Skip to main content
Download PDF

Determining the relationship between over-care burden and coping styles, and resilience in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder

Italian Journal of Pediatrics volume 49, Article number: 53 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Stress and over-care burden are problems for mothers of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Therefore, it seems necessary to evaluation of coping with stress according to the burden of care for these mothers. This study aimed to determine the relationship between care burden with coping styles and resilience of mothers of children with ASD.

Methods

The present study is a descriptive-analytical study performed on mothers of children with ASD in Kermanshah, Iran. Participants in the study were selected by convenience sampling. A Demographic questionnaire, Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and Coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ) were used for collecting data. Then it was analyzed through an independent t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation test.

Results

The mean total score of the burden of care was 95.5 ± 9.1, resilience was 52.7 ± 8.7, and coping styles were 92.4 ± 8.4. Mothers of children with autism experience a severe burden of care and moderate levels of resiliency. There was also a significant negative correlation between the burden of care and resilience) p < 0.001, r = -0.536), but no significant correlation was found between burden of care and coping style) p = 0.937, r = -0.010).

Conclusion

According to the results of this study, it is necessary to pay more attention to the factors affecting resiliency. Also, considering the significant relationship between burden of care and resiliency, teaching strategies to increase resiliency can be used in the educational program for mothers with autistic children.

Background

Autism spectrum disorder is a disease or a set of diseases related to the development of the nervous system, which is characterized by impaired social interaction and communication and limited and repetitive behaviors [1]. The prevalence of autism has been continuously increasing over the past two decades [2]. According to the Centers for the Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report in the United States, the prevalence is estimated to be one in every 59 people in 2014 and one in every 54 people in 2016 in 8-year-old children [3].

Inability to take care of oneself and dependence on caregivers are the most critical problems of children with autism [4]. Caring for children with autism spectrum disorder is a stressful process [5]. The stress caused by raising a sick or disabled child creates a burden of care [6]. The burden of care is defined as the physical, psychological, social, or economic reactions that appear in the caregiver during care, and it is defined as stress or negative experiences caused by care in the caregiver. Various studies on the relationship between maternal stress, Discordant behavior, and low social support have been associated with an increased burden of care [7, 8].

The burden of care imposed on mothers of children with autism leads them to find strategies to deal with caregiving stress [9]. Coping styles have been proposed as a mechanism by which people respond to threats caused by stress [10]. Coping styles are divided into two general types, problem-focused coping (strategies aimed at solving the problem or doing something to change the source of stress) and emotion-focused coping (strategies aimed at reducing or managing feelings of distress associated with the stressor) [11, 12]. In studies of parents of individuals with autism, the use of emotion-focused coping styles (e.g., denial and avoidance) has generally been associated with higher levels of psychological distress. In comparison, the use of problem-focused coping styles (for example, planning and taking action to deal with this problem) has often been associated with improved mental health outcomes [11]. According to studies, the stress of parents of autistic children affects the care burden [11,12,13]. Also, effective coping styles against stress reduce the incidence of depression and other mental disorders in these parents [14].

Researchers believe there are moderating factors between parents’ mental pressures and child disorders. The presence of some characteristics can increase the internal resistance to mental stresses. It is one of the factors that moderates resilience [15]. Resilience is returning to the initial equilibrium or reaching higher stability in a threatening situation [16]. People with a high-level resilience are likely to deal with their exceptional children logically and correctly [17]. Several studies’ results have indicated a significant relationship between resilience and care burden in caregivers of patients [18, 19]. Based on the results, high resilience in caregivers may help prevent caregiving burden, reduce its severity, and facilitate effective coping styles [19].

Therefore, considering the increasing prevalence of autism, the importance of women’s position in society and family, and their essential role in caring for children with autism spectrum disorder, we decided to design and implement this study. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between caregiving burden and coping styles and resilience in mothers of autistic children. Also, the research hypothesis was that there is a relationship between the burden of care and coping methods and resilience in mothers of autistic children.

Methods

Study design and setting

This study was conducted using a descriptive-analytical research plan between July and December 2021 at the Autism Center affiliated with Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. The following two objectives were investigated in the study: “Assessment of caregiving burden, coping styles and resilience of mothers of autistic children” and “Relationship between caregiving burden and coping styles and resilience in mothers of autistic children.“

Participants and sampling

For sampling, after obtaining ethics approval, the researcher went to the Autism Center affiliated with Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and received the phone numbers of the mothers of autistic children who met the inclusion criteria. Then researcher contacted mothers with autistic children, and mothers willing to participate in this study were invited. Therefore, 80 mothers with autistic children were selected to participate in the research using the available sampling method. It should be noted that their families and children visited the center one day a week to receive special educational and counseling services. The questionnaires were delivered to the volunteer mothers on the same day, and they were asked to complete the questionnaires if they agreed to participate in the study. Completion of the forms and tools took approximately 40 min.

The criteria for entering the study were as follows: having at least one child aged 3 to 15 with a definite diagnosis of autism, the absence of other physical, cognitive or mental disorders in the mother, and the willingness and consent of the mother to participate in the study. Participants who could not answer more than half of the questions in their questionnaires or did not return their questionnaires were excluded. The majority of questionnaires (87%) were collected in November, and finally, 69 mothers completed the questionnaires. One of the main reasons for mothers not participating in this study was containing many questions in the questionnaire and not having enough time to complete the questionnaire.

Questionnaire

Demographic information questionnaire

Demographic information included the child’s age, mother’s age, child’s gender, economic status, number of children, mother’s education level, mother’s status, marital status, and age of autism diagnosis.

Caregiver burden inventory (CBI)

The caregiving burden questionnaire was created in 1989 by Novak and Guest to measure the objective and subjective burden of care. This questionnaire has 24 questions and five subscales, which are: time-dependent burden of care, developmental burden of care, physical burden of care, social burden of care, and emotional burden of care. This questionnaire is based on a 5-point Likert scale from completely disagree [1] to completely agree [5]. Based on this, the scores of this questionnaire ranged from 24 to 120, where scores of 24 to 47 are considered mild care pressure, 48 to 71 as moderate care pressure, 72 to 95 as severe care pressure, and 96 to 120 as very severe care pressure. In the study of Novak et al., the validity and reliability of the care burden questionnaire were measured in caregivers, and Cronbach’s alpha for different subscales was obtained from 73 to 87% [20]. This tool has been translated into different languages and used in various countries, including; Brazil, Turkey, China, and Italy, and it has a high level of validity and reliability [21,22,23].

Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC)

Connor and Davidson prepared the resilience scale in 2003 to measure the power to deal with pressure and threat. This questionnaire has 25 questions and five subscales: perception of personal competence, correspondence to trust in one’s instincts, tolerance of negative affect, positive acceptance of change, secure relationships, control, and spiritual influences. For each question, a five-choice grading scale is considered, scored from zero (completely false) to four (always true). The scoring method of this questionnaire is 0-100. Scores of 0–50 indicate low resilience, 50–75 mean resilience, and 75 and above show high resilience. Connor and Davidson reported the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the resilience scale, 0.89 [24].

Coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ)

Lazarus and Folkman designed the Coping Strategies Questionnaire in 1980. It is a tool to study how people cope with stress. This questionnaire has 66 questions and eight subscales. The problem-based coping part includes the four characteristics of seeking social support, responsibility, managerial problem-solving, and positive re-evaluation. The emotion-based coping part consists of the four attributes of direct confrontation, escape and avoidance, avoidance, and self-control. The questions are scored on a 4-point Likert scale (from 0: I have not used it at all to 3: I use it a lot). In this questionnaire, if the calculated score is between 0 and 66, it is a sign of using a low coping style in the person, and if the calculated score is between 66 and 110, it is a sign of using an average coping style. Finally, if the calculated score is 110 or more, it is a sign of using a high coping style in the person. Lazarus reported internal consistency of 0.79 to 0.66 for each coping style [25]. Rezakhani et al. obtained the reliability coefficient of this tool using Cronbach’s alpha method of 0.80, and the research results showed that this questionnaire has acceptable validity and reliability [26].

Statistical methods

Data analysis was done using SPSS version 25 software. Descriptive statistics methods (including setting frequency distribution tables, calculating numerical indices such as mean, the standard deviation for quantitative traits, and percentage for qualitative traits) were used to summarize and describe the variables. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the normality of the distribution of the scores of the investigated indicators. Also, an independent t-test was used for two-category variables, and a one-factor analysis of variance was used for three-category and higher demographic variables at a significance level of less than 0.05. Pearson’s correlation test was used to investigate the correlation between the burden of care, coping styles, and resilience of mothers of children with autism.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee approved the study of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR.KUMS.REC.1400.040). Also, at the beginning of the study, the researcher introduced herself to the research units, explained the way of conducting the research and the purpose of its implementation, and assured them that all information would remain confidential and the participants could withdraw from the study at any time. To gain the trust of the research units, we refrained from asking and including their names, family names, and addresses. Finally, after providing sufficient information about the study, written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Results

Demographic information

Of the 69 mothers who participated in the study, the participants’ age range was between 26 and 54 years, with an average of 38.4 ± 7 years. Most participants (94.2%) were married, 50.7% of whom had one child. The income of more than half of the mothers (78.2%) was equal to the expenses. Also, 56.5% had a university education, 30.4% were employed, and 79.7% had a son with autism. The age range of children with autism was between 3 and 15 years, with an average of 9.4 ± 3.8 years. The average age of autism diagnosis in children was 3.3 ± 1. The minimum and maximum age of diagnosis were 2 and 5 years, respectively (Table 1).

The relationship between caring burden and demographic information

This study’s findings showed a significant relationship between the burden of care and the mother’s age, number of children, mother’s employment status, child’s gender, and economic status. So, mothers with more children, low economic status, and a daughter with autism reported more burden of care (Table 1).

Table 1 Participants’ demographic characteristics and caring burden scores
Full size table

Caring burden, coping styles and resilience in the participants

The average burden of care of mothers participating in the present study was 95.5 ± 9.1, which shows that the care load is severe. The average resilience score was 52.7 ± 8.7, which indicates an average level of resilience. Also, the average score of coping styles was 92.4 ± 8.4, indicating an average level of coping style (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2  Means and standard deviations of the participants’ caring burden, coping styles and resiliency scores
Full size table
Table 3 Frequency of caring burden, coping styles and resilience of the participants
Full size table

The relationship between caring burden, coping styles and resilience in the participants

This study’s findings showed an inverse relationship between caregiving burden and resilience in mothers of children with autism (p < 0.001, r = -0.536). Still, there was no significant relationship between caregiving burden and coping strategies. (0.937, r = 0.010) (Table 4).

Table 4 The relationship between caring burden, coping styles and resilience
Full size table

Discussion

This study showed that mothers of children with autism reported higher caregiving burdens, moderate levels of resilience, and moderate levels of coping styles. There is an indirect correlation between caregiving burden and resilience, but no significant relationship was found between caregiving burden and coping style.

The results of this study showed that the mother’s age, number of children, employment status, child’s gender, and economic status affect the burden of care imposed on these mothers. The results of previous studies have shown that parents of children with autism bear a heavy burden of care and often suffer from significant depression and anxiety symptoms, which is similar to the results of our study [27,28,29]. A study by Picardi et al. showed that parents of children and adolescents with autism suffer from high levels of objective and subjective burden. Mothers of these children reported more subjective burdens than fathers [29]. In justification of this finding, it can be said that the constant care of an autistic child is accompanied by mental stress, frustration and depression, which can affect the mental health of parents and caregivers responsible for supporting and caring for them [29]. Autistic children are a significant challenge for their parents. When parents are diagnosed with autism in their children, they face significant problems related to children’s symptoms and special and long-term care [30]. Parents have to meet the needs of themselves and their children simultaneously, which leads to increased pressure in all physical, emotional, social, and economic dimensions and changes in life following the provision of a caring role [31]. The studies indicate that the adverse effects of having a weak or disabled child cause tension and pressure on family members, especially the mother, because the mother is the first person to communicate directly with the child [32, 33]. Also, in explaining the intense burden of care for autistic children’s mothers, it can be said that the lack of support and social system that can provide therapeutic, medical, and occupational support to these children and their families is another serious problem in Iranian society [34].

Based on the results of this study, the average score of resilience in this research was 52.7, which indicates a moderate level of resilience. In Pastor et al.‘s study, the level of resilience of parents of autistic children was reported as moderate, which is in line with the results of our study. [35]. The average level of resilience of mothers of autistic children can be justified by the fact that the availability of a support system and the existence of support may be a means of adapting to the conditions in the role of caregiver, which leads to greater resilience [36]. Hesi et al. reported that a good support system is one of the factors related to resilience [37]. Also, as the nature of autism is a chronic disorder, it may reduce the perceived stress on caregivers over time because they may adapt to the behavioral patterns and fluctuations of the disease over the years and may become more flexible people as a result of getting used to it, and this is consistent with the findings of the present study [12].

The present study’s average score of coping styles was 92.4, which indicates an average level of coping styles. Also, among the subscales of problem-focused coping styles, positive re-evaluation with an average of 13.2, and Emotion-focused, avoidance, and avoidance styles got the highest scores with an average of 14.8. This result was in line with Hastings et al.‘s findings; They reported that the use of positive reappraisal of potentially traumatic and stressful events might be one of the only effective and available coping strategies for families with children with autism in severe situations [12]. Also, Rayan et al. stated that coping with positive re-evaluation by parents of autistic children reduces their stress [38]. In their study, Dunn et al. noted that the use of avoidance strategy among parents of autistic children is used more than other strategies, which can be a short-term stress reduction mechanism. However, avoiding the problem and not dealing directly with stressful events can be harmful and ultimately lead to family inconsistencies. Also, the avoidance coping style is related to increased depression and isolation [39]. Also, in the study of coping styles of parents of children with autism, Lai et al. found that these parents use avoidant coping more than parents with normal children [40]. Based on the present study’s findings, the average score for emotion-focused coping style was higher than the average score for problem-oriented coping style. There are conflicting results about common styles in families with autistic children. Wang et al. showed that avoidant coping was less common among parents of children with autism [41], while Lai et al. and Pisula et al. reported the opposite [40, 42]. These different findings in the existing studies show the need for more studies on coping strategies that mothers of children with autism specifically use.

The results obtained in this study aimed at determining the relationship between caregiving burden and coping styles in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder showed no statistically significant relationship between caregiving burden and coping style. Based on previous studies, it was expected that mothers with more problem-focused coping styles report a lower burden of care, and mothers who use more emotion-focused coping styles report a higher burden of care. However, unlike many previous studies, the relationship between caregiving burden and problem-focused and emotion-focused coping styles was meaningless in this study [43,44,45]. In line with the present study, Stuart et al. conducted a research to investigate the factors affecting the burden of care after the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. The results indicated no relationship between caregiving burden and active coping styles [30]. Also, the findings of this study are consistent with the research of Osundina et al. They found no significant relationship between caregiving burden and coping style in caregivers of patients with mental disorders [46]. Smith et al. also stated that using problem-focused coping strategies minimally reduces mothers’ discomfort [47]. Also, the study by Hastings et al. showed that problem-focused coping is not related to stress and mental health of parents of autistic children [12].

In justifying the lack of relationship between coping styles and the burden of care, it can be said that coping styles are often used when a person is exposed to acute stress and uncontrollable stressful conditions [48], which means that according to The chronicity of the stress factor, mothers of autistic children have adapted to their long-term experience as caregivers. The use of coping styles does not affect their burden of care [12]. Also, through the cultural dimension, the results of this study can be justified as Iranian families accept and support their children despite any illness and have a sense of commitment towards the unchangeable situation [49]. In this regard, previous studies show that accepting and understanding the disease’s characteristics helps the family stay together even in the face of unpleasant problems when family caregivers can take the diagnosis and evaluate the critical situation positively. They can find different ways to adapt to their situation [50, 51]. Also, one of the possible explanations for the lack of relationship between coping styles and the burden of care is the small sample size in this study. More studies with a more complex design and a larger sample size may provide more information on this issue. Other research methods such as qualitative research may be necessary to understand how the mothers of these children cope with complex life conditions.

Also, the results obtained in this study to determine the relationship between caregiving burden and resilience in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder showed an inverse and significant relationship between caregiving burden and resilience in mothers of children with an autism spectrum disorder. There are statistics, and the results obtained were similar to the results of previous studies [19, 52, 53]. Ozge et al.‘s study aimed to determine the relationship between caregiving burden and resilience and the quality of life of parents of children admitted to a rehabilitation center in Turkey, showed that there is a moderate negative correlation between caregiving burden and resilience, which was similar to the results of our study. 53). Also, Pipatananond et al. reported that resilience indicators reduce caregiver burden in family members of people with mental illness [54]. This relationship can be explained by reducing the amount of care burden and the stress caused by care, adaptability to adverse conditions increases, and as a result, resilience increases. In fact, a resilient person is characterized by self-efficacy. Such a person sees stress as a challenge and an opportunity, uses the support of others, accepts reality, has an extraordinary ability to adapt to important changes, and deeply believes that life is meaningful. In addition, a person with high resilience has a sense of humor, an action-focused approach, patience, and optimistic thoughts. All these characteristics help them bear the stress and burden of care effectively [24, 55, 56].

Finally, we can state that according to the findings of this research, mothers of autistic children shoulder a lot of burden in taking care of their children and have moderate adaptation to the existing conditions. Therefore, proper planning and policies are necessary to reduce the burden of care for these mothers. In addition, due to the importance of resilience, nursing interventions are essential to increase resilience. Also, longitudinal studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of resilience on the physical and psychological outcomes of people with autism and their caregivers.

Limitations

The most important limitation of the current research in the method of collecting studies is the use of a self-assessment questionnaire with a large volume of questions, affecting the subject’s accuracy in answering all the questions correctly. Also, one of our limitations was the use of the available sampling method, which made it impossible to select the participants in the research randomly. Finally, the statistical population of this research is made up of 69 mothers of children with autism, so it is recommended to conduct this research on a large sample size so that the hypotheses can be rejected or confirmed more strongly.

Conclusion

According to the results obtained in the present study and its comparison with other studies with similar goals, it was found that the mothers of autistic children experience intense caregiving and have a moderate level of resilience. There is a significant relationship between the burden of care and resilience, so paying more attention to the effective factors in increasing resilience is necessary. Based on this, nurses and policymakers of healthcare organizations can provide support, counseling, and training for these mothers to help them adapt to caring for children with autism and thus reduce their burden of care.

Data Availability

Data is contained within the article.

References

  1. Pennington ML, Cullinan D, Southern LB. Defining autism: variability in state education agency definitions of and evaluations for autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res Treat. 2014;2014.

  2. Chiarotti F, Venerosi A. Epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders: a review of worldwide prevalence estimates since 2014. Brain Sci. 2020;10(5):274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Baio J, Wiggins L, Christensen DL, Maenner MJ, Daniels J, Warren Z, et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveillance Summaries. 2018;67(6):1.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bal VH, Kim S-H, Cheong D, Lord C. Daily living skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorder from 2 to 21 years of age. Autism. 2015;19(7):774–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cetinbakis G, Bastug G, Ozel-Kizil E. Factors contributing to higher caregiving burden in turkish mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders. Int J Dev Disabil. 2020;66(1):46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boztepe H, Çınar S, Ay A, Kerimoğlu Yıldız G, Kılıç C. Predictors of caregiver burden in mothers of children with leukemia and cerebral palsy. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019;37(1):69–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Estes A, Olson E, Sullivan K, Greenson J, Winter J, Dawson G, et al. Parenting-related stress and psychological distress in mothers of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Develop. 2013;35(2):133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lecavalier L, Leone S, Wiltz J. The impact of behaviour problems on caregiver stress in young people with autism spectrum disorders. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006;50(3):172–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown M, Whiting J, Kahumoku-Fessler E, Witting AB, Jensen J. A dyadic model of stress, coping, and marital satisfaction among parents of children with autism. Fam Relat. 2020;69(1):138–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Seiffge-Krenke I. Stress, coping, and relationships in adolescence. Psychology Press; 2013.

  11. Benson PR. Coping, distress, and well-being in mothers of children with autism. Res Autism Spectr Disorders. 2010;4(2):217–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hastings RP, Kovshoff H, Brown T, Ward NJ, Espinosa FD, Remington B. Coping strategies in mothers and fathers of preschool and school-age children with autism. Autism. 2005;9(4):377–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hastings RP, Kovshoff H, Ward NJ, Degli Espinosa F, Brown T, Remington B. Systems analysis of stress and positive perceptions in mothers and fathers of pre-school children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2005;35(5):635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zablotsky B, Bradshaw CP, Stuart EA. The association between mental health, stress, and coping supports in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43(6):1380–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peer JW, Hillman SB. Stress and resilience for parents of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a review of key factors and recommendations for practitioners. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2014;11(2):92–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Southwick SM, Litz BT, Charney D, Friedman MJ. Resilience and mental health: Challenges across the lifespan. Cambridge University Press; 2011.

  17. Kumpfer K. In: Glantz MD, Johnson JL, editors. Factors and processes contributing to resilience. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Y, Wang K, Yin Y, Li Y, Li S. Relationships between family resilience, breast cancer survivors’ individual resilience, and caregiver burden: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;88:79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Üzar-Özçeti̇n YS, Dursun S. Quality of life, caregiver burden, and resilience among the family caregivers of cancer survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020;48:101832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Novak M, Guest C. Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory. Gerontologist. 1989;29(6):798–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Valer DB, Aires M, Fengler FL, Paskulin LMG. Adaptation and validation of the Caregiver Burden Inventory for use with caregivers of elderly individuals. Rev Latinoam Enferm. 2015;23(1):130–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cil Akinci A, Pinar R. Validity and reliability of turkish caregiver burden scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(3–4):352–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chou K-R, Jiann-Chyun L, Chu H. The reliability and validity of the chinese version of the caregiver burden inventory. Nurs Res. 2002;51(5):324–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD‐RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company; 1984.

  26. Rezakhani S. Construction and standardization coping strategies questionnaire with stress for college students. Innov Manage eduction(Journal Mod thoughts education). 2011;6(2(22)):-.

  27. Weiss JA, Viecili MA, Sloman L, Lunsky Y. Direct and indirect psychosocial outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder and their parents following a parent-involved social skills group intervention. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;22(4):303.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hayes SA, Watson SL. The impact of parenting stress: a meta-analysis of studies comparing the experience of parenting stress in parents of children with and without autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43(3):629–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Picardi A, Gigantesco A, Tarolla E, Stoppioni V, Cerbo R, Cremonte M, et al. Parental burden and its correlates in families of children with autism spectrum disorder: a multicentre study with two comparison groups. Volume 14. Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health: CP & EMH; 2018. p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stuart M, McGrew JH. Caregiver burden after receiving a diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder. Res autism Spectr disorders. 2009;3(1):86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Marsack-Topolewski CN, Church HL. Impact of caregiver burden on quality of life for parents of adult children with autism spectrum disorder. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019;124(2):145–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cadman T, Eklund H, Howley D, Hayward H, Clarke H, Findon J, et al. Caregiver burden as people with autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder transition into adolescence and adulthood in the United Kingdom. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(9):879–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fairthorne J, de Klerk N, Leonard H. Brief report: burden of care in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disability. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(3):1103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zarafshan H, Mohammadi MR, Abolhassani F, Motevalian SA, Sepasi N, Sharifi V. Current status of health and social services for children with autism in Iran: parents’ perspectives. Iran J psychiatry. 2019;14(1):76.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Pastor-Cerezuela G, Fernández-Andrés M-I, Pérez-Molina D, Tijeras-Iborra A. Parental stress and resilience in autism spectrum disorder and Down syndrome. J Fam Issues. 2021;42(1):3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abd El SAE-M, Abd El-Nabi AA, Fathalla HE-D. Resilience, burden, and quality of life in egyptian family caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. Egypt Nurs J. 2018;15(2):196.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Herbert HS, Manjula M, Philip M. Resilience and factors contributing to resilience among the offsprings of parents with schizophrenia. Psychol Stud. 2013;58(1):80–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rayan A, Ahmad M. Psychological distress in jordanian parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: the role of positive reappraisal coping. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017;31(1):38–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dunn ME, Burbine T, Bowers CA, Tantleff-Dunn S. Moderators of stress in parents of children with autism. Commun Ment Health J. 2001;37(1):39–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lai WW, Goh TJ, Oei TP, Sung M. Coping and well-being in parents of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(8):2582–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang P, Michaels CA, Day MS. Stresses and coping strategies of chinese families with children with autism and other developmental disabilities. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011;41(6):783–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pisula E, Kossakowska Z. Sense of coherence and coping with stress among mothers and fathers of children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;40(12):1485–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pakenham KI, Samios C, Sofronoff K. Adjustment in mothers of children with Asperger syndrome: an application of the double ABCX model of family adjustment. Autism. 2005;9(2):191–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Abbasi A, Ashrafrezaee N, Asayesh H, Shariati A, Rahmani H, Mollaei E, et al. The relationship between caring burden and coping strategies in hemodialysis patients caregivers. Nurs Midwifery J. 2012;10(4):0.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Akpan-Idiok PA, Ehiemere IO, Asuquo EF, Chabo JAU, Osuchukwu EC. Assessment of burden and coping strategies among caregivers of cancer patients in sub-saharan Africa. World J Clin Oncol. 2020;11(12):1045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Osundina A, Fatoye F, Akanni O, Omoreagba J, Akinsulore A, Oloniniyi I. Burden and coping styles among caregivers of patients with major mental disorders and hypertension attending a nigerian tertiary hospital. Indian J Social Psychiatry. 2017;33(3):189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Smith LE, Seltzer MM, Tager-Flusberg H, Greenberg JS, Carter AS. A comparative analysis of well-being and coping among mothers of toddlers and mothers of adolescents with ASD. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008;38(5):876–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Biggs A, Brough P, Drummond S. Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. The handbook of stress and health: A guide to research and practice. 2017:351 – 64.

  49. Mehmannavazan M, Hosseini M, Vartanoosian J, Matbouei M, Nasiri M, Vasli P. Translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the “Family Management Measure” among iranian families with a child with a chronic disease. Electron physician. 2018;10(6):6942.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bishop M, Greeff A. Resilience in families in which a member has been diagnosed with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015;22(7):463–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Greeff AP, Vansteenwegen A, Ide M. Resiliency in families with a member with a psychological disorder. Am J Family Therapy. 2006;34(4):285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Senturk SG, Akyol MA, Kucukguclu O. The relationship between caregiver burden and psychological resilience in caregivers of individuals with dementia. Int J Caring Sci. 2018;11(2):1223.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Keniş-Coşkun Ö, Atabay CE, Şekeroğlu A, Akdeniz E, Kasil B, Bozkurt G, et al. The relationship between caregiver burden and resilience and quality of life in a turkish pediatric rehabilitation facility. J Pediatr Nurs. 2020;52:e108–e13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pipatananond P. Caregiver burden predictive model: an empirical test among caregivers for the schizophrenic (dissertation). Bangkok (TH): Mahidol Univ. 2002.

  55. Hassanzadeh F, Hojjati H. The relationship between resilience and care burden among parents of students with intellectual disability in Golestan Province, Iran, in 2016. J Res Rehabil Sci. 2017;12(5):252–8.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Burns R, Anstey K. The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): testing the invariance of a uni-dimensional resilience measure that is independent of positive and negative affect. Pers Indiv Differ. 2010;48(5):527–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present article is extracted from a research project registered at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. The authors thank the Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences for financially supporting this research. The researchers would like to express their gratitude to the authorities at Kermanshah School of Nursing and Midwifery, the staff of the Autism Center and the mothers who participated in the study, and all the other individuals who cooperated with them.

Funding

By Deputy for Research and Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR) (4000101). This deputy has no role in the study process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

    Shabnam Rasoulpoor

  2. Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Nader Salari

  3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Amir Shiani

  4. Sleep Disorders Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Behnam Khaledi-Paveh

  5. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Gerash University of Medical Sciences, Gerash, Iran

    Masoud Mohammadi

Authors
  1. Shabnam Rasoulpoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nader Salari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amir Shiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Behnam Khaledi-Paveh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Masoud Mohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SHR, BKH, ASH, and MM were involved in the conception of the study and designed the study, and were responsible for data collection. Then NS and SHR and MM analyzed the data. MM drafted the primary manuscript, revised and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Mohammadi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR.KUMS.REC.1400.040) approved the study. Also, at the beginning of the study, the researcher introduced himself to the research units and explained the way of conducting the research and the purpose of its implementation, and assured them that all information remains confidential and can be withdrawn from the study at any time. To gain the trust of the research units, we refrained from asking and including their names, family names, and addresses. Finally, after providing sufficient information about the study, written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All procedures performed in this study were performed in accordance with the ethical standards contained in the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rasoulpoor, S., Salari, N., Shiani, A. et al. Determining the relationship between over-care burden and coping styles, and resilience in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder. Ital J Pediatr 49, 53 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-023-01465-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-023-01465-0

Keywords

Italian Journal of Pediatrics

ISSN: 1824-7288

Contact us