Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Impact of family integrated care on infants’ clinical outcomes in two children’s hospitals in China: a pre-post intervention study

  • Shi-wen He1, 2,
  • Yue-e Xiong3,
  • Li-hui Zhu1Email author,
  • Bo Lv3,
  • Xi-rong Gao3,
  • Hua Xiong1,
  • Huan Wang4,
  • Hua-rong Shi4 and
  • Jos M. Latour1, 5
Contributed equally
Italian Journal of Pediatrics201844:65

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-018-0506-9

Received: 10 February 2018

Accepted: 28 May 2018

Published: 5 June 2018

Abstract

Background

Most Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) in China have restricted visiting policies for parents. This also implicates that parents are not involved in the care of their infant. Family Integrated Care (FIC), empowering parents in direct care delivery and decisions, is becoming the standard in NICUs in many countries and can improve quality-of-life and health outcomes of preterm infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a FIC intervention on the clinical outcomes of preterm infants with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD).

Methods

A pre-post intervention study was conducted at NICUs in two Chinese children’s hospitals. Infants with BPD were included: pre-intervention group (n = 134) from December 2015 to September 2016, post-intervention (FIC) group (n = 115) and their parents from October 2016 to June 2017. NICU nurses were trained between July and September 2016 to deliver the FIC intervention, including parent education and support. Parents had to be present and care for their infant minimal three hours a day. The infants’ outcome measures were length-of-stay, breastfeeding, weight gain, respiratory and oxygen support, and parent hospital expenses.

Results

Compared with control group (n = 134), the FIC group (n = 115) had significantly increased breastfeeding rates (83% versus 71%, p = 0.030), breastfeeding time (31 days versus 19 days, p < 0.001), enteral nutrition time (50 days versus 34 days, p < 0.001), weight gain (29 g/day versus 23 g/day, p = 0.002), and significantly lower respiratory support time (16 days versus 25 days, p < 0.001). Oxygen Exposure Time decreased but not significant (39 days versus 41 days p = 0.393). Parents hospital expenses in local Chinese RMB currency was not significant (84 K versus 88 K, p = 0.391).

Conclusion

The results of our study suggests that FIC is feasible in two Chinese NICUs and might improve clinical outcomes of preterm infants with BPD. Further research is needed to include all infants admitted to NICUs and should include parent reported outcome measures. Our study may help other NICUs with limited parental access to implement FIC to enhance parental empowerment and involvement in the care of their infant.

Keywords

Bronchopulmonary dysplasiaClinical outcomeFamily integrated careFamily centered careIntensive careNeonatologyParentsPreterm infants

Background

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that there are about 15 million preterm babies born each year worldwide and the number is still rising. At present, the number of preterm infants in China ranks second in the world [1]. Complications from preterm births are the most common cause of death among five-year-old children. About 70% of perinatal diseases occur in preterm infants. The incidence of cerebral palsy in preterm infants is 70 to 80 times that of full-term infants, and the rate of cognitive impairment is also significantly higher in preterm infants than in full-term infants [2]. In addition, it was found that up to 800 million U.S. dollars (USD) in costs are incurred due to preterm infants each year [3], leading to a significantly greater economic burden on their families. These expenses decrease as the number of gestational weeks and birth weight increases [4]. At the same time, the prolonged hospital stays of preterm infants have a serious impact on familial, social and medical resources [5].

The WHO proposed several relevant measures to improve the quality-of-life and health of preterm infants. These include regularly updating the clinical guidance for management of pregnant women at risk of preterm birth or mothers of preterm infants and guidelines for preterm infant nursing professionals in terms of kangaroo care, feeding of low birth weight infants, treatment of infectious and respiratory diseases and family-centered care [1]. Kangaroo care [6] and family-centered care [7] encourage greater involvement of parents in giving direct care to their infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). For a greater involvement of parents in the care of their infant the NICUs need to be liberal in the visiting policies. Most NICUs in China have restricted visiting policies and parents have limited involvement in care. In contrast, NICUs in higher resources countries welcome parents without restrictions. However, evidence suggests that in some European countries the visiting policies vary. A survey published 10 years ago among 175 NICUs in eight European countries identified that the majority of the participating NICUs in Italy (n = 35) and Spain (n = 22) had limited visiting hours while one third of the French NICU (n = 45) did not have unrestricted visiting hours for parents [8]. More recently, Raiskila and colleagues documented significant differences between 11 NICUs in six European countries in physical parent–infant closeness and presence [9]. Welcoming parents without restrictions and supporting them in the care of preterm infants might improve the quality of care. Therefore, the clinical staff should strive for family-centered care interventions and integrate the parents in care and decision-making processes in the NICU.

Family Integrated Care (FIC) is an approach that allows parents to provide non-medical routine care for their preterm infant during NICU hospitalization after they have been provided with education and guidance by well-trained neonatal nurses [10]. When parents are permitted to be closer to their infant and become more involved in providing care with the support of nurses, a good relationship between parents and nurses is essential. This can result in higher parent satisfaction with care and the parents become more confident in their parental roles [11]. A study in a Dutch NICU showed that parents rated their involvement in care as very important and they were more satisfied with care if they receive information about their infant and participate in the development of the treatment plan [12, 13]. Thus, nurses and doctors must recognize and acknowledge the wishes of parents based on their social and cultural needs [1416].

The involvement of parents in providing care to infants at the NICU may affect the stability of preterm infants and the incidence of disease [17]. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is still a common disease in premature infants [1820]. Due to immature lung development and few alveolar surfactants, premature infants are prone to respiratory distress syndrome and BPD. The use of mechanical ventilatory strategies may influence the incidence of BPD. Furthermore, in China, many tertiary NICUs are in a children’s hospital requiring transport of critically ill infants from a maternity hospital to these NICUs. Infants with delayed transport to a tertiary NICU had a higher incidence of BPD (57%) compared to transport within 24 h [21]. Given the increased emphasis of early parental education in NICUs, the role of parents can become important in the early stages of a NICU admission and might improve infant’s health outcomes. However, research on the effects of FIC on infants with BPD is sparse and overall the effects of FIC on the general NICU population remains limited. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a FIC intervention on the clinical outcomes of preterm infants with BPD.

Methods

Design

This study used a pre-post intervention design and was conducted between December 2015 and June 2017.

Settings

Hunan Children’s Hospital is the largest child care center in Hunan province. The NICU is a tertiary neonatology center with 60 beds and admitting around 85 BPD infants every year. Guiyang Children’s Hospital is a specialist hospital and the NICU is the referral center of neonates in Guizhou province. The NICU has 70 beds and annually around 73 infants with BPD are treated. Parents in both NICUs are not allowed to visit their infants. Communication with parents is done via the NICU doctors three times a week and parents are able to see their infant via a video-connection.

Participants and recruitment

Infants were eligible when they met the following four criteria:1) weight ≥ 1800 g with ventilatory support or weight ≥ 1500 g with non-invasive oxygen support; 2) stable hemodynamic condition; 3) some form of respiratory support or oxygen therapy is still required at the corrected gestational age of 36 weeks (FiO2 ≥ 0.3); 4) parents agreed to follow a training and take care of their child for at least three hours per day.

Exclusion criteria were: 1) severe congenital anomalies or respiratory deformities such as laryngeal cartilage dysplasia; 2) surgery; 3) receiving palliative care; 4) brain damage; 5) parents have serious social problems or language issues; 6) expected discharge within one week.

Interventions

Infants with BPD hospitalized at both NICUs between December 2015 and September 2016 were the standard care group, and those admitted between October 2016 and June 2017 were the intervention group. The NICU nurses were trained from July to September 2016 to effectively deliver the intervention to parents of infants in the intervention group.

In the standard care group, parents were asked to follow the routine caring model and comply with the hospital rules and regulations. The parents were not allowed to be involved in the treatment and care of their infants except for visits by means of video connection every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.

The FIC intervention required parents to accept the FIC training from qualified nurses before they entered the NICU. The training items included: 1) Hand hygiene: Parents were instructed to wash their hands under running water in 7 steps, and informed of the times to wash hands, such as before entering the NICU and before feeding. 2) Neonatal feeding: Parents were encouraged to breastfeed their infant and communicate at the same time to allow the infant to become familiar with the mother, feel loved and relieve anxiety. 3) Neonatal contact: Parents were told to touch the infant in the sequence of head and face, chest, abdomen, limbs, hands and feet then back with moderate to intense force and rub large muscle groups. 4) Patting on the back of the infant: Parents were instructed to smoothly pat the back of their infant with hollow hands from the outside to the inside and from top to the bottom 30 min before a meal or two hours after. 5) Involvement of care: Parents were encouraged to bath the infant, change diapers, and perform other basic care.

Parents in the FIC group were involved in non-medical care of their infant for at least three hours a day between 10:00 and 16:00. In these periods parents were encouraged to talk with their infant and play music.

Data collection

Each NICU appointed one nurse (member of the FIC research group) to collect data from the medical records. Length-of-stay was the number of NICU days because all infants are discharged home directly from the NICU. Oxygen exposure time was defined as the number of days the infant received any form of oxygen support. Respiratory support time was defined as the number of days with invasive mechanical ventilatory support. The definition of breastfeeding time was the time the infant received partial or full breastfeeding per day [22]. The enteral nutrition time included the days of breastfeeding and formula. Weight gain was calculated by the formula: weight at discharge minus weight at admission divided by the length of NICU stay. BPD categorized in recovery, incomplete recovery, and death after NICU discharge. Readmission within one month after NICU discharge and hospital expenses were also collected. Hospital expenses were retrieved from the medical records and were related to the treatment and care expenses the parents had to pay.

Data analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS19.0 software. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyze the data. The t-test and χ2 test were used to compare the clinical outcomes between the FIC group and the standard care group. A p-value of < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hunan Children’s Hospital (HCHLL-2015-33). The data of the standard care group were retrieved from the medical records and made anonymous to include in the study analysis. Therefore, a signed consent form was waived. Parents in the FIC group received an invitation letter and information about the study. A member of the FIC research group also verbally explained the study. Parents could withdraw participation without reason. A signed informed consent was required and collected.

Results

A total of 319 cases were eligible, of which 58 cases were excluded because parents did not want to participate or were unable to stay for the required hours per day. Among the remaining 261 cases, 13 infants died or were in palliative care. Included in the final analysis were 115 infants in the FIC group and 134 in the standard care group (Fig. 1).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Flowchart of study participants. Legend. FIC=Family Integrated care

Characteristics of infants and parents

A total of 249 infants were included in the study, of which 168 were male. The mean gestational age and birth weight of infants in the FIC group were significantly lower than in the standard care group (P < 0.05). Also, father’s education was higher in the FIC group (Table 1).
Table 1

Infant and Parent Characteristics

Characteristics

FIC

(n = 115)

Control

(n = 134)

P value

Male (n, %)

75 (65.2)

93 (69.4)

0.4821

Female (n, %)

40 (34.8)

41 (30.6)

Gestational age; weeks (mean, SD)

29.9 (1.8)

30.79 (2.0)

<0.0012

Birth weight; gram (mean, SD)

1352.6 (267.5)

1441.2 (376.8)

0.0212

Father’s age; years (mean, SD)

33 (5.8)

32 (6.3)

0.4012

Father’s education (n, %)

Below high school

31 (27.0)

61 (45.5)

0.0041

High school

32 (27.8)

36 (26.9)

Above high school

52 (45.2)

37 (27.6)

Mother’s age; years (mean, SD)

30.(4.8)

29 (4.9)

0.0872

Mother’s education (n, %)

Below high school

38 (33.0)

55 (41.0)

0.2931

High school

26 (22.7)

32 (23.9)

Above high school

51 (44.3)

47 (35.1)

1Chi-square test (χ2); 2Student t-test; FIC Family Integrated Care, SD Standard Deviation

Clinical outcomes of infants with BPD

Table 2 shows the clinical outcomes of infants with BPD. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in respiratory support time (invasive or non-invasive ventilator support), breastfeeding rate, breastfeeding time, enteral nutrition time and weight gain rate between the infants of the FIC group and standard care group. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found in length-of-stay, hospitalization expenses, oxygen exposure time and BPD outcome.
Table 2

Infants’ Clinical Outcomes FIC and Control Group

Outcomes

FIC

n = 115

Control

n = 134

P value

Length-Of-Stay; days (mean, SD)

52 (10.5)

49 (20.2)

0.0842

Hospital expenses (RMB, mean, SD)

84,409 (27,766.2)

87,602 (37,343.5)

0.3912

Oxygen exposure time; days (mean, SD)

39 (14.9)

41 (13.8)

0.3932

Respiratory support time; days (mean, SD)

16 (10.8)

25 (13.0)

< 0.0012

Breastfeeding

Yes (%)

95 (82.6)

95 (70.9)

0.0301

No (%)

20 (17.4)

39 (29.1)

Breastfeeding time; days (mean, SD)

31 (20.2)

19 (19.5)

< 0.0012

Enteral nutrition time; days (mean, SD)

50 (15.9)

34 (22.9)

< 0.0012

Weight gain rate; grams/day (mean, SD)

28.5 (14.6)

23.3 (9.9)

0.0022

BPD outcome

Complete recovery (n, %)

81 (70.4)

86 (64.2)

0.4221

Incomplete recovery (n, %)

34 (29.6)

45 (33.6)

Death (n, %)

0

3 (2.2)

Re-admission within 1 Month

Yes (n, %)

14 (12.2)

21 (15.7)

0.4921

No (n, %)

101 (87.8)

113 (84.3)

1Chi-square test (χ2); 2 Student t-test; FIC Family Integrated Care, SD Standard Deviation, BPD Bronchopulmonary Disease, RMB RenMinBi (Chinese Yuan)

Discussion

The FIC model was implemented in the NICUs of two Chinese children’s hospitals to test the feasibility of this model. Our study provides evidence that FIC might improve the clinical outcomes of infants with BPD and could provide a reference for further utilization of FIC in other children’s hospitals in China. A survey of 129 pediatric nurses in Hunan Province about the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of FIC before and after a training course revealed that most nurses (74%) were willing to deliver the FIC model regardless of the training [23]. Consequently, with the results of this intervention study we now participate in a larger multi-center RCT to test FIC in a larger NICU population [24].

The FIC model allows the parents of infants with BPD to participate in the care and provides them with training to better understand the methods and benefits of breastfeeding. The breastfeeding rate and time in our study was significantly higher in infants in the FIC group than in the standard care group. Verma and colleagues also confirmed in their study that providing training to parents and involving parents in care (n = 148) increases the breastfeeding rates to 80% [25].

We found that the respiratory support time for infants with BPD in the FIC group was significantly reduced. Ortenstrand, et al. [26] also demonstrated that family involvement in care significantly reduced the number of infants with moderate to severe BPD from 6% in the standard care group to 1.6% in the family care group. Thus, FIC might suggest that parents’ involvement in care might have a positive effect on the infants’ health and outcomes.

Although the length-of-stay in our study did not show significant improvements, Melnyk et al. [7] and Bhutta et al. [27] demonstrated that allowing parents to care for their infant can reduce length-of-stay. However, Welch et al. [28] argued that although the average length-of-stay of infants in a FIC model was 3.4 days less than that for infants under routine care and the median length-of-stay was 4 days less, there was no statistical significance. Our results indicated no significant difference even though the length-of-stay of infants in the FIC group was longer than the control group, which may be associated with the significantly lower gestational age of infants in the FIC group than the standard care group. The respiratory support time of infants in our FIC group was significantly lower than the standard care group, but the oxygen exposure time and length-of-stay of the FIC group were significantly higher than the standard care group, resulting in higher average hospitalization expenses of the FIC group. Therefore, the impact of the FIC model on length-of-stay and hospitalization expenses needs to be further studied.

Our study is subject to some limitations. Firstly, parents only stay for a minimum of three hours a day, which is short and fragmented. A recent study used the inclusion criteria of a minimum of eight hours and even more time with the increase of the demands of the infant for breastfeeding [10]. The clinical outcomes of the infants showed a significant positive weight gain and a significant increase in breastfeeding. We acknowledge that the length of time of parents taking care of their infant could have influenced our results. Secondly, private rooms were not available for parents and their infants to spend time together due to lack of space in the NICU. Therefore, we placed a screen at the infant’s bedside to provide privacy for parents to interact with their infant. A systematic review identified the benefits of single room designed NICUs and conclude that single family room NICUs might decrease length-of-stay and reduce readmissions [29]. Thirdly, we observed a substantial imbalance of the number of cases in the FIC intervention group between the two hospitals; 37 infants were included from Guiyang Children’s Hospital in the FIC group compared to 83 infants from Hunan Children’s Hospital (n = 83). It was unclear how the differences occurred. A reason could be the termination of the one-child policy beginning 2016 which might have led to differences in birth rate in the two provinces. The differences in proportion of infants from the two hospitals between the pre and post-intervention groups could represent a bias for the results and a larger study in the future is needed to test the effect of a FIC intervention. Finally, the Chinese tradition of “zuo yuezi” (sitting the month) means that mothers are expected to rest indoors and avoid heavy physical activity for one full month after giving birth. Therefore, several infants were cared for by their fathers but after discharge were then cared for by the mothers at home. Therefore, specific information about discharge planning that might have influenced the readmission rate could not be shared with the mothers.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the FIC model is feasible in NICUs and might result in significant improvements of infants’ clinical outcomes such as weight gain, breastfeeding time, breastfeeding rate and respiratory support time. Therefore, this study might be supportive to all NICUs who consider implementing the involvement and empowerment of parents in the care and decision making of their infant. However, further studies are needed to explore the benefits of FIC in infants and parent reported outcomes.

Notes

Abbreviations

BPD: 

Broncho-pulmonary Disease

FIC: 

Family Integrated Care

NICU: 

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

RMB: 

RenMinBi (Chinese Yuan)

SD: 

mean and standard deviation

USD: 

U.S. dollar

WHO: 

the World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all the staff of the NICUs of Hunan Children’s Hospital and Guiyang Children’s Hospital for delivering the intervention and their engagement in the study. We thank the parents who agreed to participate in the study.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Beijing Children Hospital Group and the Health and Family Planning Commission of Hunan Province (B2016031).

Availability of data and materials

The dataset and analyses are available from the corresponding author on request.

Authors’ contributions

All authors have approved the final manuscript. SH contributed to the data collection, arrangement and analysis; writing the first draft of the manuscript and revised it; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. YX contributed to the development of the research protocol; ensuring nurses’ support in delivering the intervention and data collection; helped in completing the data collection and arrangement; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. LZ contributed to the development of the research protocol; involved the NICU participating at the study; contributed to the development of the research protocol; ensured all the funding support in practicing the whole research; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. BL contributed to the implementation of the research; helped in establishing the study group and completing the data collection and arrangement; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. XG cooperated in planning the study; ensuring doctors’ support in delivering the intervention and data collection; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. HX contributed to the implementation of the research; helped in completing the data collection and arrangement; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. HW, HS collaborated in completing the research in Guiyang Children’s Hospital; helped in completing the data collection and arrangement; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. JML; support in delivering the intervention and data collection; data analysis and interpretation; writing the first draft of the manuscript; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hunan Children’s Hospital, Changsha, China. (reference number HCHLL-2015-33). The data of the standard care group were retrieved from the medical records and made anonymous to include in the study analysis. Therefore, a signed consent form was waived. Parents in the FIC group received an invitation letter and information about the study. A member of the FIC research group also verbally explained the study. Parents could withdraw participation without reason. A signed informed consent was required and collected.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nursing Department, Hunan Children’s Hospital, Changsha, China
(2)
Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
(3)
Division of Neonatal Medicine, Hunan Children’s Hospital, Changsha, China
(4)
Nursing Department, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guiyang Province, Guiyang, China
(5)
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK

References

  1. World Health Organization. Preterm birth. 2018. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs363/zh/. Accessed 27 Apr 2018.
  2. Hack M. Adult outcomes of preterm children. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009;30:460–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Challis JRG, Lye SJ, Gibb W, Whittle W, Patel F, Alfaidy N. Understanding preterm labor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;943:225–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:488–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kirkegaard I, Obel C, Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB. Gestational age and birth weight in relation to school performance of 10-year-old children: a follow-up study of children born after 32 completed weeks. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1600–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ramanathan K, Paul VK, Deorari AK, Taneja U, George G. Kangaroo mother care in very low birth weight infants. Indian J Pediatr. 2001;68:1019–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Melnyk BM, Feinstein NF, Alpert-Gillis L, Fairbanks E, Crean HF, Sinkin RA, et al. Reducing premature infants’ length of stay and improving parents mental health outcomes with the creating opportunities for parent empowerment (COPE) neonatal intensive care unit program: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1414–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Greisen G, Mirante N, Haumont D, Pierrat V, Pallás-Alonso CR, Warren I, et al. Parents, siblings and grandparents in the neonatal intensive care unit. A survey of policies in eight European countries. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98:1744–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Raiskila S, Axelin A, Toome L, Caballero S, Tandberg BS, Montirosso R, et al. Parents' presence and parent-infant closeness in 11 neonatal intensive care units in six European countries vary between and within the countries. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106:878–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. O'Brien K, Bracht M, Macdonell K, McBride T, Robson K, O'Leary L, et al. A pilot cohort analytical study of family integrated care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(Suppl 1):S12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Obeidat HM, Bond EA, Callister LC. The parental experience of having an infant in the newborn intensive care unit. J Perinat Educ. 2009;18:23–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Latour JM, Hazelzet JA, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Goudoever JB. Perceptions of parents, nurses, and physicians on neonatal intensive care practices. J Pediatr. 2010;157:215–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Latour JM, Duivenvoorden HJ, Hazelzet JA, van Goudoever JB. Development and validation of a neonatal intensive care parent satisfaction instrument. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13:554–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhu L, Li F, Zhu Y. Practice of the family-centered nursing model in the pediatric ward. Chin Nurs Res. 2013;27:2512–4.Google Scholar
  15. Latour JM, Haines C. Families in the ICU: do we truly consider their needs, experiences and satisfaction? Nurs Crit Care. 2007;12:173–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffin T. Family-centered care in the NICU. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2006;20:98–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Westrup B, Kleberg A, von Eichwald K, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H. A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effects of the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program in a Swedish setting. Pediatrics. 2000;105:66–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Edstedt Bonamy AK, Zeitlin J, Piedvache A, Maier RF, van Heijst A, Varendi H, et al. Wide variation in severe neonatal morbidity among very preterm infants in European regions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313697.
  19. Klinger G, Sokolover N, Boyko V, Sirota L, Lerner-Geva L, Reichman B, et al. Perinatal risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in a national cohort of very-low-birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:115.e1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kong X, Xu F, Wu R, Wu H, Ju R, Zhao X, et al. Neonatal mortality and morbidity among infants between 24 to 31 complete weeks: a multicenter survey in China from 2013 to 2014. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:174.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyu B, Gao XR, Zhuang Y, Xiong YE, Li TT, Liu ZY. Correlation of transit time and clinical outcome in 363 cases of premature infants with respiratory failure. Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr. 2015;30:1087–9.Google Scholar
  22. Labbok M, Krasovec K. Toward consistency in breastfeeding definitions. Stud Fam Plan. 1990;21:226–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lihui Zhu, Li Wang, Jianhui Xie, XinLiu, Shaonan Shi, Liang Xiong. Research on cognition and attitude about family-centered care on pediatric nurses. Chin J Modern Nurs. 2015;21:2373–6.Google Scholar
  24. Mingyan Hei, Xiangyu Gao, Xirong Gao, Shaohan Nong, Aimin Zhang, Qianshen Zhang, et al. Is family integrated care in neonatal intensive care units feasible and good for preterm infants in China: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2016;17:22.Google Scholar
  25. Verma A, Maria A, Pandey RM, Hans C, Verman A, Sherwani F. Family-centered care to complement care of sick newborns: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2017;54:455–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ortenstrand A, Westrup B, Broström EB, Sarman I, Akerström S, Brune T, et al. The Stockholm neonatal family centered care study: effects on length of stay and infant morbidity. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e278–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bhutta ZA, Khan I, Salat S, Raza F. Reducing length of stay in hospital for very low birthweight infants by involving mothers in a stepdown unit: an experience from Karachi (Pakistan). BMJ. 2004;329:1151–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Welch MG, Hofer MA, Stark RI, Andrews HF, Austin J, Glickstein SB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of family nurture intervention in the NICU: assessments of length of stay, feasibility and safety. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:148.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Shahheidari M, Homer CJ. Impact of the design of neonatal intensive care units on neonates, staff, and families: a systematic literature review. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2012;26:260–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement