shaft enclosed (buried) in prepubic fat. This can be the consequence of obesity, circumcision in an overweight child or the less frequently observed congenital abnormal fixation of the fascia and skin to the balanic sulcus instead of to the base of the penis. Surgical correction is indicated only for the congenital or the post-circumcision forms. (LE:5;GR:B) [18, 32, 43–45].
An abnormal peno-scrotal junction, resulting in a ventral web, is not only an esthetic problem but it can involve a functional complication during erection. The common V-Y or multiple Z plasty are easily realized as day surgery procedures. (LE: 5; GR: A) [4, 5].
SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
PHIMOSIS AND WEBBED PENIS (LE: 5; GR: A)
TO BE EVALUATED IF SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
BURIED PENIS (LE: 5; GR: B)
DISTAL HYPOSPADIA (LE: 3; GR: B)
Cysts, nevi and tumors, which reach the fascia or the skull periosteum may be managed on a day surgery basis, as well as embryonal remnants such preauricular sinus or cartilaginous tags. (LE: 5; GR: A) [6, 15, 17, 18, 53].
Angiomas and lymphangiomas
Small hemangiomas or lymphangiomas, if susceptible to surgical resection or laser photocoagulation as well as other superficial lumps, may be managed as outpatient procedures. This is also true in the case of larger masses where sclerotherapy is the treatment of choice (LE: 5; GR: A) [54–59].
SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
NEVI, TEGUMENTAL AND EPIFASCIAL LUMPS
(LE: 5; GR: A)
SURGICALLY RESECTABLE OR SCLEROSABLE HEMANGIOMA AND LIMPHANGIOMA (LE:5:GR:A)
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY AND SUPERFICIAL LIMPHADENECTOMY
(LE: 5; GR: A)
TO BE EVALUATED IF SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
PILONIDAL DISEASE PRIMARY CLOSURE OR PUNCH FISTULECTOMY
(LE: 5; GR: B)
PILONIDAL DISEASE OPEN TREATMENT
(LE: 5; GR: D)
Tongue-tie requires frenulotomy if it interferes with suction or causes speech problems. Within the first six-nine months frenulotomy can be carried out as office surgery.In relation to older infants a light and short general anesthesia, feasible as day surgery, is required (LE: 5; GR: A) [65–67].
An excessive gap between superior teeth is called a distema and is frequently observed when the superior labial frenum is hypertrophic and inserted on the free edge of the gums. In this case, and mainly for esthetic reasons, a z plasty correction can be realized when the permanent dentition has been completed. (LE:5;GR:A) [6, 15, 17, 18, 53].
Mouth floor, labial and sublingual mucoceles are all resectable as outpatient procedures. Larger ranulas are more frequently treated with marsupialisation to prevent relapse. (LE:5;GR:A) [6, 15, 17, 18, 53].
Several studies with good scientific evidence report the feasibility of cleft lip and anterior palate surgical correction with a day surgery regimen. (LE:3;GR:B).
Sinuses, cysts and fistulas of the second and third branchial arch can be excised as outpatient procedures (LE: 5; GR:A) whereas the resection of the first and fourth branchial arch cysts must be evaluated for overnight stay in hospital. (LE: 5; GR: B). Partial thyroidectomy is often necessary to remove a cyst of the 4th branchial arch and therefore an overnight stay in hospital is recommended (LE: 5; GR: C) [6, 15, 17, 18, 53, 76–78].
SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
2ND AND 3RD BRANCHIAL ARCH SINUSES, CYSTS AND FISTULAS
(LE: 5; GR: A)
TO BE EVALUATED IF SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
1ST AND 4TH BRANCHIAL ARCH CYSTS
(LE: 5; GR: B)
THYROGLOSSAL DUCT CYSTS
(LE: 4; GR: B)
(LE: 5; GR: C)
Despite a good level of evidence in both adult and pediatric scientific literature reporting, the feasibility of non complicated appendectomies or interval appendectomies in day surgery, there is still uncertainty among surgeons about discharge on the day of surgery in such cases (LE: 3; GR:B) [82–87].
Gallbladder diseases in children are quite rare particularly if compared to adults. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard of treatment. The widespread diffusion of this procedure has produced a great number of high quality scientific studies (RCT) reporting the feasibility and safety of this procedure in day surgery.
In the pediatric field laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less frequently performed with a consequent reduction in the surgeon’s experience and confidence. For this reason the pediatric consensus conference held in Perugia, despite the high quality of evidence (LE: 1), preferred to assign a grade of recommendation B to this procedure in day surgery (LE: 1; GR: B) [88–98].
Currently, gastric fundoplication is mainly performed laparoscopically both in adults and children. The degree of post-operative pain has been reduced together with the duration of hospitalization. A number of good evidence based studies have been reported in adult and pediatric scientific literature suggesting the feasibility of this procedure as day-case surgery with early postoperative feeding and domiciliary pain control. However, as in the case of cholecystectomy, due to the limited use of this practice in pediatric surgery, discharge on the day of fundoplication is not yet recommended except in relation to centers with considerable experience. (LE: 4; GR: C) [99–101].
SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
(L: 3; G.R.: B)
(L: 1; G.R.: B)
TO BE EVALUATED IF SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
(L: 4; G.R.: C)
(L: 3; G.R.: C)
As for the previously mentioned more complex procedures, pyeloplasty has been reported to be suitable for a day surgery regimen either when performed with an open or laparoscopic approach. Additionally in this case the level of evidence is fairly good (LE: 4). However, the consensus conference suggestion is that careful consideration should be given and the day surgery approach should be adopted only by very experienced team. (LE: 4; GR: C) [109–114].
The endoscopic subureteric injection of bulking materials is the most popular mini-invasive treatment for vesico-ureteric reflux. Many surgeons perform this procedure on an outpatient basis. (LE: 4; GR: B) .
SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
(L: 4; G.R.: B)
TO BE EVALUATED IF SUITABLE FOR DAY SURGERY
(L: 4; G.R.: C)
(L: 5; G.R.: C)
General Anesthesia (Inhalation Anaesthesia vs. TIVA)
No differences between the two techniques have been observed in causing PONV, emergence agitation and respiratory and hemodynamic complications, and in influencing the length of stay in the recovery unit.
Caudal Anesthesia and post-operative analgesia
Of all the loco-regional techniques, caudal block has shown the best results in the short and long term, although maintaining a significant risk of motor block and urinary retention
These guidelines are based on a review of the literature in relation to different aspects of day surgery including enrollment or exclusion criteria, the surgical feasibility of the most common pediatric operations, customer satisfaction, the safety of day surgery, discharge criteria have all been reported and scored according to evidence based scientific proofs.
For more more than a century pediatric day surgery has been is carried out as the best practice for several common pediatric surgical procedures. However, still today, there are no good proofs supporting the feasibility of the most common pediatric day case surgery procedures on account of the absence of well designed randomized trials. Nevertheless, the widespread worldwide experience in relation to these routine operations suggests that they should be assigned a high score in the grade of recommendations scale.
The goal of these guidelines is to provide pediatric surgeons with a broader range of pediatric operations feasible in a day surgery setting with the same degree of safety as that ensured in relation to in-patient operations. The well known advantages of day surgery consist in the reduction in hospital infections, the lessening of psychological stress, the higher level of customer satisfaction, the shortening of waiting lists and the reduction in hospital costs.
The authors are grateful to Jonathan Paul Cole for the english review and to the SICP and SARNePI workshops for the reference reserch studies.
SICP workshop: Accinni A.,Appignani A., Bagnara V., Ceccarelli P., Cobellis G., Cozzi D., Del Rossi C., Esposito C., Franchella A., Gamba P., Impellizzeri P., Lelli Chiesa PL, Lima M., Marcocci G, Marte A, Messina M, Meucci D., Mognato G,Monguzzi G., Nanni L., Noccioli B., Papparella A., Parigi GB, Riccipetitoni G., Romeo C., Spagnoli A., Zampieri N.
SARNePI workshop: Astuto M, Baroncini S, Bortone L, Calamandrei M, Furlan S, Garra R, Locatelli BG, Marchesini L, Mondardini MC, Montobbio G, Presutti P, Wolfler A, Scalisi R, Schiavi F, Pinciroli L, Sbaraglia F,Serafini GP.
Publication charges sustained by The Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery.
Availability of data and materials
Reported as references
UDL, AM and AC reviewed the surgical literature; GM, ST and MTS reviewed the anesthesiological literature; UDL wrote the manuscript: GM drafted the anesthesiological tables. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Istituto Superiore di sanità (ISS), Agenzia per i servizi sanitari regionali (ASSR), Centro per la valutazione dell’efficacia dell’assistenza sanitaria (CeVEAS). Come produrre, diffondere e aggiornare raccomandazioni per la pratica clinica. Manuale metodologico. Milano: Arti Grafiche Passoni; 2002. Disponibile all’indirizzo: http://www.iss.it/binary/lgmr2/cont/Manuale_PNLG.1234439852.pdf) (1).Google Scholar
- Coté CJ, Zaslavsky A, Downes JJ, Kurth CD, Welborn LG, Warner LO, et al. Postoperative apnea in former preterm infants after inguinal herniorrhaphy. A combined analysis. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(4):809–22. http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1950011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wiener ES, Touloukian RJ, Rodgers BM, Grosfeld JL, Smith EI, Ziegler MM, et al. Hernia survey of the section on surgery of the American Academy of Pediatrics. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(8):1166–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paediatric Surgery: Standards of care. Published by the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, may 2002; editor D.A. Lloyd. Children’s Surgery.Google Scholar
- A First Class Service Report of the Paediatric Forum of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, May 2000 - Review date 2005.Google Scholar
- Gabbay J, Francis L. How much day surgery? Delphic predictions Oxford Regional Health. BMJ. 1988;297:12–8.Google Scholar
- Saia M, Mantoan D, Buja A, Bertoncello C, Baldovin T, Zanardo T, et al. Increased rate of day surgery use for inguinal and femoral hernia repair in a decade of hospital admissions in the Veneto Region (north- east Italy): a record linkage study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:349.Google Scholar
- de Lange DH, Kreeft M, van Ramshorst GH, Aufenacker TJ, Rauwerda JA, Simons MP. Inguinal hernia surgery in the Netherlands: are patients treated according to the guidelines? Hernia. 2010;14:143–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yeung YP, Cheng MS, Ho KL. Day-case inguinal herniotomy in Chinese children: retrospective study. Hong Kong Med J. 2002;8(4):245–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duff M, Mofidi R, Nixon SJ. Routine laparoscopic repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias - a viable alternative in the day surgery unit? Surgeon. 2007;5:209–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozdemir T, Arıkan A. Postoperative apnea after inguinal hernia repair in formerly premature infants: impacts of gestational age, postconceptional age and comorbidities. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013;29(8):801–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Welborn LG. Greenspun Anesthesia and apnea. Perioperative considerations in the former preterm infant. Pediatr Clin N Am. 1994;41(1):181–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ueno S, Yokoyama S, Hirakawa H. Pediatric patients with inguinal hernia can be good candidates for day surgery. Nippon Geka Gakkai. 2010;10:729–32.Google Scholar
- Mattila K, Hynynen M, Intensium Consortium Study Group. Day surgery in Finland: a prospective cohort study of 14 day-surgery units. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:455–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abdur-Rahman LO, Kolawole IK, Adeniran JO, Nasir AA, Taiwo JO, Odi T. Pediatric day case surgery: experience from a tertiary health institution in Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2009;8(3):163–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Letts M, Davidson D, Splinter W, Conway P. Analysis of the efficacy of pediatric day surgery. Can J Surg. 2001;44(3):193–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Majholm B, Engbæk J, Bartholdy J, Oerding H, Ahlburg P, Ulrik AMG, et al. Is day surgery safe? A Danish multicentre study of morbidity after 57,709 day surgery procedures B. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:323–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Segerdahl M, Warrén-Stomberg M, Rawal N, Brattwall M, Jakobsson J. Children in day surgery: clinical practice and routines. The results from a nation-wide survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:821–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- IPEG. Guidelines for inguinal hernia and hydrocele. J Laparo Adv Surg Techn. 2010;20(2):11–4.Google Scholar
- Clarke S. Pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele: an evidence-based review in the era of minimal access surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(3):305–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lao OB, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Cusick RA. Pediatric hernias, hydroceles, and undescended testicles. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(3):487–504.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang K. Assessment and Management of Inguinal Hernia in infants. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):768–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Comploj E, Armin P, Lement S. Diagnosis and Management of Cryptorchidism. Eur Urol Suppl. 2012;11:2–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ein SH, Nasr A, Wales PW, Ein A. Testicular atrophy after attempted pediatric orchidopexy for true undescended testis. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:317–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clark DA, Borzi PA. Laparoscopic orchidopexy for the intra-abdominal testis. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15(7):454–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Safwat AS, Hammouda HM, Kurkar AA, Bissada NK, et al. Outcome of bilateral laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy for bilateral intra-abdominal testes. Can J Urol. 2013;20(5):6951–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sowandea OA, Takureb AO, Salakoa AA, Badmusa TA, Olajidec AO, Banjoa OO. Day case urology in a dedicated day surgery case unit in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Ambul Surg. 2009;15(2):24–6.Google Scholar
- Kaye JD, Palmer LS. Single setting bilateral laparoscopic orchiopexy for bilateral intra-abdominal testicles. J Urol. 2008;180(4 Suppl):1795–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Canavese F, Lala R, Valfrè L, et al. Effectiveness of primary inguinal orchiopexy as treatment of non-palpable testes in the first two years of age. Minerva Pediatr. 2010;62(3):245–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koyle MA, Oottamasathien S, Barqawi A, et al. Laparoscopic Palomo varicocele ligation in children and adolescents: results of 103 cases. J Urol. 172(4 Pt 2):1749–52.Google Scholar
- Zanghí G, Di Stefano G, Furci M, et al. Surgical treatment of varicocele in day-surgery: our experience. G Chir. 2004;25(8–9):287–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sowandea OA, Takureb AO, Salakoa AA. Day Case Urology in a Dedicated Day Case.Surgery Unit in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Ambul Surg. 2009;15(2):3–11.Google Scholar
- Santangelo M, Bossa F, Serra R, et al. Our experience with treatment of varicocele in a day-surgery protocol. G Chir. 2003;24(6–7):259–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ammaturo C, Santoro M, Rossi R, et al. Day surgery management of varicocele with Doppler-assisted dissection at the external inguinal ring (subinguinal varicocelectomy). Chir Ital. 2005;57(5):641–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donà B, Cantele P, Pianalto S. Laparoscopic surgery of varicocele. Role of total endovenous anesthesia in same-day discharge. G Chir. 2000;21(10):405–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marte A., Sabatino M.D., , Borrelli M.,et al. LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 17(2):272-275.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tagge EP, Hebra A, Overdyk F, et al. One-stop surgery: Evolving approach to pediatric outpatient surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 1999 Jan;34(1):129–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gurnaney HG, Maxwell LG, Kraemer FW, et al. Prospective randomized observer-blinded study comparing the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block and local anaesthetic infiltration for umbilical .hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(5):790–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burattini MF, Bussotti C, Scalercio V, et al. Surgical treatment of umbilical hernia in children. Our experience. Minerva Chir. 2004;59(3):277–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barnett SJ, Frischer JS, Gaskey JA, Ryckman FC, et al. Pediatric hernia repair: 1-stop shopping. J Pediatr. 2012;47(1):213–6.Google Scholar
- Hariharan S, Chen D, Merritt-Charles L, et al. Performance of a pediatric ambulatory anesthesia program – a developing country experience. Pediatr Anesth. 2006;16:388–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics. 1989 Aug;84(2):388–91.Google Scholar
- Chin TW, Tsai HL, Liu CS. Modified prepuce unfurling for buried penis:a report of 12 years of experience. Asian J Surg. 2014; ISSN: 0219–3108Google Scholar
- Frenkl TL, Agarwal S. Caldamone AA Results of a simplified technique for buried penis repair. J Urol. 2004;171:826–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Senaylı A, Senaylı Y. Ther a novel operative technique for concealed penis secondary to penoscrotal web: a case report. Ther Adv Urol. 2010;2:215–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gray J, Boston VE. Glanular reconstruction and preputioplasty repair for distal hypospadias: a unique day-case method to avoid urethral stenting and preserve the prepuce. BJU. 2003;91(3):268–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alexander KC, Leung, William LM, Robson. Hypospadias: an update. Asian J Androl. 2007;9:16–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prestipino M, Bertozzi M, Nardi N. Outpatient department repair of urethrocutaneous fistulae using n-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) a single-centre experience. BJU Int. 2011;108:1514–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marrocco G, Vallasciani S, Fiocca G, et al. Hypospadias surgery: a 10-year review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20:200–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ritch CR, Murphy AM, Woldu SL, et al. Overnight urethral stenting after tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010;26:639–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burbige KA. Simplified postoperative management of hypospadias repair. Urology. 1994;43(5):719–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hadidi AT, Azmy AF. Hypospadias surgery. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Letts M, Davidson D, Splinter W. Analysis of the efficacy of pediatric day surgery. Can J Surrg. 2001;44(3):193.Google Scholar
- Li WY, Chaudhry O, Reinisch JF. Guide to early surgical management of lip hemangiomas based on our experience of 214 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):1117–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Priebe CJ Jr. Outpatient management of pediatric surgical problems. Postgrad Med. 1977;62(5):132–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Isago T, Kono T, Nozaki M, et al. Ambulatory anesthesia for children undergoing laser treatment. Surg Today. 2006;36(9):765–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDaniel DH. Cutis Cutaneous vascular disorders: advances in laser treatmen. Cutis. 1990;45(5):339–41. 346–9, 354–60;PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Babich II, Chepurnoĭ GI, Babich IV. Treatment of hygroma in children. Khirurgiia. 1989;11:79–82.Google Scholar
- Onathan S, Wheeler, et al. Phillip Ok-432 And Lymphatic Malformations In Children: The Starship Children’s Hospital Experience. J ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:855–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7:3–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meban S, Hunter E. Outpatient treatment of pilonidal disease. CMA J. 1982;126:941. Neola B; Capasso S; Caruso Let al. Scarless outpatient ablation of pilonidal sinus: a pilot study of a new minimally invasive treatment, Int Wound J, 2014 Aug 14Google Scholar
- Isbister WH, Prasad J. Pilonidal disease. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(8):561–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Solla JA, Rothenberger DA. Chronic pilonidal disease. An assessment of 150 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33(9):758–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith CM, Jones A, Dass D, Murthi G. Early experience of the use of fibrin sealant in the management of children with pilonidal sinus disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(2):320–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rose K, Kasbekar AV, Flynn A, et al. Developing a nurse-delivered frenulotomy service. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(1):149–52.Google Scholar
- Toner D, Giordano T, Handler SD. Office frenotomy for neonates: resolving dysphagia, parental satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2014;32(2):6–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sethi N, Smith D, Kortequee S, et al. Benefits of frenulotomy in infants with ankyloglossia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;77(5):762–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosen H, Barrios LM, Reinisch JF, Outpatient cleft lip repair, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(2):381–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arneja JS, Mitton C. Ambulatory cleft lip surgery: a value analysis. Can J Plast Surg. 2013;21(4):213–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sohail M, Khan FA, Mir ZA, Ayub J. Comparison of ambulatory and inpatient cleft lip surgery for adults. Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(2):71–4.Google Scholar
- Al-Thunyan AM, Aldekhayel SA, Al-Meshal O. Ambulatory cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):2048–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ugburo AO, Desalu I, Adekola AF. Day case cleft lip surgery in Lagos, Nigeria Cleft Palate. Craniofac J. 2009;46(6):636–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim TH; Rothkopf DM, Ambulatory surgery for cleft lip repair Ann Plast Surg, 1999, 42 (4), 442–4;Google Scholar
- Eaton AC, Marsh JL, Pilgram TK. Does reduced hospital stay affect morbidity and mortality rates following cleft lip and palate repair in infancy? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94(7):911–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moir CR, Blair GK, Fraser GC, Marshall RH. The emerging pattern of pediatric day-care surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 1987;22(8):743–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rajeev P, Sutaria R, Ezzat T, Mihai R, Sadler GP. Changing Trends in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery over the Decade: Is Same-dayDischarge Feasible in the United Kingdom? World J Surg. 2014;38(11):2825–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mowschenson PM, Hodin RA. Outpatient thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a prospective study of feasibility,safety, and costs. Surgery. 1995;118(6):1051–3. discussion 1053–4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teoh AY, Tang YC, Leong HT. Feasibility Study Of Day Case Thyroidectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:864–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bratu I, Laberge J-M. Day surgery for thyroglossal duct cyst excision: a safe alternative. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20:675–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geller KA, Cohen D, Koempel JA. Thyroglossal duct cyst and sinuses: a 20-year Los Angeles experience and lessons learned. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(2):264–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong P. Is drain placement necessary in pediatric patients who undergo the Sistrunk procedure? Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 May;4(14) Epub ahead of print] PMID: 24888796Google Scholar
- Frazee RC, Abernathy SW, Davis M. Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy should be the standard of care for uncomplicated appendicitis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(1):79–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cross W, Kowdley GC. Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Safe Same-day Surgery Procedure? Am Surg. 2013;79:802–5 89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alkhoury F, Burnweit C, Malvezzi L. A prospective study of safety and satisfaction with same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. J PedSurg. 2012;47:313–6.Google Scholar
- Alkhoury F, Malvezzi L, Knight CG. Routine same-day discharge after acute or interval appendectomy in children a prospective study. Arch Surg. 2012;147(5):443–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grewal H, Sweat J, Vazquez WD. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children can be done as a fast-track or same-day surgery. JSLS. 2004;8(2):151–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Akkoyun I. Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a single center experience with 92 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(1):49–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vuilleumier H, Halkic N. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Surgery Procedure: Implementation and Audit of 136 Consecutive Cases in a University Hospital. World J Surg. 2004;28:N 8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harboe KM, Bardram L. Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: results from a national database. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23(5):565–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Psaila J, Agrawal S, Fountain U, et al. Day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors influencing same-day discharge. World J Surg. 2008;32:76–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goulart A, Delgado M. Antunes laparoscopic cholecystectomy in ambulatory: what results? Acta Medica Port. 2013;26(5):564–8.Google Scholar
- Agarwal P, Bagdi RKJ. Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: a review of 11 cases. Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2014;19(2):61–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harboe KM, Bardram L. The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. SurgEndopsc. 2011;25(5):1630–41.Google Scholar
- Jawaheer G, Evans K, Marcus R. Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in childhood: outcomes from a clinical care pathway. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013;23(1):57–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2008;95(2):161–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barthelsson C, Lützén K, Anderberg B, et al. Patients’ experiences of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in day surgery. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12(2):253–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vaughan J, Gurusamy KS, Davidson BR. Day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Review).Copyright ©: The Cochrane collaboration. Published by JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013.Google Scholar
- Gurusamy KS, Junnarkar S, Farouk M. Day-case versus overnight stay in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;23(1):CD006798.Google Scholar
- Mariette C, Pessaux P. Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2859–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agrawal S, Super P. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: changing trend toward “true” day-case procedure. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18(6):785–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Banieghbal B., And Beale P., Day-Case Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication in Children. J Lap Adv Surg Tech. 2007;17: 3.Google Scholar
- Boll J, Daly S, Smolevitz J, et al. Safety and Efficsacy of Outpatient Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Am Surg. 2015;81(2):215–6.Google Scholar
- Turial S, Schwind M, Engel V, et al. Microlaparoscopic-Assisted Gastrostomy in Children: Early Experiences with Our Technique . J Lap Adv Surg Tech. 2009, 19(1), 229–231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilhelm SM, Ortega KA, Stellato TA. Guidelines for identification and management of outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Am J Surg. 2010;199(3):396–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Souza e, Mello GF, Lukashok HP, Meine GC. Outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in selected head and neck cancer patients. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(7):1487–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Best C, Hitchings H. Day case gastrostomy placement for patients in the community. Br J Community Nurs. 2010;15(6):272–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Srinivasan R, Irvine T, Dalzell M. Indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and procedure-related outcome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49(5):584–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mandal A, Steel A, Davidson AR. Day-case percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a viable proposition? Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(893):157–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stewart AF, Smith DP. Performance of open renal and bladder surgery at a freestanding pediatric surgery center. J Urol. 2011;186(1):252–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sprunger JK, Reese CT, Decter RM. Can standard open pediatric urological procedures be performed on an outpatient basis? J Urol. 2001;166(3):1062–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohamed M, Hollins G, Eissa M. Experience in performing pyelolithotomy and pyeloplasty in children on day-surgery basis. Urology. 2004;64(6):1220–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oberlin DT, McGuire BB, Pilecki M, et al. Contemporary national surgical outcomes in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology. 2015;85(2):363–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ilie CP, Luscombe CJ, Smith I, Boddy J, et al. Routine day-case laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a paradigm shift? J Endourol. 2011;25(5):797–801.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tekgul S, Dogan HS, Hoebeke R, Kocvara JM, Nijman C, Radmayr R. Stein guidelines on pediatric urology- European Association of Paediatric Urology. Pediatr Urol. 2014;71:1–130.Google Scholar
- Ilie CP, Luscombe CJ, Smith I. Day case laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25(4):631–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tradaguilla AR, Romero AR, Parente A. Fast-track in pediatric urologic surgery: pronephrectomy. Cir Pediatr. 2013;26(2):81–5.Google Scholar
- Ilie CP, Luscombe CJ, Smith I, et al. Day case laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience. J Med Life. 2011;4(1):36–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Upadhyaya M, Lander A. Day-case surgery in children. Surgery (Oxford). 2013;31(3):101–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ead H. From Aldrete to PADSS: reviewing discharge criteria after ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 2006;21(4):259–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biedermann S, Wodey E, De La Brière F, Pouvreau A, Ecoffey C. Paediatric discharge score in ambulatory surgery. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014;33(5):330–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moncel JB, Nardi N, Wodey E, Pouvreau A, Ecoffey C. Evaluation of the pediatric post anesthesia discharge scoring system in an ambulatory surgery unit. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jun;25(6):636–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brennan LJ, Prabhu AJ. Paediatric day-case anaesthesia. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2003;3:134–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tremlett M. Day surgery for children. Anaesth Int Care Med. 2003;4(12):399–401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Awad IT, Moore M, Rushe C, Elburki A, O'Brien K, Warde D. Unplanned hospital admission in children undergoing day-case surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21(5):379–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hughes JM, Callery P. Parents’ experiences of caring for their child following day case surgery: a diary study. J Child Health Care. 2004;8(1):47–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shetty N, Sethi D. Paediatric anaesthesia for day surgery. Anaesthesia Tutorial Of The Week (ATOTW) 203. 2010. http://www.frca.co.uk/Documents/203%20Anaesthesia%20for%20paediatric%20day%20surgery.pdf.Google Scholar
- Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Agence Nationale d’appui à la performance des établissements de santé et médico-sociaux (ANAP). Together for the development of day surgery. Paris: Tecnology Report Haute Autorité de Santé; 2013. https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-11/day_surgery_-_an_overview.pdf.Google Scholar
- Everett L. How young is the youngest infant for outpatient surgery? In: Fleisher L, editor. Evidence-based practice of anesthesiology. 1st ed. Oxford: Saunders; 2004. p. 523–8.Google Scholar
- Bajaj P. What is the youngest age appropriate for outpatient surgery? Indian J Anaesthe. 2009;53:5–6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900027/.Google Scholar
- Taylor D, Thomas M. Day surgery for children. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2010;11(6):210–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Navaratnarajah J, Thomas ML. Day surgery for children. Anaesth Int Care Med. 2013;14(6):232–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Short J, Bew S, Kirton C, Sanderson S, Barker J. Issues in Paediatric day surgery. London: BADS; 2007. http://daysurgeryuk.net/en/shop/handbooks/?&page=5.Google Scholar
- SARNePI. Consensus Conference Pediatric Day Surgey. Torino; 2014.Google Scholar
- Parnis SJ, Barker DS, Van Der Walt JH. Clinical predictors of anaesthetic complications in children with respiratory tract infections. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001;11(1):29–40. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00607.x/abstract.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tait AR, Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, et al. Risk factors for perioperative adverse respiratory events in children with upper respiratory tract infections. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(2):299–306. http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1945163.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tait AR, Malviya S. Anesthesia for the child with an upper respiratory tract infection: still a dilemma? Anesth Analg. 2005;100(1):59–65. http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/pages/articleviewer.aspxyear=2005&issue=01000&article=00011&type=abstract.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davidson AJ, Morton NS, Arnup SJ, de Graaff JC, Disma N, Withington DE, et al. General anesthesia compared to spinal anesthesia (GAS) consortium. Apnea after awake regional andGeneral anesthesia in infants: the general anesthesia compared to spinal anesthesia study--comparing apnea and neurodevelopmental outcomes, a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(1):38–54. http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=2294589 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walther-Larsen S, Rasmussen LS. The former preterm infant and risk of post-operative apnoea: recommendations form management. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50(7):888–93. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01068.x/epdf.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson K A, Brennan L, Rollin A-M. Paediatric Anaesthesia services in guidelines for the prevision of anaesthetic services 2016. http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/system/files/GPAS-2016-10-PAEDIATRICS.pdf.Google Scholar
- Lipp A. Anaesthesia services for day surgery 2016 in Guidelines for the prevision of anaesthetic services; 2014. p. 25. https://www.rcoa.ac.uk/system/files/GPAS-2016-06-DAYSURGERY.pdf.Google Scholar
- Hackel A, Badgwell JM, Binding RR, Dahm LS, Dunbar BS, Fischer CG, et al. Guidelines for the pediatric perioperative anesthesia environment. American Academy of Pediatrics. Section on anesthesiology. Pediatrics. 1999;103(2):512–5. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/103/2/512.long.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters, Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation, Pasternak LR, Arens JF, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Fleisher LA, Flowerdew R, et al. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(3):522–38. http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=2443414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Serafini G, Ingelmo PM, Astuto M, Baroncini S, Borrometi F, Bortone L, et al. Italian Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Anesthesia and intensive care (SARNePI). Preoperative evaluation in infants and children: recommendations of the Italian Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Anesthesia and intensive care (SARNePI). Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80(4):461–9. Review. http://www.minervamedica.it/it/riviste/minerva-anestesiologica/articolo.php?cod=R02Y2014N04A0461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mangia G, Presutti P, Antonucci A, Bianco F, Bonomo R, Ferrari P. Diagnostic accuracy of anesthesiology evaluation timing: the ‘One-stop Anesthesia’ in pediatric day-surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(8):764–9. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03080.x/epdf.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mangia G, Bianco F, Bonomo R, Di Caro E, Frattarelli E, Presutti P. Willingness to pay for one-stop anesthesia in pediatric day surgery. Ital J Pediatr. 2011;37:23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3121670/.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Czoski-Murray C, Lloyd Jones M, McCabe C, Claxton K, Oluboyede Y, Roberts J, et al. What is the value of routinelytesting full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function testsbefore elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and insubgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of theclinical and cost-effective literature. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(50):i-xvi, 1–159. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0051890/.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Le Roux C, Lejus C, Surbleb M, Renaudin M, Guillaud C, de Windt A, et al. Is haemostasis biological screening always useful before performing aneuraxial blockade in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12(2):118–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bonhomme F, Ajzenberg N, Schved JF, Molliex S, Samama CM, French Anaesthetic and intensive care committee on evaluation of routine preoperative testing, French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Pre-interventional haemostatic assessment: guidelines from the French society of Anaesthesia and intensive care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30(4):142–62. http://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/Fulltext/2013/04000/Pre_interventional_haemostatic_assessment_.2.aspx.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Castellano P, López-Escámez JA. American Society of Anesthesiology classification may predict severe post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage in children. J Otolaryngol. 2003;32(5):302–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biss TT, Blanchette VS, Clark DS, Bowman M, Wakefield CD, Silva M, et al. Quantitation of bleeding symptoms in children with von Willebrand disease: use of a standardized pediatric bleeding questionnaire. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(5):950–6. Disponibile alla pagina: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03796.x/epdf.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Biss TT, Blanchette VS, Clark DS, Wakefield CD, James PD, Rand ML. Use of a quantitative pediatric bleeding questionnaire to assess mucocutaneous bleeding symptoms in children with a platelet function disorder. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(6):1416–9. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.15387836.2010.03846.x/abstract.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Licameli GR, Jones DT, Santosuosso J, Lapp C, Brugnara C, Kenna MA. Use of a preoperative bleeding questionnaire in pediatric patients who undergo adenotonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139:546–50. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.06.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brady M, Kinn S, Ness V, O'Rourke K, Randhawa N, Stuart P. Preoperative fasting for preventing perioperative complications in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD005285.Google Scholar
- Schmidt AR, Buehler P, Seglias L, Stark T, Brotschi B, Renner T, et al. Gastric pH and residual volume after 1 and 2 h fasting time for clear fluids in children. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114(3):477–82. https://academic.oup.com/bja/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/bja/aeu399.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith I, Kranke P, Murat I, Smith A, O'Sullivan G, Søreide E, Spies C, in't Veld B, European Society of Anaesthesiology. Perioperative fasting in adults and children: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(8):556–69. http://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/Fulltext/2011/08000/Perioperative_fasting_in_adults_and_children__.4.aspx.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lambert E, Carey S. Practice guideline recommendations on perioperative fasting: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(8):1158–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eberhart LH, Geldner G, Kranke P, Morin AM, Schäuffelen A, Treiber H, et al. The development and validation of a risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(6):1630–7. http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiaanalgesia/Fulltext/2004/12000/The_Development_and_Validation_of_a_Risk_Score_to.11.aspx.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, Kovac A, Kranke P, Meyer TA et al; Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(1):85–113. http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiaanalgesia/Fulltext/2014/01000/Consensus_Guidelines_for_the_Management_of.13.aspx.
- Ortiz AC, Atallah AN, Matos D, da Silva EM. Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD009015.Google Scholar
- Polaner DM, Taenzer AH, Walker BJ, Bosenberg A, Krane EJ, Suresh S. Pediatric regional anesthesia network (PRAN): a multi-institutional study of the use and incidence of complications of pediatric regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(6):1353–64. http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Fulltext/2012/12000/Pediatric_Regional_Anesthesia_Network__PRAN____A.15.aspx.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ivani G, Suresh S, Ecoffey C, Bosenberg A, Lonnqvist PA, Krane E. The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine joint committee practice advisory on controversial topics in pediatric regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(5):526–32. http://journals.lww.com/rapm/Fulltext/2015/09000/The_European_Society_of_Regional_Anaesthesia_and.11.aspx.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bosenberg A. Benefits of regional anesthesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(1):10–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neal JM, Bernards CM, Butterworth JF 4th, Di Gregorio G, Drasner K, Hejtmanek MR, et al. ASRA practice advisory on local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35(2):152–61. http://journals.lww.com/rapm/Fulltext/2010/03000/ASRA_Practice_Advisory_on_Local_Anesthetic.7.aspx.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ecoffey C, Lacroix F, Giaufré E, Orliaguet G, Courrèges P, Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d'Expression Française (ADARPEF). Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF). Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(12):1061–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shanthanna H, Singh B, Guyatt G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudal block as compared to noncaudal regional techniques for inguinal surgeries in children. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:890626. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139076/.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar