Skip to main content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Combined effect of different factors on weight status and cardiometabolic risk in Italian adolescents

Italian Journal of Pediatrics201945:32

  • Received: 16 October 2018
  • Accepted: 18 February 2019
  • Published:



The observed increase in body weight and cardiometabolic risk (CR) in youth from developed countries contributes to the global burden of chronic diseases in adult age. The aim of this work is to provide a patterning of the associations between different factors and the weight status and CR of the subjects involved in the Italian ministerial ASSO project.


This study involved 919 students from high schools in Palermo. Weight, height and waist circumference were collected by trained teachers; weight status was estimated by the BMI cut-offs for adolescents and CR through the waist-to-height ratio. Questionnaires were administered through the web-based ASSO-NutFit software. Chi-square test investigated the variables significantly associated with the outcomes, which were then included in a Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA), to explore their dimensional relationship to weight status and CR. Poisson regressions were conducted separately for the two outcomes, reporting raw and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and Bootstrap Method was used to determine confidence intervals (CIs), to assessing the degree of effect of the explanatory variables over the outcomes.


Two main dimensions were evidenced, with the overweight/obese group and the group at CR characterized by the following strongly associated factors: male gender, overweight/obese parents, following a slimming regime, caesarean birth, sedentariness, being under/overweight at birth, presence of metabolic risk, going to school by car/scooter, not using supplements.


This study contributed to identifying those adolescents that should be prioritized in interventions aiming at reducing overweight/obesity and CR in this age group.


  • Weight status
  • Cardiometabolic risk
  • Determinants
  • Adolescent
  • Multiple Correspondence Analysis


The obesity and overweight status in youth have been widely investigated in the last decades and its contribution to the global burden of chronic disease and disability has been highlighted [1, 2]. Children and adolescents classified as overweight or obese exhibit an increase in cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors when compared with those with normal weight [3], this places them at increased risk for many serious health conditions [4]. Changes in BMI and central adiposity in youth positively correlate with changes in cardiometabolic risk (CR) factors [5, 6]. Waist-to-Height Ratio has been proposed as an easily measurable anthropometric index for detection of central obesity and related adverse CR among adults and children [7], but also helps to identify those without central obesity and a healthy risk factor profiles among the overweight/obese children [8, 9].

In 2008 Wang et al. highlighted the increasing interest in understanding the potential link between obesity risk factors and tailoring interventions for different population subgroups [10], especially in youth. Targeted interventions could be translated into the improving of population health and reduction of economical public expenses. In the light of these considerations, some systems addressed to the nutritional and lifestyles surveillance have been developed worldwide [11, 12]. Unfortunately, few data are available in Southern Italy with regard to patterns of obesity and cardiovascular risk factors. The recently piloted Italian ASSO (Adolescents and Surveillance System for the Obesity prevention) Project, funded by the Italian Ministry of Health, aimed to develop and test an innovative web-based system that allows a continuous and standardized data collection about health and lifestyle of adolescents in the school environment [13]. The surveillance system developed by ASSO could be adopted within the National Health Service, this having a big impact on the improvement of the surveillance and prevention efficacy on the national territory [14]. A wide variety of data have been collected through this system, including directly measured anthropometric parameters and socio-demographic, early life, clinical, lifestyle and food habits information, that has been analysed in the present paper. The aims of this work were to evaluate associations between these variables and overweight/obesity risk and CR of the subjects involved in the ministerial ASSO project, and identify groups at risk and patterns of associations by exploring analytically and visually the dimensional relationships.


Participants and data collection

A total of 1021 students were recruited overall (see the sampling procedure in Additional file 1), and among these, 919 delivered consents signed by their parents. All participants were provided with information sheets and had to supply the informed consent signed by their parents.

All data were collected in the school year 2012/2013. Weight, height and waist circumference were collected by the teachers through the use of a calibrated scale, a stadiometer and a non-elastic meter respectively, all available within the schools. Personal, health and lifestyle information were obtained through the administration of three web-based questionnaires included in the ASSO-NutFit software: ASSO-PIQ (Personal Information Questionnaire), ASSO-PASAQ (Physical Activity, Smoke and Alcohol Questionnaire) and ASSO-FHQ (Food Habits Questionnaire). The ASSO-PIQ included questions regarding participant and family information, neonatal and clinical assessment. The ASSO-PASAQ consisted of three sections: physical activity, smoking, alcoholic drinks and other beverages. Finally, the ASSO-FHQ consisted of six items regarding: breakfast, school break, lunch, afternoon break, dinner, and various habits. Students were asked to compile these web-based questionnaires at school, carefully assisted by teachers. For some questions they were alerted the day before, in order to ask some information to their parents (e.g. questions on their breastfeeding, weaning, anthropometric data of parents, etc.). A proper toolkit including the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed by the ASSO team and all required materials have been provided to the teachers. Afterward, a dedicated training course was administered in order to implement the project correctly and to collect the data properly.

Variables analysed

The two dependent variables were weight status and CR. Underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese classes were defined using the threshold values for BMI recommended by the International Obesity Task Force [15]. In addition, waist circumference was used to evaluate the waist-to-height ratio, with a cut-off of 0.5 indicating the threshold for subjects at CR [16]. These variables were respectively dichotomized in “under weight/normal weight” - “overweight/obese”, and “not at risk” - “at risk” subjects [16].

The categorical independent variables considered for the association analysis were also dichotomized and grouped as in Table 1 (details on the variables characteristics are explained in the table).
Table 1

Sample composition by socio-demographic, early, clinical, lifestyle factors and food habits of the ASSO subjects

Parameter 1

Parameter 2

N (%); (father) (%), [mother] [%]

Socio-demographic factors



524 (60.7)


339 (39.3)


14–15 years

355 (41.1)

16–17 years

508 (58.9)

 Marital status


1204 (85.9); (601) (86.1), [603] [85.7]


198 (14.1); (97) (13.9), [101] [14.3]

 Weight status***$

Normal weight

758 (54.1); (279) (40.1), [479] [68.2]


640 (45.8); (417) (59.9), [223] [31.8]



407 (29); (206) (29.5)***$, [201] [28.6]*$$


995 (70.9); (492) (70.5)***$, [503] [71.4]*$$



1030 (73.5); (621) (89.0), [409] [58.1]


372 (26.45); (77) (11.0), [295] [41.9]


Manual job

118 (10.5); (94) (15.1), [24] [5.9]

Non-manual job

912 (89.5); (527) (84.9), [385] [94.1]

 Family Affluence Scalea


309 (43.6)


400 (56.4)

 Pocket money

Up to € 10

659 (92.9)

More than € 10

50 (7.1)

Early life factors

 Term of birth


588 (82.9)


121 (17.1)



569 (80.3)


140 (19.7)

 Birth weight**


464 (65.4)

Under/over weight

245 (34.6)

 Breastfeeding duration

3–5 months

466 (81.9)

6 months

103 (18.1)

 Type of birth*


376 (53.0)


333 (47.0)


3–5 months

533 (75.2)

6 months

176 (24.8)

Clinical aspects

 Diagnosed diseasesb


617 (87.0)


92 (13.0)

 Family diseasesb


284 (40.1)

 Use of drugs


663 (93.5)


46 (6.5)

 Psycho-physical malaise scorec

Low/very low

486 (68.5)

High/very high

223 (31.5)


 Use of supplementsd**$


641 (90.4)


68 (9.6)

 Smoking frequency

Lower than 7 days/week

25 (40.3)

7 days/week

37 (59.7)

 Slimming regime***$$$


585 (82.5)


124 (17.5)

 Alcohol consumer


195 (37.5)


325 (62.5)

 Way to go to school$

Walking/by bike

126 (24.2)

By car/scooter

394 (75.8)

 Type of alcoholic drinks

Beer/wine/light drinks

198 (60.9)


127 (39.1)

 Physical activity statuse*$


325 (62.5)


195 (37.5)

 Alcoholic riskf

Not at risk

467 (89.8)

At risk

53 (10.2)


Non-smoker/ experimenterg

458 (88.1)


62 (11.9)

 Coffee consumption


296 (56.9)


224 (43.1)

Food habits

 Breakfast consumption


457 (62.6)


273 (37.4)

 Between meals


337 (46.2)

At least one

393 (53.8)

 Breakfast adequacyi


226 (31.0)


504 (69.0)

 Industrial foods consumption

Up to one/week

546 (74.8)

More than one/week

184 (25.2)

 School-break adequacyi


176 (24.1)


554 (75.9)

 Organic food consumption


391 (53.6)


339 (46.4)

 Lunch adequacyl


549 (75.2)


181 (24.8)

 Fresh vegetables/fruit consumption


560 (76.7)


170 (23.3)

 Afternoon-break adequacyi


204 (27.9)


526 (72.1)

 Vending machines foods consumption


375 (51.4)


355 (48.6)

 Dinner adequacyl


489 (67.0)


241 (33.0)

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Significant associations with weight status, estimated by a chi-square test $p < 0.05, $$p < 0.01, $$$p < 0.001. Significant associations with CR, estimated by a chi-square test,

aThe Family Affluence Scale (FAS) is a scale constructed by the sum of scores of the answers to questions about the presence of common goods such as computers, number of cars, single bedroom and annual holidays17

bObesity, cardiovascular diseases, high triglycerides/cholesterol, diabetes, hypertension, liver diseases, osteoporosis, cancer, food allergies, and food intolerances

cThe score of psycho-physical malaise was constructed on the presence of one or more symptoms: headache, stomach ache, backache, feeling low, irritability or bad mood, nervousness or anxiety, sleeping difficulties, dizziness [53]

dVitamins; mixed minerals, single minerals such as iron or calcium; proteins, aminoacids, creatin carnitin; fibers; other

eAssessed by considering “sedentary” whoever stayed on average more than 3 h a day watching TV, playing computers or videogames

fCalculated on the basis of alcoholic daily intake greater than 12 g. It is identified as the risk of health problems related to alcohol abuse

gNon smoker: never tried smoking in his/her life; Experimenter: tried smoking at least once in his/her life

hSporadic: smokes less than one cigarette per week

iEvaluated with resoect to a proper meal excluding carbonated beverages or other junk food

lEvaluated with respect to a proper meal including a first or a second course with vegetables, fruit, bread, and excluding carbonated beverages or other junk food

Statistical analysis

Recorded information was automatically converted by the software into an excel database, that was analysed using the statistical software STATA/MP 12.1 (StataCorpLP, college Station, TX, USA).

Frequencies were reported on categorical variables. Pearson’s Chi-square test investigated the variables significantly associated with the outcomes.

Variables found to be associated with the two outcomes were included in a Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA), a suitable method for population-based studies that projects data into space-dimensions and searches for patterns in the dataset, helping to visualize the variables more closely associated with different groups [17]. The number of dimensions was chosen by analysing the decline of eigenvalues. The outcome variables were included as supplementary points in the analysis.

Finally, the degree of effect of the explanatory variables over the outcomes was assessed through the estimation of Prevalence Ratios (PRs). In analyses of data from cross-sectional studies, when the binary outcome is common and usually with a prevalence greater than 10%, PRs are more appropriate than Odds Ratios as they can be overestimated by the OR and can be better controlled for confounding [1820]. Moreover, the Cox and Poisson models with robust variance are better alternatives than logistic regression in order to estimate PRs [21]. Therefore, raw and adjusted PRs were estimated using the Poisson regression model, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained using Bootstrap Method.

All statistical analyses were performed considering an alpha level of 0.05 as significant.


Sample composition

The sample composition by socio-demographic factors, early life factors, clinical aspects, lifestyles and food habits, is shown in Table 1. Gender, weight status and education of the parents, birth weight and type of birth, use of supplements, slimming regime, way to go to school and physical activity status, were found to be associated with the outcomes (Table 1) and, then, entered the MCA.

Weight status was evaluated on 759 subjects, this accounting for the 83% of the subjects involved; the other 17% were not present at school the day of collection, or were ashamed to put off their shoes for the weight and height collection by the teachers. More than a quarter of adolescents were overweight/obese; a significantly higher proportion of males were overweight/obese (30.2%) compared to females (16.2%) (p < 0.001) (Table 2), with a PR of 1.54 (CI 1.09–2.10) for males compared to females (Table 3).
Table 2

Weight status and cardiometabolic risk in the total sample and in the sample stratified by gender of the adolescents participating in the ASSO project











Weight status


 Under weight







 Normal weight







 Over weight














 Under + Normal weight







 Over weight + Obese***














Cardiometabolic Risk

 Non at risk







 At risk***














***p < 0.001. Significant difference between males and females, estimated by a chi-square test

aPercentages are referred to the total sample

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the associations between weight status/cardiometabolic risk (CR) and selected variables


Weight status



Raw PR a (95% CI)

Adj PR (95% CI)

Raw PR (95% CI)

Adj PR (95% CI)

Gender (Male vs Female)

1.91 (1.31–2.66)

1.54 (1.09–2.10)

2.03 (1.46–2.83)

1.91 (1.24–2.91)

Father weight status (Overweight/Obese vs Normal)

1.75 (1.23–2.21)

1.57 (1.20–2.28)



Father education (High vs Low)

0.62 (0.45–0.77)




Mother weight status (Overweight/Obese vs Normal)

1.78 (1.34–2.22)

1.56 (1.04–2.08)

1.50 (1.10–2.04)


Mother education (High vs Low)

0.72 (0.54–0.90)


0.67 (0.49–0.93)


Birth weight (Under/Overweight vs Normal)

1.51 (1.05–1.95)

1.46 (1.10–1.99)



Birth type (Caesarean vs Natural)

1.34 (1.02–1.63)

1.39 (1.03–2.02)



Use of supplements (Yes vs Not)

0.43 (0.18–0.71)

0.39 (0.10–0.68)



Slimming regime (Yes vs Not)

2.50 (1.81–3.11)

2.11 (1.52–2.79)

2.52 (1.83–3.46)

2.09 (1.41–3.11)

Way to go to school (By car/scooter vs Walking/by bike)



1.68 (1.05–2.70)


Physical activity status (Sedentary vs Active)

1.43 (1.01–1.81)


2.16 (1.46–3.17)


aRaw and adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) performed through Poisson regression of the subjects’ weight status and cardiometabolic risk (CR)

CR was evaluated on 702 subjects; the other participants were not present at school the day of collection, or were ashamed to show their belly and refused to be measured. Among these, 27.2% were at CR. (Table 2). Males had higher prevalence of CR compared to females (Adj PR 2.03, CI 1.24–2.91) (Table 3). Weight status and CR were significantly associated, with overweight/obese subjects being at higher CR (PR 7.86, CI 5.68–10.87, p < 0.001).

Multiple Correspondence Analysis

The Multiple Correspondence Analysis favoured dimensions 1 and 2 for a total of 73.5% explained Chi-squared distribution. These two orthogonal dimensions explained about 73.5% of general Chi-squared distribution.

Graphically, in the 2-dimensional space, the proximity of categories and their location along the axes (horizontal or vertical for Dimension 1 and Dimension 2, respectively) helps to identify variables that are the most correlated with each dimension. Figure 1 shows lifestyles factors to be the variables contributing to the first dimension (explaining about 40.8%): the categories being active vs sedentary, consume supplements vs not consume supplements, going to school walking/by bike vs going to school by car/scooter are located along the horizontal axis. Dimension 2 consisted of socio-demographic and early factors (explaining about 32.7%): the categories natural birth vs caesarean birth, normal weight birth vs under- or over-weight birth, normal weight parents vs overweight or obese parents are located along the vertical axis (Fig. 1). Then, analysing the pattern of categories around the outcomes (weight status and CR), the following characteristics were observed for the overweight/obese group and the group at CR: male gender, overweight/obese parents, following a slimming regime, caesarean type of birth, sedentary physical activity status, being under/overweight at birth, presence of metabolic risk, going to school by car/scooter, not using supplements (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Multiple correspondence analysis of weight status and cardiometabolic risk with all associated variables

Prevalence ratios

Raw and adjusted PR with 95% CI for weight status and CR are showed in Table 3. After adjusting for confounders, father and mother education were not associated anymore with weight status of their sons, as well as, the physical activity status. In the multivariate analysis, males were around one time and a half more overweight/obese than females (Adj PR 1.54, CI 1.09–2.10), and for adolescents whose father or mother was overweight/obese were one and a half time more overweight/obese compared to adolescents with normal weight parents (Adj PR 1.57, CI 1.20–2.28; Adj PR 1.56, CI 1.04–2.08 respectively). In addition, weight status increased in adolescents being under/overweight at birth (Adj PR 1.46, CI 1.10–1.99) and born with caesarean delivery (Adj PR 1.39, CI 1.03–2.02), while it decreased among supplements consumers (Adj PR 0.39, CI 0.10–0.68); finally, those adolescents following a slimming regime were two times overweight/obese than those who were not at regime (Adj PR 2.11, CI 1.52–2.79).

With regard to the CR, the adjustment for confounding factors removed the association with mother weight status and mother education, and with the way to go to school and sedentariness/activity (Table 3). Males were at CR around twice more compared to females (Adj PR 1.91, CI 1.24–2.91). Slimming regime was an independent factor to be more at CR of around twice (Adj PR 2.09, CI 1.41–3.11).


The present study investigated the characteristics of a sample of adolescents in Southern Italy and the associations of weight status and CR with socio-demographic, early life, clinical, lifestyle and food habits factors. The following variables were found to be significantly associated with the two outcomes: male gender, overweight/obese parents, following a slimming regime, caesarean type of birth, sedentary physical activity status, being under/overweight at birth, presence of metabolic risk, going to school by car/scooter, not using supplements.

The prevalence of overweight/obese adolescents in the analysed sample is well higher than the correspondent prevalence in the HBSC sample of Sicilian adolescents aged 15 (28.1% vs 18.3%) [22]. This difference may be due to the fact that our sample is collected from an urban area of Sicily, which could include adolescents with different lifestyle and behaviours compared to students coming also from rural areas, such as in the HBSC study. It is noticeable that our measures were collected directly on subjects involved, while BMI measure in HBSC study was self-reported.

As regards CR, there are not reference data to carry out comparisons in terms of prevalence, but a high association with the weight status was observed, thus suggesting that preventive actions should also take into account factors related to metabolism and cardiovascular system, and not only to weight status of adolescents.

In line with Bolton et al. [23], weight status was found to be significantly associated with gender, and the association remained even after adjustment for confounders; this suggests that health promotion initiatives could be tailored to be gender specific. Gender patterns may indicate that environmental influences are more detrimental for boys or those preventive interventions are less effective [24].

Our results showed that adolescents whose parents were overweight/obese were twice more overweight/obese and this remained after adjustment for confounding factors. The association between parents’ weight status and their kids’ weight is widely reported in the literature [2528], and may be due to a combination of genetic and lifestyle drivers [2934]. Also for the CR associations were found in the bivariate analysis, but the effect disappeared after adjustment.

Significant associations were found between subjects’ weight status and their parents’ education, with a higher education level being protective against the overweight/obesity development. This is in line with the review from Shrewsbury et al. [35], where parental education was inversely associated with children adiposity in most studies, and with the most recent review and meta-analysis stating that parental educational level was consistently inversely associated with childhood overweight and obesity than other indicators [36]. Nevertheless, in our analysis the education was not influencing the overweight/obesity status anymore after adjustment, thus indicating that it is not an independent risk factor. Education is an important socio-economic status indicator, but does not entirely capture the financial aspects of socio-economic status; results of the mentioned meta-analysis state that lower socio economic position had higher risks of overweight and obesity, and the increased risks were independent of the income levels of countries [36]. In our analysis, parents’ occupation, profession and Family Affluence Scale (FAS) that are indicators of the economic aspect of the family, were found not to be associated with the weight status and CR of the adolescents. This finding is not in line with a wide literature stating that subjects from low family SES in industrialized countries are at increased risk of being obese than their counterparts [36, 37].

Regarding the CR, high parents’ education is not a protective factor, as evidenced from the analysis after adjustment.

Among early life factors, birth weight and delivery type showed significant association with weight status; according to another study [38], a child’s risk of future overweight can be determined on the basis of its weight and BMI measures from early infancy, and throughout early childhood with even greater certainty. Results about the association of weight status with the birth delivery was in line with Li et al. [39], observing caesarean section moderately associated with offspring overweight and obesity.

The use of supplements is a strong preventive factor of weight gain in our study. Even though the question concerning supplements was asking for the use of different supplements, it was noticed that students using supplements where mostly those having an active life and practising sport.

Walking or going by bike to school was found to be protective only against CR, even though this effect was not present after adjustment; similar results were observed in Pizarro et al. [40], where exertions to increase and maintain walking to school was observed to likely have a positive impact on children’s health and eventually decrease metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.

A sedentary physical activity status was found to be associated with the increased risk of overweight/obesity and of CR. This is in line with several studies reported in a systematic literature review stating that sedentary behaviour (assessed primarily through increased TV viewing) for more than 2 h per day was associated with unfavourable body composition [41]. However, when analysing the relationship between sedentary behaviour and weight status, few studies control for confounding factors such as diet and physical activity. In our study, in fact, the effect disappeared when adjusting for confounders. This is in line with a meta-analysis of mainly cross-sectional studies, stating that the strength of such an association was actually very small [42].

Sedentariness was also initially associated with the CR, this according to the study from Machado-Rodrigues et al. [43] stating that increased TV viewing had an adverse effect on metabolic health of adolescent girls. After the adjustment for confounders, the association disappeared, and this is in line with the review reporting that, although increased sedentary time was associated with increased health risk, there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on the relationship for metabolic risk as a whole [41].

Overall, even though there was not an association between smoke and weight status or CR, the percentage of smokers and the frequency of consumption was high. These data are discouraging, because smoking, especially in adolescence, involves major diseases in the lung that are among the top causes of death in Western countries.

No associations were found with nerve stimulant beverages and alcoholic drinks use. While there is no literature on the effect of nerve stimulant beverages, few studies have explored the association between alcohol use and body weight in adolescence. In some cross-sectional studies overweight/obesity has been shown to be significantly associated with youth substance use, including alcohol [44, 45].

Weight status and CR were found not to be significantly associated with variables relating to food habits and clinical aspects. Regarding dietary behaviours, some studies showed an inconsistent relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and a child BMI [46, 47], and a negative association between regular breakfast consumption and childhood obesity outcomes [48, 49]. On the contrary, another study suggests that eating breakfast is associated with a reduced risk of becoming overweight or obese and a reduction in the BMI in children and adolescents in Europe [50]. However, breaks include often high-calorie foods such as packaged snacks and unhealthy snacks baked products in our sample. Almost three quarters of students, in fact, don’t have an adequate school or afternoon break. The result on clinical aspects, such as psycho-physical malaise score are not in line with the study of Castro-Pinero et al. [51] stating that overweight-obesity increased the risk of having health complaints in youth.

The Multiple Correspondence Analysis helped identifying groups at higher risk of overweight/obesity and with CR. The overweight/obese group and the group at CR presented the following characteristics: male gender, overweight/obese parents, following a slimming regime, caesarean type of birth, sedentary physical activity status, under/overweight at birth, going to school by car/scooter, not using supplements. The overweight/obese group and the group at CR were closest to the Y axis, and, consequently, more associated with dimension 2, which means that the categories of variables that made up this dimension (socio-demographic and early factors) were the variables that contributed the most to describe this group. As few other studies have been using the MCA, it is difficult to provide comparisons with other authors. E.g. one study found also a dimension made up from socio-demographic, clinical and health behaviors factors on the sitting time, but it was on adult population and in a developing country [52]. The observed results suggest the need of different interventions addressed to adolescents in order to change their sedentary lifestyles, addressed to mothers to change their behaviors in the perinatal period, and targeted in particular to male adolescents with overweight/obese parents.

The strengths of the present study are mainly methodological. The ASSO project, in fact, is aimed at collecting valid and reliable data by using a standardized methodology. Web questionnaires were developed by experts and weight, height and waist circumference were directly measured by trained operators instead of being self-reported. The possibility of collecting such a valid data, provides an added value to this study, as information on the interconnections between different variables in an adolescent population from Southern Italy is presented here, thus adding important and previously missing data to the literature. The use of the MCA, moreover, is particularly relevant in studies where a large amount of qualitative data is collected, such as in the ASSO surveillance system; it is a particularly powerful method as uncovers groupings of variable categories in the dimensional spaces, providing key insights on relationships between categories, without needing to meet assumptions requirements.

One methodological limitation, however, is that an objective method to assess sedentary behavior (e.g. accelerometry) has not been used. A second limitation is the high heterogeneity of the dimension 1 data; maybe due to the fact that are self-reported information coming from adolescents, while the one of dimension 2 (reported by the parents) seem to be more stable. Moreover, the study sample was from a single city, thus reducing the generalizability of the results to a larger population, and was composed of a higher number of male adolescents (65%) compared to females; this was due to the sample stratification per school typology, which did not take into consideration the gender distribution of each school.


This study identified in some socio-demographic, early factors and lifestyle factors important determinants of overweight/obesity status and cardiometabolic risk in a sample of adolescents from Southern Italy. The evidenced pattern included male gender, caesarean delivery, under/over birth weight, parents’ overweight/obesity, sedentariness, being at metabolic risk and not using supplements. It contributed to identifying those groups of adolescents that should be prioritized in interventions in Southern Italy aiming at reducing overweight/obesity and CR in this age group.

It can be hypothesized that specific prevention actions could be targeted to adolescent males; or they could be focussed on those families (parents) presenting a condition of overweight/obesity, by warning them on the importance of educate their kids to take care about their weight status and their health. Actions should be also reinforced for pregnant women, in order to make them more aware of the significance of a correct birth weight and of the importance of a natural delivery for the child’s health.



Adolescents and Surveillance System for the Obesity prevention


Food Habits Questionnaire


Physical Activity, Smoke and Alcohol Questionnaire


Personal Information Questionnaire


Body Mass Index


confidence interval


cardiometabolic risk


Family Affluence Scale


Multiple Correspondence Analysis


Prevalence ratio


Standard Operating Procedures



We are grateful to all schools involved in the ASSO Project.


The work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health [code GR-2008-1140742, CUP I85J10000500001], within the Adolescents and Surveillance System for the Obesity prevention (ASSO) Project.

Availability of data and materials

Available through formal request (by email) to the corresponding Author.


João Breda is staff members of the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The author alone is responsible for the views expressed in this publication and they do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization.

Authors contributions

AB. and GT. conceptualized the research and were involved also on data curation and formal analysis. ARF. and VL. contributed on methodology definition and providing resources. LP. and APao. have been involved on manuscript writing and editing. APal., AB., JB. and GT. contributed on project implementation, manuscript revision and project supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico “Paolo Giaccone” in Palermo (approval code n.9/2011).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare no conflict if interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, University of Palermo, Via G. Pascoli 6, 90144 Palermo, Italy
Department of Sciences for Health Promotion and Mother-Child Care “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, Via Del Vespro 133, 90127 Palermo, Italy
WHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD Office, 9 Leontyevsky Pereulok, Moscow, Russian Federation, 125009
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Ugo Bassi, 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy
PhD Program in Health Promotion and Cognitive Sciences, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Via G. Pascoli 6, 90144 Palermo, Italy


  1. Shoup JA, Gattshall M, Dandamudi P, Estabrooks P. Physical activity, quality of life, and weight status in overweight children. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(3):407–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Crawford DJ, Obesity Prevention RW. Public health. Landon: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  3. Gong CD, Wu QL, Chen Z, Zhang D, Zhao ZY, Peng YM. Glycolipid metabolic status of overweight/obese adolescents aged 9- to 15-year-old and the BMI-SDS/BMI cut-off value of predicting dyslipidemiain boys, Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional study. Lipids Health Dis. 2013;12:129.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhuper S, Buddhe S, Patel S. Managing cardiovascular risk in overweight children and adolescents. Paediatr Drugs. 2013;15(3):181–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jago R, Mendoza JA, Chen T, Baranowski T. Longitudinal associations between BMI, waist circumference, and cardiometabolic risk in US youth: monitoring implications. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(3):E271–9.Google Scholar
  6. Kelly AS, Barlow SE, Rao G, Inge TH, Hayman LL, Steinberger J, et al. Severe obesity in children and adolescents: identification, associated health risks, and treatment approaches: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128(15):1689–712.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2012;13(3):275–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Maffeis C, Banzato C, Talamini G. Obesity study Group of the Italian Society of pediatric E, Diabetology. Waist-to-height ratio, a useful index to identify high metabolic risk in overweight children. J Pediatr. 2008;152(2):207–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mokha JS, Srinivasan SR, Dasmahapatra P, Fernandez C, Chen W, Xu J, et al. Utility of waist-to-height ratio in assessing the status of central obesity and related cardiometabolic risk profile among normal weight and overweight/obese children: the Bogalusa heart study. BMC Pediatr. 2010;10:73.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang H, Kim J, Su D, Xu L, Chen LW, Huang TT. Joint influence of individual choices, parenting practices, and physician advice on adolescent obesity, Nebraska, 2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E175.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Tabacchi G, Filippi AR, Breda J, Censi L, Amodio E, Napoli G, et al. Comparative validity of the ASSO-food frequency questionnaire for the web-based assessment of food and nutrients intake in adolescents. Food Nutr Res. 2015;59:26216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bianco A, Jemni M, Thomas E, Patti A, Paoli A, Ramos Roque J, et al. A systematic review to determine reliability and usefulness of the field-based test batteries for the assessment of physical fitness in adolescents - the ASSO project. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28(3):445–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Filippi AR, Amodio E, Napoli G, Breda J, Bianco A, Jemni M, et al. The web-based ASSO-food frequency questionnaire for adolescents: relative and absolute reproducibility assessment. Nutr J. 2014;13(1):119.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Tabacchi G, Bianco A, Alessi N, Filippi AR, Napoli G, Jemni M, et al. Design, implementation, and evaluation of the adolescents and surveillance system for the Obesity Prevention project. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(12):e3143.Google Scholar
  15. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1240–3.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahn HS, Imperatore G, Cheng YJ. A population-based comparison of BMI percentiles and waist-to-height ratio for identifying cardiovascular risk in youth. J Pediatr. 2005;146(4):482–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Carvalho H. Multivariate analysis of qualitative data. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo. 2004.Google Scholar
  18. Thompson ML, Myers JE, Kriebel D. Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done? Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(4):272–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:21.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Behrens T, Taeger D, Wellmann J, Keil U. Different methods to calculate effect estimates in cross-sectional studies. A comparison between prevalence odds ratio and prevalence ratio. Methods Inf Med. 2004;43(5):505–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Coutinho LM, Scazufca M, Menezes PR. Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies. Rev Saude Publica. 2008;42(6):992–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Italia H. Stili di vita e salute dei giovani in età scolare. In: Rapporto sui dati regionali HBSC 2009–2010; 2011.Google Scholar
  23. Bolton K, Kremer P, Rossthorn N, Moodie M, Gibbs L, Waters E, et al. The effect of gender and age on the association between weight status and health-related quality of life in Australian adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:898.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Haug E, Rasmussen M, Samdal O, Iannotti R, Kelly C, Borraccino A, et al. Overweight in school-aged children and its relationship with demographic and lifestyle factors: results from the WHO-collaborative health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(Suppl 2):167–79.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Trost SG, Kerr LM, Ward DS, Pate RR. Physical activity and determinants of physical activity in obese and non-obese children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(6):822–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Danielzik S, Langnase K, Mast M, Spethmann C, Muller MJ. Impact of parental BMI on the manifestation of overweight 5-7 year old children. Eur J Nutr. 2002;41(3):132–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R, TaskForce IIO. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev. 2004;5(Suppl 1):4–104.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Sandovici I, Smith NH, Nitert MD, Ackers-Johnson M, Uribe-Lewis S, Ito Y, et al. Maternal diet and aging alter the epigenetic control of a promoter-enhancer interaction at the Hnf4a gene in rat pancreatic islets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(13):5449–54.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Whitaker RC, Deeks CM, Baughcum AE, Specker BL. The relationship of childhood adiposity to parent body mass index and eating behavior. Obes Res. 2000;8(3):234–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Reilly JJ, Armstrong J, Dorosty AR, Emmett PM, Ness A, Rogers I, et al. Early life risk factors for obesity in childhood: cohort study. BMJ. 2005;330(7504):1357.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Rankinen T, Zuberi A, Chagnon YC, Weisnagel SJ, Argyropoulos G, Walts B, et al. The human obesity gene map: the 2005 update. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14(4):529–644.Google Scholar
  32. Barness LA, Opitz JM, Gilbert-Barness E. Obesity: genetic, molecular, and environmental aspects. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(24):3016–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore GE, Stanier P. Fat dads must not be blamed for their children's health problems. BMC Med. 2013;11:30.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris MJ. Early life influences on obesity risk: maternal overnutrition and programming of obesity. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2009:625–37.Google Scholar
  35. Shrewsbury V, Wardle J. Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990-2005. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(2):275–84.Google Scholar
  36. Wu S, Ding Y, Wu F, Li R, Hu Y, Hou J, et al. Socio-economic position as an intervention against overweight and obesity in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11354.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang YF, Lim HJ. The global childhood obesity epidemic and the association between socio-economic status and childhood obesity. Int Rev Psychiatr. 2012;24(3):176–88.Google Scholar
  38. Graversen L, Sorensen TI, Petersen L, Sovio U, Kaakinen M, Sandbaek A, et al. Stability of the associations between early life risk indicators and adolescent overweight over the evolving obesity epidemic. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95314.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Li HT, Zhou YB, Liu JM. The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2013;37(7):893–9.Google Scholar
  40. Pizarro AN, Ribeiro JC, Marques EA, Mota J, Santos MP. Is walking to school associated with improved metabolic health? Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2013;10.Google Scholar
  41. Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:98.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Marshall SJ, Biddle SJH, Gorely T, Cameron N, Murdey I. Relationships between media use, body fatness and physical activity in children and youth: a meta-analysis. Int J Obesity. 2004;28(10):1238–46.Google Scholar
  43. Machado-Rodrigues AM, Leite N, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Enes F, Fernandes R, Mascarenhas LP, et al. Metabolic risk and television time in adolescent females. Int J Public Health. 2015;60(2):157–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pasch KE, Nelson MC, Lytle LA, Moe SG, Perry CL. Adoption of risk-related factors through early adolescence: associations with weight status and implications for causal mechanisms. J Adolesc Health. 2008;43(4):387–93.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Farhat T, Iannotti RJ, Simons-Morton BG. Overweight, obesity, youth, and health-risk behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(3):258–67.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Field AE, Gillman MW, Rosner B, Rockett HR, Colditz GA. Association between fruit and vegetable intake and change in body mass index among a large sample of children and adolescents in the United States. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(7):821–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Vernarelli JA, Mitchell DC, Hartman TJ, Rolls BJ. Dietary energy density is associated with body weight status and vegetable intake in US children. J Nutr. 2011;141(12):2204–10.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Timlin MT, Pereira MA, Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D. Breakfast eating and weight change in a 5-year prospective analysis of adolescents: project EAT (eating among teens). Pediatrics. 2008;121(3):e638–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Gleason PM, Dodd AH. School breakfast program but not school lunch program participation is associated with lower body mass index. J Am Diet Assoc 2009;109(2 Suppl):S118–S128.Google Scholar
  50. Szajewska H, Ruszczynski M. Systematic review demonstrating that breakfast consumption influences body weight outcomes in children and adolescents in Europe. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50(2):113–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Castro-Pinero J, Padilla-Moledo C, Ortega FB, Moliner-Urdiales D, Keating X, Ruiz JR. Cardiorespiratory fitness and fatness are associated with health complaints and health risk behaviors in youth. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(5):642–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Meneguci J, Sasaki JE, da Silva Santos A, Scatena LM, Damiao R. Socio-demographic, clinical and health behavior correlates of sitting time in older adults. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:65.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Napoli G, Di Pasquale M, Filippi A, Gómez-López M, Messina G, Iovane A, Bianco A, & Tabacchi, G. (2018). Factors associated with the subjective health complaints among adolescents: Results from the ASSO Project. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, in press.


© The Author(s). 2019