Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Clinical cardiac assessment in newborns with prenatally diagnosed intrathoracic masses

Italian Journal of Pediatrics201844:98

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-018-0543-4

  • Received: 6 July 2018
  • Accepted: 13 August 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Congenital space-occupying thoracic malformations and diaphragmatic hernia have in common pulmonary hypoplasia. Our study aims to assess cardiac involvement during post-natal adaptation.

Methods

A retrospective study was carried out on newborns with prenatally diagnosed intrathoracic mass. Gathering for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), 35 neonates were compared for clinical course, cardiovascular enzymes, ECG, and ultrasound.

Results

The analysis revealed a high left heart defect rate in patients with severe RDS, without being influenced by the laterality. Ultrasound or laboratory assessment did not detect altered cardiac dimension or cardiomyopathy. Solely ECG signs of right ventricular strain were found. Increased QT-dispersion, T-wave and cardiac variability alterations in the first hours were all expression of non-specific cardiac repolarization disorders but predict worse outcome.

Conclusions

Although RDS is the predominant symptom, slight cardiac dysfunctions should be recognized for prompt treatment. Conventional examinations for postnatal adaption should be integrated by complementary investigations.

Keywords

  • Retrospective study
  • Respiratory system abnormalities
  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • Cardiovascular abnormalities

Background

Advanced prenatal ultrasound (US) screening program allows the diagnosis of intrathoracic masses, but above all may influence follow-up, early therapeutic strategies, prognosis, and parental expectations. Rare space-occupying thoracic malformations such as congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (CCAM; incidence 0.11‰ live births) [1], pulmonary sequestration complex, congenital lobar emphysema, bronchial atresia, foregut duplication cysts, and chest tumors, must be differentiated from displaced abdominal organs due to congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH; incidence 0.28‰ live births) [1]. All these conditions must be evaluated for concomitant congenital pulmonary hypoplasia (congenital small lung) [24].

Multiple malformations can occur in the same patient implicating a common embryopathogenesis (pulmonary sequestration associated with CDH, CCAM, and lung lobe anomalies, or eventratio and enterogenous cysts) [512]. The normal lung development proceeds simultaneously by the interaction of bronchial, arterial, venous, and lymphatic tree. Consequently, the symptomatology, and thus the prognosis, depends not only on the respiratory function but also on the cardiovascular and lymphatic involvement [3]. All these malformations are characterized by the risk of cardiomediastinal shift, loss of diaphragmatic thickness and concavity, nonimmune hydrops (pleural/pericardial effusion, ascites, scalp/integumentary edema, placentomegaly, Ballentyne syndrome), and cardio-pulmonary insufficiency, requiring intensive prenatal and postnatal surveillance and timely therapy [4, 7, 8, 1017]. Mortality rate resulting from CCAM with associated early hydrops and without intervention or maternal betamethasone administration can reach up to 100% [13, 1517]. Despite promising preliminary results of fetal medicine and advanced neonatal intensive care with aggressive treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, mortality from CDH remains high, not only when heart defects are associated [4, 18].

The aim of the present study was to assess cardiac involvement during postnatal pulmonary (mal-)adaptation in newborns with lung hypoplasia secondary to congenital pulmonary malformations or CDH.

Methods

An institutional review board-approved retrospective study was carried out on all newborns with prenatally diagnosed intrathoracic masses delivered between 2009 and 2016 at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of University Hospital. Information on gestation at diagnosis, maternal medication, progression of the lesion during pregnancy, laterality, and the presence of other associated anomalies were recorded. Postnatal investigations for intrathoracic mass, degree of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), surfactant replacement therapy, the best oxygenation index, and cardiovascular assessment during pulmonary adaption were evaluated including analyses of cardiac serum enzymes, ECG, and cardiac US indexed to Haycock-body surface area and Z-scores [19, 20]. The ECG was further analyzed for QRS wave amplitudes, Sokolow-Lyon-index (RV6 + SV1), Cornell (RaVL+SV3) criterion [21]; heart rate (RR- or NN-interval) variability, standard deviation of NN intervals, number of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms, rate of NN50 [22]; QTc and QT dispersion [23]. For the comparison of the cardiac data, the patient group was paired with a control group of newborns with the same gestational age and without RDS enrolled in a previous study. Parent’s informed written consent was provided.

Outcome data regarding oxygenation index, days of ventilation, days of hospitalization and mortality were recorded. Genetic counseling, karyotype, additional cytogenetic and molecular analyses were performed in all cases with suspected genetic background.

Statistical analyses were performed by the open source statistical R 3.04.0 software (R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria), and the significance was defined as p-value < 0.05. In a second step, the patient group was further divided by RDS gravity (absent-mild-severe), which was considered a sign of congenital pulmonary hypoplasia. RDS was defined as severe if the oxygenation index remained > 13 and the extubation was not achieved within 96 h of life, or within 96 h after neonatal surgery, or if the baby died. Baseline characteristics of the RDS groups were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests for continuous variables, and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Multivariate analysis was performed.

Results

Prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of fetal intrathoracic masses coincided in about 94% (33/35) of the cases. CDH with displaced abdominal organs in the thorax was the most frequent malformation (17/35; 48.5%), followed by CCAM (14/35; 40%). Patients with sequestration and anomalous pulmonary venous return (2/35; 5.7%), and postnatal discordant diagnoses such as eventratio (1/35; 2.9%) and pericardic cyst (1/35; 2.9%), were excluded for the further analysis. Perinatal characteristics were not significantly different in the malformation groups, but they differed in the RDS severity-gathering (Table 1).
Table 1

Perinatal characteristics of newborns with prenatally diagnosed intrathoracic masses categorized by RDS

 

Controls (n = 31)

Without RDS (n = 9)

Mild RDS (n = 6)

Severe RDS (n = 16)

p

laterality R/L

 

4/5

3/3

3/13

0.27

CDH (%)

0

0

50

87.5

< 0.0001

mediastinal shift (%)

 

33.3

50

100

0.00036

polydramnios (%)

0

12.5

0

43.7

0.00035

prenatal steroids (%)

0

11

0

25

0.23

birth gestational age, weeks (range)

38+ 6 (29+ 6–40)

39 (33+ 4–40)

39+ 2 (38+ 4–39+ 5)

38+3 (29+3–39)

0.064

birth weight (g)

3200

3000

3440

2665

0.002

weight centile

44

37

71

16

0.024

SGA (%)

0

11

0

31

0.0066

minimum serum calcium (mmol/L)

2.4

2.45

2.25

2.3

0.38

CK (μkat/L)

3.6

10

9

5.5

0.019

Apgar score 1′/5’

9/10

9/10

8/9

3/7

< 0.0001

days of hospitalization

3

6

20

25

< 0.0001

mortality (%)

0

0

0

37.5

< 0.0001

Abbreviations: RDS respiratory distress syndrome, CDH congenital diaphragmatic hernia, CK creatine kinase, SGA small for gestational age

Significant differences are in bold

Mediastinal shift, polydramnios, and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) were correlated with more severe RDS and poor neonatal outcome. Serum cardiac enzymes, surfactant replacement therapy, or the best oxygenation index from 1st day were not correlated with outcome. Associated extracardiac malformations were found in 9/16 patients with severe RDS (p = .00016).

The cardiovascular assessment revealed a high rate of congenital heart defects (CHD) in patients with severe RDS. In this group of patients, aortic and ductal arch anomalies and ventricular septal defects (VSD) were detected. In one infant VSD was associated with Edwards syndrome, and in one with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The laterality of the mass was not statistically associated with cardiac assessment or CHD rate.

The Sokolow index was significantly augmented in sequestration complex group but it was normal in newborns affected by CDH or CCAM, with or without RDS. Differences in cardiac US and ECG variables in the RDS subgroups were reported in Table 2.
Table 2

Medians of characteristic clinical cardiac parameters from newborns with prenatally diagnosed intrathoracic masses, categorized by RDS

 

Controls (n = 31)

Without RDS (n = 9)

Mild RDS (n = 6)

Severe RDS (n = 16)

p

CHD (%)

0

11.5

0

31

0.005

left ventricular cardiac index (L/min/m2)

3.45

3.4

N/A

2.9

0.47

left ventricular diastolic diameter (Z Score)

−0.49

−0.79

N/A

−1.75

0.28

aortic valve diameter (Z score)

0.42

1.71

−0.03

0.52

0.35

pulmonary valve diameter (Z score)

−0.46

−1.49

−1.91

−0.15

0.088

QRS axis

121

91.5

105

83.5

0.13

Sokolow index

1.2

1.032

0.957

1.15

0.31

Cornell index

0.8

0.75

1.025

0.2

0.098

amplitude R/S V2

1.14

2.1

0.4

0.75

0.0025

amplitude RV1 (mV)

1.1

0.7

0.4

0.5

0.002

amplitude RV6 (mV)

0.5

0.375

0.3

0.15

0.04

amplitude SV6 (mV)

0.35

0.025

0.4

0.2

0.015

QT dispersion (ms)

60

60

70

100

0.032

QTc dispersion (ms)

82

84

104

137.5

0.01

precordial T-wave inversion

3

2.5

1

2

0.023

SDNN (ms)

29.23

28.59

11.48

9.25

0.001

Abbreviation: RDS respiratory distress syndrome, CHD congenital heart defects, N/A not available

Significant differences are in bold

Discussion

The clinical presentation of infants with pulmonary hypoplasia depends on the severity of the disease and the underlying cause. In severe forms, RDS, hypercapnia, and hypoxemia consistently occur with signs and symptoms of associated conditions.

We investigated the cardiac involvement in newborns with pulmonary hypoplasia secondary to intrathoracic space-occupying lesions. In newborn, the suspected cardiac impact derived from the intrathoracic mass effect can be explained by almost three physiopathological mechanisms.

In fetal echocardiograms it has been demonstrated that an increased intrathoracic pressure in hydropic fetuses depresses global fetal growth, decreases left ventricular and aortic dimensions, and tends to increase the inferior vena cava dimension, reflecting the inability of the heart to adequately drain the venous system [2426]. However, cardiac dimension in our study population was within the normal range and did not differ significantly between groups. In all neonates, during the first few hours of cardiopulmonary transition, the optimal left ventricular filling was not achieved, and this could have resulted in a diminished global left ventricle dimension. Another explanation could be that the real ventricular diameters in the RDS groups might be overestimated due to not always optimal insonation due to mediastinal shift. The literature refers to significant reduced diameters only in cases with hydrops, which were not observed in our cases.

The concept of left-sided cardiac underdevelopment could be highlighted also by the increased frequency of left-sided CHD (11–29%) in the CDH population, ranging from severe hypoplastic left heart syndrome to asymptomatic bicuspid aortic valve or VSD [18, 2528]. We can confirm this high prevalence of left CHD, but without the influence of the laterality of the malformation. CCAM usually occurs as a sporadic nonhereditary disease, rarely accompanied by other anomalies, predominantly renal anomalies/tumors, VSD (10%) [8], conotruncal CHD (1.9%) [29], and ECG abnormalities, attributable to associated autosomal chromosome trisomies or 17p deletion syndromes (Hornstein-Birt-Hogg-Dubé or Smith-Magenis syndrome) [7, 12, 29, 30]. Candidate genes like HOXB5 located in chromosome 17p11.2 and FGF7 located in chromosome 15, actuating transcription factors and growth factors, seem to be involved in this disrupted epithelio-mesenchymal crosstalk [29]. In a Notch signaling inhibited mouse-model (the Pax3Cre/+ mouse), the development of both the cardiac neural crest derivatives (developing aortic arch vessels and the conotruncal septum) and the derivatives of the somites, including skeletal muscle of the diaphragm and limbs, were altered, but surprisingly the major cause of death at birth in these mice was respiratory failure, and not heart failure [31]. Given that it is probable that a genetic entity is characterized by CCAM (or CDH) and CHD [29, 31], the still unknown interaction of altered gene as a primary event prevail over the secondary hydrops effect theory of left-sided cardiac underdevelopment.

The second physiopathological aspect of the intrathoracic mass effect derives from the degree of lung hypoplasia and sustained pulmonary arterial hypertension owing to decreased pulmonary arterial growth and hypertensive vascular remodeling. Consequently, there are findings of right hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and intracardiac and extracardiac right-to-left shunts across a patent ductus arteriosus, a patent foramen ovale, and/or intrapulmonary anastomotic vessels [32]. However, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the neonatal age must be distinguished from other causes as CHD, asphyxia, infections, supraventricular tachycardia, diabetic cardiomyopathy, or large extrapulmonary arterio-venous malformations.

Finally, the presence of the above mentioned intrapulmonary shunts (seen in CCAM, sequestration, CDH as well as in alveolar capillary dysplasia or bronchopulmonary dysplasia) [32] suggests a potential mechanism of refractory hypoxemia with further hemodynamic impact on left ventricle dysfunction and the risk of congestive heart failure [10, 3335]. The regression of cardiac symptoms after surgical treatment of these pulmonary malformations has been reported [3436]. Nevertheless, also isolated lung hypoplasia without associated malformations has been reported with dilated cardiomyopathy [37].

Even though we also enrolled newborns with severe RDS and hypoxemia who died during the first day of life before surgery, we could not find evidence of significant signs of cardiomyopathy by US or laboratory cardiac assessment. Solely ECG signs of right ventricular strain were detected in patients with severe RDS. Only in patients with pulmonary sequestration we observed a further correlation between right heart impairment and spectral-Doppler US. Probably, the lack of correlation in the other patient groups could be attributed both to small study groups and the timing of cardiological exam soon after admission. It would take time to develop important postnatal intrapulmonary shunts and cardiomyopathy. Due to the study design, we could not retrospectively measure more specific ECG or US parameters for suspected concomitant diastolic impairment, like Tei-index or tissue Doppler.

For the first time, in the severe RDS group we could find evidence of significant early non-specific signs of cardiomyopathy and cardiac repolarization disorders like increased QT-dispersion, T-wave alterations, and reduced cardiac variability by ECG. Although non-specific and still not detectable by US or laboratory investigations, they can anticipate worse outcome when detected in the first few hours. In the multivariate regression analyses these anomalies were independent from gestational age. Significant spatial heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization in newborns with severe aortic coarctation [38] or with IUGR [23], due to relative interventricular septum hypertrophy and electrophysiological remodeling of the heart, is reported. Both rates of IUGR and left-sided CHD are high among newborns with intrathoracic masses, also in our study, therefore it is not clear if heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization is ascribable to these variables or is due to hypoxemic severe RDS. Data from histology and cellular immunophenotyping support the cardiovascular remodeling hypothesis which consists of an inhomogeneous distribution of ventricular growth factors and muscle proteins [39]. Subtle ECG repolarization disorders could be attributed to these non-homogenous cardiac muscle alterations.

Previous reports have suggested that the combination of CDH and CHD is a strong predictor of prenatal and postnatal mortality [40], even in the presence of cardiac lesions (e.g. VSD) that generally have excellent survival rates and do not cause significant hemodynamic compromise in neonatal age [27, 28]. Apart from CHD, also prenatal lung volume estimate, fetal MRI lung-to-liver signal intensity ratio, liver herniation, premature birth, or best oxygenation index on day 1 of life as lung function markers, but not prenatal Z-scores of left heart structures, have been reported as significant independent predictors of mortality in CDH [28, 41]. Fetal MRI lung volume measurements are the most useful predictor of perinatal outcomes also in fetuses with CCAM, as they best reflect the severity of pulmonary hypoplasia [42, 43].

Conclusions

Although in the early neonatal age RDS is the predominant symptom in all intrathoracic space-occupying lesions, a subtle early cardiac dysfunction must be recognized for prompt treatment before irreversible cardiac damage occurs. Conventional US for postnatal pulmonary and cardiac evaluation should be integrated by complementary dynamic, non-invasive, pain-free and ionizing radiation-free investigations.

Abbreviations

CCAM: 

Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation

CDH: 

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia

CHD: 

Congenital heart defects

IUGR: 

Intrauterine growth restriction

RDS: 

Respiratory distress syndrome

US: 

Ultrasound

VSD: 

Ventricular septal defects

Declarations

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

IAMS contributed in all parts of the study and in writing the paper. MG and EP revising the manuscript. MCL collected the patient data and revised the literature. GP performed statistical analysis and revising the manuscript. GC coordinated and supervised all part of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Parent’s informed written consent was provided.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, AOUP “P. Giaccone”, Department of Sciences for Health Promotion and Mother and Child Care “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, Via Alfonso Giordano n. 3, 90127 Palermo, Italy

References

  1. European surveillance of congenital anomalies (EUROCAT) Network http://www.eurocat-network.eu/accessprevalencedata/prevalencetables. Accessed 30 Dec 2017.
  2. Porter HJ. Pulmonary hypoplasia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;81:F81–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bush A. Congenital lung disease: a Plea for clear thinking and clear nomenclature. PediatrPulmonol. 2001;32:328–37.Google Scholar
  4. Snoek KG, Reiss IK, Greenough A, Capolupo I, Urlesberger B, Wessel L, et al. CDH EURO consortium. Standardized postnatal management of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: the CDH EURO consortium consensus - 2015 update. Neonatology. 2016;110:66–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ryan CA, Finer NN, Etches PC, Tierney AJ, Peliowski A. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: associated malformations cystic adenomatoid malformation, extralobular sequestration, and laryngotracheoesophageal cleft: two case reports. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30:883–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cruz SM, Akinkuotu AC, Cass DL, Lee TC, Cassady CI, Mehollin-Ray AR, et al. Space occupying lesions in the presence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:710–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davenport M, Warne SA, Cacciaguerra S, Patel S, Greenough A, Nicolaides K. Current outcome of antenally diagnosed cystic lung disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:549–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aziz D, Langer JC, Tuuha SE, Ryan G, Ein SH, Kim PC. Perinatally diagnosed asymptomatic congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation: to resect or not? J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:329–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Koksal Y, Unal E, Aribas OK, Oran B. An uncommon extrapulmonary sequestration located in the upper posterior mediastinum associated with the azygos lobe in a child. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1110–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Konen E, Raviv-Zilka L, Cohen RA, Epelman M, Boger-Megiddo I, Bar-Ziv J, et al. Congenital pulmonary venolobar syndrome: spectrum of helical CT findings with emphasis on computerized reformatting. Radiographics. 2003;23:1175–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Singal AK, Srinivas M, Bhatnagar V. Bronchopulmonary foregut malformations in association with diaphragmatic eventration. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:1329–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bush A. Rare lung diseases: congenital malformations. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82:833–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bunduki V, Ruano R, da Silva MM, Miguelez J, Miyadahira S, Maksoud JG, et al. Prognostic factors associated with congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20:459–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Aghabiklooei A, Goodarzi P, Kariminejad MH. Lung hypoplasia and its associated major congenital abnormalities in perinatal death: an autopsy study of 850 cases. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76:1137–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vu L, Tsao KJ, Lee H, Nobuhara K, Farmer D, Harrison M, et al. Characteristics of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations associated with nonimmune hydrops and outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:1351–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grethel EJ, Wagner AJ, Clifton MS, Cortes RA, Farmer DL, Harrison MR, et al. Fetal intervention for mass lesions and hydrops improves outcome: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:117–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Peranteau WH, Boelig MM, Khalek N, Moldenhauer JS, Martinez-Poyer J, Hedrick HL, et al. Effect of single and multiple courses of maternal betamethasone on prenatal congenital lung lesion growth and fetal survival. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:28–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Menon SC, Tani LY, Weng YT, Lally PA, Lally KP, Yoder BA. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia study group. Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with cardiac defects and congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr. 2013;162:114–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mertens L, Seri I, Marek J, Arlettaz R, Barker P, McNamara P, et al. Targeted neonatal echocardiography in the neonatal intensive care unit: practice guidelines and recommendations for training. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:715–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cantinotti M, Scalese M, Murzi B, Assanta N, Spadoni I, De Lucia V, et al. Echocardiographic nomograms for chamber diameters and areas in Caucasian children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:1279–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Brothers MB, Oster ME, Ehrlich A, Strieper MJ, Mahle WT. Novel electrocardiographic screening criterion for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:1246–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:354–81.Google Scholar
  23. Fouzas S, Karatza AA, Davlouros PA, Chrysis D, Alexopoulos D, Mantagos S, et al. Heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization in newborns with intrauterine growth restriction. Early Hum Dev. 2014;90:857–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bigras J-L, Ryan G, Suda K, Silva AE, Seaward PG, Windrim R, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of fetal hydrothorax: the effusion ratio as a diagnostic tool. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:37–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rocha LA, Byrne FA, Keller RL, Miniati D, Brook MM, Silverman NH, et al. Left heart structures in human neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and the effect of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;35:36–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kailin JA, Dhillon GS, Maskatia SA, Cass DL, Shamshirsaz AA, Mehollin-Ray AR, et al. Fetal left-sided cardiac structural dimensions in left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia – association with severity and impact on postnatal outcomes. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37:502–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cohen MS, Rychik J, Bush DM, Tian ZY, Howell LJ, Adzick NS, et al. Influence of congenital heart disease on survival in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr. 2002;141:25–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vogel M, McElhinney DB, Marcus E, Morash D, Jennings RW, Tworetzky W. Significance and outcome of left heart hypoplasia in fetal diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:310–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hüsler MR, Wilson RD, Rychik J, Bebbington MW, Johnson MP, Mann SE, et al. Prenatally diagnosed fetal lung lesions with associated conotruncal heart defects: is there a genetic association? Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:1123–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamamoto T, Ueda H, Kawataki M, Yamanaka M, Asou T, Kondoh Y, et al. A large interstitial deletion of 17p13.1p11.2 involving the smith-Magenis chromosome region in a girl with multiple congenital anomalies. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140:88–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. High FA, Zhang M, Proweller A, Tu L, Parmacek MS, Pear WS, et al. An essential role for notch in neural crest during cardiovascular development and smooth muscle differentiation. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:353–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Acker SN, Mandell EW, Sims-Lucas S, Gien J, Abman SH, Galambos C, et al. Histologic identification of prominent intrapulmonary anastomotic vessels in severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr. 2015;166:178–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Thilenius OG, Ruschhaupt DG, Replogle RL, Bharati S, Herman T, Arcilla RA, et al. Spectrum of pulmonary sequestration: association with anomalous pulmonary venous drainage in infants. Ped Cardiol. 1983;4:97–103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Fabre OH, Porte HL, Godart FR, Rey C, Wurtz AJ. Long-term cardiovascular consequences of undiagnosed intralobar pulmonary sequestration. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1144–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Snoek KG, Kraemer US, Ten Kate CA, Greenough A, van Heijst A, Capolupo I, et al. High-sensitivity troponin T and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in prediction of outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: results from a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2016;173:245–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Delacourt C, Hadchouel A, Toelen J, Rayyan M, de Blic J, Deprest J, et al. Long term respiratory outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, esophageal atresia, and cardiovascular anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17:105–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gupta MK, Singh M, Manoj R, Devidayal. Lung hypoplasia with dilated cardiomyopathy: coincidence or association? Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74:304–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nigro G, Russo V, Rago A, Papa AA, Cioppa ND, Di Meo F, et al. Heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization in newborns with severe aortic coarctation. PediatrCardiol. 2012;33:302–6.Google Scholar
  39. Pelizzo G, Bussani R, Zandonà L, Custrin A, Bellieni CV, De Silvestri A, et al. Cardiac adaption to severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Fetal PediatrPathol. 2016;35:10–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruano R, Javadian P, Kailin JA, Maskatia SA, Shamshirsaz AA, Cass DL, et al. Congenital heart anomaly in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a single-center experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:683–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruttenstock E, Wright N, Barrena S, Krickhahn A, Castellani C, Desai AP, et al. Best oxygenation index on day 1: a reliable marker for outcome and survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2015;25:3–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zamora IJ, Sheikh F, Cassady CI, Olutoye OO, Mehollin-Ray AR, Ruano R, et al. Fetal MRI lung volumes are predictive of perinatal outcomes in fetuses with congenital lung masses. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:853–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Girsen AI, Hintz SR, Sammour R, Naqvi A, El-Sayed YY, Sherwin K, et al. Prediction of neonatal respiratory distress in pregnancies complicated by fetal lung masses. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37:266–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement