Skip to main content

Consensus communication strategies to improve doctor-patient relationship in paediatric severe asthma



Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that is very common among youth worldwide. The burden of this illness is very high not only considering financial costs but also on emotional and social functioning. Guidelines and many researches recommend to develop a good communication between physicians and children/caregiver and their parents. Nevertheless, a previous Italian project showed some criticalities in paediatric severe asthma management. The consensus gathered together experts in paediatric asthma management, experts in narrative medicine and patient associations with the aim of identify simple recommendation to improve communication strategies.


Participants to the consensus received the results of the project and a selection of narratives two weeks before the meeting. The meeting was structured in plenary session and in three working groups discussing respectively about communication strategies with children, adolescents and parents. The task of each working group was to identify the most effective (DO) and least effective practices (DON’ T) for 5 phases of the visit: welcome, comprehension of the context, emotions management, duration and end of the visit and endurance of the relationship.


Participants agreed that good relationships translate into positive outcomes and reached consensus on communication strategies to implement in the different phase of relationships.


The future challenges identified by the participants are the dissemination of this Consensus document and the implementation of effective communication strategies to improve the management of pediatric asthma.


Asthma is a heterogeneous chronic inflammatory disease that affects airways causing respiratory symptoms including wheeze, breathlessness, chest tightness, and cough [1, 2]. Asthma is very common among youth worldwide, with approximately 7% of adolescents and 5% of children reporting symptoms of severe asthma [3]. The burden of this disease is very high and it causes numerous school absence and visits to the emergency department (ED) [4]. In the USA, Wand and colleagues have estimated that the management of paediatric asthma costs 2 billion dollars per year in direct and indirect expenses [5]. Medication costs differ across countries depending on the health system but in recent years the use of asthma drugs is globally increased [6, 7]. Nevertheless, in Italy one of the major problems in asthma management is represented by poor adherence to the therapy and to the implementation of an appropriate lifestyle [8].

Poorly controlled asthma doesn’t affect only the expenses but also lead to an increase in morbidity and mortality [9]. At the same time, a delay in the treatment of asthma undermine patients’ and caregivers’ emotional, psychological and social functioning by limiting their ability to engage in normal day activities [10, 11].

In order to improve asthma management, guidelines recommend developing partnership between healthcare providers, patients and their parents.Footnote 1 [12] Many studies demonstrated the efficacy of health communication intervention to improve the doctor-patient/parent relationship and diminish non-adherence and access to ED. [13,14,15,16] The benefit of doctor-patient communication may extend beyond these short-term outcomes, as demonstrated on other adult chronic diseases [17,18,19].

Despite this evidence, children and adolescents are rarely engaged in discussion during medical visits, accounting for only 3–15% of the total medical visit interactions [20]. Indeed Carpenter and colleagues demonstrated that providers engage their patients less frequently than these children and adolescents preferred [13].

In 2016, ISTUD Foundation led a project named SOUND (the Italian abbreviation of “Writing narrative about patients with severe asthma to achieve a new effective diversification and improvement in healthcare”) to investigate doctor-patient relationship in severe asthma through the narrative medicine methodology [21]. Narrative medicine research seeks to gain insight into how a person lives with his/her illness, in an attempt to consider the many facets of the pathway of care [22,23,24].

The results of the SOUND project highlighted the need to improve the communication to children and adolescents with severe asthma and their parents since paediatricians recurred more frequently to judgemental words compared to providers caring adult patients and this endanger the building of mutual trust [21].

In view of what emerged from the SOUND project, it was considered that the “Consensus” was an appropriate method to identify first and then share a series of attitudes and behaviours to be adopted in daily clinical practice, in order to obtain effective relationships with paediatric patients with severe asthma and their families.


The methodology of building consensus is a decision-making process that aims to identify what is preferable for a group through a face-to-face debate among stakeholders [25]. The consensus methodology aims to move from the logic of voting to that of deliberation, improving the decision-making process [26] through rational and emotional arguments to limit or renounce particular interests in light of the collective interest [27]. One kind of consensus conference uses a group of experts [28] who meet in an open meeting to hear evidence and try to reach a consensus on procedures to follow [26]. One of the advantages of this methodology is to strengthen the engagement of the experts involved in the decision-making process, generating greater awareness in the carrying out of activities with respect to objectives [29].

The results of the SOUND project and a selection of narratives collected within the project were sent to the members of the Paediatric SOUND group two weeks before the meeting to allow all participants to analyse the evidences and make their own opinion. The consensus meeting was performed on the 14 September 2017 and held at the headquarters of the ISTUD Foundation in order to reduce the influence provided by the location since it was new to any participant. The participants were representative of three different groups of experts:

  • 11 paediatricians with strong expertise in paediatric severe asthma management (eg. presidents of Italian scientific societies, professors);

  • 6 paediatricians who already participated in the SOUND project and which showed a strong disposition to communication;

  • 3 representatives of patient association which are patients or parents of children and adolescents with asthma.

The researchers of ISTUD Foundation, due to their expertise on narrative medicine and on the SOUND project, had the role of facilitator of the meeting.

The first plenary session of the meeting was aimed to reaffirm the main results of the SOUND project. Subsequently, the objectives of the day and the Consensus methodology were shared with practical examples linked to work previously carried out by the ISTUD Foundation. Three working groups were therefore set up, based on the professional and roles of the participants involved to maintain wide representativeness. This promoted the mutual exchange of experience, good practice, and new ideas.

The groups worked on three specific macro-topics related to the theme of communication in the care pathway for severe asthma, respectively focusing on communication to children, communication to adolescents and communication to parents.

The task of each working group was to identify the most effective (DO) and least effective practices (DON’ T) for 5 phases of the visit identified by the ISTUD Foundation researchers: welcome, comprehension of the context, emotions management, duration and end of the visit and endurance of the relationship.

The communication phase of the diagnosis and the phases most linked to the disease were not considered in an analytical way, as the project SOUND did not reveal any particular critical points in the management of this type of communication for Italian scenarios.

During the subdivision of the working groups, each participant had a few minutes to write their own proposals of DOs and DON’Ts for each phase of the visit. Subsequently, the facilitators of the groups gathered the written ideas and the whole group discussed the ideas to arrive at a series of actions to do and not do for each phase. At the end of the group work, participants voted anonymously on the degree of consensus reached for each phase using a scale from 1 to 10, only the proposal that reached at least a degree of 8.5 where selected [26]. All the practices and ideas proposed by the individual groups were shared and discussed in plenary.

After the meeting, the results of the consensus were collected by ISTUD Foundation and shared with the Paediatric Sound Group, which had one month to review all the results and confirm, or not, their degree of consensus.


From reading the results of the SOUND project, the consensus participants agreed that the relationships and the ability to communicate empathically with patients and their families are the aspects that cross all the collected narratives. In particular, the ability to establish positive relationships affects not only people’s experiences but also the outcomes of the therapeutic plan [21].

During the course of the meeting, members from all groups actively worked together to develop proactive proposals and strategies to improve the relationship between physicians and patients with severe asthma.

Tables 12345 show the reflections and results of the discussion, the consensus degree reached by the total of the proposal is 9.4 out of 10. DOs and DON’Ts were written by the participants based on their experiences in the management of severe asthma, even if some suggestions can be applicable to all chronic diseases.

Table 1 Proposals and strategies identified by the Pediatric Sound Group for the “Welcome” phase
Table 2 Proposals and strategies identified by the Pediatric Sound Group for the “Comprehension of the context” phase
Table 3 Proposals and strategies identified by the Pediatric Sound Group for the “Emotions management” phase
Table 4 Proposals and strategies identified by the Pediatric Sound Group for the “Visit end” phase
Table 5 Proposals and strategies identified by the Pediatric Sound Group for the “Endurance of the relationship” phase

In particular, all participants agreed to maintain a warm and reassuring attitude towards the children by trying to involve them in all phases, while adolescent patients should be treated as adults by directing the interest of the examination to them and not to their parents. Other recurring themes are the use of open questions and, especially in the early stages of the visit, not strictly related to asthma management, and the ability to contain negative emotions.

One important challenge identified by the children communication group is the prohibition topic: participants shared their experiences and they unanimously decided that it is important to never forbid the child anything (e. g. plush toys, pets, sports) but find a planned compromise with the child and their clinical situation. During the plenary session, all participants agreed that these should be the correct behaviour, since prohibitions can cause trauma in patients’ experience and negatively affect the relationship.

Some topics widely discussed within the groups have been the management of interruptions to visits by other doctors or phone calls and the possibility of sharing one’s mobile phone number with the patient’s parents. Initially, some doctors proposed to completely avoid answering the telephone and others that this was impossible in the daily management of the visits; at the end of the day the participants agreed that interruptions should be minimized and the visiting families should be reassured that they will benefit from the same availability.

The lowest degree of consensus was reached when discussing how to maintain relationships between the visits (Table 5). Paediatricians, who initially proposed to share their personal mobile phone number with families to manage the relationship remotely, through instant messaging applications (e.g. Whatsapp), after the group work, did take a step backwards. This because giving medical advice through this means of communication is not regulated and supported by law, thus all patients would refer only to one doctor and not to the entire care team. Conversely, the idea of creating an app for managing online monitoring of patients with severe asthma had been advocated by all participants.

In conclusion, the future challenges identified by the Pediatric SOUND Group are the dissemination of these suggestions and the implementation of classes addressed to pediatricians to improve communication and of effective technologies to maintain long-distance relationships.


The Pediatric SOUND Group agreed that good relations translate into positive outcome on patients’ quality of life, therefore pursuing them becomes a needed professional competence, as stated by other Italian clinicians [30]. The main result of this consensus was to create a simple and practical list of recommendations on how to improve communication with paediatric patients with severe asthma and their parents. In literature there are many evidences on how collaborative dialogue positively associate with parental satisfaction, adherence and the creation of effective relationships [31, 32], but a pragmatic list of advice was lacking to help and support clinicians.

All participants agreed firstly to maintain a warm and reassuring attitude towards the children and secondly to engage them in all phases; for adolescent patients recommendation was to address them as adults by directing the interest of the examination to them and not to their parents. This advice is supported by the studies of Giambra and colleagues [33] who demonstrated that provider dominance of communication may impair relationships during clinic visits for children with chronic conditions. Moreover, they suggested adopting narrative medicine techniques [23, 24] in every pediatric ward: thanks to reading the narratives of patients and their parents the physicians could collect useful information for the management and treatment of people living with asthma. This practice is already supported by evidences in other countries [34] and on other pathologies [35] and the broader understanding of illness in the social context of patients’ lives can improve outcomes and patient satisfaction [23].

Regarding the asthma management, the group agreed to the necessity for avoiding prohibitions (as having a pet or playing with plush toys) while focusing on the education of both patients and families to empower them to handle the allergen cause with a vigilant attitude. The group based this disruptive recommendation not only on their clinical experiences but also on many evidences that prohibitions could have a traumatic effect during childhood and in literature findings are already there regarding childhood obesity management [36, 37].

The main criticalities emerged from this consensus conference were related to the management of communication. During the visit, the first problem is due to interruptions caused by phone calls by other patients; the group agreed that, even if avoiding them desirable, visit interruptions are inevitable explaining the reasons to patients and families, but pediatricians must limit that. Regarding the communication in the long-distance relationship, the unresolved issue is linked to the use of Mobile Messaging Apps and therefore sharing the private phone number. Using WhatsApp to communicate with patients, in particular with chronic patients, is becoming quite a routine not only in Italy but worldwide [38]. Recent studies demonstrated that anxiety is frequent in mothers of children with asthma [39] and this can lead to a pathological use of online communication applications [40]. All members agreed that giving medical advice through mobile messaging apps, or even by SMS, is risky and that for real emergencies patients and their parents should go to ED or refer to other colleagues on call. On the other hand, the use of this communication method is part of modern life [41] and quite expected by patients and in particular by parents who feel reassured when they know they can count on the presence of a specialist 24/7. The urge of regulation on the use of web and instant messaging to communicate with patients is perceived not only in the management of severe asthma, but it is becoming a frequent topic nowadays in healthcare [42]. The Pediatric SOUND Group, in the end, conveyed that one possible solution is the implementation of a dedicated app for managing the long-term relationship between patients and their families and the whole care team.

One limitation of this consensus was the lack of involvement of children and adolescents to the meeting; this is due to the chosen methodology, which involves the exchange of ideas among a group of experts. In order to overcome the absence of this point of view, members of the patients’ association were invited to participate as experts in patients’ and parents’ perception. Another limitation was the participation of only specialist paediatricians: in Italy routine check-ups are mainly followed by paediatricians and in our healthcare system the involvement of other professional providers is limited, with no respiratory nurses as in other countries like UK. Nevertheless, it would be interesting to involve both patient and other healthcare professionals, as nurses or physiotherapists, in future activities on this topic.

Despite the limitations, this consensus provides strong suggestions that can be used to develop communication interventions in paediatric asthma management.


The aim of this Consensus conference was to identify first and then share a series of attitudes and behaviours to be adopted in daily clinical practice, to obtain effective interactions with paediatric patients with severe asthma and their families. Overall, in agreement with previous studies, the communication between clinicians and paediatric patients with severe asthma and their parents was lacking [13, 20] with detrimental effect on the management of the illness [21]. At the same time effective communication, which is a mix of empathy and structured method [32, 33], improve the doctor-patient/parent relationship and diminish non-adherence and access to ED [1316].

This document offers a practical guideline that may help paediatrician optimise the relationships with both patients and parents. In conclusion, future challenges are the dissemination of these suggestions to all pediatricians through education and training on soft skills. The implementation of this advice into the life-long learning process of paediatricians will help to ensure a proper education not only on the pathways of the disease but also on listening and communication to patients and their parents.


  1. We use parents to refer to any primary caregiver



Emergency December


Short Message Service


the Italian abbreviation of “Writing narrative about patients with severe asthma to achieve a new effective diversification and improvement in healthcare”


United Kingdom


  1. Hargreave FE, Nair P. The definition and diagnosis of asthma. Clinic Exp Allergy. 2009;39:1652–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bush A, Fleming L. Diagnosis and management of asthma children. BMJ. 2015;350:h996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lai CKW, Beasley R, Crane J, et al. Global variation in the prevalence and severity of asthma symptoms: phase three of the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC). Thorax. 2009;64:476–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR. Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:907–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang L, Zhong Y, Wheeler L. Direct and indirect costs of asthma in school-age children. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V, Navaratnam P, Friedman HS, Kavati A, Ortiz B, et al. National prevalence of poor asthma control and associated outcomes among school-aged children in the United States. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6:536–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nunes C, Pereira AM, Morais-Almeida M. Asthma costs and social impact. Asthma Res Pract. 2017;3:1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Klok T, Kaptein AA, Brand PLP. Non-adherence in children with asthma reviewed: the need for improvement of asthma care and medical education. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015;26(3):197–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Butz AM, Tsoukleris M, Donithan M, Hsu VD, Mudd K, Zuckerman IH, Bollinger ME. Patterns of inhaled anti-inflammatory medication use in young underserved children with asthma. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2504–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Global Initiative for Asthma Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention (2018). Available online at: Accessed 28 Feb 2019.

  11. Juniper EF. Quality of life in adults and children with asthma and rhinitis. Allergy. 1997;52:971–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (US). Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Rev. Bethesda: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; 2007. p. 417. (NIH publication; no. 07-4051)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carpenter DM, Stover A, Slota C, Ayala GX, Yeatts K, Tudor G, Davis S, Williams D, Sleath B. An evaluation of physicians’ engagement of children with asthma in treatment-related discussions. J Child Health Care. 2014;18(3):261–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carpenter DM, Ayala GX, Williams DM, Yeatts KB, Davis S, Sleath B. The relationship between patient-provider communication and quality of life for children with asthma and their caregivers. J Asthma. 2013;50(7):791–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Horn IB, Mitchell SJ, Gillespie CW, Burke KM, Godoy L, Teach SJ. Randomized trial of a health communication intervention for parents of children with asthma. J Asthma. 2014;51(9):989–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Butz AM, Halterman J, Bellin M, Kub J, Tsoukleris M, Frick KD, Thompson RE, Land C, Bollinger ME. Improving preventive care in high risk children with asthma: lessons learned. J Asthma. 2014;51(5):498–507.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ong LML, de Haes JCJM, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:903–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplan SH, Sheldon G, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27:S110–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Butz A, Kub J, Donithan M, James NT, Thompson RE, Bellin M, Tsoukleris M, Bollinger ME. Influence of caregiver and provider communication on symptom days and medication use for inner-city children with asthma. J Asthma. 2010;47:478–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cahill P, Papageorgiou A. Triadic communication in the primary care pediatric consultation: a review of the literature. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:904–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cappuccio A, Latella M, Pelaia G, Menzella F, Pellegrini G, Marini MG. Narrative medicine to evaluate the relationship between clinicians and patients living with severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(suppl 61):PA2779.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Greenhalgh T, Hurwitz B. Why study narrative? In: Greenhalgh T, Hurwitz B, editors. Narrative based medicine: dialogue and discourse in clinical practice. London: BMJ Books; 1998. p. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Charon R. Narrative Medicine. Honoring the stories of illness. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Greenhalgh T. Cultural contexts of health: the use of Narrative research in the health sector. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2016. (Health Evidence Network Synthesis Report, No. 49.) Available from: Accessed 28 Feb 2019.

  25. Campbell SM, Cantrill JA. Consensus methods in prescribing research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001;26(1):5–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Black N, Murphy M, Lamping D, et al. Consensus development methods: a review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999;4(4):236–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vella K, Goldfrad C, Rowan K, et al. Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care. Br Med J. 2000;320(7240):976–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lorenz W, Troidl H. Fingerhut a et al duration of antibiotic treatment in surgical infections of the abdomen. Introduction – the different ways to reach consensus. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1996;576:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Halcomb E, Davidson P, Hardaker L. Using the consensus development conference method in healthcare research. Nurse Res. 2008;16(1):56–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Grassi L, Caruso R, Costantini A. Communication with patients suffering from serious physical illness. Adv Psychosom Med. 2015;34:10–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brand PL, Klok T, Kaptein AA. Using communication skills to improve adherence in children with chronic disease: the adherence equation. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013;14(4):219–23. [PubMed: 23434178].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hart CN, Kelleher KJ, Drotar D, Scholle SH. Parent-provider communication and parental satisfaction with care of children with psychosocial problems. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(2):179–85 [PubMed: 17643912].

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Giambra BK, Haas SM, Britto MT, Lipstein EA. Exploration of parent-provider Communication during clinic visits for children with chronic conditions. J Pediatr Health Care. 2017;32(1):21–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Rich M, Taylor SA, Chalfen R. Illness as a social construct: understanding what asthma means to the patient to better treat the disease. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000;26(5):244–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cappuccio A, Sanduzzi Zamparelli A, Verga M, et al. Narrative medicine educational project to improve the care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ERJ Open Res. 2018;4(2):00155–2017. Published 2018 May 4.

  36. Jansen E, Mulkens S, Jansen A. Do not eat the red food!: prohibition of snacks leads to their relatively higher consumption in children. Appetite. 2007;49(3):572–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jansen E, Mulkens S, Emond Y, Jansen A. From the garden of Eden to the land of plenty. Restriction of fruit and sweets intake leads to increased fruit and sweets consumption in children. Appetite. 2008;51(3):570–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Spence D. Bad Medicine: What's up with WhatsApp? Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(669):190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Behmanesh F, Moharreri F, Soltanifar A, Hamzeh M, Heidari E. Evaluation of anxiety and depression in mothers of children with asthma. Electron Physician. 2017;9(12):6058–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wegmann E, Internet-Communication Disorder BM. It's a matter of social aspects, coping, and Internet-use expectancies. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1747.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Chan WS, Leung AY. Use of social network sites for Communication among health professionals: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e117.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hawkes N. Sixty seconds on … WhatsApp. BMJ. 2018;360:k1041.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Luigi Reale and Silvia Napolitano who were responsible of tutoring the participant of the Consensus.

The Pediatric Sound Group is composed by Filomena Bugliaro, Silvia Maria Elena Caimmi, Valeria Caldarelli, Lucia Caminiti, Enza D’Auria, Emanuela di Palmo, Marzia Duse, Alessandro Giovanni Fiocchi, Francesco Gesualdo, Ahmad Kantar, Enrico Lombardi, Anna Lucania, Margherita Marchiani, Maria Giulia Marini, Gianluigi Marseglia, Maria Carmela Montera, Elio Massimo Novembre, Guido Pellegrini, Giorgio Piacentini, Alessandro Policreti, Francesca Santamaria.


Novartis Italy gave an unconditional grant to ISTUD Foundation for the realization of the consensus meeting.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicabile.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




AC was a major contributor in writing the manuscript and organizing the consensus. All authors actively participated to the consensus and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonietta Cappuccio.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicabile.

Consent for publication

Not applicabile.

Competing interests

Alessandro Policreti is a Novartis employee. Dr. Francesca Santamaria reports receiving lecture fees from Chiesi. Dr. Marzia Duse reports receiving lecture fees from Novartis. Dr. Enrico Lombardi reports receiving honoraria /grant support/consulting fees/ lecture fees /fees for serving on advisory boards from Angelini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Lusofarmaco, Omron, Novartis, Vifor. The other authors report no competing interest in this work.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cappuccio, A., on behalf of Paediatric Sound Group., Bugliaro, F. et al. Consensus communication strategies to improve doctor-patient relationship in paediatric severe asthma. Ital J Pediatr 45, 31 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: